White House Blames ICE for release of Illegal Aliens

The White House and the Department of Homeland Security were unaware of Immigration Customs and Enforcement's decision to release detainees until the agency announced it, administration officials said Wednesday.

"This was a decision made by career officials at ICE without any input from the White House, as a result of fiscal uncertainty over the continuing resolution, as well as possible sequestration," White House press secretary Jay Carney said Wednesday.


  • Currently 0/5 stars.

Views: 700


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Michael J. Erickson on June 20, 2014 at 8:09am

I have extolled-upon this at length, and described various Federal Government programs designed to waste taxpayer money to pamper these illegal aliens. Please see my comments at: http://federalabuse.blogspot.com/

Comment by Americanmom on April 27, 2013 at 7:18am

At what point will Americans just say out loud the word LIAR when the Whitehouse openly tells lies?

Comment by Americanmom on April 27, 2013 at 7:17am


Comment by Virgil Earl Koon on April 22, 2013 at 10:12pm

When will Americans realize that Obama is just like a Putin in the mirror? Obama told us what is plans were at his acceptance speech! He will be like Reagan. Reagan was a supporter of our freedoms and our Constitution! What did Obama mean? He slammed it in all our Citizens faces that he will bankrupt America, just as Reagan did with Russia! The intellectual fool has done all to destroy our freedoms. He is charged with 5 counts of treason and is guilty! He, because of the liars in the Liberal, Fed controlled media, is still in office! It seems that the Liberal media will support him if he gives all of America to Russia! He gave several islands to them off of Alaska! I said, "gave!" They were ours by agreement. Face it, we have a full blown Communist in our White House and he even refuses to prove he is legal as a President. Just where is this coming from that he is still in office? Some say it is the MOB and Unions that got him elected. I am sure that is fully true! 

Do we really have any say because the Liberal media is fully Communist supporting? Would any honorable media support all those acts of treason? One was against his people and our inner city! "Fast and Furious", the media calls it! They cannot claim race to support him because he is half white. So which race are they supporting when they tell those that report facts, that they are racists?

Comment by Roland C. Cartier Jr on February 28, 2013 at 4:30pm

 Jerry Morris please feel free to go to my FB profile page and scroll down to a real good video entitle "If I Wanted America To Fail" if that don't fit the cluster F___! We're in right now by all means let me know Thanks Roland.

Comment by Roland C. Cartier Jr on February 28, 2013 at 3:53pm

The Sequester is like going through your college semester nothing to it! Lie#1, Don't ask Don't tell is not only infiltrating the Military it's already abundant in our house (The White House) Lie#2, I've come up with the perfect slogan for this Administration here goes! Deny All, Admit To Nothing and Blame Someone or Something Else! What do ya think?

Comment by Terri on February 28, 2013 at 3:26pm

New School that's a very good question.   The 5th Amendment to the Constitution says "[N]or shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb"

However, impeachment is not a criminal trial nor a matter of "life or limb" so double jeopardy would not apply.  Judgment in Cases of Impeachments shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust, or Profit under the United States, but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment, and Punishment  according to Law. 

Since it is specifically left open that the person impeached is still subject to trial then it would follow that impeachment is not considered as part of the double jeopardy law.  If that were so then they would be protected from being tried and punished by law for the same offense they were impeached for.

The hardest part would be convincing Congress to impeach the first time let alone a second time.

Comment by New School on February 28, 2013 at 2:10pm

As for impeachment, I have to ask, if the House initiated impeachment procedings and the Senate stopped the process, would another Congress, one controlled by the GOP in both chambers, be able to try again? I am concerned that there is that thing called double jeopardy. Does it apply under such circumstances?

Comment by my911 on February 28, 2013 at 2:01pm

Jerry and Anthony,...and everybody

You might find a couple of blogs interesting.

To Speaker Boehner

The Fox News Girls

This should cover it.... from dead serious to "git er done"... with fun

Let me know what you think.

Comment by Jerry Morris on February 28, 2013 at 1:50pm

my911 is absolutely correct! Obama is still in juvenile mindset, like the rest of us were in at one point in our lives. I think we can all look back on our teen years and remember when no one could tell us anything either. WE grew out of that, Obama never has.

What we have to do is expose him as the empty suit that he is.



Clinton Donor And Tax Cheat Tied To Russia

“Do as we say, not as we do.”

That seems to be the slogan for Hillary Clinton and her political allies, and it’s especially apt in light of new information about one of Clinton’s largest campaign donors.

While the left is still trying to attack President Trump and his family over unproven business dealings and largely debunked connections to Russia, a new report indicates that it was Hillary Clinton’s team who were doing those exact things.

“Fox News has learned that one of the top donors to the ‘Hillary Victory Fund’ (HVF) in 2016 was a Los Angeles-based attorney who is alleged to have misused company funds to create his own $22 million real estate portfolio,” that outlet reported on Thursday.

“He has also been considered by California to be one of the state’s biggest tax cheats, and allegedly has ties to the (Russian) Kremlin,” Fox continued.

The man’s name is Edgar Sargsyan. His deep pockets greatly benefited Clinton’s campaign, with contributions of at least $250,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund in 2016.

He was also in charge of an elite fundraising dinner to benefit Clinton, where donors paid $100,000 per couple just to attend the ritzy event. But in true Clinton fashion, the money apparently went missing.

Sargsyan is now “being sued by his former company for allegedly diverting those funds to start his own real estate company,” according to Fox.

Now, people are asking hard questions about Clinton’s buddy Sargsyan, including whether his contributions were part of a pay-to-play scheme and if he had shady connections to foreign governments.

“Nobody gave to the Hillary Victory Fund out of the goodness of their heart or some generalized desire to help 33 random state parties,” pointed out attorney Dan Backer from the Committee to Defend the President.

“They did so to buy access and curry influence — something the Clintons have been selling for nearly three decades in and out of government,” he continued.

Trying to buy political influence is sadly common, especially when it comes to the Clintons. What is raising more red flags than normal, however, is the evidence that Sargsyan is no run-of-the-mill campaign donor.

“The really scary question is, what did this particular donor with this strange web of connections hope to buy for his quarter-million dollars?” Backer asked Fox News.

That web of connections is strange indeed.

The Committee to Defend the President is now alleging that SBK, a major Sargsyan-linked company “is an investment firm that is affiliated with United Arab Emirates president, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, and its international affiliate has business interests in Russia,” according to Fox.

“Among its dealings was a bid to finance $850 million for a major bridge project to connect Crimea with Russia,” the group claims.

“He worked for SBK, and SBK appears to have bid on some Crimean/Russian bridge project,” Backer said. “That’s usually an indicator of political favor and connections.”

It raises several chilling questions: Was Sargsyan paying a quarter million dollars to Clinton for political favors, and — more disturbingly — was that money actually from sources in Russia in order to smooth the way for its construction plans?

Nobody knows for sure. What is clear, however, is that there is a pattern of dirty money surrounding the Clintons, with the “Uranium One” and “Clinton Foundation” scandals just two of the most well-known examples.

“It reinforces how fast and loose the Clinton machine was when it came to ‘Hoovering up’ these megadonor checks, not just from questionable Hollywood and Wall Street elites but potentially from foreign influence peddlers using who knows what money,” Backer told Fox News.

“It reinforces the need to take a long hard look at not just the unlawful money laundering process, but the way in which they were solicited as well,” he continued. “The Clintons have never shown a great deal of concern for whomever it was cutting the checks — whether it’s foreign influence peddlers or Hollywood smut peddlers like Harvey Weinstein.”

If those claims are even partially true, then America dodged a bullet in November of 2016 — and it’s worth keeping the pile of foreign-connected Clinton scandals in mind the next time the left tries desperately to tie Donald Trump to Russia. Perhaps they should look in the mirror.


Washington Post Compares
Jeff Sessions To Slaveholder’

The Washington Post compared Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “slaveholders” after he quoted the Bible on Thursday while discussing his department’s policy of prosecuting all illegal immigrants who cross the border.

Sessions made the statement during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

WaPo ran a story entitled “Sessions cites Bible passage used to defend slavery in defense of separating immigrant families” by general assignment editor Keith McMillan and religion reporter Julie Zauzmer on Friday.

Rather than detailing the statistics Sessions cited in the speech that explain the immigration policy, the story quoted John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

“This is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made,” Fea said.

Sessions spent much of the speech discussing the numbers behind current immigration policy, including separating families at the Southwest border.

“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes,” Sessions said.

“Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful.”

“The previous administration wouldn’t prosecute aliens if they came with children,” Sessions said.

“It was de-facto open borders if you came with children. The results were unsurprising. More and more illegal aliens started showing up at the border with children.”

Sessions laid out the numbers in the speech.

“In 2013, fewer than 15,000 family units were apprehended crossing our border illegally between ports of entry in dangerous areas of the country,” he said.

“Five years later, it was more than 75,000, a five-fold increase in five years. It didn’t even have to be their child that was brought, it could be anyone. You can imagine that this created a lot of danger.”

The U.S. has the “opportunity” to fix its broken immigration system now, Sessions said.

“I believe that’s it’s moral, right, just and decent that we have a lawful system of immigration,” he said. “The American people have been asking for it.”

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service