Democrat Politician Warns Jewish Voters Not to Vote for Obama

The candid interview that has shocked Democrats across the USA. Democrat Politician from New York Warns Jewish Voters.

Rating:
  • Currently 0/5 stars.

Views: 2037

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Charles Bill L.CDurry on September 19, 2012 at 12:30pm

The American Jew has it comming cause they always voted for the Ofaggo's type.Ofaggo is a muslim and muslims want Jew's dead so would you vote for someone who wanted you dead?

Comment by TIM CHRISOLM on September 17, 2012 at 11:52am

A Jewish man made a comment about the jewish people once but i cant remember it exactly but it went something like "The Jews are unequaled when it comes to business and making money. However when it comes to self preservation they are also unequaled, as in dead last" Kinda funny but it does seem to fit))

Comment by Historian on September 16, 2012 at 7:37pm

The bain of Israel is that for over a hundred and fifty years the heresy of Karl Marx has been allowed to steal Jewish souls.  The leftist who wear the Yarmulke, but deny the existence of Israel's God and repudiate the covenant made with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, have been very supportive of the Islamic invasion of this country in the name of their insane Marxist theory of one world government. These people may have the ancestry, but so do Sephardaim Hebrews who 4oo years after expulsion from Spain are still faithful to the God of Abraham though today it be as Christians. Marxists who have repudiated the Torah, Tanakh, and Cotevim are still called Jewish. How can these people who have cause Israel so much pain still be regarded as children of a holy covenant?  The righteous of Israel who still keep Simchat Ha Torah have not been the propagators of this Islamic invasion. It is understandable how leftists and Marxists can support this enemy of Israel, but it is a mystery how Jews who are faithful to the God of the Jews can support this enemy of Israel and the Jewish people. 

Comment by Diane Van Antwerp on September 16, 2012 at 7:26pm

Good idea from Michael-for M. Romney to meet with PM Netenyaheu when he is here. The Jewish community should heed the warning-to not vote for Obama because he is anti-Jewish, anti=Israel,  anti-God and anti-American. We need to stay allied sith Israel.

Comment by Paul R. Nistico on September 16, 2012 at 5:59pm

Wow.  Even his own party it turning on him.

Comment by MeMikeT on September 16, 2012 at 5:45pm

In my 20s I worked for a Jewish man.  Very smart man.  Very business man.  And a religious man.  He said something interesting...it went something like this.  Business is business...religion is religion.  It is my opinion that the Jewish community votes and supports the democrat party because it is "good business" for them.  

Comment by Valerian Popkoff on September 16, 2012 at 4:07pm

Perhaps this T shirt say's it all (picture worth a thousand words):

Will some people in NY start wearing these t shirts to get the point across?

Comment by Grace Polaris on September 16, 2012 at 2:18pm

TG,

Theory 1

I think many Jewish people aligned themselves with the Dems because they were the party of the working class people and Jews throughout history have been associated with business and banking and as a result were scapegoated and crucified for being part of the group of people with money  by their host countries. Consequently, when they came to America they wanted to be known as part of the working class party so they would not stand out and would be safe.

Theory 2

Many Jewish people came to American from Socialist countries and the Dem party is closely related to  Socialism.

Theory 3

Many Jewish people are not practicing Jews and have no allegiance to Israel.

Comment by Cathy Anifant on September 16, 2012 at 12:11pm

Obama is no friend to Isreal. You can see it for yourself.  What kind of leader treats our allies the shameful way Obama has done to Isreal and Yetanyahu.  Obama is a complete incompetent. He can't be trusted with U.S. security.

Comment by Tom DiGiulio on September 16, 2012 at 10:58am

I grew up in a Jewish/Italian American neighorhood in NYC. I knew many Jewish people. To this dayI can't understand the people they support, Many marched with the Dr. King and his group,Now the jewish and Israel are HATED By most Black leaders. I JUST Don't understand!!!

 

LIGHTER SIDE

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by Henry Payne

Political Cartoons by Mike Lester

ALERT ALERT

Newt Says What The Rest Of Us Are Thinking:
It’s Time To Throw Peter Strzok In Jail

Disgraced FBI special agent Peter Strzok, a senior member of the bureau who gained notoriety in recent months over his anti-Trump text messages to a colleague, was grilled for nearly 10 hours during a joint congressional committee hearing on Thursday.

At issue was Strzok’s anti-Trump texts to former FBI lawyer and lover Lisa Page that coincided with his leading of the investigations into both former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server scandal and the alleged Trump/Russia 2016 election collusion, as well as his involvement in the subsequent Robert Mueller special counsel probe.

The hearing proved to be a heated battle, as Strzok displayed an arrogant smugness in defiance of pointed questions from Republicans that he largely danced around, while Democrats sought to upend and undermine the entire hearing with a plethora of interruptions, parliamentary maneuvers and outright praise for the man who helped let Clinton off the hook while ferociously targeting Trump.

Former House speaker and presidential candidate Newt Gingrich was less than impressed with Strzok’s performance and cooperation in the hearing and suggested during an appearance on Fox Business that the FBI agent should be held in contempt of Congress.

“I think they have to move to hold him in contempt and throw him in jail,” Gingrich said of Congress and Strzok.

“This is a person who is willfully standing up and refusing to appear as a congressional witness and he was a government employee at the time,” he continued.

“He has every obligation to inform the legislative branch, and I don’t think they have any choice except to move a motion of contempt because he is fundamentally — and so is his girlfriend (Page) — they’re both fundamentally in violation of the entire constitutional process,” he added.

Page had been subpoenaed to appear before Congress on Wednesday but refused to appear, saying she’d been unable to review relevant documents prior to the scheduled hearing, a closed-door hearing that has since been rescheduled for Friday.

Gingrich was not the only one who thought Strzok deserved to be held in contempt of Congress, as House Judiciary Committee chairman Bob Goodlatte informed Strzok that he remained at risk of such during the hearing, according to The Daily Caller.

That warning from Goodlatte came after Strzok had refused to answer a straightforward question posed by House Oversight Committee chairman Trey Gowdy, regarding how many people Strzok had personally interviewed between a specific set of dates in relation to the Clinton email investigation.

“Mr. Strzok, please be advised that you can either comply with the committee’s direction to answer the question or refuse to do so,” Goodlatte stated. “The latter of which will place you in risk of a contempt citation and potential criminal liability. Do you understand that? The question is directed to the witness.”

Strzok still refused to answer, citing instructions received from his counsel and the FBI to not answer certain questions on certain topics.

Goodlatte replied, “Mr. Strzok, in a moment we will continue with the hearing, but based on your refusal to answer the question, at the conclusion of the day we will be recessing the hearing and you will be subject to recall to allow the committee to consider proceeding with a contempt citation.”

It is unclear if Goodlatte and the committee ultimately did consider a contempt citation for Strzok following the contentious hearing, nor is it clear if Page will be held in contempt for blowing off her subpoenaed appearance on Wednesday.

Hopefully Congress will follow through on the threats of contempt followed by actual jail time against Strzok and Page in response to their uncooperative behavior and failure to appear when subpoenaed, if only to ensure that future witnesses called before Congress for sensitive or contentious hearings don’t think they can get away with the same sort of behavior.

TEA PARTY TARGET

Cops Sent To Seize Veteran’s Guns Without A Warrant, He Refused To Turn Them Over

“No one from the state was going to take my firearms without due process,” says Leonard Cottrell, after successfully staving off law enforcement and the courts from confiscating his firearms. Cottrell, an Iraq War veteran, was at work when he received a phone call from his wife. The cops were there, busting in to take his guns away. It all started after a casual conversation his son had at school.

Ammoland reports:

Police said their visit was sparked by a conversation that Leonard Cottrell Jr.’s 13-year-old son had had with another student at the school. Cottrell said he was told his son and the other student were discussing security being lax and what they would have to do to escape a school shooting at Millstone Middle School.

The conversation was overheard by another student, who went home and told his parents, and his mother panicked. The mom then contacted the school, which contacted the State Police, according to Cottrell.

The visit from the troopers came around 10 p.m. on June 14, 2018, Cottrell said, a day after Gov. Phil Murphy signed several gun enforcement bills into law.

After several hours, Cottrell said police agreed not to take the guns but to allow him to move them to another location while the investigation continued.

“They had admitted several times that my son made no threat to himself or other students or the school or anything like that,” he said.

Cottrell said he made it very clear to the police that he was “not going to willingly give up my constitutional rights where there’s no justifiable cause, no warrants, no nothing.”

The troopers searched his son’s room and found nothing, Cottrell said.

“To appease everybody, I had my firearms stored someplace else,” he said. “That way, during the course of the investigation, my son doesn’t have access to them and it’s on neutral ground and everything and everybody’s happy.”

“In the Garden State, the usual approach is to confiscate first and ask questions later, and victims of this approach often don’t know their rights. ‎In this case, the victim pushed back and confiscation was avoided — but the circumstances surrounding the incident are outrageous. A student expressing concern over lack of security is not a reason to send police to the student’s home — but it might be a reason to send police to the school to keep students and teachers safe” said Scott L. Bach, executive director of the Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs and a member of the NRA board of directors.

NJ.com adds:

Cottrell, a disabled U.S. Army veteran who served three tours during “Operation Iraqi Freedom,” owns a shotgun and a pistol. He has all the correct permits to own the firearms, he said, and predominately uses the shotgun to hunt.

He said his wife allowed the officers to enter the home, and with her permission, they searched his son’s room — but they did not find any weapons, he said. The officers, he said, didn’t have a warrant but still wanted to take his guns. Cottrell wouldn’t let them.

“No one from the state was going to take my firearms without due process,” he said Thursday.

He said the attempted seizure resulted because of a new law Gov. Phil Murphy signed into law that makes it easier for police to confiscate guns when someone in the state poses a threat to themselves or others. The law is part of a broader statewide effort to make New Jersey’s gun laws even tougher amid the national outcry for more gun control in the wake of the school shooting in Parkland, Florida.

Cottrell said the officers “danced around the issue” when he confronted them about the new law.

A New Jersey State Police spokesman declined to answer questions about whether this incident had anything to do with the new gun laws.

In an email, Sgt. First Class Jeff Flynn said, “Troopers responded to Mr. Cottrell’s residence in reference to the report of a possible school threat. Based on their investigation, it was determined that Mr. Cottrell’s weapons did not need to be seized.”

David Codrea, writing for Ammoland, further added:

To appease everybody, I had my firearms stored someplace else,” New Jersey gun owner and Army veteran Leonard Cottrell Jr. told New Jersey 101.5 after a June 14 visit from State Police,. “That way, during the course of the investigation, my son doesn’t have access to them and it’s on neutral ground and everything and everybody’s happy.”

Cottrell was recalling state troopers showing up at his door to confiscate firearms after his 13-year-old son was overheard discussing lax school safety with a friend.

Indoctrinated by a pervasive snitch culture — one that never seems to deter the blatantly obvious demonic nutjobs — the eavesdropping student told his parents, who told school administrators, who in turn called the cops. (Note “If you see something, say something” carries risks of its own – if you report the wrong person, you could end up smeared as a “hater.”)

“Cottrell said he made it very clear to the police that he was ‘not going to willingly give up my constitutional rights where there’s no justifiable cause, no warrants, no nothing,’” the report continued. Despite that, his home is now a “gun free zone” and that has been publicized by the media. He has, in fact, willingly ceded those rights, and by his own words in order to make authorities “happy.”

Before judging him for that, consider the environment that is New Jersey. Then consider the overwhelming force the state can bring to bear, and its predisposition to using it, especially if it’s to enforce citizen disarmament. It’s easy to anonymously declare “Molon Labe” on the internet. In meatspace, resistance is more effective when the aggressor doesn’t get to dictate the time and place, especially if that place is your home and you have family inside.

Appeasing gun-grabbers, generally couched as “compromise,” is impossible. It’s like throwing a scrap of flesh to a circling pack of jackals and expecting them to be sated and leave you alone — instead of sensing opportunity and fear, and moving in closer.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service