Democrat Politician Warns Jewish Voters Not to Vote for Obama

The candid interview that has shocked Democrats across the USA. Democrat Politician from New York Warns Jewish Voters.

Rating:
  • Currently 0/5 stars.

Views: 2037

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Charles Bill L.CDurry on September 19, 2012 at 12:30pm

The American Jew has it comming cause they always voted for the Ofaggo's type.Ofaggo is a muslim and muslims want Jew's dead so would you vote for someone who wanted you dead?

Comment by TIM CHRISOLM on September 17, 2012 at 11:52am

A Jewish man made a comment about the jewish people once but i cant remember it exactly but it went something like "The Jews are unequaled when it comes to business and making money. However when it comes to self preservation they are also unequaled, as in dead last" Kinda funny but it does seem to fit))

Comment by Historian on September 16, 2012 at 7:37pm

The bain of Israel is that for over a hundred and fifty years the heresy of Karl Marx has been allowed to steal Jewish souls.  The leftist who wear the Yarmulke, but deny the existence of Israel's God and repudiate the covenant made with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, have been very supportive of the Islamic invasion of this country in the name of their insane Marxist theory of one world government. These people may have the ancestry, but so do Sephardaim Hebrews who 4oo years after expulsion from Spain are still faithful to the God of Abraham though today it be as Christians. Marxists who have repudiated the Torah, Tanakh, and Cotevim are still called Jewish. How can these people who have cause Israel so much pain still be regarded as children of a holy covenant?  The righteous of Israel who still keep Simchat Ha Torah have not been the propagators of this Islamic invasion. It is understandable how leftists and Marxists can support this enemy of Israel, but it is a mystery how Jews who are faithful to the God of the Jews can support this enemy of Israel and the Jewish people. 

Comment by Diane Van Antwerp on September 16, 2012 at 7:26pm

Good idea from Michael-for M. Romney to meet with PM Netenyaheu when he is here. The Jewish community should heed the warning-to not vote for Obama because he is anti-Jewish, anti=Israel,  anti-God and anti-American. We need to stay allied sith Israel.

Comment by Paul R. Nistico on September 16, 2012 at 5:59pm

Wow.  Even his own party it turning on him.

Comment by MeMikeT on September 16, 2012 at 5:45pm

In my 20s I worked for a Jewish man.  Very smart man.  Very business man.  And a religious man.  He said something interesting...it went something like this.  Business is business...religion is religion.  It is my opinion that the Jewish community votes and supports the democrat party because it is "good business" for them.  

Comment by Valerian Popkoff on September 16, 2012 at 4:07pm

Perhaps this T shirt say's it all (picture worth a thousand words):

Will some people in NY start wearing these t shirts to get the point across?

Comment by Grace Polaris on September 16, 2012 at 2:18pm

TG,

Theory 1

I think many Jewish people aligned themselves with the Dems because they were the party of the working class people and Jews throughout history have been associated with business and banking and as a result were scapegoated and crucified for being part of the group of people with money  by their host countries. Consequently, when they came to America they wanted to be known as part of the working class party so they would not stand out and would be safe.

Theory 2

Many Jewish people came to American from Socialist countries and the Dem party is closely related to  Socialism.

Theory 3

Many Jewish people are not practicing Jews and have no allegiance to Israel.

Comment by Cathy Anifant on September 16, 2012 at 12:11pm

Obama is no friend to Isreal. You can see it for yourself.  What kind of leader treats our allies the shameful way Obama has done to Isreal and Yetanyahu.  Obama is a complete incompetent. He can't be trusted with U.S. security.

Comment by Tom DiGiulio on September 16, 2012 at 10:58am

I grew up in a Jewish/Italian American neighorhood in NYC. I knew many Jewish people. To this dayI can't understand the people they support, Many marched with the Dr. King and his group,Now the jewish and Israel are HATED By most Black leaders. I JUST Don't understand!!!

 

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service