Angry Black Man 2 - Guilty Liberal Whites

Angry Black Man 2, -Guilty Liberal Whites, NAACP, BET, Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, National Association For The Advancement Of Colored People, Slavery, What ...

Rating:
  • Currently 5/5 stars.

Views: 1067

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Alfred J. Gagne on May 8, 2012 at 6:52am

God Bless you E.T. Williams.  You should be speaking at Colleges and Universities all over the Country.

Comment by Elijah Hobert (E.H.) Croft on May 7, 2012 at 5:44pm

 If only people would listen to the truth in this video.

Last year I sent an e-mail to our Governor Bill Haslam of Tennessee to ask for his help in suporting a bill which said that you are either

1. AMERICAN (by Birth)

2. NATURALIZED AMERICAN (by going through the correct legal process)

 There should be no place on any application for jobs, loans or other forms that should say anything else. As of today 5-7-2012 I have not received a reply from the governor.

This is something we should tell the CONGRESSMEN, SENATORS, and other leaders than we want done.

We have been a Country for 235 years and still we can not put on a form that we are either

AMERICAN or NATURALIZED AMERICAN. This would help stop any form of racisim on job applications,

loan forms and other forms we fill out.

GOD BLESS AMERICA

Comment by Roland C. Cartier Jr on May 7, 2012 at 5:11pm

 Not my comrade buddies from the State of Massachusetts! There are plenty of us like minded individuals to go around. Do you know why? Because we are Americans first!

Comment by Mark Caplinger on May 7, 2012 at 4:51pm

Unfortunately, this man is in a very small minority of black people who think like this.... 

Comment by Yvonne & Mike Appell on May 7, 2012 at 8:55am

You are right on the money brother....

Comment by Grace Polaris on May 7, 2012 at 8:32am

This is one brave Patriot!

Comment by Clark Hamblin,aka ComancheShaman on May 7, 2012 at 12:04am

USA! USA! USA! USA!  Back to back we will take America back! Brother , I got your back!

Comment by Lyn Rogers on May 6, 2012 at 8:44pm

What a hero, what a voice, what a wonderful presentation. Keep it up and talk and talk to all, any color., yes, move on and get over it. WOW, he is great.

Comment by sandi a. on May 6, 2012 at 8:29pm

very awsome video, I loved it. We need to hear some more from this Black man he is a true Patroit

Comment by Lindar on May 6, 2012 at 8:23pm

This is great!! Going to send this to my 2 local conservative talk radio show hosts...so all in Houston area  & beyond can listen up.

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service