Liberal Democrats always promise the poor a bigger slice of the pie in exchange for their votes. Notice how the poor never seem to get it. Bill exposes the l...

  • Currently 5/5 stars.

Views: 602

Favorite of 1 person


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by James Frankin on November 10, 2013 at 10:09pm

Ditto with you on that we have no better way of stating this one.  It is not an I told you so it is a fact.  The rest is focused to the old addage of productive citizens!  Why should they become productive when you have a gubment that prints more money every day than any hard working engineer makes in 10 lifetime's.  The Sal Alinsky method.  Remember voltaire stated if you want to know who is in charge just criticize them.  They are so used to running non-productive village's the steel mills and, coal mines would  have collapsed long ago.  Easier to grow pot and poppy's along the interstates and in national park's than learn how to be a productive citizen.  The village idiots like Bill Maher speaks well for them.  He doesn't want a nation under God.  He has been a trained village idiot for so long wouldn't know God if he met him. Just act productive on a talk show and, blame the rest on the churches. Recruit Jessie Ventura if you get challenged a little.  

Comment by Robert N. Schick on November 2, 2013 at 5:52am

Hmmm~~Fascist book won't let me share this~~Wild Bill for Homeland Security Chief~~instead we have a lawyer with No security experience replacing the Lesbian who didn't qualify to head security for a Gay Pride parade !

Comment by harold r caton on October 25, 2013 at 7:01pm

is any body  worried about  the debt ,the printing of money every day and night

Comment by Robert N. Schick on October 25, 2013 at 4:15pm

Ditto Wild Bill~~Democrats say No vouchers for poor people~~keep your kids in failed Public indoctrination schools ran by incompetent Sal Alinsky sycophants~~Poor~unharmed~ ignorant people are easy to control~~just ask Castro !

Comment by M16ark58 on October 24, 2013 at 5:12am

 Most Poor people are either too supid or ignorant to realize this. The rest of the poor that are actually aware and informed are powerless. The regime has squandered billions and billions and billions of dollars on programs like Solyndra, and oblameacare.

Comment by Mary Gomez on October 23, 2013 at 8:54pm
Comment by Historian on October 23, 2013 at 6:37pm

All one has to do is look at the track record of communist countries. They are never about prosperity. They talk about sharing the wealth, but what they really mean is equalizing the poverty. That is what communists do. They spread out the poverty so that everyone is equally impoverished.

Comment by Donna Rammer, mod on October 23, 2013 at 5:55pm

Thanks Bill! always enjoy your Common Sense!

Comment by harold r caton on October 23, 2013 at 4:48pm

I am with you   bill

Comment by sharon ostwinch on October 23, 2013 at 2:03pm

invalid swf source  what does that mean?? 



Clinton Donor And Tax Cheat Tied To Russia

“Do as we say, not as we do.”

That seems to be the slogan for Hillary Clinton and her political allies, and it’s especially apt in light of new information about one of Clinton’s largest campaign donors.

While the left is still trying to attack President Trump and his family over unproven business dealings and largely debunked connections to Russia, a new report indicates that it was Hillary Clinton’s team who were doing those exact things.

“Fox News has learned that one of the top donors to the ‘Hillary Victory Fund’ (HVF) in 2016 was a Los Angeles-based attorney who is alleged to have misused company funds to create his own $22 million real estate portfolio,” that outlet reported on Thursday.

“He has also been considered by California to be one of the state’s biggest tax cheats, and allegedly has ties to the (Russian) Kremlin,” Fox continued.

The man’s name is Edgar Sargsyan. His deep pockets greatly benefited Clinton’s campaign, with contributions of at least $250,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund in 2016.

He was also in charge of an elite fundraising dinner to benefit Clinton, where donors paid $100,000 per couple just to attend the ritzy event. But in true Clinton fashion, the money apparently went missing.

Sargsyan is now “being sued by his former company for allegedly diverting those funds to start his own real estate company,” according to Fox.

Now, people are asking hard questions about Clinton’s buddy Sargsyan, including whether his contributions were part of a pay-to-play scheme and if he had shady connections to foreign governments.

“Nobody gave to the Hillary Victory Fund out of the goodness of their heart or some generalized desire to help 33 random state parties,” pointed out attorney Dan Backer from the Committee to Defend the President.

“They did so to buy access and curry influence — something the Clintons have been selling for nearly three decades in and out of government,” he continued.

Trying to buy political influence is sadly common, especially when it comes to the Clintons. What is raising more red flags than normal, however, is the evidence that Sargsyan is no run-of-the-mill campaign donor.

“The really scary question is, what did this particular donor with this strange web of connections hope to buy for his quarter-million dollars?” Backer asked Fox News.

That web of connections is strange indeed.

The Committee to Defend the President is now alleging that SBK, a major Sargsyan-linked company “is an investment firm that is affiliated with United Arab Emirates president, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, and its international affiliate has business interests in Russia,” according to Fox.

“Among its dealings was a bid to finance $850 million for a major bridge project to connect Crimea with Russia,” the group claims.

“He worked for SBK, and SBK appears to have bid on some Crimean/Russian bridge project,” Backer said. “That’s usually an indicator of political favor and connections.”

It raises several chilling questions: Was Sargsyan paying a quarter million dollars to Clinton for political favors, and — more disturbingly — was that money actually from sources in Russia in order to smooth the way for its construction plans?

Nobody knows for sure. What is clear, however, is that there is a pattern of dirty money surrounding the Clintons, with the “Uranium One” and “Clinton Foundation” scandals just two of the most well-known examples.

“It reinforces how fast and loose the Clinton machine was when it came to ‘Hoovering up’ these megadonor checks, not just from questionable Hollywood and Wall Street elites but potentially from foreign influence peddlers using who knows what money,” Backer told Fox News.

“It reinforces the need to take a long hard look at not just the unlawful money laundering process, but the way in which they were solicited as well,” he continued. “The Clintons have never shown a great deal of concern for whomever it was cutting the checks — whether it’s foreign influence peddlers or Hollywood smut peddlers like Harvey Weinstein.”

If those claims are even partially true, then America dodged a bullet in November of 2016 — and it’s worth keeping the pile of foreign-connected Clinton scandals in mind the next time the left tries desperately to tie Donald Trump to Russia. Perhaps they should look in the mirror.


Washington Post Compares
Jeff Sessions To Slaveholder’

The Washington Post compared Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “slaveholders” after he quoted the Bible on Thursday while discussing his department’s policy of prosecuting all illegal immigrants who cross the border.

Sessions made the statement during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

WaPo ran a story entitled “Sessions cites Bible passage used to defend slavery in defense of separating immigrant families” by general assignment editor Keith McMillan and religion reporter Julie Zauzmer on Friday.

Rather than detailing the statistics Sessions cited in the speech that explain the immigration policy, the story quoted John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

“This is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made,” Fea said.

Sessions spent much of the speech discussing the numbers behind current immigration policy, including separating families at the Southwest border.

“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes,” Sessions said.

“Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful.”

“The previous administration wouldn’t prosecute aliens if they came with children,” Sessions said.

“It was de-facto open borders if you came with children. The results were unsurprising. More and more illegal aliens started showing up at the border with children.”

Sessions laid out the numbers in the speech.

“In 2013, fewer than 15,000 family units were apprehended crossing our border illegally between ports of entry in dangerous areas of the country,” he said.

“Five years later, it was more than 75,000, a five-fold increase in five years. It didn’t even have to be their child that was brought, it could be anyone. You can imagine that this created a lot of danger.”

The U.S. has the “opportunity” to fix its broken immigration system now, Sessions said.

“I believe that’s it’s moral, right, just and decent that we have a lawful system of immigration,” he said. “The American people have been asking for it.”

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service