Rangel: You're Going to Hell if You Don't Support Food Stamps, Social Security

Rangel: You're Going to Hell if You Don't Support Food Stamps

Rating:
  • Currently 5/5 stars.

Views: 450

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Kristi Ann Mod on October 28, 2013 at 2:42pm

OPEN MOUTH INSERT FOOT!! Politicians we have are SUPER BAD, expect for a Good FEW!! I am NOT DEMOCRAT or REPUBLICAN!! I am TEA PARTY NOW, that I belong to Jesus Christ my KING of kings, LORD of lords, ALPHA and OMEGA, the FIRST and the LAST, PRESIDENT of presidents!! Jesus is the WAY, the TRUTH and the LIFE, No one comes unto the FATHER, but through Me ( Jesus Christ )!! This is WHAT POLITICIANS SHOULD READ AND FOLLOW!! NOT an COWARD like Obama-Nation!! WE THE PEOPLE WANT OUR COUNTRY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BACK from this TYRANNICAL Government under the Obama-REGIME!!!

Charlie Rangel is going to HELL if he don't ACCEPT Jesus Christ as his LORD and SAVIOR!! 

1 Corinthians Chapter 13

1 Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not Charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.

2 And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries, and all knowledge; and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not Charity, I am nothing.

3 And though I bestow all my goods to feed the poor, and though I give my body to be burned, and have not Charity, it profiteth me nothing.

4 Charity suffereth long, and is kind; Charity envieth not; Charity vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up,

5 Doth not behave itself unseemly, seeketh not her own, is not easily provoked, thinketh no evil;

6 Rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the Truth;

7 Beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, Endureth all things.

8 Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away.

9 For we know in part, and we prophesy in part.

10 But when that which is Perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.

11 When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.

12 For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.

13 And now abideth Faith, Hope, Charity, these three; but the Greatest of these is Charity ( LOVE ).

Love Covers a Multitude of SINS!! Thus meaning, Jesus Christ Came to TEACH and LOVE everyone UNCONDITIONALLY!  ALL POLITICIANS NEED to LEAR THIS ABOVE!!

Love In Jesus Christ. YSIC \o/

Kristi Ann

http://kristiann1.com

Comment by Eugene P. Clark on September 29, 2013 at 6:03pm

Rangel is going to HELL, just for being the corrupt bastard he has been since he first took office.

Comment by J D Davis on September 28, 2013 at 2:30pm

This is so pathetic; Mr. Charlie Rangle and his liberal host (who they hell is “Ed”) are so pathetically ignorant.  They gloat and think they can use Christian doctrine to shame conservatives for opposing government welfare and socialism.  I do not know what the latest pronouncements are from Pope Francis, but I do know that many Roman Catholic priests and protestant ministers (people who should understand theology enough to know better) are as ignorant as Mr. Rrangle about the profound difference between government welfare and Christian charity. 

 When the bible talks about charity to the poor, it is understood to be a personal voluntary act of compassion for the truly needy. There are no exceptions anywhere in the bible to this concept.  By contrast government welfare is literally the confiscation of one man’s wealth to give aid to another man as determined by political hacks.  It is an abuse of government power that is truly immoral; it violates the Eight Commandment, “Thou shall not steal” (Exodus 20:15), and the bible does not equate all taxation with theft, “Render unto Cesar the things that are Cesar’s” (Mathew 22:21).  Modern welfare does not qualify as something belonging to “Cesar” as understood in biblical context.   

Comment by Eleanor Jean Turner on September 28, 2013 at 2:13pm

Consider his District and the "people" who keep re-electing him.  I would wager if we took a really annilitical look we would find at least 3, possibly 4 GENERATIONS on FULL WELFARE BENEFITS, with ABSOLUTELY NO ATTEMPT to find work.

I was on Medi-Cal (California) once (I am 74) for 3 months. It was because I had to have surgery on both heel spurs and I  was on TWO crutches and at all times ONE FULL FOOT BOOT, first one and then the other. I have worked with bronchial pneumonia, back to work at 2 wks, not 6 as doctor ordered, etc., after surgeries. Except for the feet, never took more than 2 wks, and used vacation or sick leave for it.

So it is possible to "take care of business" AND not be on welfare.  But that mentality no longer exists in this country.  Go into either the "Disability Office" or "Unemployment Office" in ANY state and you will see the healthiest bunch of people you ever saw in your life.  You could back up a truck, load them up, and take them to ANY construction site and put them to work. Except that would be against some RIGHT or other.  

People on either "Disability" or "Unemployment" should NOT be allowed to vote for the duration of their "Benefits".  Think about it....it is ENTIRELY POSSIBLE that their vote would/could be influenced by their Benefits, or the lack thereof.  

Comment by Barry Wind on September 28, 2013 at 1:54pm

To brother Chuck,

You have some knowledge of the Scriptures and and you are to be commended. We all need to STUDY the word and not be caught misleading others. That is why some have the SPIRITUAL GIFT of teaching.

All that to say some corrections are needed in your statements... You mentioned Priscilla and Aquila who are married man and wife. Many times they cared for Paul provided lodging and food as he ministered in the area. There was a deaconess mentioned in the book of Acts who was used of God because He found no man to do the work not because of any other reason. You know that one instance in the scriptures does not work in establishing a doctrine. Remember what God said... line upon line precept upon precept here a little there a little. This is His Word not man's and He sets the coarse and the teacher that will open our understanding... the HOLY SPIRIT! As far as Church order is concerned you are correct woman is not to usurp authority and this is God's will. Shall we go against God's will spelled out in His word? God forbid!

The other scripture you alluded to was where Paul states that there is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female for ye are all one in Christ Jesus... that is true and is valid in proper context. As far as our faith in Christ Jesus we can all approach our Heavenly Father in and through the Lord Jesus Christ and that is what it is talking about. If you were to say that there were no longer slaves in Paul's day it would not be true to the word for he says if you find yourself a slave remain as you are... but if you have opportunity to buy your freedom do so.

We are told to meditate on His Word... that is what a cow does when it eats grass... lays down and chew, chew, chew. That's what it takes! We don't have all the answers yet but we will one day. Keep reading brother but rather study to show yourself approved rightly dividing the Word.

Comment by Jan Cubbage on September 28, 2013 at 6:51am
We shall see!

ADMIN
Comment by Dee on September 28, 2013 at 6:33am

The Emam troll has been removed from the site.

Comment by Jan Cubbage on September 28, 2013 at 4:07am
Go ahead & censor me too & you will never see another dime of our monies. This is crazy! If you this this Emam guy is an American who loves this country, better reread his threads again. We are programmed...not his Allah! This is crazy & if this is what the tea party is about, then you have lost me. What the heck! I am really surprised & makes me wonder who this tea party administrator is! Think I will forward all this to our local tea party president & see what they say!
Comment by Donald L. Pugh Sr. on September 27, 2013 at 8:35pm

No I am not going to make demands, and I have maybe been here two days but have supported the tea party for years and been on here before! I thought this was a member page where I could converse with those of like mind. You had the gall to censor me and question  me ? Kiss my ass and you saw the last dime from me! Take that and your support for Unconstitutionally qualified candidates and shove them. There are a lot of more important places to comment and more serious conservative voters who know and support the Constitution!  Futher they have more influence on the GOP and political outcomes, No demands from me . Enjoy my last donations. I found you are not using it very effectively anyway, Bye bye!

Comment by Donald L. Pugh Sr. on September 27, 2013 at 4:39pm

If you can not get this damn Muslim invader off of here I am leaving! There is no way he did not lie to get on here! ythere is no way he is qualified to be here! Your choice!

LIGHTER SIDE

ALERT ALERT

Clinton Donor And Tax Cheat Tied To Russia

“Do as we say, not as we do.”

That seems to be the slogan for Hillary Clinton and her political allies, and it’s especially apt in light of new information about one of Clinton’s largest campaign donors.

While the left is still trying to attack President Trump and his family over unproven business dealings and largely debunked connections to Russia, a new report indicates that it was Hillary Clinton’s team who were doing those exact things.

“Fox News has learned that one of the top donors to the ‘Hillary Victory Fund’ (HVF) in 2016 was a Los Angeles-based attorney who is alleged to have misused company funds to create his own $22 million real estate portfolio,” that outlet reported on Thursday.

“He has also been considered by California to be one of the state’s biggest tax cheats, and allegedly has ties to the (Russian) Kremlin,” Fox continued.

The man’s name is Edgar Sargsyan. His deep pockets greatly benefited Clinton’s campaign, with contributions of at least $250,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund in 2016.

He was also in charge of an elite fundraising dinner to benefit Clinton, where donors paid $100,000 per couple just to attend the ritzy event. But in true Clinton fashion, the money apparently went missing.

Sargsyan is now “being sued by his former company for allegedly diverting those funds to start his own real estate company,” according to Fox.

Now, people are asking hard questions about Clinton’s buddy Sargsyan, including whether his contributions were part of a pay-to-play scheme and if he had shady connections to foreign governments.

“Nobody gave to the Hillary Victory Fund out of the goodness of their heart or some generalized desire to help 33 random state parties,” pointed out attorney Dan Backer from the Committee to Defend the President.

“They did so to buy access and curry influence — something the Clintons have been selling for nearly three decades in and out of government,” he continued.

Trying to buy political influence is sadly common, especially when it comes to the Clintons. What is raising more red flags than normal, however, is the evidence that Sargsyan is no run-of-the-mill campaign donor.

“The really scary question is, what did this particular donor with this strange web of connections hope to buy for his quarter-million dollars?” Backer asked Fox News.

That web of connections is strange indeed.

The Committee to Defend the President is now alleging that SBK, a major Sargsyan-linked company “is an investment firm that is affiliated with United Arab Emirates president, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, and its international affiliate has business interests in Russia,” according to Fox.

“Among its dealings was a bid to finance $850 million for a major bridge project to connect Crimea with Russia,” the group claims.

“He worked for SBK, and SBK appears to have bid on some Crimean/Russian bridge project,” Backer said. “That’s usually an indicator of political favor and connections.”

It raises several chilling questions: Was Sargsyan paying a quarter million dollars to Clinton for political favors, and — more disturbingly — was that money actually from sources in Russia in order to smooth the way for its construction plans?

Nobody knows for sure. What is clear, however, is that there is a pattern of dirty money surrounding the Clintons, with the “Uranium One” and “Clinton Foundation” scandals just two of the most well-known examples.

“It reinforces how fast and loose the Clinton machine was when it came to ‘Hoovering up’ these megadonor checks, not just from questionable Hollywood and Wall Street elites but potentially from foreign influence peddlers using who knows what money,” Backer told Fox News.

“It reinforces the need to take a long hard look at not just the unlawful money laundering process, but the way in which they were solicited as well,” he continued. “The Clintons have never shown a great deal of concern for whomever it was cutting the checks — whether it’s foreign influence peddlers or Hollywood smut peddlers like Harvey Weinstein.”

If those claims are even partially true, then America dodged a bullet in November of 2016 — and it’s worth keeping the pile of foreign-connected Clinton scandals in mind the next time the left tries desperately to tie Donald Trump to Russia. Perhaps they should look in the mirror.

SLAVEHOLDER??

Washington Post Compares
Jeff Sessions To Slaveholder’

The Washington Post compared Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “slaveholders” after he quoted the Bible on Thursday while discussing his department’s policy of prosecuting all illegal immigrants who cross the border.

Sessions made the statement during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

WaPo ran a story entitled “Sessions cites Bible passage used to defend slavery in defense of separating immigrant families” by general assignment editor Keith McMillan and religion reporter Julie Zauzmer on Friday.

Rather than detailing the statistics Sessions cited in the speech that explain the immigration policy, the story quoted John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

“This is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made,” Fea said.

Sessions spent much of the speech discussing the numbers behind current immigration policy, including separating families at the Southwest border.

“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes,” Sessions said.

“Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful.”

“The previous administration wouldn’t prosecute aliens if they came with children,” Sessions said.

“It was de-facto open borders if you came with children. The results were unsurprising. More and more illegal aliens started showing up at the border with children.”

Sessions laid out the numbers in the speech.

“In 2013, fewer than 15,000 family units were apprehended crossing our border illegally between ports of entry in dangerous areas of the country,” he said.

“Five years later, it was more than 75,000, a five-fold increase in five years. It didn’t even have to be their child that was brought, it could be anyone. You can imagine that this created a lot of danger.”

The U.S. has the “opportunity” to fix its broken immigration system now, Sessions said.

“I believe that’s it’s moral, right, just and decent that we have a lawful system of immigration,” he said. “The American people have been asking for it.”

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service