Rangel: You're Going to Hell if You Don't Support Food Stamps, Social Security

Rangel: You're Going to Hell if You Don't Support Food Stamps

  • Currently 5/5 stars.

Views: 450


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Kristi Ann Mod on October 28, 2013 at 2:42pm

OPEN MOUTH INSERT FOOT!! Politicians we have are SUPER BAD, expect for a Good FEW!! I am NOT DEMOCRAT or REPUBLICAN!! I am TEA PARTY NOW, that I belong to Jesus Christ my KING of kings, LORD of lords, ALPHA and OMEGA, the FIRST and the LAST, PRESIDENT of presidents!! Jesus is the WAY, the TRUTH and the LIFE, No one comes unto the FATHER, but through Me ( Jesus Christ )!! This is WHAT POLITICIANS SHOULD READ AND FOLLOW!! NOT an COWARD like Obama-Nation!! WE THE PEOPLE WANT OUR COUNTRY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BACK from this TYRANNICAL Government under the Obama-REGIME!!!

Charlie Rangel is going to HELL if he don't ACCEPT Jesus Christ as his LORD and SAVIOR!! 

1 Corinthians Chapter 13

1 Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not Charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.

2 And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries, and all knowledge; and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not Charity, I am nothing.

3 And though I bestow all my goods to feed the poor, and though I give my body to be burned, and have not Charity, it profiteth me nothing.

4 Charity suffereth long, and is kind; Charity envieth not; Charity vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up,

5 Doth not behave itself unseemly, seeketh not her own, is not easily provoked, thinketh no evil;

6 Rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the Truth;

7 Beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, Endureth all things.

8 Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away.

9 For we know in part, and we prophesy in part.

10 But when that which is Perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.

11 When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.

12 For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.

13 And now abideth Faith, Hope, Charity, these three; but the Greatest of these is Charity ( LOVE ).

Love Covers a Multitude of SINS!! Thus meaning, Jesus Christ Came to TEACH and LOVE everyone UNCONDITIONALLY!  ALL POLITICIANS NEED to LEAR THIS ABOVE!!

Love In Jesus Christ. YSIC \o/

Kristi Ann


Comment by Eugene P. Clark on September 29, 2013 at 6:03pm

Rangel is going to HELL, just for being the corrupt bastard he has been since he first took office.

Comment by J D Davis on September 28, 2013 at 2:30pm

This is so pathetic; Mr. Charlie Rangle and his liberal host (who they hell is “Ed”) are so pathetically ignorant.  They gloat and think they can use Christian doctrine to shame conservatives for opposing government welfare and socialism.  I do not know what the latest pronouncements are from Pope Francis, but I do know that many Roman Catholic priests and protestant ministers (people who should understand theology enough to know better) are as ignorant as Mr. Rrangle about the profound difference between government welfare and Christian charity. 

 When the bible talks about charity to the poor, it is understood to be a personal voluntary act of compassion for the truly needy. There are no exceptions anywhere in the bible to this concept.  By contrast government welfare is literally the confiscation of one man’s wealth to give aid to another man as determined by political hacks.  It is an abuse of government power that is truly immoral; it violates the Eight Commandment, “Thou shall not steal” (Exodus 20:15), and the bible does not equate all taxation with theft, “Render unto Cesar the things that are Cesar’s” (Mathew 22:21).  Modern welfare does not qualify as something belonging to “Cesar” as understood in biblical context.   

Comment by Eleanor Jean Turner on September 28, 2013 at 2:13pm

Consider his District and the "people" who keep re-electing him.  I would wager if we took a really annilitical look we would find at least 3, possibly 4 GENERATIONS on FULL WELFARE BENEFITS, with ABSOLUTELY NO ATTEMPT to find work.

I was on Medi-Cal (California) once (I am 74) for 3 months. It was because I had to have surgery on both heel spurs and I  was on TWO crutches and at all times ONE FULL FOOT BOOT, first one and then the other. I have worked with bronchial pneumonia, back to work at 2 wks, not 6 as doctor ordered, etc., after surgeries. Except for the feet, never took more than 2 wks, and used vacation or sick leave for it.

So it is possible to "take care of business" AND not be on welfare.  But that mentality no longer exists in this country.  Go into either the "Disability Office" or "Unemployment Office" in ANY state and you will see the healthiest bunch of people you ever saw in your life.  You could back up a truck, load them up, and take them to ANY construction site and put them to work. Except that would be against some RIGHT or other.  

People on either "Disability" or "Unemployment" should NOT be allowed to vote for the duration of their "Benefits".  Think about it....it is ENTIRELY POSSIBLE that their vote would/could be influenced by their Benefits, or the lack thereof.  

Comment by Barry Wind on September 28, 2013 at 1:54pm

To brother Chuck,

You have some knowledge of the Scriptures and and you are to be commended. We all need to STUDY the word and not be caught misleading others. That is why some have the SPIRITUAL GIFT of teaching.

All that to say some corrections are needed in your statements... You mentioned Priscilla and Aquila who are married man and wife. Many times they cared for Paul provided lodging and food as he ministered in the area. There was a deaconess mentioned in the book of Acts who was used of God because He found no man to do the work not because of any other reason. You know that one instance in the scriptures does not work in establishing a doctrine. Remember what God said... line upon line precept upon precept here a little there a little. This is His Word not man's and He sets the coarse and the teacher that will open our understanding... the HOLY SPIRIT! As far as Church order is concerned you are correct woman is not to usurp authority and this is God's will. Shall we go against God's will spelled out in His word? God forbid!

The other scripture you alluded to was where Paul states that there is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female for ye are all one in Christ Jesus... that is true and is valid in proper context. As far as our faith in Christ Jesus we can all approach our Heavenly Father in and through the Lord Jesus Christ and that is what it is talking about. If you were to say that there were no longer slaves in Paul's day it would not be true to the word for he says if you find yourself a slave remain as you are... but if you have opportunity to buy your freedom do so.

We are told to meditate on His Word... that is what a cow does when it eats grass... lays down and chew, chew, chew. That's what it takes! We don't have all the answers yet but we will one day. Keep reading brother but rather study to show yourself approved rightly dividing the Word.

Comment by Jan Cubbage on September 28, 2013 at 6:51am
We shall see!

Comment by Dee on September 28, 2013 at 6:33am

The Emam troll has been removed from the site.

Comment by Jan Cubbage on September 28, 2013 at 4:07am
Go ahead & censor me too & you will never see another dime of our monies. This is crazy! If you this this Emam guy is an American who loves this country, better reread his threads again. We are programmed...not his Allah! This is crazy & if this is what the tea party is about, then you have lost me. What the heck! I am really surprised & makes me wonder who this tea party administrator is! Think I will forward all this to our local tea party president & see what they say!
Comment by Donald L. Pugh Sr. on September 27, 2013 at 8:35pm

No I am not going to make demands, and I have maybe been here two days but have supported the tea party for years and been on here before! I thought this was a member page where I could converse with those of like mind. You had the gall to censor me and question  me ? Kiss my ass and you saw the last dime from me! Take that and your support for Unconstitutionally qualified candidates and shove them. There are a lot of more important places to comment and more serious conservative voters who know and support the Constitution!  Futher they have more influence on the GOP and political outcomes, No demands from me . Enjoy my last donations. I found you are not using it very effectively anyway, Bye bye!

Comment by Donald L. Pugh Sr. on September 27, 2013 at 4:39pm

If you can not get this damn Muslim invader off of here I am leaving! There is no way he did not lie to get on here! ythere is no way he is qualified to be here! Your choice!


Facebook & Twitter


BREAKING: Hillary Admits She Was Wrong About ‘Deplorables,’
White Nationalists Only ‘0.15%’ Of U.S. Population

(TeaParty.org) – Hillary Clinton, the failed liberal presidential candidate who sealed her fate by slamming half of U.S. voters as a load of racist, sexist, xenophobic “deplorables,” just came out and admitted she was wrong, Breitbart reports.

Speaking with Hugh Hewitt on his radio show about her book “What Happened,” he asked her if she actually believes that half of the American population are white nationalists and racists.

“Of the 62.9 million people who voted for President Trump, do you have a number in your mind that you think are actually white nationalist racists of that 62.9 million, a real number?” he asked.

“No, I don’t,” she said.

Still have any doubts? Later in the conversation, Hewitt asked the same question again. “Do you think there are more than a half million, you know, honest-to-God white nationalists running around the United States?”

Clinton: “Probably not, no.”

A white nationalist would like to establish a sovereign country for people of white European heritage, an idea everyone across the political spectrum finds unspeakably intolerable and offensive. Now, the woman who declared that this was the desire of more than half of Americans is saying that virtually nobody wants it. On both counts, she’s completely wrong.

There’s no doubt that Clinton is probably going to try running again for president in 2020 – if she’s even alive that long – and might be trying to absolve her guilt and pander to all those “undecideds” who instantly went MAGA the second she blasted them as no-good racist deplorables for not voting Democrat.

However, Clinton did later admit that there were more white nationalists in America than she had thought. Expressing her worries that the internet and the presidency of Trump is giving them a voice and a platform, she hinted that under her iron scepter, she will attempt to silence them.

“Unfortunately, their views, which used to be quite beyond the mainstream, you know, have a much broader audience now, because you know, of being online and having outlets and media presence that can promote those attitudes,” she said.

How many white nationalists are there in the United States? That’s a question with troublingly few answers, since for some mysterious reason the liberal mainstream media – even though it claims all the time that white supremacy is on the rise – hasn’t actually bothered to take polls and just ask people whether they are white nationalists.

Actually, there’s a simple answer to that. If such a poll were to be taken, our bet is that liberals would be very disappointed to discover that almost nobody is actually a white nationalist, and so there would be no way they could continue scaring people with those fears. A tactic Clinton has apparently given up on.

Left-wingers are entirely convinced that some vague but large majority of people who say they aren’t racists or white nationalists, actually share a lot of views with them – which is why Nazi and white supremacist have become interchangeable with Republican and libertarian.

An article by Newsweek, which polled around 5,000 in order address this very question, came up with this response:

About 70 percent of respondents strongly agreed that people of different races should be “free to live wherever they choose” and that “all races are equal,” and 89 percent agreed that all races should be treated equally. At the same time, 31 percent of respondents said they strongly or somewhat agreed that the country needs to “protect and preserve its White European heritage,” while 34 percent strongly or somewhat disagreed and 29 percent said they neither agreed nor disagreed.

Reality is, it’s a little true that some Americans do have overlapping views with white nationalists, but the overwhelming majority of respondents STRONGLY believe that the races should be free, are equal, and should be treated equally. Sounds like none of these respondents would be joining a lynch mob or waging a second Holocaust any time soon – trying to equate the preservation of white heritage with support for slavery and genocide is obviously one of the Left’s biggest lies, and the very reason why 39 percent of people in this same survey believe white people are under attack.

So Clinton changes her mind, and now says she believes less than one percent of the American population are white nationalists – did she believe there were even LESS than that during the campaign trail? Either way, she’s either just lying or plain stupid.


© 2017   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service