Police perform house-to-house raids in Watertown MA ripping innocent families from their homes

WATERTOWN, MA -- On Friday, April 19, 2013, during a manhunt for a bombing suspect, police and federal agents spent the day storming people's homes and performing illegal searches. While it was unclear initially if the home searches were voluntary, it is now crystal clear that they were absolutely NOT voluntary. Police were filmed ripping people from their homes at gunpoint, marching the residents out with their hands raised in submission, and then storming the homes to perform their illegal searches.

  • Currently 5/5 stars.

Views: 2178


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Oleg Gielman on April 24, 2013 at 1:27pm

One more time Roberto –in the name of cohesion… by taking credit where credit isn’t due, it usually follows not taking credit where credit is due –like a mole ceo of a soon to be bankrupt company always intends his underlings take the fall… many practical conclusions can be derived through what's called deductive and inductive reasoning… I cannot prove stalin murdered tens of millions of people (many of whom were even willing to be his subjects) –but I know he did, it is in the “nature” of the beast –victory through lies, deception and blood… after becoming familiar with a beast’s ideology and/or behavior one doesn’t need a camera nor a witness to know where its crypto is.

Comment by ellis beam on April 24, 2013 at 5:19am

The irony of the fact that the part of the country where our nation started is now the hot spot of idiots who go along with the atrocities that started the Revolutionary War.

Comment by Roberto Benitez on April 24, 2013 at 12:00am

Oleg, I didn't ask you for proof of a false flag operation. I just asked if you believed that Obama did it as many claimed Bush was behind 911. Now I won't say it's impossible that Obama was involved. As a matter of fact, I don't trust that Fabian socialist Muslim operating by the Alinsky and Cloward-Piven plans one bit.

However, particularly with more information coming out I believe the Obama regime was intentionally "incompetent" due to ideological reasons, i.e., and unwillingness to admit the implication that Islam is our enemy. I believe there's a lot more than meets the eye about the Saudi national that Obama tried to whisk out of the country and also the matter of the warnings from Russia for example.

But I'll admit I see no purpose in stating or implying Mr. (intentional) Obama did it without proof. Of course I wouldn't expect anybody in this regime however to not practice taqiyya over this matter, Fast and Furious, or Benghazi. If you want to ask the question, could he have done it, that's quite fair. I believe both Fast and Furious and Benghazi amounted to treason.

As for taking out bin Laden, how does that connect to the Boston bombing? However, there're credible reports that both Clinton and Panetta kept Obama out of the loop until it was under way because Valerie Jarrett had talked Obama into canceling several times earlier opportunities to get bin Laden.

While I'm not afraid to ask questions, I don't engage in accepting speculation and conspiracies as fact without relevant facts. I also expect that people should answer questions forthrightly as best they can.

You see, I don't believe that we conservatives and libertarians can afford behaving like liberals, progressives, or socialists. We can't use their tactics of deceit, theft (elections), violence, and worse. We must conduct ourselves according to the principles we claim to believe in. For me that's the Constitution and the Bible.

There's a saying from people I know, "we don't lie, cheat, or steal nor permit those among us who do; and quibbling is lying." Does that help explain my position Oleg?

PS; I often agree with you, but on this matter it seems we've sadly gotten into a spat.

Comment by Donna Rammer, mod on April 23, 2013 at 11:20pm

yes, I too agree, they did not protest, they probably would have been shot. This was illegal. They stomped on the fourth Amendment... They were terrorized!

Comment by Debra A Shawver on April 23, 2013 at 11:16pm

I agree with Dan...it was a huge martial law test..and the people of Boston "performed" beyond king o's wildest dreams....

Comment by Oleg Gielman on April 23, 2013 at 3:07pm

Until what’s its name, also known by soldiers as boom boom says it did it or janet napolitano says he did it or somebody in authority with a tinkle down its his leg says boom boom did it …folks like Roberto will need proof, do we have any paparazzi willing to make a buck? …hey, like boom boom said, it took out bin laden all by its lonesome.

Comment by Donna Rammer, mod on April 22, 2013 at 9:43pm

I feel that the public in Boston should report to their congress and senate, how they were treated. Being treated like they were the terrorists. I AM appalled by their actions. These were not the police, they looked like special ops or something more sinister. They terrorized these Bostonians, and I felt so bad for them. This definately looked like a training day, to see what the american people would do and how they would re act. You know that Obama had to OK this. Dont forget we are under NDAA and whatever the other one is, NDRA....appalling to treat OUR citizens like this!

Comment by Roberto Benitez on April 22, 2013 at 9:13pm
Just as many on the left wanted the terrorists to be right-wingers and were willing to resort to preposterous canards, innuendoes, and prevarications to further a political agenda, it seems many on the supposed right like Dan Holsopple need to believe this was a false flag operation by the Obama regime. Professional conspiracy manufacturers are even claiming that the TX fertilizer plant was caused by a missile based on sounds that are clearly different.

Nevertheless, that doesn't justify the actions of the police to search homes in the manner they did without a governor formally declaring a state of emergency and martial law or Congress doing so. But then what's left of the Bill of Rights, perhaps only the Third Amendment?

However, as long as conspiracists make absurd claims against Fabian socialist Mr. (intentional) Obama we'll never get him removed from office for provable offenses like Libya, Fast and Furious, extortion, by passing Congress, refusing to enforce laws passed by Congress, appointing officials without Senate approval, and Benghazi, the latter which i believe amounted to treason.
Comment by Dan Holsopple on April 22, 2013 at 2:34pm

Martial Law is what the whole "drill" was about. Introducing Militarized Police and Martial Law to America. The bombing is a false flag attack. It was a "sting operation" taken to the next level. The difference being WE just got stung. (Did you notice the missile attack in West, Texas - go check it out. there were at least two video witness of the burning plant attacked by an incendiary missile) 
Wake up and smell the BS.

Comment by Donna Rammer, mod on April 22, 2013 at 2:39am

oh brother, what a bunch a a holes...i cannot believe we have come to this! Breaking into innocent peoples homes...this is bull stuff...



Bill and Hillary Clinton Brutally
Mocked After Defending

View image on Twitter

Crooked Bill and Hillary Clinton were brutally mocked Monday after defending the Clinton Foundation on social media.

The Clinton Foundation’s official Twitter account tweeted Saturday, “ICYMI: President @BillClinton wrote on Facebook this week about our work improving lives in the United States and around the world, from fighting climate change to combating the opioid crisis.”

Former President Bill Clinton’s Facebook post served to correct the record about so called fake news smearing the Clinton Foundation. Naturally, he linked to far left sites such as Snopes and Politifact to debunk the smears.

After touting all the charity the Clinton Foundation brings to hurricane victims, farmers in East Africa and combating Climate Change, Bill Clinton unleashed on Breitbart News for spreading conspiracy theories and false information about the Foundation.

Nevertheless, spreading false information about the Foundation continues, apparently as part of an ongoing strategy to distract attention from real problems and, over the long run, to completely erase the line between fact and fiction.

For example, just a few weeks ago on MSNBC, during a discussion of the President’s disparaging remarks about Haiti, his designated defender repeated the ridiculous assertion that I had taken money raised for Haiti for personal use and was responsible for the apparent suicide of a Haitian who knew all about it. Thankfully, the host cut her off, refusing to provide a forum for known false conspiracy theories. I’m proud of the work the Foundation and I have done in Haiti and will give you a more detailed report on that soon.

These attacks on the Foundation began in earnest with the 2015 publication of the Breitbart-inspired book, Clinton Cash. I thought the Foundation staff did a good job debunking the book’s charges, but they were published as written even in “mainstream” outlets, and even now the charges continue to be repeated online and in forums favorable to those who make them.

I have never responded personally to these charges, but out of respect for our donors, partners, and those who work at the Foundation, I think I should—because as we see, attacks, no matter how outrageous, can have a long life.

Bill Clinton also argued Chelsea’s wedding wasn’t paid for by Clinton Foundation donations nor do any of them receive salaries.

No, Foundation funds were not used to pay for Chelsea’s wedding. It’s not only untrue, it’s a personal insult to me, to Hillary, and to Chelsea and Marc. It was a wonderful day that Hillary and I were grateful to be able to pay for.

Clinton also argued the foundation was given 4 out 4 stars from Charity Navigator, Platinum from GuideStar, A from Charity Watch, and a 20 out of 20 score for meeting all of the Better Business Bureau’s good practice standards.

Hillary Clinton tweeted: Want to hear the real story of the @ClintonFdn? Read this: 

 Trump supporters savaged the Clintons.

How about when Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Oman donated MILLIONS to your foundation when you were Secretary of State and then you conducted official US business with them? 

What about how Haitian villages that you raised money for are STILL without the homes, schools and infrastructure you promised for them? Where did it go Hillary? Where's that money? Why did you plunder the great people of Haiti? 


Unless it explains

Benghazi 33,000 missing emails  Haiti  Destroyed electronics  Missing money
Uranium One Etc

Then no. Nope.  
Not on Presidents day.  

Care to tell us how much the Foundation pays out in salaries each year? 


Slush fund? Pay-to-play? Salaries for Sid Blumenthal?
Fraud in Haiti?  The vast majority of funds don't reach people in need?
That's the real story, right?   



© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service