Tucker Carlson DESTROYS Kevin Appleby Migration Advocate Extreme Vetting

Tucker Carlson DESTROYS Kevin Appleby Migration Advocate Extreme Vetting

  • Currently 5/5 stars.

Views: 445

Favorite of 1 person


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by John Barr on January 29, 2017 at 6:36pm

Is all part of the long range plan to bring The United States of America to her knees

Comment by Marilyn Calkins on January 29, 2017 at 6:19pm

I used to enjoy going up to St. Paul/Minneapolis, MN.  And if it weren't for my favorite relative on mom's side living up there, I wouldn't go back.  They have a HUGE population of muslims.  And of course even the local media rarely covers the incidents, but my cousin no longer wants to go out in the evening because you don't know if you're going to run into a roaming gang of muslim cockroaches.  They have people being assaulted and vandalism all the time, and it's never reported.  And now MN has allowed them to infiltrate their government.

Comment by Don R. Sherwood on January 29, 2017 at 6:05pm

I like America.  I like the Constitution.  I like our form of government.  I like our culture

I do not like Islam.  I do not like Sharia Law.  I do not like Radical Islamic Terrorism.  

Every place where large numbers of Muslims immigrate (including France, Germany, England), they have NOT assimilated they have demanded their ghettos be ruled by Sharia Law.  They become "NO GO Zones" where police DO NOT DARE GO!  Rape, robberies and murders have increased.

I do not want my country to become like that! 

Comment by John Barr on January 29, 2017 at 6:02pm

Liberals want the total destruction of The United States of America as a world power.

Liberals want the United States to become a third world country.

Comment by Marilyn Calkins on January 29, 2017 at 5:24pm

WHAT is it going to take to convince the idiots that islam is not a religion of peace?  For that matter.....a religion AT ALL...

Faith Spirituality Belief Religion

Faith— Most of us think of “faith” in supernatural terms, as in “faith in God.” This is actually more of what psychologists of religion would call “belief” (see below). Faith, from a more naturalistic, psychological perspective, is merely the innate drive to search for meaning, purpose and significance.

From infancy, every human person has an innate sense that “there is something more than just me” and a drive to discover what that might be. The baby calls out for the mother even when the mother is gone from view. In the same way, all people, whether they are believers or not, seek the deeper meaning, purpose, and significance that exists in life, relationships and the things that happen to us. We recognize this basic striving as “faith” and it is a universal part of being human. Even atheists have this kind of faith. I think this is an especially useful understanding of the term because of its universality. We often hear that “faith is a gift” but when we see so many people who do not believe in God, we wonder if God simply did not gift those people with faith. The answer is that everyone has the gift of faith–that innate drive to seek meaning, purpose and significance–but some people have exercised this innate gift more than others, allowing their faith to be better defined than others.

Spirituality—For psychologists of religion, the term “spirituality” represents both the things on which a person focuses his or her faith (e.g, God, church, nature, etc) and the things he or she does to try to make a connection with those things (prayer, sacraments, hiking). In other words, spirituality represents the paths a person’s faith (as defined above) travels as it seeks meaning, purpose, and significance. In these terms, faith is an internal feeling, a sense that there is “something more.” By contrast, spirituality represents the effort to find out what that “something more” might be. Spirituality results when one’s faith that has been activated.


Belief–Belief represents the truths claims I make as a result of my spiritual journey. When, as a result of my spiritual striving, I decide that “this is true” and “this is not” I am articulating various “beliefs” that I hold because of experiences I have had while trying to satisfy my innate sense of faith (i.e., that innate human longing for meaning, purpose, and significance) by engaging in various spiritual practices and pursuits.

Religion–Religion refers to the community of people who share similar beliefs and who work together to provide both support for going deeper into those beliefs and accountability for living up to those beliefs. Religions codify beliefs into sacred texts and–by means of rituals and moral practices–seek to facilitate the deepest possible connection with the beliefs the particular community holds.

Of course you should feel free to use whatever terms you want in your conversation with your friends and family about these issues, but these distinctions can be helpful in discussions with people who wonder why so-and-so “doesn’t have the gift of faith” or what it really means when someone says they are “spiritual but not religious” or any number of other exchanges that can get bogged down when people use words in poorly-defined, little understood ways.

Comment by sharon ostwinch on January 29, 2017 at 4:10pm

How is it ok to let people in that hate you and want you dead.  Really??  Religion or not they will all tell you this.  No one of muslim faith will assimilate - so there you go..  They don't want to be here at all.

Comment by Bob Russell on January 29, 2017 at 3:52pm

In response to Oleg's post I must say I agree and wrote about the satanic cult of islam:  http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2015/09/islam-is-a-satanic-cul...

Comment by Skip peters on January 29, 2017 at 12:14pm
We miss many things here, when we can't ask what faith they are. And is the reasoning there coming here is 1. To excape the evil attacks of ISIS? 2. To move here to repopulate America with Muslim faith based territory. 3. By doing both is a attack on Christians and there families and our Country. We can look at Germany today and see there entent. They have brought more criminal crimes to Germany and have forced there laws on the German people. The German people are mad and want it stopped, but the One World Order Groups want to control all people by controlling the money system. And this controls healthcare,food,housings do every form of life.
Comment by Randal W. Howard on January 29, 2017 at 12:03pm

"Multiculturalism is a large part of the problem where it is accepted as a normal religion."

Multiculturalism is not viable when one of those 'cultures' is hell-bent upon the destruction of all the others.  We are aware that they want nothing to do with Christians and Jews.  Does anyone remember the two Buddha statues in the desert that were blown up because they were "UN-ISLAMIC"?  How many more are there?  I don't claim to know how many Religions there are that rate as genuine belief systems, content to allow others to believe differently, without killing them.

Comment by Oleg Gielman on January 29, 2017 at 11:36am
"The term moderate islime is ugly and offensive. There's no moderate islime ...islime is islime." -erdogan, PM of Turkey

And here's proof...
Michigan Muslim Woman Openly Defends The Stabbing of Jews. Yes, All Jews…
This Michigan woman must be one of those moderate Muslims we’ve been hearing a lot about. Scratch that, it’s the moderate Muslims she’s mocking. You know...
Ref. Brigitte Gabriel (Facebook)



Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service