Truckers to shut down America for 3 days

The American people are sick and tired of the corruption that is destroying America! We therefore declare a GENERAL STRIKE on the weekend of October 11-13, 2013! Truck drivers will not haul freight! Americans can strike in solidarity with truck drivers!

  • Currently 4/5 stars.

Views: 2400

Favorite of 1 person


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Chris on October 11, 2013 at 8:39am

Donna, I guess Fox will be in and out with coverage but not much live.  Sunday is the Vets day at the Memorials and I hope Fox gives tht. coverage.  Search around the web for some live action threads.

Comment by Donna Rammer, mod on October 11, 2013 at 8:09am

So how is it going? There was a small exerpt on Megyn Kelly last eve. On RedFlag dot net, it says the OB admin is shutting down the roads with Road Blocks. Anyone hear anything?

Comment by Alexandra Mark on September 28, 2013 at 5:56pm

Well said, J.D. Davis!  But getting over Republcian fears of "being percieved as racist," needs some creative therapy by secure 'therapists.' The time has come, however, to deal with the problem openly because it is the Democrats' secret weapon, and they wield it brilliantly. So, Mr. Davis, give it some thought and let's hear how we can deal with it with a hostile media. 

Comment by J D Davis on September 28, 2013 at 5:31pm

Man I love these guys!  Recently it was the bikers going to DC to counter demonstrate against the “Million Muslim March.”  Now we have the truckers.  These are the tough, hard working, patriotic “Blue Collar Reagan Democrats.”  They have a visceral understanding of what it is to be free.  Since Reagan the Republican Party has lost them because they have been ignored by the Party big shots. The GOP is preoccupied with the fantasy that it must compete with the Democrats for the Hispanic vote because Hispanics have more babies than Caucasians.

 The Blue Collar Reagan Democrats are overwhelmingly opposed to amnesty (any legal status) for illegal aliens. They understand it will force them to compete with FOREIGNERS for American jobs.  If the GOP were to come out boldly and propose that “Illegal aliens must go home.” and secured the border, these Reagan Democrats would return to the GOP in numbers far greater than the few votes the Party might gain by pandering to Hispanics with proposals for amnesty.      

 Senator Jeff Sessions estimated the Senate’s “Gang of Eight” amnesty bill would result in 33 million legalized foreigners in 10 years and with “chain migration” 50, 60 or more millions is almost certain.   The Reagan Democrats are patriots and it disturbs them to see the very nature of their country, society and culture being drastically altered due to a legally sanction uncontrolled mass migration of aliens.  They know  Mark Zuckerberger and his billionaire buddies are  literally purchasing laws for amnesty and they justly, bitterly resent it.

 The GOP has a great opportunity to create a new majority coalition of voters, if the Party can get over its psychotic obsession about not being perceived as “racist.”   

Comment by Joseph T. Ward on September 22, 2013 at 7:50am

I'm in complete solidarity with the truckers, but I would call attention to the real possibility that it could initiate a long-term shortage of food, fuel and merchandise. Prepare accordingly Patriots and SEMPER FI.




Comment by robert cosenza on September 21, 2013 at 12:26pm

we the people,who are the real government.we aren,t truckers,but will be with our truckers brothers in Washington dc in our cars,to stand with our trucker brothers.anything to stand up against ovomit/satan the ineligible treasonous war crimes traitor,and his unconstitituional administration.who are all do nothing treasonous traitors.with a very few exceptions.god bless america

Comment by Ted Sockwell on September 20, 2013 at 4:13pm

Id like to see the truckers surround the White House and let those air horns have at it for hours

Comment by Donna Rammer, mod on September 20, 2013 at 2:33pm

Headlites on for the Truckers those days! Give them support!

Comment by Paul Z. on September 20, 2013 at 7:51am

Way to go Truckers! ! !

Comment by Jan on September 19, 2013 at 10:31pm




The cartoonist's homepage,


Clinton Donor And Tax Cheat Tied To Russia

“Do as we say, not as we do.”

That seems to be the slogan for Hillary Clinton and her political allies, and it’s especially apt in light of new information about one of Clinton’s largest campaign donors.

While the left is still trying to attack President Trump and his family over unproven business dealings and largely debunked connections to Russia, a new report indicates that it was Hillary Clinton’s team who were doing those exact things.

“Fox News has learned that one of the top donors to the ‘Hillary Victory Fund’ (HVF) in 2016 was a Los Angeles-based attorney who is alleged to have misused company funds to create his own $22 million real estate portfolio,” that outlet reported on Thursday.

“He has also been considered by California to be one of the state’s biggest tax cheats, and allegedly has ties to the (Russian) Kremlin,” Fox continued.

The man’s name is Edgar Sargsyan. His deep pockets greatly benefited Clinton’s campaign, with contributions of at least $250,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund in 2016.

He was also in charge of an elite fundraising dinner to benefit Clinton, where donors paid $100,000 per couple just to attend the ritzy event. But in true Clinton fashion, the money apparently went missing.

Sargsyan is now “being sued by his former company for allegedly diverting those funds to start his own real estate company,” according to Fox.

Now, people are asking hard questions about Clinton’s buddy Sargsyan, including whether his contributions were part of a pay-to-play scheme and if he had shady connections to foreign governments.

“Nobody gave to the Hillary Victory Fund out of the goodness of their heart or some generalized desire to help 33 random state parties,” pointed out attorney Dan Backer from the Committee to Defend the President.

“They did so to buy access and curry influence — something the Clintons have been selling for nearly three decades in and out of government,” he continued.

Trying to buy political influence is sadly common, especially when it comes to the Clintons. What is raising more red flags than normal, however, is the evidence that Sargsyan is no run-of-the-mill campaign donor.

“The really scary question is, what did this particular donor with this strange web of connections hope to buy for his quarter-million dollars?” Backer asked Fox News.

That web of connections is strange indeed.

The Committee to Defend the President is now alleging that SBK, a major Sargsyan-linked company “is an investment firm that is affiliated with United Arab Emirates president, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, and its international affiliate has business interests in Russia,” according to Fox.

“Among its dealings was a bid to finance $850 million for a major bridge project to connect Crimea with Russia,” the group claims.

“He worked for SBK, and SBK appears to have bid on some Crimean/Russian bridge project,” Backer said. “That’s usually an indicator of political favor and connections.”

It raises several chilling questions: Was Sargsyan paying a quarter million dollars to Clinton for political favors, and — more disturbingly — was that money actually from sources in Russia in order to smooth the way for its construction plans?

Nobody knows for sure. What is clear, however, is that there is a pattern of dirty money surrounding the Clintons, with the “Uranium One” and “Clinton Foundation” scandals just two of the most well-known examples.

“It reinforces how fast and loose the Clinton machine was when it came to ‘Hoovering up’ these megadonor checks, not just from questionable Hollywood and Wall Street elites but potentially from foreign influence peddlers using who knows what money,” Backer told Fox News.

“It reinforces the need to take a long hard look at not just the unlawful money laundering process, but the way in which they were solicited as well,” he continued. “The Clintons have never shown a great deal of concern for whomever it was cutting the checks — whether it’s foreign influence peddlers or Hollywood smut peddlers like Harvey Weinstein.”

If those claims are even partially true, then America dodged a bullet in November of 2016 — and it’s worth keeping the pile of foreign-connected Clinton scandals in mind the next time the left tries desperately to tie Donald Trump to Russia. Perhaps they should look in the mirror.


Washington Post Compares
Jeff Sessions To Slaveholder’

The Washington Post compared Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “slaveholders” after he quoted the Bible on Thursday while discussing his department’s policy of prosecuting all illegal immigrants who cross the border.

Sessions made the statement during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

WaPo ran a story entitled “Sessions cites Bible passage used to defend slavery in defense of separating immigrant families” by general assignment editor Keith McMillan and religion reporter Julie Zauzmer on Friday.

Rather than detailing the statistics Sessions cited in the speech that explain the immigration policy, the story quoted John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

“This is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made,” Fea said.

Sessions spent much of the speech discussing the numbers behind current immigration policy, including separating families at the Southwest border.

“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes,” Sessions said.

“Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful.”

“The previous administration wouldn’t prosecute aliens if they came with children,” Sessions said.

“It was de-facto open borders if you came with children. The results were unsurprising. More and more illegal aliens started showing up at the border with children.”

Sessions laid out the numbers in the speech.

“In 2013, fewer than 15,000 family units were apprehended crossing our border illegally between ports of entry in dangerous areas of the country,” he said.

“Five years later, it was more than 75,000, a five-fold increase in five years. It didn’t even have to be their child that was brought, it could be anyone. You can imagine that this created a lot of danger.”

The U.S. has the “opportunity” to fix its broken immigration system now, Sessions said.

“I believe that’s it’s moral, right, just and decent that we have a lawful system of immigration,” he said. “The American people have been asking for it.”

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service