Sources Confirm Obama Purging Military Commanders

Author Sara Carter joins Andrew Wilkow to discuss Obama's alarming purge of top military commanders.

U.S. General: Obama's Military Purge 'Criminal And Treasonous'

Obama Terminates Another 34 Nuclear Missile Air Force Officers

Lt. General McInerney: Muslim Brotherhood Inside White House

  • Currently 5/5 stars.

Views: 1067


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Bruce Hahn on February 3, 2014 at 12:12pm

He has been asking military people if they would fire on American citizens to enforce laws. Now he is replacing the ones that won't with ones that will.

Comment by whit on February 3, 2014 at 11:46am

Word to the Wise (generals): act like a socialist until this Bast%$d is out of office !

Comment by neal carmen toglia on February 3, 2014 at 8:11am

He and his party " blame America first" for all the evils in the world. They view America as the "bully"  ( a term you will hear more amd more as Hillay makes her run in 2016) in the world and Obama wants to make us " a non-exceptional Country"  as he has stated clearly. He is weakening our nuclear and conventional forces to " bring us down to size" and make us "just another nation" along with the rest of the world, not a super-power. The dem. propaganda goes against the "rich" as not deserving what they have and "taking from the poor". All this is socialistic propaganda and you will hear more and more about " economic equality" , another socialistic myth. We need to stop all this crap before the Chinese overcome us militarily which they are working hard to do right now. Obama and his party are fools and will cause serious problems worldwide if they succeed in making America weak and subject to the evils like Iran, China, North Korea etc. It only takes one nuke to turn the world upside-down and if we don't have the deterent to make any nation fear us,  hold on to your hats!!!!

Comment by John P Wilch Jr (TSgt, USAF Ret. on February 2, 2014 at 10:46pm

Rev. Richardson, there is: He could resign and take that moocher, Mooshell with him.

May the Great Spirit watch over you and yours and guide yours and their steps for all eternity.

US Combat Veteran: Vietnam, '68-'69; 228th Avn. Bn. (ASH), 1st Cav. Div. (AM) and former Armored Cavalry Scout (19D30) and damned proud to have served and would do it again if this wonderful country and its people ever needed me. (However, not under BHO and his Socialist Regime.) Enlisted into the Army Dec. 20, '63 and retired out of the Id. Air National Guard Apr. 1, '92.


Comment by Rev. Christine Richardson on February 2, 2014 at 10:10pm

Dictator Obama: Is there anything you could do that would be good for our country? Anything? Just one thing? I didn't think so. 

Comment by Richard Ratliff on February 2, 2014 at 9:22pm

They are already purging law enforcement.  I just read an article (yesterday I think or the day before) where a local Police Chief and his entire force were relieved.  He was placed on administrative leave--all for having attended a Constitutional meeting with fellow law enforcement.  The Sheriff relieved him.  Being able to do that was a surprise to me!  Does the Sheriff have that authority?  Evidently so, since it's his county in which the city/municipality lies.  Some federal guy was also involved at the airport along with the TSA.  I think this is the second I've heard about.  Sorry, don't have the link for either of these.

Comment by Jim Delaney on February 2, 2014 at 8:24pm

Excellent comment.

Comment by Ray Hause on February 2, 2014 at 7:02pm

To all of those who are the critics to Operation American Spring, ask yourselves why should this be happening.  

Comment by Historian on February 2, 2014 at 6:34pm

Some of you no doubt are already aware that the youtube links on this page have been censored and removed. Some of you no doubt are already aware of the cruel and vindictive nature of the powers that threatens our people and our nation, and that it has no boundaries.

Some perhaps have read Alexander Solzhenitsyn's book "The Gulag Archipelago". One of the things that struck me as I was reading the book was that the Soviets did not hesitate to punish the innocent family members of those whom the Soviet State regarded as enemies. I do not know if any of you have noticed pressures being placed on wives or children at school or in the workplace. Perhaps this is not happening yet. But the purge will not be limited to the military.

Two years ago I spoke of a military purge and was censored. Now everyone is aware of the military purges. I spoke not long ago of a teacher purge, and have been ignored. It will not be long before people become aware of the teacher purges. Then what? Will there be police department and law enforcement purges? Will every agency in which the Federal government has it's presence be purged? We have already seen the capitulation of American work places that have human resources departments that often act as enforcers of politically correct policy. Has the corporate world become the proxy enforcers of the Marxist state? Will some of you one day find that your child is being harassed because you are a known patriot ? Will you find your wife's job threatened because you write comments on tea party? This is no longer a game, and each of us should count the cost and realize that we are dealing with dangerous and malevolent forces that will harm us, and our families. But silence is not a real option in this critical hour, because when the lights go out in America, our children and grandchildren may never see the lights of liberty again in their lifetimes.

Comment by Historian on February 2, 2014 at 5:55pm

That this crisis can not longer be ignored is an understatement.  Marxists have a tendency to follow patterns that have been followed before in history. People think that they have changed, and are somehow more civilized, but the reality is that they cannot change, and only evil can come from these enemies of humanity.


In 1934, arguably Stalin had one of the finest armies in Europe.  Under the organizational skills of Marshall Mikhail Tukhachevsky the combined arms doctrine developed by him had made the Red army a truly formidable force. The Red army won a smashing victory over the Japanese in 1939 at the battle of Khalkin Gol.  However this powerful force was severely weakened by the Stalin purges. By 1937 the Red army had lost many of it's best commanders, including marshals Rovossovsky, Tukhachevsky, Yegorov, and Blukher. Sixteen General,  fifteen admirals, 264 colonels. 107 majors and a multitude of lower ranking officers. By the time that the purge had run it's course, 34,000 officers had been purged from the armed forces of the Soviet Union.  It was not long before the Soviets felt the effects of the purge.  When the Red Army attacked Finland in the winter of 1939-1940 with an overwhelming force the Red Army was badly bloodied by the small but efficient Finnish army.  With the loss of over 50,000 dead, the Soviet Union had exposed it's serious weaknesses to the Germans.  When the Germans launched operation Barbarossa, in June of 1941, the Red army reeled under the shock of German Blitzkrieg.  Stalin was in a panic and threw more and more untrained raw soldiers into the meat grinder trying to stop the German juggernaut, but it almost appeared as if the Soviet Union was doomed. Fortunately for Stalin, Marshals like Zhukov, Timoshenko, Koniev, and some others had not been eradicated by the Stalin purges, and with the extreme bravery and self sacrifice of the Russian soldier, and the leadership of the great marshals, the Soviet Union was eventually able to turn the tide.  This is a day of great peril for our nation.,  the purges seem to have entered other areas of American life.  If things do not change I fear for the life of the nation. 



Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich


 Judge Orders Mueller To Prove  Russia Meddled In Election 

Judge Dabney L. Friedrich

A Washington federal judge on Thursday ordered special counsel Robert Mueller’s team to clarify election meddling claims lodged against a Russian company operated by Yevgeny Prigozhin, an ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, according to Bloomberg.

Concord Management and Consulting, LLC. – one of three businesses indicted by Mueller in February along with 13 individuals for election meddling, surprised the special counsel in April when they actually showed up in court to fight the charges. Mueller’s team tried to delay Concord from entering the case, arguing that thee Russian company not been properly served, however Judge Dabney Friedrich denied the request – effectively telling prosecutors ‘well, they’re here.’

Concord was accused in the indictment of supporting the Internet Research Agency (IRA), a Russian ‘troll farm’ accused of trying to influence the 2016 US election.

On Thursday, Judge Freidrich asked Mueller’s prosecutors if she should assume they aren’t accusing Concord of violating US laws applicable to election expenditures and failure to register as a foreign agent.

Concord has asked Dabney to throw out the charges – claiming that Mueller’s office fabricated a crime, and that there is no law against interfering in elections.

According to the judge’s request for clarification, the Justice Department has argued that it doesn’t have to show that Concord had a legal duty to report its expenditures to the Federal Election Commission. Rather, the allegation is that the company knowingly engaged in deceptive acts that precluded the FEC, or the Justice Department, from ascertaining whether they had broken the law. -Bloomberg

On Monday, Friedrich raised questions over whether the special counsel’s office could prove a key element of their case – saying that it was “hard to see” how allegations of Russian influence were intended to interfere with US government operations vs. simply “confusing voters,” reports

During a 90-minute hearing, Friedrich questioned prosecutor Jonathan Kravis about how the government would be able to show the Russian defendants were aware of the Justice Department and FEC’s functions and then deliberately sought to skirt them.

“You still have to show knowledge of the agencies and what they do. How do you do that?” Friedrich asked.

Kravis, a prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, argued that the government needed only to show that Concord Management and the other defendants were generally aware that the U.S. government “regulates and monitors” foreign participation in American politics. That awareness, Kravis said, could be inferred from the Russians’ alleged creation of fake social media accounts that appeared to be run by U.S. citizens and “computer infrastructure” intended to mask the Russian origin of the influence operation.

“That is deception that is directed at a higher level,” Kravis said. Kravis appeared in court with Michael Dreeben, a top Justice Department appellate lawyer on detail to the special counsel’s office.

Concord pleaded not guilty in May. Their attorney, Eric Dubelier – a partner at Reed Smith, has described the election meddling charges as “make believe,” arguing on Monday that Mueller’s indictment against Concord “doesn’t charge a crime.”

“There is no statute of interfering with an election. There just isn’t,” said Dubelier, who added that Mueller’s office alleged a “made-up crime to fit the facts they have.”

Dubelier added that the case against Concord Management is the first in US history “where anyone has ever been charged with defrauding the Justice Department” through their failure to register under FARA.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service