Sean Hannity Podcast - April 22 2014 Hour 2

During the second hour of Sean Hannity’s talk radio show Tuesday, David Horowitz argued that the American Left’s attitudes on Israel and Islamo-fascism are promoting the rise of anti-Semitism.

Hannity invited on Horowitz and writer Joel Rosenberg to discuss America’s international security concerns and the role anti-Semitism played in recent global and domestic events. After citing the Obama administration’s troubling relationship with the Muslim Brotherhood, Hannity stated that recent stories suggested that “anti-Semitism was on the rise.”

Highlighting the anti-Semitic pamphlets circulated in Ukraine, Hannity said they sound reminiscent of Nazi Germany, “like those who seek a modern-day Holocaust.”

Horowitz agreed, arguing that a more sinister form of anti-Semitism was being inflamed, in part by the American Left. After highlighting the connections between the Kansas City shooter, Frazier Glenn Cross and the Democratic Party in part via the influence of Max Blumenthal, Horowitz argued that a clear “alliance” had developed between the American Left and Islamo-fascists:

Horowitz then stated that after the Second World War, “there was a certain intolerance” for anti-Semitic attitudes, but “thanks to the American Left... attacking Israel,” attitudes toward Israel began to deteriorate.

After stating that Palestinian leadership was united against Israel and the culture was “evil,” consistently celebrating terrorism—a characterization with which Rosenberg disagreed—Horowitz returned to the role of Obama in the Middle East, arguing that the president is “enabling the Iranians to get nuclear weapons.”

Hannity then turned to Rosenberg for his opinion of the growth of anti-Semitism in America. Rosenberg argued that it was undeniably growing internationally but rejected the idea that it was an increased problem in America. Horowitz strongly disagreed, saying "Excuse me, on campuses across this country, the American left is calling for the destruction of Israel. How can you say there's no anti-Semitism? The American Left is the fountainhead of anti-Semitism now."

When Rosenberg explained that he meant physical violence was not an increased threat in the U.S., Horowitz asserted, “It just takes a little time for the actual physical violence, believe me.”

Exchange begins 16:33.
Read at:

  • Currently 0/5 stars.

Views: 56


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center



Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service