What would justify armed revolution in America? Wild Bill answers.

Rating:
  • Currently 5/5 stars.

Views: 910

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Richard Rogers on July 3, 2012 at 11:23am

Illinois is in the same shape as Cali., The Dems here are out of control. I have sent letters and phoned DICK Durbin many times only to get letters back telling me that they do not agree with my stance on the issues I have complained about. These pinheads will not listen to us at all. I am currently looking for a job in a conservative state either AZ or Ind. or possibly Texas. This place is one big lib central and Obuma's home state, if we know where that really is?????

Comment by Pat Chadwell on July 3, 2012 at 9:55am

Wild Bill right about the votes.. Just look at what SEIU did for Harry Reid..10 points down as voting started and over 10 points up at the end.. Also the voting booth screens were seen changing before the voter hit enter and it changed from Angle to Reid. People made it know if the change but the Democratic election board said it was because the voter rubbed their coat sleeves on the screen changing the vote from Angle to Reid in Nevada. But the election board said the vote was not being changed by electronics...

Comment by Valerie Birge on July 3, 2012 at 9:24am

It's just a big, frustrating mess!  I've never been one to run away from a problem, but I keep thinking about what I heard my whole life in Alabama:  If at first you don't secede, try, try again!

Comment by hal lederer on July 3, 2012 at 9:07am

A VOTE DOESN'T MEAN ANYTHING IN CALIFORNIA. EITHER THE COURTS OR THE POLITICIANS WILL ALWAYS TURN IT IN THEIR FAVOR IF THEY DON'T AGREE WITH THE POPULAR VOTE. ARE WE READY TO PULL THE TRIGGER ON THOSE LEFT-WING COMMIES?? LET ME HEAR U!!!

Comment by sharon kalisz on July 3, 2012 at 9:02am

Google who is going to be counting our votes this November.  I read that a company in Spain has the contract to count our votes Please reseach if this is in fact true. 

Comment by Robert M Maritn on July 3, 2012 at 8:42am

I have for sometime have realized that our greatest enemy is among us. They are the Progressive Humanist Socialists who are nothing more than Marxists/Leninists who are based upon Class Warfare. These vermin are not to be denied until there is the need for a 2nd American Revolution! This Sovereign Constitutional Republic isgoing to happen as prophesied  by Thomas Jefferson - "The Tree of LIBERTY must be refreshed from time to time with the Blood of PATRIOTS and tyrants." He also said The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to BEAR ARMS is as a last resort to protect themselves against TYRANNY IN GOVERNMENT.   

Comment by Larry D Rambo on July 3, 2012 at 7:53am

Vote!!!! I agree with  this presentation.. Lets hope the American people will somehow come to their senses.  Remember that a "no vote" is the same as voting for Obama.

Comment by van nolan price on July 3, 2012 at 6:49am

I think slavery is a good reason for a revolt.

Comment by Alan Ott on July 3, 2012 at 6:07am

Never in his life had he seen a violation of the rights of the voters?  The 9th circuit court of appeals has done that stuff before...like when the people of California TRIED to save their state from the bankruptcy of bi-lingual existence and voted to be American-English only, only to have the 9th circuit court of appeals shoot down the will of the voters.  It HAS been done before.  It WILL happen again, until the corruption of our govt is torn down, either through MASSIVE reforms, or armed revolt, but either way, we cannot continue down this path much longer without SOMETHING happening.

Comment by Grace Polaris on July 3, 2012 at 5:15am

I love wild, Bill.

The war is on, now!

LIGHTER SIDE

ALERT ALERT

Clinton Donor And Tax Cheat Tied To Russia

“Do as we say, not as we do.”

That seems to be the slogan for Hillary Clinton and her political allies, and it’s especially apt in light of new information about one of Clinton’s largest campaign donors.

While the left is still trying to attack President Trump and his family over unproven business dealings and largely debunked connections to Russia, a new report indicates that it was Hillary Clinton’s team who were doing those exact things.

“Fox News has learned that one of the top donors to the ‘Hillary Victory Fund’ (HVF) in 2016 was a Los Angeles-based attorney who is alleged to have misused company funds to create his own $22 million real estate portfolio,” that outlet reported on Thursday.

“He has also been considered by California to be one of the state’s biggest tax cheats, and allegedly has ties to the (Russian) Kremlin,” Fox continued.

The man’s name is Edgar Sargsyan. His deep pockets greatly benefited Clinton’s campaign, with contributions of at least $250,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund in 2016.

He was also in charge of an elite fundraising dinner to benefit Clinton, where donors paid $100,000 per couple just to attend the ritzy event. But in true Clinton fashion, the money apparently went missing.

Sargsyan is now “being sued by his former company for allegedly diverting those funds to start his own real estate company,” according to Fox.

Now, people are asking hard questions about Clinton’s buddy Sargsyan, including whether his contributions were part of a pay-to-play scheme and if he had shady connections to foreign governments.

“Nobody gave to the Hillary Victory Fund out of the goodness of their heart or some generalized desire to help 33 random state parties,” pointed out attorney Dan Backer from the Committee to Defend the President.

“They did so to buy access and curry influence — something the Clintons have been selling for nearly three decades in and out of government,” he continued.

Trying to buy political influence is sadly common, especially when it comes to the Clintons. What is raising more red flags than normal, however, is the evidence that Sargsyan is no run-of-the-mill campaign donor.

“The really scary question is, what did this particular donor with this strange web of connections hope to buy for his quarter-million dollars?” Backer asked Fox News.

That web of connections is strange indeed.

The Committee to Defend the President is now alleging that SBK, a major Sargsyan-linked company “is an investment firm that is affiliated with United Arab Emirates president, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, and its international affiliate has business interests in Russia,” according to Fox.

“Among its dealings was a bid to finance $850 million for a major bridge project to connect Crimea with Russia,” the group claims.

“He worked for SBK, and SBK appears to have bid on some Crimean/Russian bridge project,” Backer said. “That’s usually an indicator of political favor and connections.”

It raises several chilling questions: Was Sargsyan paying a quarter million dollars to Clinton for political favors, and — more disturbingly — was that money actually from sources in Russia in order to smooth the way for its construction plans?

Nobody knows for sure. What is clear, however, is that there is a pattern of dirty money surrounding the Clintons, with the “Uranium One” and “Clinton Foundation” scandals just two of the most well-known examples.

“It reinforces how fast and loose the Clinton machine was when it came to ‘Hoovering up’ these megadonor checks, not just from questionable Hollywood and Wall Street elites but potentially from foreign influence peddlers using who knows what money,” Backer told Fox News.

“It reinforces the need to take a long hard look at not just the unlawful money laundering process, but the way in which they were solicited as well,” he continued. “The Clintons have never shown a great deal of concern for whomever it was cutting the checks — whether it’s foreign influence peddlers or Hollywood smut peddlers like Harvey Weinstein.”

If those claims are even partially true, then America dodged a bullet in November of 2016 — and it’s worth keeping the pile of foreign-connected Clinton scandals in mind the next time the left tries desperately to tie Donald Trump to Russia. Perhaps they should look in the mirror.

SLAVEHOLDER??

Washington Post Compares
Jeff Sessions To Slaveholder’

The Washington Post compared Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “slaveholders” after he quoted the Bible on Thursday while discussing his department’s policy of prosecuting all illegal immigrants who cross the border.

Sessions made the statement during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

WaPo ran a story entitled “Sessions cites Bible passage used to defend slavery in defense of separating immigrant families” by general assignment editor Keith McMillan and religion reporter Julie Zauzmer on Friday.

Rather than detailing the statistics Sessions cited in the speech that explain the immigration policy, the story quoted John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

“This is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made,” Fea said.

Sessions spent much of the speech discussing the numbers behind current immigration policy, including separating families at the Southwest border.

“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes,” Sessions said.

“Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful.”

“The previous administration wouldn’t prosecute aliens if they came with children,” Sessions said.

“It was de-facto open borders if you came with children. The results were unsurprising. More and more illegal aliens started showing up at the border with children.”

Sessions laid out the numbers in the speech.

“In 2013, fewer than 15,000 family units were apprehended crossing our border illegally between ports of entry in dangerous areas of the country,” he said.

“Five years later, it was more than 75,000, a five-fold increase in five years. It didn’t even have to be their child that was brought, it could be anyone. You can imagine that this created a lot of danger.”

The U.S. has the “opportunity” to fix its broken immigration system now, Sessions said.

“I believe that’s it’s moral, right, just and decent that we have a lawful system of immigration,” he said. “The American people have been asking for it.”

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service