What would justify armed revolution in America? Wild Bill answers.

Rating:
  • Currently 5/5 stars.

Views: 910

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Donna Rammer, mod on March 31, 2013 at 11:14pm

thanks! good common cents.

Comment by Peter van der Heiden on January 18, 2013 at 4:08pm

Yeah I think it is coming, people are tired of all the lying going on by the govt. I would have to watch from the sidelines, I'm lucky I can walk lol.

Comment by Virgil Earl Koon on January 9, 2013 at 10:13am

Looks like great fishing there! I totally agree with Wild Bill. We also remember several movies of the past. Death Wish in NYC and Death Wish 3 which took us back to NYC. We remember, also the movie, "A Few Good Men" where 2 Marines were found guilty for obeying their Commanding Officer. The ruling was Conduct unbecoming a Marine. I wonder if our servicemen and women will support their oath and not a bad Commander in Chief? Obama does not respect his oath of office as we all note from much of his actions against our people. As a veteran whose father also gave his life in WWII, we need all to support our rights given to us by our Constitution and our Amendments. It seems like, no matter how many of us desire and even insist on Obama being impeached, the media, somehow will cover it up.

Comment by Kathryn Schweigert on July 8, 2012 at 6:41am

I THINK ITS COMING SOON!!!  EVERYDAY THE TENSION BUILDS BETWEEN THE SOCIETY IN AMERICA AND IS LED BY THE LEFT RADICALS AND THE YOUNGER GERNERATIONS JUST FOLLOWS.

Comment by Douglas W. Rodrigues on July 5, 2012 at 12:31am

So James, what do you have in mind?  Should you just go along with the New World Order?

Comment by Douglas W. Rodrigues on July 4, 2012 at 11:45pm

Sun Tsu would probably have said to slowly kill off the opposing leadership because he wouldn't be able to take on a vast military army.  Considering that most Vetrans, such as myself, wouldn't want to be causing harm to anyone in the Military because our hearts are still with the military, the only practical revolt would be to asassinate those treasonous politicians responsible for the peril this country is in.  Through slow attrition, the "heads of the snake" will be reduced to a powerless base, probably fearing for their lives as they should be.  Everytime a traitor shows his head at a political function, someone would be nearby to put a bullet into it.  Given enough time, and knowing human nature, the majority of the anti-Constitutional (read: Communists inspired) politicians will fall into line and stop with the subversion.  However, those politicians who played a leading role in the slow overthrow of the Constitution will have to be executed.  They are like a social virus that cannot be allowed to live.  We already know the names of those involved.  The others requiring elimination would be the leadership of the subversive CFR, the Tri-Laterals, the Bilderbergers, George Soros, David Rockerfeller, and the FED.  They are all complicit in the slow overthrow of the Constitution of the United States.  With them, ANYTHING is possible, even the killing of people such as myself who state our opinions against the treason going on in government.  Patriots should arm themselves and be prepared to assume duties to function without contact with other like people.  If Obama actually created a Martial Law situation, without a doubt all communications will cease.  It will be up to individuals themselves to do what is required...to function as a one man assault team.   Only then can we rid ourselves of the traitors in government.  If what I said sounds extreme, consider this: The U.S. Military has a new MOS (job function) of Internment Camp guards.  Exactly who does the government want to put into intermnent camps?  Us?  Why did Obama's stooge Janet Napolitano just order 20 million rounds of ammunition?  Who does she plan on shooting up?  Us?  Bill Ayers, Obama's buddy once said, "As many as 20 million citizens may have to be eliminated to have socialism succeed."  I believe him.  Perhaps that's the reason for the new MOS...to keep millions of us separated from the rest of the sheep in society who meekly go along with the New World Order? 

Comment by Douglas W. Rodrigues on July 4, 2012 at 8:41pm

If the Washington politicians of both parties allow Barack Obama to proceed with the rumored Martial Law he supposedly has planned, then a violent revolution all that is left for patriotic citizens to do.  The treasonous politicians will be the targets of that bloody revolution, and the revolution won't end until every last one of them is put into a grave.  That's how it has to be.  Nothing else will make any difference.  The time for talk will be over.

Comment by Charles Bill L.CDurry on July 4, 2012 at 1:33pm

It just maybe a 2nd revolution is needed if the scoundrol #1 remains in office.Remember the tea party that was given with by our forfathers when the threw king george III taxed tea overboard.It maybe time for true americans to throw king george IV out of the USA.What do you say?

Comment by Douglas W. Rodrigues on July 4, 2012 at 9:24am

Elections haven't been fair since the so-called Liberals have decided that electioncheating is acceptable. 

Comment by Richard Rogers on July 3, 2012 at 11:26am

On top of that FOID cards are needed to buy ammo, can't carry. Friggin criminals here are on the loose with weapons. And they can't figure out how to reduce the crime rate, bunch of morons..... There is a big CCW movement but I do not think they will win against these Dems....

 

LIGHTER SIDE

The cartoonist's homepage, indystar.com/opinion/varvel

ALERT ALERT

Schumer Refusing To Help Border Kids
Wants To Hurt Trump Instead

The controversy over how underage illegal aliens are handled at the border is heating up — but Democrat Senator Chuck Schumer just rejected a good-faith proposal to fix the problem.

A growing number of people on both sides of the political aisle have expressed concern for border separations, which occur when migrants are caught breaking the law along the border while they have children with them, or when the often exploitative relationship between adults and minors at the border cannot be established.

A vast amount of mis-information and outright lying about the situation has muddied the water, making it tough to understand the situation in its entirety.

Both liberals and conservatives, however, have voiced their support for a better system that results in fewer family separations, and even President Donald Trump has indicated that he is willing to stand with Congress if they change the law.

Shockingly, however, it looks like one of the most well-known faces of the Democratic party isn’t willing to take action, and is instead playing politics in order to attack Trump.

On Tuesday, Schumer openly rejected a Republican proposal to fix the immigrant separation problem at the legislative level, and instead whined about the president.

“There are so many obstacles to legislation and when the president can do it with his own pen, it makes no sense,” Schumer stated, according to The Hill.

“Legislation is not the way to go here when it’s so easy for the president to sign it,” he complained.

Democrats Reject Bill To Keep Families Together At Border – Schumer Says He “Wants To Keep Focus On Trump”

Think about that for a second: The president’s job is to execute existing laws. The legislature’s job is to change or enact new laws when needed.

A senator elected to the legislature for exactly that purpose is now refusing to do his job and pass legislation, while simultaneously blaming the president for enforcing the existing laws, as he is sworn to do.

If there was any doubt that Schumer and the Democrats are playing politics instead of trying to actually help migrant families, the senator made his intentions clear: Obstruct and point fingers at Trump.

“Asked if that meant Democrats would not support a bill backed by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) to keep immigrant families together while seeking asylum on the U.S. border, Schumer said they want to keep the focus on Trump,” The Hill explained.

Make no mistake: The Democrats dragging their feet and refusing to back legislation already drafted by Republicans will prolong the problems at the border.

“Schumer’s opposition to a legislative fix means there likely won’t be a quick end to the emotional images of immigrant children being separated from their families unless Trump backs down,” The Hill reported.

“Democrats want to keep the pressure on Trump instead of having Congress assume responsibility for the growing crisis,” the news outlet continued.

Again: There’s a solution ready to go, with Republicans including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell ready to support it. Yet Democrats like Schumer apparently believe that scoring political points against Trump is more important than helping broken families on the border, even as their own liberal voters demand action.

“Congress alone can fix it,” stated Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen on Monday.

“I support, and all of the senators of the Republican conference support, a plan that keeps families together,” McConnell agreed.

“We need to fix the problem and it requires a legislative solution,” he said.

Yet Democrats refuse to budge.

This “do nothing but blame Trump” response from the left should prove beyond a doubt that all the tears and hand-wringing from liberals are disingenuous. They’re for show. If it was truly about helping innocent kids at the border, Schumer and his fellow Democrats could act right now.

If their priority was actually to solve the problem and help broken families, scoring points against Trump shouldn’t even be a concern. Even if they believed he was being stubborn on the issue, they could take the high road by doing their jobs and supporting bipartisan legislation.

They don’t, because solving the problem was never their goal. They are playing political games and using devastated children as pawns, while pretending that the president is the monster.

That’s sick… and the American people need to see exactly who is doing the obstruction.

SLAVEHOLDER??

Washington Post Compares
Jeff Sessions To Slaveholder’

The Washington Post compared Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “slaveholders” after he quoted the Bible on Thursday while discussing his department’s policy of prosecuting all illegal immigrants who cross the border.

Sessions made the statement during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

WaPo ran a story entitled “Sessions cites Bible passage used to defend slavery in defense of separating immigrant families” by general assignment editor Keith McMillan and religion reporter Julie Zauzmer on Friday.

Rather than detailing the statistics Sessions cited in the speech that explain the immigration policy, the story quoted John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

“This is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made,” Fea said.

Sessions spent much of the speech discussing the numbers behind current immigration policy, including separating families at the Southwest border.

“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes,” Sessions said.

“Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful.”

“The previous administration wouldn’t prosecute aliens if they came with children,” Sessions said.

“It was de-facto open borders if you came with children. The results were unsurprising. More and more illegal aliens started showing up at the border with children.”

Sessions laid out the numbers in the speech.

“In 2013, fewer than 15,000 family units were apprehended crossing our border illegally between ports of entry in dangerous areas of the country,” he said.

“Five years later, it was more than 75,000, a five-fold increase in five years. It didn’t even have to be their child that was brought, it could be anyone. You can imagine that this created a lot of danger.”

The U.S. has the “opportunity” to fix its broken immigration system now, Sessions said.

“I believe that’s it’s moral, right, just and decent that we have a lawful system of immigration,” he said. “The American people have been asking for it.”

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service