Radical Plan to Disrupt Inaguration Exposed

Roger Stone says that he wants to talk about what is coming to Washington because it is scary. While there will be exhaustive layers of protection for the Americans attending the inauguration of our next president, the leftist radicals are quite brazen in their plans to disrupt the events, in some ways violently.

Stone reveals, “We had an operative who infiltrated the J20 committee planning session. And let me go through what these folks have in mind because this is not some benign, civilly disobedient protest. They intend to march from McPherson Square to Columbus Square. They are going to march during the lunch period immediately after the inauguration, approximately 12:30 pm. Their goal is to ‘create a sense of crisis.’

read more:

  • Currently 0/5 stars.

Views: 609


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Robert J Trice on December 23, 2016 at 7:29pm

We are under assault from the Progressive left they can't except the fact that America people have voted them out of power and want to America to be the light on the hill that Ronald Reagan spoke about

Comment by John Barr on December 23, 2016 at 6:58pm

Having trouble posting to this page [ [ [ [

Will try again later 0 0 0 0 0 :)

Comment by Honest Glenn on December 23, 2016 at 5:01pm

I read that Putin issued an International Warrant for the arrest (Dead Or Alive) of Sorry a** Soros & I hope they get him real soon! They should have a big bounty on that Worthless BO supporter! 

Comment by sharon ostwinch on December 23, 2016 at 4:44pm

Never have i seen such horrid behavior.  This is beyond sickening.

Comment by Robert L Fredrickson on December 23, 2016 at 1:20pm

Bikers will be there. Don't think there will be many snowflakes who want to take them on. If they do it will be the only time.

Comment by Archie C B on December 23, 2016 at 1:06pm

OK, great place for the Left to pick up their free chest cavity shots, fractured skulls programs, etc. Put a round in it already.

Comment by Ruth Webster on December 23, 2016 at 12:23pm

@ Marilyn Calkins

No, Marilyn, I was NOT on the phone all the time.  I know the difference between a sarcastic comment and a serious threat.

Yes, a verbal assault is still an assault.  Do you honestly think that the Secret Service would have let this guy touch her???

Yes, I DO know MANY Secret Service Agents personally.

I am also a veteran, and WE ALL had to go through briefings that described the difference between a real and an imagined threat.

I am sure you think I am quite stupid, but I can assure you that I am NOT.

And of course there were Secret Service agents outside in the terminal!!  These two men were NOT just removed from the flight.  They were detained in the airport, interviewed by law enforcement, interviewed by Air Marshals, etc.

The best way to shut down someone who is harassing you is to ignore them.  These two men were looking for a confrontation ON THE PLANE.  THEY DID NOT GET IT.


Comment by Ruth Webster on December 23, 2016 at 12:16pm

@Marilyn calkins --

I said never PHYSICALLY threatened her.  Further, had the Secret Service stepped in -- rather than waiting to confront the couple OUTSIDE in the TERMINAL -- it would have been a MUCH bigger scene.

Ivanka HERSELF said, "NO HARM DONE!"  And she handled the situation with grace and good manners.

BIG difference than the way these people acted.  Getting in someone's face is NOT a PHYSICAL threat.

There's a huge difference between making a scene and refusing to lower yourself to someone else's standards.

I don't know about you, but that is how I was raised and it has done me quite well in my 62-1/2 years.

Besides, can you imagine the negative press that her father would have gotten had she MADE a big deal out of two SMALL MINDED FOOLS who decided to cause a disturbance?

Comment by Debbie on December 23, 2016 at 11:49am

Comment by Harry Rainey - Sheepdog on December 23, 2016 at 10:55am

After President Trump takes office, he then signs Federal arrest warrants for George Soros, BLM leaders and Hillary Clinton for inciting riots with violence. George Soros should then be taken to the Russian Embassy and handed over to them as a gift to President Putin. BLM leaders should be banished to Liberia, an American Colony, the Africans would take good care of them.  Hillary can enjoy the lavish life at Club Levinworth. Also there is a Petition on Change.org to Hunter College demand the Professor resign immediately and messages are being left at that college for the actions of one of their staff.



Refugee Complains:
‘Too Many Laws’ In Western World

 During a recent interview with local media in Australia, a Sudanese refugee and mother of six suggested that the Australian government deserves the blame for her eldest son’s propensity for crime.

According to Nine News, Asha Awya’s eldest son is an unemployed gang member who has spent time in prison. Instead of pinning the blame for her son’s actions on him, however, Awya feels the Australian government deserves it for passing “too many laws.”

She said so during an appearance last week on the Australian program “A Current Affair,” where she also appeared to slam actual Australians for allegedly not making it easy for refugees to assimilate.

“They (her kids) came from a very traumatized environment, and coming to Australia, trying to fit in with the religion and the friends around them at school, is very challenging,” she said. “We have all these laws, so it’s just very confusing, and I feel sorry for the kids because they don’t know how to deal with this.”

But that’s not all. Awya also complained that the government provides her with too little money.

“The Centrelink money is not enough,” she said, referencing a welfare program operated by the Australian government’s Department of Human Services.

“Sometimes I cut some of their entertainment,” she added, saying in effect that she sometimes stops handing out allowances so as to reduce her costs.

And this, she believes, only serves to incentivize her son’s desire to commit crime.

“If mum always not giving me money, there’s no pocket money, then maybe I have to find a way of stealing and get my own money,” she said, articulating what she believes goes through her son’s mind.

So even though the Australian government graciously (and perhaps naively) allowed this Sundanese woman to migrate to the country, she basically resents this same government because it refuses to lavishly provide for her and her family’s every single need, including their desire for entertainment.

Behold the perfect example of a spoiled-rotten, ungrateful refugees, ladies and gentlemen.

You know, the media often accuse those who criticize their respective governments for allowing refugees to flood their neighborhoods of harboring racist views. If only it were that simple.

Many Westerners, including your truly — a citizen whose family immigrated to the West from India over three decades ago — take issue with the behavior of refugees.

Besides making nary an effort to assimilate, many refugees wind up on welfare, eschewing hard work and effort for a life of government subsistence and oftentimes a life of crime as well.

Now, consider what Awya told “A Current Affair” and answer me this: Is it really “racist” that Westerners such as yours truly prefer that migrants such as her remain in their own country instead of being allowed to migrate to ours?

Please share this story on Facebook and Twitter and let us know what you think about this Sudanese refugee’s disgusting lack of gratitude.

What do you think about this migrant trying to blame her son’s behavior on the Australian government? Scroll down to comment below!


© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service