We find our selves in a sad place where local municipalities are stepping all over peoples freedom with the signing of a pen.

  • Currently 0/5 stars.

Views: 528

Favorite of 1 person


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by robert cosenza on September 21, 2014 at 12:37pm

we the people,who are the real government.would you let us know a name as we want to start calling and emailing these people who sent you this notice,you said a jay something.as we won,t allow these treasonous traitors to dictate there unamerician agenda to we the people.don,t let anybody jam anything unamerican down your throat.jam it back down there throats with both feet.god bless american veterans/citizens.stay alerted/focused/prepared

Comment by Pete F on September 10, 2014 at 6:53am

Bet if he hung the trans africa or gay flag they would leave him alone 

Comment by Mark A Mills on September 10, 2014 at 3:49am

Sell me a flag,take five dollars towards flag defense fund

Comment by Gray Jones on September 9, 2014 at 7:28pm

I dug deep into Ocala's Municode. Under exemptions: (7) "Governmental or religious flags or insignia and holiday decorations incidental to the business and customarily associated with any national, religious or local holiday." Seems this guys flag is exempted...Semper Fi Nam 66-67

Comment by Rafael Garcia, USA ABN,1SG (Ret) on September 9, 2014 at 3:23pm

Recall your city council members. Put someone in there that will follow the Constitution. Everyone in Ocala should show their support by hanging the same flag in homes and businesses. One of the biggest problem we have now is we vote for people to represent us, instead they want to speak and force their decisions on us. This is getting out of control. There is now a city or town trying to pass a law making it mandatory to carry an orange flag when crossing the street. Are you kidding?

Comment by CJ on September 9, 2014 at 2:16pm

This Is WHAT HAPPENS, when you vote Communist onto your City and County Boards!

Comment by Mary Gomez on September 9, 2014 at 2:07pm
Comment by John King on September 9, 2014 at 2:04pm

Hey Guys, Give your lawyers this piece of information: It's in the bill of rights, it states the following,

Given the primacy that the framers assigned to the values the First Amendment embodies, it is fitting that freedom of expression should be the first freedom cited in the Bill of Rights. In other words it is the first article in the bill of rights. If they fine you, they them selves are braking the law. A federal law I might add. Look it up?

Comment by John King on September 9, 2014 at 1:54pm

Tell the city kiss your ass, it's called freedom of expression. If they don't like it to bad. I support these Guys. They need to give us their web site address, so we can support them. I also think I will put my don't tread on me flag  up in support of these guys?

Comment by JOHN CAPDEVIELLE on September 9, 2014 at 1:09pm
I'm in NYC, about the only thing I could buy from him is that flag. Hope all goes well.



Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service