England Warns America: Don't let them take your guns

England grabbed its citizens guns in 1997. Crime skyrocketed as the law-abiding were disarmed. The English citizens have a message for Americans.

  • Currently 5/5 stars.

Views: 1023


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by James B. Wheedleton on January 3, 2013 at 7:39am

The greatest civilization is one where all citizens can defend themselves equally, maintains the right to bear arms, which means they can only be persuaded by logic and intelligent argument. They will never be forced and never ruled by their government but instead united, guided and protected by a government for the people, by the people!!  

Comment by Christina Latchford on December 28, 2012 at 2:01pm

A clear warning that no one can, no should even slightly, ignore.

And remember, doctors are now asking questions about your mental health at every office visit, and they also are now including a question regarding if you have guns in your house.  DON'T ANSWER ANY OF IT.

Yes, they will try to confiscate our guns, fiercely.  Let them come and get 'em,  and see what happens!

Comment by al pambuena on December 27, 2012 at 11:22pm

look what happened to australia..they spent millions confiscating guns from citizens, and homicides went up 44 percent. why these know it all washington desk jockies think they are smarter than anyone else is beyond me....but everytime something happens in this country, they think they have to pass a law. try to get answers from washington, as to why they are stockpiling millions of rounds of ammunition in government buildings around washington......i think obamas crime syndicate, is setting us up...and everyone in this country should go out and buy a gun today.

Comment by TIM CHRISOLM on December 27, 2012 at 9:27pm

Hey John, thanks for the reply. You made some great points and I certainly agree. I think from a rhetorical perspective I wonder how this will play out. Will they come for our guns? Which seems to have already been answered. Will we resist? Who will blink first? Will the US military take sides? The country is divided. If you take into account the Nov election results, (provided there is no fraud) we seem to be outnumbered. So to rid them by the ballot is not an option. The problem is in the people of this nation. Moral decay, sexual promiscuity, love of money/self etc. Basically, end times signs. Obama himself is Gods judgement on a nation who once knew him, but has now turned its back on him. So what will become of our once great nation? Will there be bloodshed? There are many questions to be answered. If you wanna see a really cool pic enter the search phrase "Jesus in a tornado in Jarrell Texas" Theres a really "inspiring" pic there. And it is 100% real. Again, thanks for the reply and I look forward to hearing from you again. Tim

Comment by john smithson on December 27, 2012 at 6:53pm

Thanks Ralph: Tim-oh ye of little faith, your questions have been answered a 1000 times here already, countless times on other Christian, Conservative, Constitutional sites. A couple of days ago I listed many groups that totaled 50 million loyal Americans, Christians for the most part & all Constitutionalists, most Right Conservatives. Not one will give up their guns to anyone at anytime. I stopped at 50 million I could have went on, stupid me thinking people would get it. However for the most part my God is bigger than all of us or these temp situations. Tim where is your faith, you wouldntbe asking questions like this, remember my friend it only takes faith as the size of a mustard seed. Politicians in DC go to hell, back where you came from, satan your daddy is calling

Comment by TIM CHRISOLM on December 27, 2012 at 6:13pm

So what are we gonna do? We could have voted Obama out, but that didnt work. He found a way to lie and cheat his way in for 4 more years. So do we recoil and try to "wait out" the next 4 years and hope we can "do better next time?" Seriously, what are our options? Do we wait for them to make the first move and react accordingly? Do we pre empt the first move? Chances are if we do nothing they will have achieved their goal in 4 years. Theres much to consider. Half of the population agrees with Obamas agenda. Or so they would like to say "As evidenced by the last election" Diane Feinstein plans to begin gun ban legislation next month. Theyre coming. Ready or not.

Comment by Vladimir Val Cymbal on December 27, 2012 at 6:07pm

Every dictator and dictator wannabe throughout history has had disarming the populous on the agenda.  All those politicians wanting to take our guns, are protected by some kind of security or they them selves are packing.  There has never been a successful revolution by an unarmed populous.  The Gestapo would not have been so successful with sending people to the gas chambers if the people were armed.  An unarmed citizenry is very tempting to leaders who are eager to rule by edicts.  Some times the temptation is too great for them to resist.  We must not let the Obama administration have that much temptation. 

Comment by Janice Bloomfield on December 27, 2012 at 1:37pm

DC-you are corrupt- from bogus agreement not to say the dems fraudulently took the election, to the absolute gutless wonders we have walking the halls--and govnt workers have vested interest in keeping gov as big as poss--job security.   

Comment by donald e. burkhardt on December 27, 2012 at 1:36pm

All Politicians, men and women have no idea what they are talking about when they say "taking guns out of the hands of All Americans" will save lives - a gun cannot go out on the street and start firing randomly at people and killing anyone of them at will - it takes a trigger happy idiot to aim the gun and pull the trigger - take all the guns off the market, outlaw their ownership and the only people that gain from such action is the criminally insane people who can find guns anywhere - they just have to ask - the people who get hurt are the ones you disarm - they are prone to being killed by the nuts out there that have no sense of happiness - just cold blooded killing - all the Politico's have to do is make it an inforceable law that all aspects of a persons background should be checked, i.e., credit history, military association any and all medical records that can be obtained, family history and neighborhood living standards and any and all Police filings - from this they should be able to determine if the person is a gun crazy idiot or a God Fearing Citizen - Gun ConfiscatingNO NO NO - better checks YES YES YES


Comment by Gene Szymanski on December 27, 2012 at 1:09pm

I promise you will burn in the fires of hell before I surrender my weapons.

Diamond & Silk

Tea Party
Facebook & Twitter


Breaking: Jury Sides With Sheriff Joe
Smacks Down Establishment GOP’s Lawsuit

A jury has sided in favor of conservative icon, former Sheriff Joe Arpaio, against the lawsuit filed by Austin Flake, the son of GOP establishment Senator Jeff Flake, and Austin’s ex-wife, Logan Brown.

Flake and Brown had filed a lawsuit against the Arizona sheriff for “malicious prosecution” after over a dozen dogs died on their watch at a Gilbert dog kennel.

The jury decided Flake and Brown had failed to provide sufficient evidence to back up their accusations of malicious prosecution by Arpaio, The Associated Press reported via Tucson.com.

Flake and Brown ran the kennel while Brown’s parents were out of town in 2014, the AP reported.

The two were still in college.

Initially, Flake and Brown were charged in the incident, but the charges were dropped at the prosecution’s request. Later, Flake’s in-laws pleaded guilty to animal cruelty charges after an expert determined that the facility air conditioner failed because it was not properly maintained.

Thus, the owners of the kennel were responsible for the death of the 21 dogs, and they answered for their crimes.

Nonetheless, Flake and Brown reportedly alleged that Arpaio had charged them to gain publicity and deal damage to Senator Flake — an establishment fixture within the GOP.

The two “contended the charges caused them emotional distress, contributed to the demise of their marriage and led the senator’s son to being suspended from college for an honor-code violation,” according to The Associated Press.

Despite the jury’s decision, the U.S. District Judge Neil V. Wake will not issue a final verdict until the defense explains why it didn’t turn over documents that may have benefited the plaintiffs, according to a statement from the plaintiffs’ attorney to The Associated Press.

“The struggle to hold government officials accountable has always required a steep, perilous climb,” the plaintiffs’ attorney said in a Friday statement according to KNPX.

“Although we disagree with the jury’s verdict, we are grateful we had the opportunity to force former Sheriff Arpaio and his subordinates at Maricopa County to account for their indisputably reckless conduct. Near the end of the trial, we discovered that the County failed to turn over documents that might have helped us prove our case,” he continued.

“The Court has ordered the County to explain its failure and indicated that it will not enter a final judgment in the case until a satisfactory explanation is provided. We will access our future options in this fight when the County complies with the Court’s Order.”

Charges that didn’t pan out are an annoyance to those affected — there’s no question of that.

But to claim that those charges — which were dropped — were the reason behind a failed marriage, and that Arpaio needs to pay is completely ridiculous.

What do you think about this story? Please share this on Facebook and Twitter and let us know!

Are you glad about the jury’s decision? Scroll down to comment below!


© 2017   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service