Diane Feinstein Gun ban in 1995 - She wanted to Ban all guns, Force turn in

"Diane Feinstein Gun ban in 1995 - She wanted to Ban all guns, Force turn in"

Rating:
  • Currently 0/5 stars.

Views: 855

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Edward Ducy on January 1, 2013 at 7:59pm

marc- you should start preparing now.  Get everyone on your street to get a license to carry firearms & arm them; set up an armed Neighborhood Watch in which if someone on the street has an intruder, they contact the rest of the members of the street unit & all respond armed to the location of the problem.  Everyone in the unit should have a ham radio- portable or base to stay in communications.  WE THE PEOPLE MUST BEGIN PROTECTING EACH OTHER STREET BY STREET.

Comment by marc s ruby on January 1, 2013 at 3:20pm

This Country is in F**KEN Freefall !!!!  Fraud President ,Disarm the People , 'Constitution out the Window !!! We are now Subjects !!!! of the NWO , Globalist !! Elite !!!

Comment by Samuel M. Smith on January 1, 2013 at 3:19pm

I am a member of two Tea Party organizations; Tea Party Command Post and Tea Party Patriots. Which will provide the leadership to establish a NATIONAL Political Party to replace the now compromising, not-to-be trusted Republican Party? Can these organizations work together as one and bring Common Sense Democrats, Common Sense Republicans and Common Sense Independents together into a party that can BEAT the Socialist Democratic Party?

Let there be no mistake.  If House Republicans ratify the Senate Bill as it stands, while it may seem popular for a few days or weeks until the effects of that compromise are plain to see, the Republican Party will be DEAD as far as voters are concerned. We will be essentially a One Party System. That one party may keep the name Democrat, as many serf-republics of the U.S.S.R. were titled, or they could change to Socialist or Communist, but make no mistake we are within a few breaths of becoming a One-Party nation. Lets get the Tea Party or whatever the chosen leadership of our party and members vote, MOVING FORWARD BEFORE IT BECOMES ILLEGAL TO DO SO.

Comment by Samuel M. Smith on January 1, 2013 at 3:01pm

As of today, January 1, 2013, the news is that the Republican Party MUST vote to OPPOSE the Senate "Fiscal Cliff" bill the Senate Republicans caved and voted for or the RNC may as well close its offices and get out of town before they can't! We are almost the U. S. version of the Bolshevik Revolution. If HOUSE Republicans cave like the ones in the Senate did, the two party system in the U. S. is DEAD . Persons  elected to the House and Senate need to assure their own safety, then declare they are no more Republican but TEA Party.

Meanwhile, the TeaParty needs to formally unite into ONE National Political Party and become legally recognized IMMEDIATELY, or we may not be allowed to by our ONE PARTY Democrat/Socialist controlled government. Look at history of the Soviet Union in the 1920's and see what we can expect.

One major difference: Karl Marxian Socialism is anti any god.American Socialism has a potential Josef Stalin leader who is pro Muslim with Allah as god. Already, for up to two years already, some judges have heard cases based on Muslim Shariah Law, which gives the Muslim man total rights over his wife or wives and children.

We are currently providing shelter in our home to a young mother who was attacked by her husband at knife-point and their 6 and 3 year old children witnessed it. He is now in prison, but under Shariah Law, he could be released and come kill all three of them, if he declares to follow Allah and become a Muslim. He might even be allowed to kill my wife and family for harboring them and if I refuse to become Muslim, kill me for allowing it.

As the late Charles B. Galloway so brilliantly points out in Christianity and the American Commonwealth book, nations grow and build as long as there is a solid religious base, even non-Judeo-Christian religions, but when religion becomes irrelevant the nation soon collapses, as we can see happening already in the U. S. Still, the Soviet Union, with the No God laws, survived seventy years. But the U. S. version of Socialism with the addition of the Muslim religion mandatory when Obama suspends the U. S. Constitution, might last even longer.

Get ready folks. Read your world history with emphasis on the early Soviet Union. Read your Bible, particularly Daniel, Matthew and Revelation. Then PRAY, PRAY, PRAY, EARNESTLY AND EFFECTUALLY, making sure that you are righteous in Almighty God Jehovah's (Yahweh's) eyes.

And pray for me and my family, as I work to complete my book, DEATH of FREEDOM in AMERICA: An Indictment of All Christian Churches. If the church had maintained First Century power of God authority after the establishment of this nation, we would not have most of the problems we have today.

Comment by Robert N. Cowley on January 1, 2013 at 10:55am

Feinstein and the rest of them can have all my guns when they pry them out of my cold dead hands.

Comment by Mark W Boucher on January 1, 2013 at 10:12am

@ ken  ALMOST ALL OF THEM JUST TRAMPLE IT , WHAT DO YOU EXPECT FROM A MAN WHO HATES OUR NATIONAL ANTHEM DISRESPECTS THE MILITARY BY HOLDING ONTO HIS BALLS WHILE IT`S PLAYING, WHEN MEMBERS OF THE MILITARY CAME HOME DEAD I COULD READ MICHELLES LIPS SAYING ALL THIS FOR A FLAG. THIS THIS NO PRESIDENT THAT I CAN RESPECT. HOW HE GOT ANOTHER TERM IS BEYOND ME .IN MY WILDEST DREAMS I NEVER THOUGHT A PRESIDENT WOULD LIE SO MUCH

Comment by M16ark58 on January 1, 2013 at 10:07am

Constitution? Freakenstein lied when "taking and swearing" the oath to uphold and protect the Constitution of the United States. She has herself deluded into believing that she is able to do this singlehandedly, however once again, Insane/Hussian is definitely as antigun as this crazed bitch, and it wouldn't surprise me if he dictated executive orders saying his orders override the Constitution, and demand one and all to surrender ALL TYPES AND FORMS OF FIREARMS!

Comment by Rafael Garcia, USA ABN,1SG (Ret) on January 1, 2013 at 7:22am

If you disarm Americans, criminals will be the leased of our worries. Our enemies are standing in the background waiting to make their move once our weapons are removed. We have some really stupid people in Washington making some really stupid decisions. Want to control violent criminal acts? Make the sentences quick and stiffer. I can never understand why we do more for the criminals than the victims. NC just took three murders off death row not because they were not guilty or doubts about their involvement but because it's the humane thing to do. What about the victims who all died violent deaths. You want a good law? Try this; if you break into someone's home or attempt to kidnap, rape, rob, and the criminal is shot in the process; Game over! Your faith will be decided by your victim.

Comment by Ken Locke on January 1, 2013 at 5:59am

she asks Mr and Mrs. America to turn in their guns.

apparently she has forgot the Oath she took and that WE have a Constitution and Bill of Rights.

 

 

 

Comment by Greg Stone on January 1, 2013 at 4:10am

Another idiot that does not have a clue what she is doing or asking. I wonder if she believes the criminals will actually turn theirs in...DUH...  that's why their called criminals... WE THE PEOPLE must never turn in our weapons!!!

LIGHTER SIDE

ALERT ALERT

Clinton Donor And Tax Cheat Tied To Russia

“Do as we say, not as we do.”

That seems to be the slogan for Hillary Clinton and her political allies, and it’s especially apt in light of new information about one of Clinton’s largest campaign donors.

While the left is still trying to attack President Trump and his family over unproven business dealings and largely debunked connections to Russia, a new report indicates that it was Hillary Clinton’s team who were doing those exact things.

“Fox News has learned that one of the top donors to the ‘Hillary Victory Fund’ (HVF) in 2016 was a Los Angeles-based attorney who is alleged to have misused company funds to create his own $22 million real estate portfolio,” that outlet reported on Thursday.

“He has also been considered by California to be one of the state’s biggest tax cheats, and allegedly has ties to the (Russian) Kremlin,” Fox continued.

The man’s name is Edgar Sargsyan. His deep pockets greatly benefited Clinton’s campaign, with contributions of at least $250,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund in 2016.

He was also in charge of an elite fundraising dinner to benefit Clinton, where donors paid $100,000 per couple just to attend the ritzy event. But in true Clinton fashion, the money apparently went missing.

Sargsyan is now “being sued by his former company for allegedly diverting those funds to start his own real estate company,” according to Fox.

Now, people are asking hard questions about Clinton’s buddy Sargsyan, including whether his contributions were part of a pay-to-play scheme and if he had shady connections to foreign governments.

“Nobody gave to the Hillary Victory Fund out of the goodness of their heart or some generalized desire to help 33 random state parties,” pointed out attorney Dan Backer from the Committee to Defend the President.

“They did so to buy access and curry influence — something the Clintons have been selling for nearly three decades in and out of government,” he continued.

Trying to buy political influence is sadly common, especially when it comes to the Clintons. What is raising more red flags than normal, however, is the evidence that Sargsyan is no run-of-the-mill campaign donor.

“The really scary question is, what did this particular donor with this strange web of connections hope to buy for his quarter-million dollars?” Backer asked Fox News.

That web of connections is strange indeed.

The Committee to Defend the President is now alleging that SBK, a major Sargsyan-linked company “is an investment firm that is affiliated with United Arab Emirates president, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, and its international affiliate has business interests in Russia,” according to Fox.

“Among its dealings was a bid to finance $850 million for a major bridge project to connect Crimea with Russia,” the group claims.

“He worked for SBK, and SBK appears to have bid on some Crimean/Russian bridge project,” Backer said. “That’s usually an indicator of political favor and connections.”

It raises several chilling questions: Was Sargsyan paying a quarter million dollars to Clinton for political favors, and — more disturbingly — was that money actually from sources in Russia in order to smooth the way for its construction plans?

Nobody knows for sure. What is clear, however, is that there is a pattern of dirty money surrounding the Clintons, with the “Uranium One” and “Clinton Foundation” scandals just two of the most well-known examples.

“It reinforces how fast and loose the Clinton machine was when it came to ‘Hoovering up’ these megadonor checks, not just from questionable Hollywood and Wall Street elites but potentially from foreign influence peddlers using who knows what money,” Backer told Fox News.

“It reinforces the need to take a long hard look at not just the unlawful money laundering process, but the way in which they were solicited as well,” he continued. “The Clintons have never shown a great deal of concern for whomever it was cutting the checks — whether it’s foreign influence peddlers or Hollywood smut peddlers like Harvey Weinstein.”

If those claims are even partially true, then America dodged a bullet in November of 2016 — and it’s worth keeping the pile of foreign-connected Clinton scandals in mind the next time the left tries desperately to tie Donald Trump to Russia. Perhaps they should look in the mirror.

SLAVEHOLDER??

Washington Post Compares
Jeff Sessions To Slaveholder’

The Washington Post compared Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “slaveholders” after he quoted the Bible on Thursday while discussing his department’s policy of prosecuting all illegal immigrants who cross the border.

Sessions made the statement during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

WaPo ran a story entitled “Sessions cites Bible passage used to defend slavery in defense of separating immigrant families” by general assignment editor Keith McMillan and religion reporter Julie Zauzmer on Friday.

Rather than detailing the statistics Sessions cited in the speech that explain the immigration policy, the story quoted John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

“This is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made,” Fea said.

Sessions spent much of the speech discussing the numbers behind current immigration policy, including separating families at the Southwest border.

“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes,” Sessions said.

“Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful.”

“The previous administration wouldn’t prosecute aliens if they came with children,” Sessions said.

“It was de-facto open borders if you came with children. The results were unsurprising. More and more illegal aliens started showing up at the border with children.”

Sessions laid out the numbers in the speech.

“In 2013, fewer than 15,000 family units were apprehended crossing our border illegally between ports of entry in dangerous areas of the country,” he said.

“Five years later, it was more than 75,000, a five-fold increase in five years. It didn’t even have to be their child that was brought, it could be anyone. You can imagine that this created a lot of danger.”

The U.S. has the “opportunity” to fix its broken immigration system now, Sessions said.

“I believe that’s it’s moral, right, just and decent that we have a lawful system of immigration,” he said. “The American people have been asking for it.”

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service