Chairman Gowdy's Opening Statement at First Benghazi Select Committee Hearing

Chairman Gowdy's opening statement at first Benghazi Select Committee hearing on the implementation of the ARB report.

  • Currently 0/5 stars.

Views: 712

Favorite of 1 person


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Don R. Sherwood on October 25, 2014 at 6:01am

At a minimum, in the interim, Trey Gowdy SHOULD REPLACE "Cry Baby" John Boehner as SPEAKER of the HOUSE!

Comment by Barbara Tamargo on October 24, 2014 at 4:29pm

I think Trey Gowdy deserves to be the next President of America. He has the guts and the brains to fulfill the duties of the President. People need to get in touch with their congressman and demand that they support Mr. Gowdy and urge him to run for President for the republican party. America needs this man very badly. Maybe then the rest of the world will once again respect us.

Comment by Joseph T. Ward on September 19, 2014 at 9:55am


Comment by Don R. Sherwood on September 19, 2014 at 5:46am

I'm not sure how Speaker Boehner and Congress allowed such a good and competent man, like Rep. Trey Gowdy, to become chairman of the Behgnazi committee?  They departed from their normal pattern of obfuscation and inaction.

Thankfully, Rep. Gowdy is truly competent and will likely get somewhere, at least exposing reality, even if Congress DOES ITS USUAL NOTHING, we will hear the truth!

Comment by Merissa on September 18, 2014 at 3:37pm

Trey Gowdy for President is the best  idea I've  heard all day!

Comment by Patricia on September 18, 2014 at 1:58pm

Trey Gowdy is a hero! May God bless and protect this amazing man.

Comment by Michael J Nellett on September 18, 2014 at 12:36pm

Mr. Leinbach the president, the Speaker of the House, ALL members of Congress, including the Senate Majority LEADER, ALL judge including the Supreme Court have sworn an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States. The Constitution IS the Supreme Law of the land! Why would you be against someone who is a strict constitutionalism?

Comment by Michael S. Leinbach on September 18, 2014 at 12:12pm

Trey Deserves to be PRESIDENT.

People who think he should be Speaker or something else don't understand how Constitutional this man truly is.

Comment by Peggy Durrwachter on September 18, 2014 at 10:26am
Good for Gowdy!
Comment by pahrumper on September 18, 2014 at 9:23am

Close your eyes and imagine,,,President Ben, VP Palin, Sec def Allen West, Speaker Tray, and it goes on. Don't you just imagine the resluts to those Islam rag-heads to that. Mo-Hammod the camel humper would turn over in his grave if in fact he was even buried.



Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service