Bill O'Reilly Calls Out Moron Sheila Jackson Lee & Spells it Out For her M-O-R-O-N

Too much. Bill O'Reilly blasted Dem Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee for her nutty comments comparing the US border crisis to the ISIS war in Syria.

  • Currently 5/5 stars.

Views: 864


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Roger Mann on July 13, 2014 at 3:07pm

Why do I have to log in for every Tea Party story once a day should do!

Comment by Joe Tatman on July 10, 2014 at 5:54pm

TO Charles Imwold!  Where are you getting your information about Bill O'Reilly??  From Sheila Jack--f Lee?  To say that Bill is an admirer of Obamorat, is just plan crazy!! Get your facts straight before you spout off.  Or.....are you a "closet lover" of the half-breed faggot in the WH? 

Comment by Joe Tatman on July 10, 2014 at 5:47pm

Sheila (Affirmative Action) Lee is nothing but a crazy bi--h!  Can you believe she was once a judge?  A white person that appeared before her was SCREWED, ROYALLY!!   But she is black and a mouth the spits out shit, has the LOW KNOWLEDGE people convinced she knows what hell she is talking about!  

Hey, you LOW KNOWLEDGED TYPES,  get your asses back to school so you can  understand what's going on!! 

Comment by Melony B. DeFord on July 10, 2014 at 5:25pm

Douglas W. Rodrigues 

Can anyone imagine the stupid decisions she made as a Judge?

She was a judge? OMG!!!

Comment by Charles S Imwold on July 10, 2014 at 4:00pm

Bill the Blow Hard O'Reilly is trying to save what integrity he has left by stating the obvious . It does not take a so called Harvard grad to know that Sheila Jackson Lee is an idiot . But good old Bill O'Reilly will defend the fraud and usurper barack hussein obama to his dying day . Bill O'Reilly  is looking out for his Alma mater Harvard University . For if it ever got that his Alma mater Harvard University sold their educational integrity for twenty million dollars and GAVE the fraud and usurper barack hussein obama a diploma from their prestigious institution a diploma from Harvard University would not be worth the paper it is written on . 

Comment by robert mullally on July 10, 2014 at 1:41pm

Correct, Terry, "you can't debate liberals." Add progressive to the mix and not only the debate is futile, but  an "Audacity of Hope," or an Occupy Wall Street ensues!!!  And worse.  Just look at all the places run by liberal progressives, [Chicago, Detroit, WH, etc.]; and now the world!!!  See what happens when you depend on a liberal progressive to geterdone!!!  The world is on fire, and "WE" are being invaded!!!  Nice job!!!

Comment by robert mullally on July 10, 2014 at 1:30pm

It's very dangerous to allow yourself to think liberal progressives are morons.  It's like underestimating an opponent.  If you think that's not actual-factual, just look at what Germany did to Brazil in futbal!!!  Brazil never saw [it] coming, because [they] underestimated Germany!!! Futbal is Brazil's life, from dawn to dusk, 12/6!!! Don't feel too bad Brazil, a few decades ago the whole world did the same!!!

Comment by Robert Michael Krause on July 10, 2014 at 1:17pm

Oh she's all that and so much more.

Comment by robert mullally on July 10, 2014 at 12:59pm

Our "alternative" media is providing two very important functions; one, [it] is informing America of what has been omitted or relegated to small passages on back pages in the mainstream media, and two, the mainstream media hates to look stupid.  In the "old days" of pure Bernays "journalism," on the alphabet channels and the syndicated "talking-points" newspapers, everything was just "peachy-dandy."  Things like [in late 1930's] "Germany finally has a good strong leader," and "the Jews are just a small problem in Germany;" and nobody knew the difference!!!  The Nazi Party was all but taking over American society by the shining example Hitler was being portrayed as in our "syndicated" newspapers; and even Carnegie Hall was holding gigantic Nazi Party shindigs.  Can you imagine that today with our alternative sources???

Comment by Charles Bill L.CDurry on July 10, 2014 at 12:26pm

Sheila Jackson Lee should put her brain in gear before she puts her mouth in motion.



Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service