Best 7 minutes on gun control I have ever seen!

In this segment of his Virtual State of the Union, the Virtual President talks about why politicians want to talk about gun control rather than crime control...

  • Currently 5/5 stars.

Views: 1045

Favorite of 2 people


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Ivan Laperle on May 20, 2014 at 12:15pm

to bad he isn't running for president.

Comment by Jonathon Joseph Parker on May 18, 2014 at 2:02pm


Comment by Gordon H Myers, Jr. on May 18, 2014 at 5:54am

Fox News should run this every hour !!!

Comment by Malcolm Rudd on May 18, 2014 at 12:29am

At the time I viewed this video there was three hundred and eighty-seven views and only 3 members liking it. After reading the comments I would have hoped more would like like it. Are you people scraed to like this video because your comments didn't reflect that. As of now they are 2 that like it and I'm the third to like it.

Comment by DeniseInAZ on May 17, 2014 at 11:01pm

They think this is funny?  Wow this guy is good. He really ripped into those scuz buckets. He told them the truth. Now if all of this penetrates their wee brains, things might look better.

Comment by al pambuena on May 17, 2014 at 9:51pm

would rather have this virtual president than the pathetic one we have today.

Comment by Rafael Garcia, USA ABN,1SG (Ret) on May 17, 2014 at 9:08pm

Why isn't this virtual guy running for the real presidency?

Comment by CARRIE BARBARA BARTON on May 17, 2014 at 8:47pm

It is a shame that we have to here this speech made in virtual

LA LA Land.   

Comment by Connie Smith on May 17, 2014 at 8:40pm

As you watch this Virtual video and you see the key players of the Obama  Administration could care less of what is said as they all do as they please, not of the people and our rights and constitution. Virtual or nor he made better points than the real so called president here. This is a real eye opener to the AMERICAN PEOPLE AND OUR CONSTITUTION, PEAPLE WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE FOR "GOD SAKE" I would vote this man in office and have him kick Obama out as he is one of US..................Think about all he said and put it to good work to remove this so called Pres. from office as what has been seen and heard here has made more since then what we have hear and witnessed from our so called GOVERNMENT FOR THE LAST SIX YEARS UNDER A TIRANANT GOVERNMENT...............Period.............   

Comment by Charles S Imwold on May 17, 2014 at 8:17pm

Do I really have to tell you people that Mr Whittle never really stood before the US Congress and made that speech . Why do you think it is called the Virtual State of the Union ?



Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service