Why the 3 branches of Government are important and how Obama's threatening them

Author: Brian D. Hill

Source: USWGO Alternative News

Why is the three branches of Government Important? Why is the Separation of Powers Important? and how is Obama Threatening the three branches of Government? Well lets all start with the basics.

First of all what are the three branches? It is the Legislative Branch (Makes and debates laws), the Judicial Branch (Decides what laws should be enforceable depending on whether they are Constitutional or
not), and the Executive Branch (Executes laws).

So the three branches of Government are well connected but at the same time physically separated and the powers are separated. Now why would separating the three basic functions of any Government be
important? Well because in Tyrannical dictatorships and corrupt kingdoms
one Administration or one man having too much power can lead us down
the path of corruption which is detrimental to a free society. The
Separation of Powers prevents one centralized Government from going
completely mad with power and prevents needs for constant civil wars.
This means that peacefully a Administration cannot turn a country into a
dictatorship without being held accountable by the other two branches.
That is why when a President or Fuhrer acts up he/she can be impeached
because then that leader has violated the Separation of Powers and is a
threat to the other two branches. All three branches are limited in
power to prevent too much power.

So in order to have complete Tyranny in any country including America you would first have to infiltrate all three branches and hold a strong alliance with those in the other two separate branches in order
to have complete control of all three branches. Although this can be
true but alliances can also break apart and so some methods a
tyrannical leader can keep control would be threats of violent acts,
and simply kill those that threaten the power alliance. Also the power
alliance must be kept secret or else the people would know the truth
and demand that the traitors answer for their crimes of High Treason
against the country. This explains how a High Treasonous criminal can
take control of all three branches.

The Importance of the 3 branches

Although how is Obama dissolving the Separation of Powers and infiltrating the three branches?

If Obama, even though he is just an elite puppet, was to ever become a Dictator of this country to force the new world order down our throats he would have to control the people to prevent any kind of uprising,
and then take control of all three branches of Government to secure his
power regime.

First of all the Executive Branch has been complete taken over and infiltrated by czars that support the Presidents ideologies. This means that the entire Executive Branch is under control by only one man or by
a secret alliance that is lead by the President himself.

When your in an alliance you have to be completely loyal and never betray your allies because doing so would ruin your position of power so if Obama is indeed in a hidden alliance with all of the czars this
means that Obama has to sacrifice his longing for good deeds and only do
what is best for only the alliance.

The second successful infiltration is installing fake democrats into the Legislative Branch, and/or at least make sure a majority of democrats are in this hidden alliance. This alliance means that any laws
the President or majority of alliance leaders wants to pass can be
pushed through without checks and balances. This kind of tyranny can
happen along with other corruptions such as Corporate Lobbying and other
special interest groups that may have given some goodies to alliance

Also Obama has the power to threaten, intimidate, or even kill people and politicians so this means if Obama played his cards right he will have complete control over the Legislative Branch in no time at all.
Already the FEC is going after Campaign for Liberty and Ron Paul.

This means that the Executive Branch and Legislative Branch are both totally under Complete Control by a elite alliance of human beings that don't care about what happens to the country or the humans that are
Citizens of that country.

Next if Elena Kagan which is Pro Obama wins the Supreme Court nomination, and if Obama builds a
secret alliance with the Supreme Court plus their nine-member bench then
hearing how certain laws are Unconstitutional may become a thing in
the past because the Supreme Court will agree with Unconstitutional
laws by calling them totally Constitutional even though that's a lie or
even ignore Unconstitutional cases aka a Kangaroo Supreme Court. This
means that if the Supreme Court is compromised then this means all
three branches is under dictatorial control thus undemocratic and makes
our dear republic fall to it's doom.

But all is not Lost

If all three branches of Government are taken control of which equals Tyranny then the only solution would be to bring fourth state secessions and that after we have many state secessions we as states
should build another Union to make the Tyrannical corruption obsolete
which Orly
talked about in my Interview.

So if your concerned about the death of the three branches of Government then start petitions in your state, in your community, and those neighboring your community the importance of state secessions and
that you believe that we the people of that state would be better off
at the time to secede from the Union. If enough states secede enough
power can be created to crush the current 3 branch infiltration and
reinstate a completely uncorrected three branch system.

So in other words state secession would be the way to prevent a dictatorship if all else fails.

Views: 7152


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Ken Schroer on August 12, 2010 at 1:54pm
Nothing could be more fundamental that the separation of powers. It's also essential and assumed that each officeholder performs the tasks and duties that he or she is paid to do. Imagine if a Supreme Court justice said, "Nah! I'm not going to enter a decision on some cases because I don't feel like it." That would be intolerable. Dude, it's not optional!

So where does Obama get off saying, "Nah. I'm not going to some laws passed by the Legislative branch (like immigration and border control) because I don't feel like it."? Dude, it's not optional. Border control is not only law, but also a fundamental duty of the President. To refuse to enforce a law is essentially to nullify that law, meaning that the Executive has, for all practical purposes, legislated. That is intolerable and unconstitutional. It clearly violates the separation of powers concept, is a direct failure to adhere to the oath of office, and is an impeachable offense. Obama, very interesting that you don't agree with those laws, but we don't care what you think. You're not a senator any more and you are getting paid to carry out the laws as determined by the Legislative branch. Now shut up and do your job.



Democrat Sen. Chris Murphy: ‘The Real Second Amendment Isn’t Absolute

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) tweeted Saturday there is a “real” Second Amendment and an “imaginary” one and he believes the real one is “not absolute.”

Murphy, “I support the real 2nd Amendment, not the imaginary 2nd Amendment. And the real 2nd Amendment isn’t absolute.”

The statement was a precursor to his call for banning “assault rifles” in the wake of the Santa Fe High School shooting, even though “assault rifles” were not used in the attack.

Murphy said the “real 2nd Amendment…allows Congress to wake up to reality and ban these assault rifles that are designed for one purpose only – to kill as many people as fast as possible.”

Gov. Greg Abbott (R-TX) said the Santa Fe High School attackers used a .38 revolver and a shotgun to carry out his heinous acts. Therefore, a ban on “assault rifles” would have done nothing to prevent the attack from occurring or the tragic loss of life from taking place.

It should be noted that Saturday was not the first time Sen. Murphy called the essence of the Second Amendment into question. On August 6, 2013, Breitbart News reported that Murphy told MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow that “The Second Amendment is not an absolute right, not a God-given right. It has always had conditions upon it like the First Amendment has.”

Murphy did not grapple with the words, “Shall not be infringed.”


© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service