Who do the "moderates" and the progressives want us to vote for?

In much of the MSM we're being told that that it's almost immoral to vote for Donald Trump. So let's look at the choices we're faced with.

The Donald may well be a narcissist and a bully; someone who isn't a true conservative constitutionalist or Republican. He's an admitted influence peddler (briber) with government officials and other nations. Of course for daring to try in business he's had some spectacular failures. And yes, he's had a wandering eye. But like it or not, I favored Dr. Carson, he's the GOP nominee.

So who would liberals, progressives, and socialists have us conservatives, constitutionalists, and libertarians vote for? Considering the next president will appoint many federal judges, including two or three to the supreme Court, which saintly untainted morally scrupulous person do they demand we support?

Would it be a person who lionized the far Left socialist Saul Alinsky who wanted to tear down the USA? Someone who hid records about Whitewater? Someone who was dismissed for unethical conduct from the Democrat committee planning to impeach Nixon? A woman who had government agencies harass women who were molested and raped by her husband? Would it be a woman who lied about a man she may have had an affair with and who wound up a "suicide"? And what of the other myriad of deaths of political enemies or threats surrounding her and her husband? Would it be someone who stole government property from the White House and AF1 thinking she had a right to it? 

While in the government would it be a women who denied an ambassador's request for more security and even reduced it so as not to expose an illegal gun running operation to enemies of the US? Would it be a woman who stood by while a stand down order was given to rescue Americans under attack at a diplomatic mission? Would it be someone who lied about the cause of the attack on the mission and to the families of those who lost loved ones? Is it someone who has used her family's foundation as a pay to play doorway to government largess? Would it be someone who intentionally was grossly negligent, at best, in handling classified communications by using an unauthorized email server and lied under oath to Congress about it?

By the way, just what is racism? Is it saying that Mexico is sending not only poor, uneducated, and often criminal citizens from its own country but also from S. Central and South America by the trainloads and that it must be stopped? Is it saying that we should not allow people of certain groups whose religion Islam is actively hostile to Western values and system and whose regions are in turmoil? Is it saying that we should vet those coming into our country to see if they really want to become part of the Great American Experiment? Is saying that the first duty of our government as a sovereign nation is to protect our borders and the second duty to protect the right of citizens? Is that racial and ethnic bigotry? Or does open mindedness and morality demand open borders and national suicide?

In short, should we vote for a socialist pathological prevaricator, adulterer, rapist enabler, country-imperiling globalist TRAITOR?

Views: 25


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center



Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

Political Cartoons by Gary VarvelPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco


SICK: Leprosy On The Rise In Los Angeles 

Ahh, the joys of open borders and Democrat leadership.

California is not just a public toilet but now there is evidence that leprosy is on the rise in Los Angeles County.

Barack Obama changed US law in 2016 and allowed immigrants with blistering STDs and leprosy to migrate to the US.

Medscape reported:

Leprosy, also known as Hansen’s disease, is rarely seen in the United States, but cases continue to emerge in Los Angeles County, a new report says.

“Hansen’s disease still exists, and we need to educate medical students and physicians,” coauthor Dr. Maria Teresa Ochoa from Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, told Reuters Health by email.

Dr. Ochoa and colleagues identified 187 patients with the disease in a review of medical records from their leprosy clinic spanning 1973 to 2018. Most patients were Latino, originating from Mexico, and they experienced a median delay in diagnosis of more than three years, the team reports JAMA Dermatology, online August 7.

Multibacillary leprosy (MB) cases outnumbered paucibacillary leprosy (PB) cases by nearly eight to one (88.6% vs. 11.4%, respectively), and Latino patients were more likely than non-Latino patients to have MB, as were patients from Central or South America (versus other regions).

Most patients (80.7%) received multidrug therapy, and most (92.6%) received antibiotics for more than two years, especially if they had MB.

Only about half of patients (56.7%) had World Health Organization (WHO) grade 0 disability (no signs or symptoms suggestive of leprosy or disability) at the one-year follow-up, whereas 16.0% had grade 1 disability (loss of protective sensation) and 26.2% had grade 2 disability (visible deformity) at the last follow-up.

Among the patients who lost protective sensation, 87.7% (50/57) did not regain it following therapy.

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service