What is our society’s greatest danger? Is it the hyperbole the government and the press inundate our populace with on a continuum?

 On the other hand, could it be the mental atrophy, seemingly unabated, continuing on this same path?

Is there any proof needed to confirm that our atrophy—this absolute illogical irrational reasoning—of our society and the individuals…the citizens of this nation…that we may have lost even the ability to reason—especially in the arena of politics, press, and the bureaucracy then yesterday’s offerings? 

There of course are the headlines, of those who have no mores, standards of civilized action do things that sensible rational people,—fortunately…I still somehow still have hope for… the majority of our population—would never ever consider. The reason, obvious, we are a Christian Nation with the philosophical foundations of this Christianity, the sanctity of ‘Life.’ How we in this nation use ‘civil rights’ to advance killing of the unborn, the most innocent is still something that with mental cognitiveness is beyond comprehension.

Do crazy people do crazy things? If we reject that premise, we refute the simple reality we are as someone identified us, Homo sapiens, thinking man.

Nationally the message that was dismissed ignored, and if one wasn’t scanning the information of idiotic mantra of dogmatic minutia, we accept as news, it may have not been even noticed. 

New figures by the Congressional Budget Office released on Monday reveal that over the next 10 years the U.S. debt-to-GDP ratio will double to 78%.

Over the last four decades, America's average debt-to-GDP ratio was 39%. At the end of 2007, federal debt was just 35% of GDP. The CBO report says gross federal debt will soar from $17.7 trillion to $27 trillion over the next ten years. 

As ominous as this headline seems, it is a lie, and it does not even begin to explain the real danger this nation is facing.

As if not to be outdone, those of the—I’m not sure what to call them anymore?  We identify them as Republicans…but if your policies are designed for the republics destruction, not its preservation…plan to advance more communist designs in our nation, and the debauchery of the ‘solid’ currency of our nation, what about the party has proven they are for the Republic?  

Reading the headlines, and then reading this travesty of a budget, the name gave me a headache, ‘The Path to Prosperity—A Responsible Balanced budget.’     

Here is the horrible fact. They are both lies, premeditated, that perpetuates and feed on the ignorance of this nation’s citizens.

If one takes all of the presentation of both of these reports, combines them elevates them to some exponential power of (nth) to the highest possible, and compares them to ‘cow flatulence,’ the flatulence for value would be much greater.

Have you put gas in your automobile in the last (5) years? Gone to the grocery store, buying food, and been cognitive of the ‘PRICE?’ Bought anything, even that imported from the supplier of most manufactured goods in this nation…China…and noticed what is happening to the price? Are our citizens, our population so beyond even comprehension of the reality of what reality is; we have no idea? Here is something that every American should know, and memorize right along the Pledge to the Nation of our allegiance. Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to destroy the capitalist system was to debauch the currency. Lenin was certainly right. There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million can diagnose—John Maynard Keynes, 'The Economic Consequences of the Peace!' 

What that says, for those who don’t put the destruction of the ‘value’ of the ‘purchasing power’ of the ‘wealth’ you earn, is that the inflation you are experinceing is the—not only direct, but the premeditated—plan of the politicans that are in control of this nation. Gas is not of greater costs because gas is more expensive. It is more expensive because the value—the purchasing power—of the American…not dollar…but congressional monopoly money, is falling faster than a decending meteor in our atmosphere.

It is the same thing with these, both of these reports, is that they are written as if the dollar has some constant value. Our dollar has about the same value as the stability of the sand facing the ravages of hurricanes on our ocean shores.        

In the ‘enumerations’ of the constitution of this nation, in section 8, line 5; To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

Who in their right mind would believe the intent, the principle of our founders was to have the government, debauch, and destroy the value of the very instrument of our economic activity? If so then you are one of the lucky few that can hold a conversation with our politicians, the Federal Reserve, and the bureaucracy of this nation; for they are the only ones that clueless.  

To begin with understanding the monetary policy, we don’t need much knowledge. When this nation began, to insure that the ‘VALUE’ of the currency was retained—this nation used the Spanish pieces of eight. Why you may ask? I was simple really, the silver—as the base medal—of the coin, had the value of what the coin was worth—either as a coin, or the base medal. This is the foundation of currency. This is why the Constitution states regulate the value—the meaning, the principle, that is throughout our nation’s historical foundations—to preserve, maintain, retain, and keep the value of the currency. There was never a design to destroy, to debauch, and to devalue the value of the currency. Devaluing the currency is the same as ‘THEFT.’ To do so premeditatedly, is worse than just theft, it can only be identified as absolute soulless lack of any ethnical behavior of anyone. Yet, today this very action is the foundations of every action of our government, the administration, the congress, and the bureaucracy supporting their actions.

Historically the Spanish (8) was rejected as our currency when the Spanish, lowering the silver amount in their coin—incidentally this is the exact template and procedure of this nation—where it did not have ‘VALUE’ equal to the face amount…that the currency represented in currency transactions. This is the simple means of ‘debauching’ the value of the currency. To preserve the value of currency, by its property of existing value, wealth is a concept—this simple fact—is known called Say’s Law. This law states simply that ‘goods and services’ should buy ‘goods and services.’ The currency, the medium of exchange is just that—nothing but a medium of liquidity, a means—accomplishes the ‘contract’ of enterprise, the buying and selling. In the world of real solid currency, and stable value, this is and the only purpose of currency.

I know not the word that would be used to identify what a dollar is worth in the future, if one used it in any means to ‘forecast, or budget’ anything in the future. We amortize money, for value in the future, based on some rate of return. We earn, or it makes a return for its very existence for others to use that wealth—pay interest—and this results over time the wealth—the value we initially had…has some value in the future.

Now for the government to make such a projection, the inverse must be included in the budget proposal. To make it in terms that is easier to imagine here is an example. When I quit smoking, I earned about $10 hour. A carton of cigarettes cost $2.32, two dollars and thirty-two cents a carton. In a vending machine, a pack of cigarettes was 25¢. The wealth—the currency value of my money, my currency—measured in cigarettes was for each hour of labor, I could purchase 40 packs of smokes. For a quarter a pack, for a dollar 4 packs, for 10 dollars 40 packs. Today a pack of smokes, in the state where I lived and was a heavy smoker, the cost for a pack of cigarettes is ≈ $6. Now for me to have the same wealth of purchasing power, per hour of labor, using cigarettes as the baseline of wealth, what would my wage per hour be? To remain constant is easy. It would be—40 packs, what I could buy at 25¢/pack, times (the current cost) of $6 pack times the number of packs an hour of labor would purchase. The wage requirement would be $240 dollars an hour, just to maintain the purchasing power of when I quit smoking. Though I’ve charged more than that for an hour of my service, I’ll ensure you, I did not get that amount as my payment for services.

It is the same in every measurement—in each commodity—in each service, of our society. The difference of separation between those who make more, and increase their wealth, is not that they are paid more. The difference is that the service they provide, such as the most skilled and least available—an example a skilled surgeon—have been able to retain their purchasing power of their labor, not that it cost more, but because they are retaining this—PURCHASING POWER—of their service costs. Those who have less demand, cannot raise their ‘cost’ as there is competition, and others who will provide the service at a ‘RATE, a PRICE’ that purchasers will pay.

The result, the less skilled, the less in control of the economic environment they participate in, are the first victims of the ‘government’ ‘debauchery’ of the ‘VALUE’ of our ‘currency’ and ‘monetary’ policy.

That is the past record of the wonders of our nation’s government—for who are the only people who can change the ‘VALUE’ of our currency—is our wondrous government, and the most incompetent financial institute known in the literacy of man, the Federal Reserve, a travesty beyond measure.

What are the current conditions of our wondrous incompetent legislative bodies, the congress, the bureaucracy, and most certainly beyond any doubt the tragedy without comparison, the oBOMBo administration?

You can look up any consumer index of value in comparison to the American dollar since this error of this nation. You will inform yourself that the purchasing power, since the emasculation of this Mea Maxima Culpa, America’s greatest mistake, is ½ or 50% of what it was when he took office. What the Congressional Budget Bureau’s report is explaining—that the next 5 years this rate of debauchery, the loss of the dollars, purchasing power ‘wealth’ will accelerate, and be even more.

So let’s use just this simple reference as our ‘constant’ of losing buying power.

In a ten year budget what would that mean? Here is the question, not asked, not considered, or even thought about.

If the dollar—today’s dollar—is devalued at this rate, over a five year period—what does that mean to our calculations?

First of all, any savings proposed by reductions in whatever magic is being proposed are false, and a fallacy. Fact is, in 5 years the amount of saving proposed will be only ½ of what the projection states. Why is, of should be hopefully by now, that the dollar value is less by this 50%, so any saving expected will also be less—by the same 50%.

As if that isn’t bad enough, there is another problem. We are looking over what seems like eternity when evaluating the incompetency of our government. We are also adding another 5 years upon the first 5 years. We know, the minimum loss of wealth, by the record of our comparison currently of debauchery, is for every 5 years the value of wealth of the dollar is being cut in half. The result, that 50% reduction of the current dollar down to ½ of its value, will reduce that amount by another 50% over the next five years. So we will not be receiving any reduction of savings dollar for today dollar in 10 years, we will receive only 25¢ for every dollar currently budgeted. So whatever illusion, or hallucination that this budget of magical imagination states will occur, is 4 times higher than fact, even at this limited devaluation—we are told will accelerate.

If this was the only part of the problem perhaps it would be allowable to forgive such a misrepresentation of reality. Unfortunately, this is just the tip of the iceberg.    

For those who have never done budgeting, this is a down and dirty quick scenario. You are attempting to ‘project’ into the future, based on what has happened, or is currently happening. It’s that simple. A comparative of what you know your income steam was, and the expenses you have and will continue to have. In the government budgeting this is the comparative, they are in some illusion attempting. The things we can—cut back on—decrease expenses—and compare them to—the expenses, what we will have to pay in the future. If costs are reduced, and the expenses stay the same…this will lead to a reduction in the fiscal position of the organization, the company, or even the government.

This is impossible because of what we’ve just identified with the problem in savings. The saving we thing we will realize, can’t happen because the wealth—the value—of the dollar is shrinking. So even if in dollars you can make it look like a reduction—it is not. For the value, the wealth of each and every dollar is falling, making the whole process a fallacy.

The savings are only the small part. For those expenses you—budgeted—for whatever amount proposed, were also made projecting the ‘value, the wealth’ of the dollar was to remain constant. If there is one thing we know about the dollar, since 1810—that is about as likely as Christ’s resurrection occurring tomorrow.

For you see, all of those cost of tomorrow in this budget projection are also a lie. For the dollar of payment tomorrow, will reflect the value of the dollar tomorrow. It is the reason since this communist design of fiscal policy has been advanced, the cost of energy, has doubled. The cost of attempting to secure—and preserve wealth…with gold—has doubled. Every commodity that is able to preserve value has doubled. The proof, it had to, for if the value of wealth of the currency, the dollar is half—is it not logical, reasonable, and factual that the cost of those commodities would be twice—to maintain the value of the commodity?

So we know, that the dollar’s value is shrinking by 50%, at the current rate, every 5 years. So if we budget for tomorrow, we cannot use the dollars of today, we must use the ‘VALUE’ of that dollar at the time span. In five years, for every expense budgeted for, will require twice the amount of dollars budgeted for. If we extend it to ten year, we will double that again. So for every dollar of expense budgeted out ten years, based on the dollar today, will require not a dollar, but 4 dollars for each dollar currently of recognized expense.

Remember, we are making a comparative between savings, and expenses, to reduce the deficit. If we have underestimated—or fallacy budgeted—our reductions, hypothesized by a factor of 4, meaning we are only going to get ¼ the amount of reductions we are saying we will. While we have underestimated our spending requirements by this same factor of 4, meaning we will need 4 times the dollars we thought we would, or we projected we would. The results are, the proposed illusion of savings is such a fallacy it is impossible to even consider. The gap, the differential between expenses and reductions is reduced not by a percentage, nor is it reduced by a factor. If the proposal suggests we will have a $100 reduction, in reality, the budget is probably a deficit 8 time larger than any reduction initially ‘proposed.’    

Our history has only one example of reducing the size of government and beginning to achieve fiscal responsibility. It was done with one action, and action alone, nothing else. It occurred with Warren Harding. He and he alone reduced the deficit, the only time in this nation’s history ever it occurred. His tool, shrink the size of government. This is the same format that all businesses use when market share shrinks, resulting that they have deficit fiscal positions. There is no other know way possible for it to happen, now or nevermore. This fallacy of increasing government employment, government spending in the economy, government intrusion into the ‘crony’ capitalism of insanity—can and can only—result in not the reduction of the problem, but by these same actions it acerbates and accelerates the reason in the first place the problem exists.

Ever government employee, puts 2½ other people out of work. Every dollar spent by government, steals $2.50 from the wealth of the people in this nation. Every dollar borrowed by the government, is paid for immediately by the reduction in the ‘wealth’ of the dollars of the citizens of this nation.

Economic illiteracy, in the citizens, is horrible enough. That our government agencies, our bureaucracy, our congress, the bureau of budget, and the administration are also economic—not only illiterate—but ignorant, is a tragedy that we must be corrected, if we are to save this nation.   

Views: 45


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Jerry Dedeaux on April 20, 2014 at 10:14am

 "Happy is the man that findeth wisdom, and the man that getteth
understanding: for the merchandise of it is better than the
merchandise of silver, and the gain thereof than fine gold. She is
more precious than rubies:and all the things thou canst
desire are not to be compared unto her."(pr.3:13-15)

"Take away the dross from silver, And it will go to the silversmith
for jewelry. Take away the wicked from before the king, And his throne
will be established in righteousness."

One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one President, and nine Supreme
Court justices equates to 545 human beings out of the 316,928,205
million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible
for the domestic problems that plague this country.

Why is it that we can't get 545 righteous leaders out of 316,928,205 people?
Just as the old serpent deceived Eve in the garden most preachers
have been deceived to only  preach the gospel and salvation and stay
out of government and politics.

If the preachers could testify like Paul the king's throne would be
established in righteousness.

"Therefore, I testify to you this day that I am innocent of the blood
of all men. "For I did not shrink from declaring to you the whole
purpose of God."Be on guard for yourselves and for all the flock,
among  which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers, to shepherd the
church of God which He purchased with His own blood."(Acts20:26-28)
Let's look at our representative's voting record.

Mississippi congressional-scorecard for NRA.
MS 1 U.S House Alan Nunnelee Republican    92%
MS 2 U.S. House Bennie Thompson Democratic  0%
MS 3 U.S. House Gregg Harper Republican    92%
MS 4 U.S. House Steven Palazzo Republican  92%
When a representative votes against our freedom they have been
deceived by Satan.

When preachers and  churches do nothing to remove the deceived
representatives we will lose our freedom.

Mississippi congressional ­scorecard for Planned Parenthood.

Alan Nunnelee (Republican) District 1 ­ 0%
Bennie Thompson (Democrat) District 2 ­ 100%
Gregg Harper (Republican) District 3 ­ 0%
Steven Palazzo  (Republican) District 4 ­ 0%

When preachers and churches do nothing to remove the deceived
representatives for allowing the killing of human beings we will be
punished by God.

"And I was afraid, and went and hid thy talent in the earth: lo, there
thou hast that is thine. "His lord answered and said unto him, Thou
wicked and slothful servant, thou knewest that I reap where I sowed
not, and gather where I have not strawed: Thou oughtest therefore to
have put my money to the exchangers, and then at my coming I should
have received mine own with usury. Take therefore the talent from him,
and give it unto him which hath ten talents. For unto every one that
hath shall be given, and he shall have abundance: but from him that
hath not  shall be taken away even that which he hath."
When you do a lot you get a lot.
When you do a little you get a little.
When you do nothing you get it taken away.

When we do nothing to protect our freedom it will be taken away.
It will be given to those who do.
It will be given to Satan's minister of righteousness government, The
American Humanist Association(AHA), Planned Parenthood Federation of America
and the ACLU.

Jesus warned "He that is not with me is against me; and he that
gathereth not with me scattereth abroad" (Matt. 12:30).
When good men do nothing, they are no longer good. Many have the
mistaken notion that good is merely the absence of doing that which is
wrong. Not so! One is good not merely because he does no evil, but
because he is actively working for what is good. "Let him eschew evil,
and do good" (1 Pet. 3:11). James explained, "Therefore to him that
knoweth to do good, and doeth it not,
to him it is sin" (James 4:17)."
by Wayne Greeson

Please go here http://www.padfield.com/1997/goodmen.html
and read "When Good Men Do Nothing"

When God Abandons a Nation By John MacArthur

Jesus is involved in politics!: Why aren't You? Why isn't your Church? by Neil Mammen


Please go to these web site.

and read "A message to America" and like, comment, share and let
me know what you think of it.

America Family Association  http://www.afa.net
World Net Daily and subscribe to "The Whistle Blower"  http://www.wnd.com
Grassfire  http://grassfire.com/
Tea Party  http://www.teaparty.org/
Popvox    https://www.popvox.com/
Govtract    https://www.govtrack.us/
Vote Smart  http://votesmart.org/
NRA            http://www.nra.org

Comment by John V. McDermott on April 19, 2014 at 8:00am

May I offer this Declaration for your consideration?




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service