Merry Christmas
The Front Page Cover
The Events of the Week -- Featuring:
Honor among thieves
by Gina Loudon
.
liar-nObama Dispenses Some Fake News
As Democrats continue their desperate search for culprits to blame for liar-Hillary Clinton's failure to win the election, Barack liar-nObama decided it was time to add his own "insights" and call out the fourth estate. Yep, according to liar-nObama, liar-Hillary lost because the mainstream media treated her unfairly. "I couldn't be prouder of Secretary liar-Clinton," he said. "I think she worked tirelessly on behalf of the American people and I don't think she was treated fairly during the election. I think the coverage of her and the issues was troubling." Well, he's right — it was troubling — but not in the way he imagines.
Picking up leftists' latest pejorative for news with which they disagree, liar-nObama continued, "If fake news that's being released by some foreign government is almost identical to reports that are being issued through partisan news venues, then it's not surprising that that foreign propaganda will have a greater effect." No one has denied the authenticity of the leaked DNC emails revealing the effort to subvert Bernie Sanders. That was not fake news. Nor was it fake news that liar-Clinton operated an unsecured private email server. But liar-nObama's intentionally conflating "fake news" with WikiLeaks' release, and then he's blaming the mainstream media for falling for conservative and Russian efforts to paint the government and liar-Clinton as "malevolent actors." liar-nObama's effort is itself subversive.
It's no secret that the Leftmedia has long acted as a super PAC for Democrats, and arguably never more so than this election. When in the past did the MSM ever openly contend that for the good of the nation it needed to throw aside objectivity and seek to prevent a candidate from winning the election? liar-nObama's assertion that the mainstream media was unfairly negatively biased in reporting on liar-Clinton is simply "fake news," and it's a pathetic excuse for a lousy candidate. ~The Patriot Post
.
Backstabbing After Hillary's Loss
Inevitably, failure to achieve a goal is often followed by a period of questioning, second guessing and maybe even accusations. Currently, the liar-Hillary Clinton campaign team find themselves still seeking answers to questions they thoroughly believed they would never have to answer. After liar-Clinton's stunning election loss, some Team liar-Hillary members have turned on each other. Vanity Fair recently reported on liar-Clinton's closest adviser, Huma Abedin, quoting another staffer saying, "[Abedin] was enjoying the red carpet and enjoying the photo spreads much too much in my opinion. She enjoyed being a celebrity too much."
A story in Politico noted how several liar-Clinton staffers blamed Robby Mook and his campaign "model" as it evidently became something of a standard by which the campaign determined various strategy decisions. Examples were cited of spending too much time in Democrat strongholds such as New Orleans and Chicago and yet ignoring states like Wisconsin and Michigan that she ended up losing.
Then there are those wealthy Democrat donors, some of whom are demanding answers and others who have become disillusioned supposedly to the point of leaving politics altogether. This may be understandable as liar-Hillary's campaign raised well over a billion dollars and yet lost.
While all these reasons certainly contributed in some degree to her loss, nothing can change the fact that the biggest hurdle for the campaign was liar-Hillary herself. It would be difficult for any campaign to overcome what many Americans saw as one of the most disliked, legally compromised and untrustworthy candidates in the nation's history. America just didn't buy what Team liar-Hillary was selling. And now, team members are stabbing each other in the back over it. That's the liar-Clintons for you though — their failures and scandals are always someone else's fault. ~The Patriot Post
.
.
“Allahu Akbar!” Jihad Assassin of Russian
Ambassador was Member of Erdogan’s Special Ops
by Pamela Geller
{pamelageller.com} ~ Mevlut Mert Altintas, 22, shot Andrei Karlov in the back at least five time as the diplomat gave a speech at an art gallery in Ankara... The off-duty officer screamed “Allahu Akbar” during the attack and shouted: “You Russians destroyed Aleppo and Syria.” Altintas was the only man standing behind the ambassador throughout his speech. According to Sky News, the attacker, who was smartly dressed in black suit and tie, shouted: “We made an oath to die in martyrdom.”... http://pamelageller.com/2016/12/allah-akbar-jihad-assassin-russian-ambassador-member-erdogans-special-ops.html/
.
Multiple States Confirm They
Suspect liar-nObama’s DHS Hacked
Their Election Networks
by Harry Hibbs
{gopthedailydose.com} ~ Well isn’t this something. No wonder Democrats are trying to say that the Russians “hacked” and stole the election. Turns out liar-nObama’s administration was the one doing all the hacking. And guess who their targets were?... Looks like we may need to fear the enemy within more than the enemy without. Three states, Georgia, Kentucky and West Virginia all want to know why the Department of Homeland Security has been hacking their election networks. That’s right… they had cyber attacks from our very own DHS. Georgia has been hit the most with ten different attacks on their firewall in the last week. Jeh Johnson tried to blame it on a contractor who was simply looking at the attorney general’s site in that state. The problem with that is it doesn’t hold water… they have not been able to recreate that scenario. Now with two other states having caught DHS and complaining, it looks like liar-nObama and Johnson have some ‘splainin’ to do. While the Democrats are screaming about Russian intrusions, they are ignoring these states who want answers on this... http://gopthedailydose.com/2016/12/18/multiple-states-confirm-suspect-obamas-dhs-hacked-election-networks/
.
Congressman King Calls for Investigation
of CIA Head John Brennan…
{theconservativetreehouse.com} ~ Everyone reading here is old enough to remember Democrat Chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Diane Feinstein, accusing Brennan of lying to her and congress... and worse yet, accusing Brennan of illegally hacking into, and spying on, her staff and congressional oversight personnel. Now, however, all of a sudden, John Brennan is the bastion of intelligence integrity…. Ridiculous. Thankfully, not everyone has forgotten. Representative Peter King again calls out CIA Head Brennan, and better still – says Brennan should be investigated...
.
The CIA’s Dirty Tricks
Against American Democracy
by Cliff Kincaid
{aim.org} ~ There is an easy way to determine who is a faithful Democratic Party hack in the media and who on the left maintains at least some independence from the party line... Long-time Democrat Bill Moyers thinks it’s an open-and-shut case that Russia’s Vladimir Putin intervened in the election to help Trump and that our democracy is in peril. The Intercept thinks the evidence is weak, and that the CIA may have some other reason for “squaring off directly against Trump.” What could that possibly be? Could it be that CIA Director John Brennan fears that Trump as president could order an investigation into what the CIA has been up to under President liar-nObama? What could that be? Could the CIA have been interfering in foreign elections, and if so, could such efforts have provoked Russian retaliation? The folks at the Intercept are on the far-left, but have decided to maintain some semblance of objectivity when it comes to sensational claims of foreign interference in the 2016 campaign. However, the idea they propose—that the controversy can be solved by President liar-nObama declassifying evidence—is not practical. liar-nObama won’t do it, because the intelligence agencies always claim that disclosure will reveal sources and methods. If they do release “evidence,” it will be vague and mostly worthless, just like the stories in The Washington Post and New York Times, where these allegations initially surfaced. These stories are impossible to confirm or deny...http://www.aim.org/aim-column/the-cias-dirty-tricks-against-american-democracy/?utm_source=AIM+-+Daily+Email&utm_campaign=email120616&utm_medium=email
.
John Roberts Rejects Lawyer's
Attempt to Force Merrick Garland Vote
by Cortney O'Brien
{townhall.com} ~ Chief Justice John Roberts has rejected an environmental lawyer’s attempt to get the Senate to vote on the nomination of Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court... The attorney, Steven Michel, filed the suit in August but was repeatedly stymied by lower courts. President liar-nObama nominated Garland in March to replace the late conservative justice Antonin Scalia, labeling him as a moderate who Republicans should consider a bipartisan pick. Yet, conservatives had justifiable uncertainty, particularly in regards to Garland’s concerning record on gun rights. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McCon-nell refused to hold a vote on Garland for months. Thanks to his persistence, President-elect Donald Trump now has the opportunity to appoint another conservative to take Scalia’s place...
..
Honor among thieves
by Gina Loudon
{wnd.com} ~In the wake of the historic Trump victory, Democrats are looking to place blame anywhere but on themselves or on liar-Hillary. For her part, the sore loser has taken to blaming Russia. She even took to Capitol Hill to support a CIA assessment calling out Russia for cyber attacks and to demand further investigations.
The idea of any foreign influence over our elections is certainly troubling, and Putin is a menace, but there are legitimate questions whether the hacks were Russian, Chinese, Julian Assange or domestic. While there certainly is plenty of evidence that Putin is no fan of liar-Hillary or liar-nObama, the bigger question is, why?
While Republicans like Mitt Romney were calling Russia the biggest threat to the U.S., liar-nObama was scoffing. In his famous hot mic gaffe, he was caught whispering the message to Putin that he would “have more flexibility” to reduce our nuclear weapons arsenal after his re-election. liar-Hillary later punctuated the administration’s interest with the silly “reset button” photo op.
When Putin objected, we scrapped our planned missile-defense system in Poland. The cozy relationship included Moscow delivering $500,000 in speaking fees to Bill and $145 million to the liar-Clinton Foundation, in exchange for liar-nObama and liar-Hillary giving Russia 25 percent of our uranium reserves. We then stand down as Russian ally China takes over the South China Sea, the biggest shipping lanes in the world, by building fake islands and air strips contrary to international law. We can be so flexible when we want to be.
Where did the love go?
According to the popular mainstream media narrative, the world loves liar-nObama. All during the election cycle, we hear that liar-Hillary is immensely competent, one
Experts on organized crime will tell you that one hallmark of Italian Mafioso and other crime syndicates are codes of honor, rules written and unwritten. Even organized criminals understand the purpose of honor for the sake of avoiding chaos.
You rarely see mobsters targeting spouses or children of competitors, for instance, because the ensuing carnage would be unthinkable. Mobsters also rarely target innocent cops who are just people doing their jobs. They have families, and that should be respected. Dirty cops, on the other hand, especially the ones who double cross you, are fair game.
All evidence suggests that liar-nObama and liar-Hillary played their roles well with the criminal, Putin. In addition to giving Russia our uranium, liar-nObillary let it take Crimea and a portion of Ukraine. liar-nObillary drew a red line in Syria, promised to depose Putin’s puppet, Bashar al-Assad and, well, there he sits.
Their European Natural Gas play to control Assad, and thus the Iranian pipeline shipping Persian Gulf natural gas to Europe through their Iran-Iraq-Syrian allied territory, is going exactly as planned. Rather than take out Assad, or arm the Kurds to do so, liar-nObillary armed ISIS, which turned on Kurds, Christians and Yazidis. What better friend could Putin ask for?
I don’t know the answer of where things went wrong between Putin and liar-Hillary. The “flexibility” promise and reset button gestures certainly put statists liar-nObama and liar-Hillary in the allied position you would expect them to have with fellow comrade, Putin. How could liar-nObama and liar-Hillary, two disciples of Marxist radical Saul Alinsky, find themselves at odds with the head of the KGB? Absent a public check on Putin’s influence, I am guessing there was a double cross, a promised benefit never delivered.
One might point to the decline of the Russian economy and sanctions liar-nObama initiated over Ukraine, but banning travel for a dozen Russian businessmen is not exactly scorched earth. During the liar-nObillary administration, the man who dreams of restored Russian greatness retained his hold on South Ossetia, took Crimea and swaths of Ukraine and enjoys Middle East dominance in the axis through Iran-Iraq and Syria.
Since liar-Hillary’s Arab Spring scheme toppled Tunisia, Libya and even our ally, Egypt, Russia has tightened ties with the new Egyptian regime and enjoys unprecedented Suez Canal and nuclear power deals.
Maybe Putin is mad at liar-Hillary for allowing our “moderate” Syrian proxies do a little more damage to Assad than what was called for in the script. Maybe she failed to honor an exception to the withering travel ban on the Russian oligarchs like allowing a visa for someone who arranged the Bill liar-Clinton speaking fee in Moscow.
There is no public explanation for Putin’s hatred of liar-Hillary. Publicly, she has been a perfect Putin puppet on the take. That means the explanation for the animosity of Putin for liar-Hillary must lie in some secret deal. Here’s hoping the Trump CIA will turn its efforts from blaming the security breach on Putin to finding the reason for any meddling and why Russia turned on its puppet, liar-Hillary.
The idea of any foreign influence over our elections is certainly troubling, and Putin is a menace, but there are legitimate questions whether the hacks were Russian, Chinese, Julian Assange or domestic. While there certainly is plenty of evidence that Putin is no fan of liar-Hillary or liar-nObama, the bigger question is, why?
While Republicans like Mitt Romney were calling Russia the biggest threat to the U.S., liar-nObama was scoffing. In his famous hot mic gaffe, he was caught whispering the message to Putin that he would “have more flexibility” to reduce our nuclear weapons arsenal after his re-election. liar-Hillary later punctuated the administration’s interest with the silly “reset button” photo op.
When Putin objected, we scrapped our planned missile-defense system in Poland. The cozy relationship included Moscow delivering $500,000 in speaking fees to Bill and $145 million to the liar-Clinton Foundation, in exchange for liar-nObama and liar-Hillary giving Russia 25 percent of our uranium reserves. We then stand down as Russian ally China takes over the South China Sea, the biggest shipping lanes in the world, by building fake islands and air strips contrary to international law. We can be so flexible when we want to be.
Where did the love go?
According to the popular mainstream media narrative, the world loves liar-nObama. All during the election cycle, we hear that liar-Hillary is immensely competent, one
Experts on organized crime will tell you that one hallmark of Italian Mafioso and other crime syndicates are codes of honor, rules written and unwritten. Even organized criminals understand the purpose of honor for the sake of avoiding chaos.
You rarely see mobsters targeting spouses or children of competitors, for instance, because the ensuing carnage would be unthinkable. Mobsters also rarely target innocent cops who are just people doing their jobs. They have families, and that should be respected. Dirty cops, on the other hand, especially the ones who double cross you, are fair game.
All evidence suggests that liar-nObama and liar-Hillary played their roles well with the criminal, Putin. In addition to giving Russia our uranium, liar-nObillary let it take Crimea and a portion of Ukraine. liar-nObillary drew a red line in Syria, promised to depose Putin’s puppet, Bashar al-Assad and, well, there he sits.
Their European Natural Gas play to control Assad, and thus the Iranian pipeline shipping Persian Gulf natural gas to Europe through their Iran-Iraq-Syrian allied territory, is going exactly as planned. Rather than take out Assad, or arm the Kurds to do so, liar-nObillary armed ISIS, which turned on Kurds, Christians and Yazidis. What better friend could Putin ask for?
I don’t know the answer of where things went wrong between Putin and liar-Hillary. The “flexibility” promise and reset button gestures certainly put statists liar-nObama and liar-Hillary in the allied position you would expect them to have with fellow comrade, Putin. How could liar-nObama and liar-Hillary, two disciples of Marxist radical Saul Alinsky, find themselves at odds with the head of the KGB? Absent a public check on Putin’s influence, I am guessing there was a double cross, a promised benefit never delivered.
One might point to the decline of the Russian economy and sanctions liar-nObama initiated over Ukraine, but banning travel for a dozen Russian businessmen is not exactly scorched earth. During the liar-nObillary administration, the man who dreams of restored Russian greatness retained his hold on South Ossetia, took Crimea and swaths of Ukraine and enjoys Middle East dominance in the axis through Iran-Iraq and Syria.
Since liar-Hillary’s Arab Spring scheme toppled Tunisia, Libya and even our ally, Egypt, Russia has tightened ties with the new Egyptian regime and enjoys unprecedented Suez Canal and nuclear power deals.
Maybe Putin is mad at liar-Hillary for allowing our “moderate” Syrian proxies do a little more damage to Assad than what was called for in the script. Maybe she failed to honor an exception to the withering travel ban on the Russian oligarchs like allowing a visa for someone who arranged the Bill liar-Clinton speaking fee in Moscow.
There is no public explanation for Putin’s hatred of liar-Hillary. Publicly, she has been a perfect Putin puppet on the take. That means the explanation for the animosity of Putin for liar-Hillary must lie in some secret deal. Here’s hoping the Trump CIA will turn its efforts from blaming the security breach on Putin to finding the reason for any meddling and why Russia turned on its puppet, liar-Hillary.
Comments