From Benghazi to buckraking, potential 2016 GOP contender Carly Fiorina blasted Democratic frontrunner Hilly Clinton at CPAC Thursday. National Journal: “Unlike every other Republican presidential hopeful at CPAC, Fiorina is uniquely able to criticize Clinton without having to worry about cries of sexism. ‘This is not leadership,’ she said of nObama. ‘Nor is it leadership when Secretary Clinton asks what difference does it make when our embassy is deliberately attacked by terrorists and four Americans are murdered,’ Fiorina said. ‘It makes all the difference, Mrs. Clinton, and the required response has never come.’ … ‘She tweets about women’s rights in this country and takes money from governments that deny women the most basic human rights. She tweets about equal pay for women, but won’t answer basic questions about her own office’s pay standards’ [Fiorina said] ‘Hilly may like hashtags, but she does not know what leadership means.’”
[Report: Hilly knew Benghazi attack was terrorists - National Review: “From the very first moments of the terrorist attack on the U.S. compound in Benghazi on September 11, 2012, then-Secretary of State Hilly Clinton and her top aides were advised that the compound was under a terrorist attack. In fact, less than two hours into the attack, they were told that the al-Qaeda affiliate in Libya, Ansar al-Sharia, had claimed responsibility. These revelations and others are disclosed by a trove of e-mails and other documents pried from the State Department by Judicial Watch in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit.”] -Fox News
Wash Ex: “As promised, President nObama is using executive actions to impose gun control on the nation, targeting the top-selling rifle in the country, the AR-15 style semi-automatic, with a ban on one of the most-used AR bullets by sportsmen and target shooters. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives this month revealed that it is proposing to put the ban on 5.56 mm ammo on a fast track, immediately driving up the price of the bullets and prompting retailers, including the huge outdoors company Cabela’s, to urge sportsmen to urge Congress to stop the president.” -Fox News
Christian Science Monitor: “What every side does agree on, though, is that the results of today’s vote will affect everyone who uses the Internet. Anyone who goes online does so through an ISP, and increasingly these companies are lobbying to provide services on their own terms. Without net neutrality rules, companies like Comcast and Verizon could cherry pick which content is easy to access. And that means that consumer access to specific online content could slow down or speed up noticeably.”
404 - The Hill: “Partisan tensions over the drafting of new net neutrality rules might not fade so quickly on the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Thursday’s 3-2 vote on the rules came after months of accusations of misconduct and antipathy from the commission’s two Republicans, and they don’t appear entirely confident that everything can be smoothed over.” -Fox News
National Journal: “Speaker backstabber John Boehner on Thursday night finally laid out a plan to avert a partial shutdown of the Homeland Security Department: kick the can a little farther down the road. Yet even that may fail. With just one day left until funding runs dry for DHS, backstabber Boehner urged his conference to pass a three-week extension of current funding and try to force Senate Democrats into a conference committee to resolve their differences. The only alternatives, he told his members behind closed doors, would be to let the department shut down or capitulate to the Senate by passing a clean full-year funding bill. But passing the measure in the House will not be easy. backstabber Boehner’s partial solution comes after a weeks-long deadlock, and he is stuck between angry conservatives adamant about blocking President nObama’s executive action on immigration and moderates concerned about the politics of a shutdown.” -Fox News
(coachisright.com) - Our friends at Americanfreedomfighters.com have examined hundreds of US Government documents and developed a clear list of characteristics Barack nObama’s Administration thinks are “red flag” indications that make us terrorists in their eyes.
All of these characteristics can be fully examined using the links provided by the authors.
All of the following “forbidden” thoughts or actions will make you suspect in nObama’s eyes.
Barack nObama thinks you are a terrorist threat if you talk about individual rights; support the idea of states’ rights; want to make the world a better place; identify with the colonists who fought the American Revolution; want to defeat Communism; believe America’s interests are separate from those of other nations; consider the state unnecessary; are intolerant toward other religions; are anti-Gay, anti-immigrant and/or anti-Muslim.
Further, anyone aligned with the following thoughts or organizations is suspect in nObama’s mind: the patriot movement; against equal rights for Gays/Lesbians; the Family Research Council or the American Family Association; believes there is a conspiracy to establish a North American Union; have joined a citizens border patrol – an immigration reform group, the Tennessee Freedom Coalition or the Christian Action Network.
The red flags continue with: opposing the “New World Order;” seeing conspiracies in government programs; opposing Agenda 21and/or FEMA camps; fearing gun confiscation; joining a militia movement; belief in citizen sovereignty, not paying taxes and speaking out against “bias” in our public life.
Here are more red flags: doubts the “value of mainstream” ideas; attending rallies nObama doesn’t like; showing religious “intolerance”; holds a “personal” grievance; suddenly acquires “weapons;” organizes a protest supporting “extreme ideas” nObama doesn’t approve of; being a “right wing extremist;” having patriotic or anti-UN bumper stickers; fierce nationalism; being afraid of attacks by government agents; believing religion should not be part of our government; or and being a member of the Army of God.
The “List” concludes by citing those who are anti-abortion; anti-Catholic; anti-nuclear; pro Second Amendment; support Ron Paul; Chuck Baldwin; and/or Bob Barr; who fly the “Don’t Tread on Me” flag; those that believe in “end of times” prophecies and of course Evangelical Christians.
If you are NOWHERE on this list you are probably not reading this on a conservative website, meaning you are quite possibly part of the problem, not part of the solution.
Comments