The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
The Life and Ministry of Christ
by David Limbaugh
.
 The Seventh Circuit's Open Activism 
By Brian Mark Weber: All eyes were on the Senate this week as Democrats and Republicans engaged in a battle over whether to confirm Neil Gorsuch as the next justice of the Supreme Court. Already, Republicans have invoked the so-called "nuclear option," a rules change that allows them to confirm Gorsuch with a simple majority vote rather than face an unprecedented partisan filibuster from Democrats. It's worth noting that Democrats started us down this road in 2003, when they filibustered Miguel Estrada, George W. Bush's nominee to the influential DC Circuit, long a stepping stone to the Supreme Court. Then they nuked it in 2013, leaving the filibuster for only the Supreme Court.
          Democrats aren't opposed to Neil Gorsuch because of their feigned ideological concerns, or because he'll restore balance to the court, or because he's not Supreme Court material. Rather, they fear Gorsuch doesn't accept the judicial dogma of all true progressives: that the Constitution is a "living document" to be interpreted so broadly that it basically means whatever progressives want it to mean.
          The problem with progressive justices today is not that they merely exaggerate the concept of a "living Constitution" or even that they're allowing leftist ideology to determine their interpretation of law (although both of these are certainly part of the problem). It's that judges responsible for ensuring the integrity of the judicial system do everything they can to circumvent the system, all in the name of social justice and progressivism. The real concern is that they view the courts as a vehicle to deliver their agenda rather than as a component of constitutional government.
          In the progressive mind, the only thing that matters is the long-term objective. As National Review's David French writes, "Never mind the actual words on the page. Never mind the common meaning of the words then or now. All that matters is the right result — the triumph of the social-justice 'super clause' that is hidden in every law, regulation, or constitutional provision."
          Hardly a week goes by without a new case popping up in which leftist judges have twisted the intent of constitutional law in order to serve a progressive end. This week, the Seventh Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals (which covers Indiana, Illinois and Wisconsin) ruled in Hively v. Ivy Tech Community College that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits sex discrimination, also covers sexual orientation.
          Let's take a look at just one of the arguments made by the concurring judges: "The compelling social interest in protecting homosexuals (male and female) from discrimination justifies an admittedly loose 'interpretation' of the word 'sex' in Title VII to embrace homosexuality: an interpretation that cannot be imputed to the framers of the statute but that we are entitled to adopt."
          Now that's a bold statement revealing the true intent of these judicial demagogues. And they actually have the audacity to spell it out in the ruling.
          Members of the Rainbow Mafia may be celebrating this ruling, but they had better think twice about what this precedent might do to our system of government in the coming years. Whether one believes that sexual orientation should be a protected class, in the end turning the courts into a quasi-legislature will ultimately undermine all of us. The Founding Fathers certainly didn't want to empower the judicial branch with legislative powers, but that's where we're heading.
          Writing for the Washington Examiner, Joseph Murray asserts, "Few would argue that it is just for an employer to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation. It is why many states have passed civil rights laws prohibiting such discrimination. But what happened in a federal court in Chicago on Tuesday is not about protecting the LGBT community. Instead, the Seventh Circuit has used the LGBT community as a conduit to further distance the federal judiciary from the checks and balances that once contained it."
          Sensing the non-activist jurisprudence of Judge Neil Gorsuch, Democrats who previously recognized the nominee's qualifications have now threatened to undermine his candidacy by attacking his character and professionalism. Remember, the Senate unanimously confirmed Gorsuch to the Court of Appeals in 2006. Now Senate Democrats think he's an imminent threat to the Constitution.
          Progressives have issues with Gorsuch because his views on the purpose and function of the Supreme Court are too close to that of the Founding Fathers. In other words, Gorsuch believes the Constitution's provisions should not be re-interpreted to mean what we think they should mean for the convenience of political expediency, but rather what the Founders intended them to mean.
          People in a free society change their views on a wide range of issues over time, but our Founders gave us various mechanisms to respond to contemporary mores and morals such as amending the Constitution. But for progressives, constitutionalism and the separation of powers are serious roadblocks to the enactment of their sweeping agenda.  ~The Patriot Post
.
.
North Has No Doubt, Says Neither Should
Kim Jong-Un – Trump Will Do What’s Necessary
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Oliver North tells Stuart Varney that he is certain that President Trump would order the Carl Vinson carrier group to shoot down a missile launched by North Korea... using their THAAD systems on a missile’s way up or those deployed in South Korea or Japan on the way down. Stuart Varney clarifies, saying, “I’m asking because, quite clearly, President Trump is prepared to fire Tomahawk missiles at the Syrians as punishment for the poison gas attack, is he prepared to fire off missiles against North Korean missiles, I mean, do you think he’s got that mindset at this point?” North replies, “I have no doubt about that. I don’t think that Kim Jong-un ought to have any doubt about it. Look, it appears that Kim is now prepping for yet another nuclear test, their sixth. All of these are part of the Pyongyang – Tehran joint venture to develop nuclear weapons and the ICBMs capable of delivering them.”...  http://rickwells.us/north-doubt-says-kim-jong-un-trump-necessary/
.
The Troubling Relationship Between Soros
and US’ Biggest Foreign Aid Agency
by Mike Gonzalez
{dailysignal.com} ~ Foreign aid can help advance U.S. national interests, for example, by promoting our values globally or by demonstrating to the world the goodwill of the American people... Calls to eliminate funding outright often fail to weigh this important function. But our lead aid agency has itself been jeopardizing this effort, and risking all-important public support, by irresponsibly funding leftist agitprop around the world—and enlisting the help of billionaire progressive activist George Soros in the process. Trying to persuade Colombians, Macedonians, Kenyans, and the Irish to accept violations of traditional norms that are still being debated here was surely not what Congress had in mind when it passed the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 and thereby created the U.S. Agency for International Development, or USAID...  http://dailysignal.com/2017/04/10/how-rogue-bureaucrats-undermine-s...
.
Chest Pounding Generals And Advisers
Have Forgotten Meaning Of Victory
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Lou Dobbs addresses America’s devolving perception of victory, saying, “No one, I assure you wants victory over all the enemies of our great nation more than me... But no one is more concerned that we have squandered so much and achieved so little in our “war against terror,” as President Bush branded it back in 2001.” He continues, “Our military is shrinking down to 1.3 million active duty military personnel. Only three combat brigades ready to fight. And the heavy toll since September 11th, nearly 5,400 hundred members of our military have been killed in action, more than 52,000 wounded over that time, some $4T spent on wars since September 11th.” “A period of almost 16 years,” says Dobbs, “think about that – 16 years without a lasting victory, without a successful general to lead another parade of our troops through the canyon of heroes in New York City. There is, in my mind, something not quite right about generals and presidential advisers acting as though airstrikes in which they rained down one and a half million dollar missiles on targets, at an undefended airbase in Syria, represents somehow a great American military victory, who go on Sunday talk shows and pound their chests.”...  http://rickwells.us/lou-dobbs-chest-pounding-generals-advisers-forg...
.
What’s at Stake in the Coming
4-Day Spending Fight
by Rachel del Guidice
{dailysignal.com} ~ When Congress returns from its Easter recess April 24, lawmakers will have only four legislative days left to decide on a spending plan that prevents a government shutdown... With such a narrow window, the House and Senate will have little choice but to pass a huge, omnibus spending bill and again put off a return to the regular budget process for a later day. This prospect rankles conservatives such as Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla. “We’ve got to be able to maintain our budget,” Lankford, who sits on the Senate Appropriations Committee, told The Daily Signal. “Just saying, ‘Whatever we did last year, let’s do that again’ is extremely inefficient, and that’s the situation where we spend the same amount of money and have less efficiency.”...  http://dailysignal.com/2017/04/10/whats-at-stake-in-the-coming-4-da...
.
The Anti-Semitic Blood Libel: It’s
Not Just For Passover Anymore
by Jeff Dunetz
{lidblog.com} ~ Through out Jewish history the weeks surrounding Passover has been a dangerous time for the Jews. Mostly because of the famous blood libel that matzah was made from the blood of Christian Children... Anybody who’s ever eaten matzah knows that matzah is made from a combination of sheet rock and cardboard (at least it tastes that way). Blood libel is a term with a specific and terrible history. It refers to the scurrilous accusation that Jews kidnapped and murdered Christian children to use their blood to prepare Passover matzoh. Charges of blood libel have spurred massacres of Jews throughout the centuries; the myth was revived by Hitler, and persists today in places like Russia, the Muslim world. It even exists in the United States in a different form preached by people like Former President liar-nObama, Ayman Mohyeldin and others in the mainstream media. College campuses in America, especially the most liberal tend to be hotbeds of blood libel they don’t provide the Jewish Students with safe spaces...  http://lidblog.com/blood-libel/
.
.
The Life and Ministry of Christ

by David Limbaugh
{townhall.com} ~
Before we begin the more detailed narrative of the Gospel accounts in the next chapter, let’s look at a short sketch of Christ’s life and ministry, which will provide an overview before we dig deeper.

Jesus was the only person who came into the world to die. “Death,” writes Bishop Fulton Sheen, “was the goal and fulfillment of His life, the gold that He was seeking. Few of His words or actions are intelligible without reference to His Cross. . . . The story of every human life begins with birth and ends with death. In the Person of Christ, however, it was His death that was first and His life that was last. . . . It was not so much that His birth cast a shadow on His life and thus led to His death; it was rather that the Cross was first, and cast its shadow back to His birth. His has been the only life in the world that was ever lived backward.”

Though He was born to die and He intended from the beginning to do just that, His death would be in God’s time. Before He and the Father would allow Himself to be captured, He had to complete His ministry. He came to preach a message of redemption, salvation, and life. But it wasn’t as if He said to Himself, “I am going to say the most controversial things I can to antagonize the religious authorities into killing Me.” No, His message was what it was—and is—and some would accept it and others would reject it, because the Truth causes division (Luke 12:51). Yet His message is precisely why they wanted to kill Him. He challenged their authority, traditions, and interpretations of their sacred Law, including the right to heal on the Sabbath. He “blasphemously” claimed to be the Messiah and the King, and made a triumphal entry into the Holy City. He claimed to be the Son of God who had the authority to forgive sins, and He had the audacity to cleanse their Temple.

In his sermon to the Gentiles recorded in the Book of Acts, Peter provides a summary of Jesus’ ministry and His substitutionary death. In this brief, inspired account we see an apostle on fire for Christ and evangelizing to the Gentiles:

So Peter opened his mouth and said: “Truly I understand that God shows no partiality, but in every nation anyone who fears him and does what is right is acceptable to him. As for the word that he sent to Israel, preaching good news of peace through Jesus Christ (he is Lord of all), you yourselves know what happened throughout all Judea, beginning from Galilee after the baptism that John proclaimed: how God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Spirit and with power. He went about doing good and healing all who were oppressed by the devil, for God was with him. And we are witnesses of all that he did both in the country of the Jews and in Jerusalem. They put him to death by hanging him on a tree, but God raised him on the third day and made him to appear, not to all the people but to us who had been chosen by God as witnesses, who ate and drank with him after he rose from the dead. And he commanded us to preach to the people and to testify that he is the one appointed by God to be judge of the living and the dead. To him all the prophets bear witness that everyone who believes in him receives forgiveness of sins through his name” (10:34–43).

Let’s not pass over Peter’s declaration lightly. Everyone who believes in Jesus receives forgiveness. “There are no incurable cases under the gospel,” writes J. C. Ryle. “Any sinner may be healed if he will only come to Christ.”

Because the Gospels don’t provide complete biographical data and sometimes present material thematically rather than chronologically, the precise order of some events is uncertain. Matthew (1–2) and Luke (1–2) both provide information on Jesus’ birth and early life. Both report that Jesus’ birth is pre-announced and that Mary gave birth to Him as a virgin. Both include genealogies tracing Jesus’ human ancestry, whereas John opens his Gospel declaring that the Word—the second person of the Triune God—is eternal and an agent in the creation. In Luke the shepherds visit the baby in Bethlehem after an angel of the Lord appears to them. In Matthew, the wise men visit to worship Him after seeing His star, and Herod, after trying unsuccessfully to find the baby, orders the murder of innocent children in Bethlehem in an attempt to kill Jesus (2:1–18). Herod fails because Joseph obeys an angel of the Lord who appears to him in a dream and tells him to take Mary and Jesus to Egypt until it’s safe to return (Matt. 2:13–15). When Herod dies, the angel tells Joseph to return to Israel with Jesus and Mary (Matt. 2:19–21). Other than Luke’s brief reference to Jesus at the Temple when He is twelve years old, we have no other information about Jesus’ life until shortly before He begins His ministry.

In preparation for Jesus’ public ministry, John the Baptist announces His coming and calls all to repentance (Matt. 3:1–12; Luke 3:1–17). John baptizes Jesus (Matt. 3:13–17; Luke 3:21–22), who undergoes the temptations of Satan, each time invoking Scripture as a defense against Satan’s wiles and demonstrating His obedience as the Son of God (Matt. 4:1–11; Luke 4:1–13).

Jesus begins His ministry when He is about thirty years old (Luke 3:23). He ministers in Judea following His baptism and makes contacts there with some of His future disciples (John 1:35–42). He next goes into Galilee (John 1:43) and performs His first miracle, or sign, by turning water into wine (John 2:1–11). He generally ministers in Galilee at this point because the Jews in Judea are seeking to kill Him (John 7:1). But He makes periodic trips into Judea, such as when He goes to Jerusalem for the Passover, where he drives the money-changers from the Temple (John 2:14), and meets the Pharisee Nicodemus (John 3:1).

Jesus calls His disciples (Mark 3:13–19) and does extensive teaching. He delivers the Sermon on the Mount (Matt. 5–7), calls for repentance and belief in the Gospel (Mark 1:15), and announces the arrival of the kingdom of God (Luke 11:20). He performs miracles of healing (Mark 1:40–3:12; Matt. 8:1–9:34), exorcisms (Matt. 8:28–34), and miracles involving nature, such as quieting a storm (Mark 4:35–41). He is well received by many people (Matt. 4:23–25) who are impressed by His miracles, though they don’t fully understand His mission. But the religious authorities oppose Him (Mark 2:5–12), and their antagonism intensifies as the news spreads about His works and ministry (Matt. 12:24).

While Jesus is busy with His own ministry, He appoints His twelve disciples and trains them before sending them out to preach repentance, cast out demons, and perform healings (Matt. 10:1–42; Mark 6:7–13). During this period, He often instructs in parables (Matt. 13:1–53; Mark 4:1–34). He is rejected in His hometown of Nazareth (Matt. 13:53–58), feeds the five thousand (Matt. 14:13–21), and is further challenged by Pharisees from Jerusalem (Matt. 15:1–20; Mark 7:1–23), leading Him to shift His ministry into the Gentile areas close to Tyre and Sidon (Mark 7:24–31).

Some believe Jesus’ ministry reaches a turning point at Caesarea Philippi (Matt. 16:13–20; Mark 8:27–38; Luke 9:18–27), when He fully acknowledges to Peter that He is the Messiah. Shortly thereafter He proves His assertion when He is transfigured before Peter, James, and John (Matt. 17:1–8).

Jesus tells His disciples many times over an extensive period that He is the Messiah and that He must die, and even predicts His own death, but they don’t fully grasp His message until after He dies and is resurrected. He doesn’t broadcast publicly that He is the Messiah, however, because He isn’t yet ready to be captured. But He does tell some people, such as the Samaritan woman at the well, because they are outside the region where His life could be threatened. He must complete His ministry before He allows the authorities to capture Him, which is why we see Him narrowly escaping capture numerous times long before His final week.

Jesus heads from Galilee back toward Jerusalem (Luke 9:51; John 7:10) and continues His ministry with His disciples. Luke devotes a large portion of his Gospel to this period, when Jesus goes to the home of Mary and Martha, teaches about prayer, tells many parables including the Good Samaritan, clashes again with the Pharisees, and lectures His disciples on the great costs of discipleship and servanthood. He casts out a demon from a mute man, which so threatens the Pharisees that they accuse Him of doing it through the power of Satan, to which Jesus responds that Satan wouldn’t cast himself out. He announces that blasphemy against the Son of God is forgivable but blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is not—for Jesus cast out demons through the power of the Holy Spirit. He rebukes the Pharisees for their obsession with external observances of righteousness while neglecting their souls. They care about the trappings of power but do not serve the poor or otherwise do God’s work.

Jesus makes His triumphal entry into Jerusalem as was prophesied in the Old Testament and pursues His controversial ministry, further challenges the Pharisees, and teaches His disciples about the future, the End Times, and the coming of the Son of Man—His Second Coming (Mark 13). During this week He and His disciples eat the last supper (Matt. 26:17–30).

Jesus predicts His betrayal, and that night He is arrested in the Garden of Gethsemane at the behest of His traitorous disciple, Judas Iscariot. He is tried before Annas, the Sanhedrin (the Jewish tribunal), Herod Antipas, and Pontius Pilate. The Jewish authorities charge Him with blasphemy, but since they have no power under Roman law to crucify Him, they pressure Pilate to convict Him of treason against Rome for claiming He is the King of the Jews. Pilate finds no guilt in Him and tries to avoid administering punishment by offering the Jews the opportunity to call for the release of one prisoner, which is a Passover tradition. Pilate is hoping he can pacify them by punishing but not crucifying Jesus. The Jews, however, want Him dead and call for the release of Barabbas, a criminal prisoner, instead of Jesus.

Knowing Jesus is innocent, Pilate could have released both Him and Barabbas, but he finally acquiesces and orders Jesus’ crucifixion. Jesus is mocked, spit on, flogged, and crucified with two common thieves on the eve of the Sabbath at Golgotha (Mark 15:22). He is buried in the tomb of Joseph of Arimathea (John 19:38), a member of the Sanhedrin and follower of Jesus, who requests permission to bury Him. Though Roman guards are posted at the tomb because of the Jews’ fear that His disciples will steal His body, Jesus’ body disappears from the tomb, and He rises on the third day just as He had predicted (Luke 24:1–7). For the next forty days He makes many appearances to His followers and others, then ascends into heaven (Acts 1:1–11), promising to send His disciples the Holy Spirit, Who would empower them to carry on His ministry.
 

Views: 11

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

TEA PARTY CONNECT

               

HOT TEA VIDEO

CNN Producer Admits Network Doesn’t Give Opposing Viewpoints on Transgender Issue

YES PATRIOT STORE

© 2017   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service