TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Anti-Wall Equals Pro-Globalism
by Arnold Ahlert  
.
Former top FBI lawyer James Baker subject
of criminal media leak probe, transcript reveals
by Catherine Herridge  
{foxnews.com} ~ The former top lawyer at the FBI has been under federal investigation for leaking to the media, a letter from House Republicans revealed Tuesday... The letter from GOP Reps. Jim Jordan and Mark Meadows cited the transcript of a congressional interview with former General Counsel James Baker and his lawyer last fall, where the probe conducted by seasoned U.S. Attorney John Durham was confirmed. “You may or may not know, Baker has been the subject of a leak investigation … a criminal leak investigation that’s still active at the Justice Department,” lawyer Daniel Levin told lawmakers, as he pushed back on questions about his client’s conversations with reporters. Jordan and Meadows’ letter was sent to Durham, the U.S. attorney for Connecticut, and requested additional information about the probe later this month. "As we continue our oversight and investigative work, we felt it prudent to write to you seeking an update. Without being apprised of the contours of your leak investigation and Baker’s role, we run the risk of inadvertently interfering with your prosecutorial plans," they wrote...
Trump’s attorneys rejected 
dirty cop-Mueller's request for interview
by Diana Stancy Correll
{washingtonexaminer.com} ~ President Trump and his legal team have rejected efforts from special counsel dirtry cop-Robert Mueller to schedule a sit-down interview with the president as part of the ongoing Russia investigation... according to a new report. After Trump submitted written responses to questions from dirty cop-Mueller in November, which touched on a number of matters prior to Trump’s inauguration, dirty cop-Mueller requested an in-person interview because he was "not satisfied,” one source familiar with the situation told CNN. Although the possibility of an interview was first raised last January, sources say that both sides remained at odds for the past five weeks. Trump’s team has argued an interview is superfluous because Trump already provided written responses and has made it clear the president would not cooperate any further. Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani signaled last month such a request from dirty cop-Mueller’s team would be rejected. "Over my dead body,” Giuliani said in an interview on Fox News in December about the possibility of a sit-down interview. “But you know, I could be dead." dirty cop-Mueller is investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election and whether the Trump campaign colluded with the Kremlin.  https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/trumps-attorneys-rejected-m...
.
Red Lobster scumbag/liar-Hillary 
Cabal Targets Tucker Carlson
by JEFFREY LORD
{spectator.org} ~ I had a great dinner at a local Red Lobster the other night. The crab cakes were excellent, the staff and service friendly and terrific.... But alas that was my last meal at the Red Lobster. The Red Lobster, which I thought was in the business of selling seafood dinners and lunches, is in another business altogether: leftwing politics. The company, owned by an outfit in San Francisco called Golden Gate Capital, is run by a slew of scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton supporters who have decided to follow a prompting from an ex-scumbag/liar-Clinton staffer and make censorship their main product, joining the anti-free press jihad that has made it their business to silence conservatives in the media. The latest example is the targeting of Fox’s Tucker Carlson, with the Red Lobster officiously and piously  announcing the following: Red Lobster’s advertising buying guidelines reflect our core values and commitment to supporting programming that represents the highest standards of good taste, fair practice and objectivity. Unmentioned in the announcement from Red Lobster was this, per a report in the Washington Times: Activists like ThinkProgress founder Judd Legum renewed the boycott, specifically calling on Red Lobster to pull its ads. Ahhh, but of course. Once again the extreme far-Left is on yet another anti-free press and free speech jihad, this time bullying Red Lobster. Then again, maybe it isn’t bullying after all. In plunging into politics by joining the side of the leftwing thugs, a closer look at those running Red Lobster reveals that there is, in fact, a built in leftward bias at the very top of the company that owns Red Lobster — Golden Gate Capital..
DOJ Seriously Eyes Changes To Media Subpoena Policy
by Saagar Enjeti
{ailycaller.com} ~ The Department of Justice (DOJ) is seriously considering adjusting existing policy to eliminate advance notice of a subpoena in media leak investigations... according to a senior DOJ official with direct knowledge. Existing DOJ guidance requires advance notice to third parties related to a media leak investigations. Officials familiar with the policy characterize it as hindering investigators’ ability to discern the source of damaging national security leaks and say the lengthy timeline of notice to media organizations and others hinders the ability to conduct timely investigations. The policy change has its roots in President Donald Trump’s directive to former Attorney General Jeff Sessions to crack down on national security leaks emanating from the DOJ. Sessions announced that the media subpoena policy would be placed under review in August 2017. “We respect the important role that the press plays, and we’ll give them respect, but it is not unlimited,” Sessions said, adding, “They cannot place lives at risk with impunity. We must balance the press’ role with protecting our national security and the lives of those who serve in the intelligence community, the armed forces and all law-abiding Americans.”...  https://dailycaller.com/2019/01/15/doj-change-media-subpoena-policy...
.
America's Youngest Lawmaker's 
INCREDIBLE Border Wall Solution  
by Evie Fordham

{dailycaller.com} ~ West Virginia House of Delegates member Caleb Hanna wants to fund a southern border wall with $10 million of his state’s surplus...
 to combat West Virginia’s drug problem, he said on “Fox and Friends” Tuesday. “West Virginia has a terrible drug problem,” Hanna said Tuesday. “I believe that a lot of those drugs and opioids are coming directly from the southern border. I spoke to local and state law enforcement, and  they say these drugs are so pure they can’t be coming from anywhere other than Mexico. So I believe that the wall is a crucial part in addressing West Virginia’s drug problem.”Hanna and his fellow Republican delegates Carl “Robbie” Martin and Patrick Martin plan to introduce the bill that would transfer $10 million of the state’s $185 million surplus to the border wall that President Donald Trump has proposed, reported The Mountaineer Journal. The state surplus funds would not make much of a dent in the wall fund, though — Trump is asking for more than $5 billion. “So, the West Virginia Republican majority in the House has been very supportive of President Trump and his efforts to secure the southern border,” Hanna said. “So, I am happy to co-sponsor a piece of legislation that I don’t think just West Virginia will be happy about, but the American people as a whole.”...  
https://dailycaller.com/2019/01/15/caleb-hanna-west-virginia-wall/
.
.
Anti-Wall Equals Pro-Globalism
by Arnold Ahlert:  Hollywood now makes more money from international box office revenues than domestic ones. Google shelved its Dragonfly Project to build a censored search engine for Communist China, but CEO Sundar Pichai refused to rule out implementing it in the future. Over the last 30-plus years, the income gap in America has reached unconscionable levels, especially over the last decade. In 2016, 52% of British voters opted to leave the EU. That vote is on the verge of being negated by a series of duplicitous negotiations.      Meanwhile, Germany and France will sign a “twinning” pact aimed at sharing defense, foreign, and economic policies, viewed as a prototype for a “more sovereign, united” Europe.

             What does any or all of this have to do with building a wall on our southern border? Everything.
               For as long as Americans can remember, the political divide in this nation has been termed Left vs. Right, conservative vs. liberal, or Republican vs. Democrat. For at least a decade, those terms have been little more than orchestrated distractions aimed at obscuring the real and most debilitating divide that has ever afflicted this nation: globalism vs. nationalism.
               In 2016, the globalist agenda was suddenly and shockingly rejected by the American electorate, who had been assured the ascension of scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton was a done deal, and that the “fundamental transformation” envisioned by Barack scumbag/liar-nObama — and supported by media, academia, Hollywood, Wall Street, Corporate America, Democrats, Establishment Republicans, and the legions of useful idiots convinced this nation is irredeemably flawed — would continue unabated.
               A wall is both a symbolic and substantive rejection of the globalists’ open-border, national sovereignty-despising agenda.
               Aided by their corrupt media lackeys, (who do the bidding of the multinational corporations that employ them), globalists insist a wall is ineffective. Yet politicians have them around their homes, the Vatican is surrounded by a wall, and Israel built one to keep terrorists at bay. Moreover, the number of countries who have constructed, or are constructing border barriers, has increased from 16 in 1989, to 65 today.
               Globalist arguments against building a wall? It’s “immoral.” Note that this bankrupt assertion is made by the same people who make the most morally bankrupt assertion of all: Illegal aliens commit crimes as “lesser rates” than native Americans. In the last two years alone, ICE arrested 266,000 illegal aliens with criminal records that included 100,000 violent assaults 4,000 murders, and 30,000 sex crimes. In 2016, more Americans died from drug overdoses than the total numbers of deaths recorded in Vietnam — over the course of 20 years. Drugs that include heroin smuggled from Mexico and fentanyl manufactured in Chinese labs and smuggled through Mexico and Canada.
               Those would countenance any number of such wholly avoidable crimes because it serves their ideological agenda are utterly despicable.
               It’s “too expensive.” Illegal immigration costs America more than $100 billion per year. Reduce that by only 10% and The Wall pays for itself in two-and-a-half years. Greater reductions equal quicker payback. It’s “racist.” As is anything that doesn’t align with globalist dogma.
               If we must have a wall, some or all illegals should get a “pathway to citizenship.” In 1986, America granted unambiguous  amnesty to 2.7 million illegals — in exchange for a secure border and a crackdown on businesses who hired illegals. The border  wasn’t secured and businesses still hire illegals. And after 30 more years of border-busting, 11-22 million illegals live here. Globalists would have you believe this time will be different.
               It won’t, and once again America will signal the world that coming here is worth the risk. Moreover, the idea that national security should be used a bargaining chip for anything else is absurd.
               “High-tech” surveillance makes a wall unnecessary. High-tech precipitates more arrests … of illegals well-rehearsed by leftist immigration lawyers to exploit our nation’s “catch and release” policy that transmits the exact same risk/reward message. A wall would partially undermine this contemptible policy.
               Open-border supporters deflect this reality by insisting more people overstay their visas. That’s true. So why not address both problems? Congress could make illegally crossing the border or overstaying one’s visa a felony that also makes one automatically ineligible for asylum. They could fully institute the E-Verify system and make it a felony to hire illegal workers. Congress could also write a law holding government officials who support sanctuary cities criminally and civilly liable for crimes committed by illegals they harbor, a clear violation of a 2014 Supreme Court ruling reiterating that immigration laws are regulated by the federal government.
               That they’ve done none of this reveals how blatantly our lawmakers have capitulated to the globalist agenda.

               Lawmakers from both parties. In 2010, Democrats had complete control of Congress and the presidency for two years. In 2016, the GOP was granted the same two years of control. Yet as recently as December, Border Patrol agents apprehended  27,518 members of family units, the highest monthly total on record. Last year they apprehended more than 500,000 people trying to enter the country illegally. While DHS claims their apprehension rate is 80%, other studies put it at 50% — meaning a minimum of 100,000 illegals successfully entered the country last year alone.
               In other words, despite all rhetoric to the contrary, members of both parties have amply demonstrated they are fine with this contemptible status quo.
               A status quo that reeks of hypocrisy. “Illegal immigration is wrong, plain and simple. Until the American people are convinced we will stop future flows of illegal immigration, we will make no progress,” said Chuck scumbag/clown-Schumer in 2009. “We simply cannot allow people to pour into the United States undetected, undocumented and unchecked,” declared Barack scumbag/liar-nObama in 2005. “I voted numerous times … to spend money to build a barrier to try to prevent illegal immigrants from coming in. And I do think you have to control your borders,” insisted scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton in 2008.
               Why the about-face? Because the Democrat Party’s only “core value” is the acquisition and maintenance of power — by any means necessary, all the hypocrisy in the world notwithstanding. They are joined by the other aforementioned globalist-supporting factions, all of whom derive either power, or historically unprecedented levels of wealth from fostering — and enhancing — the globalist status quo. The one where millions of Americans in “flyover country” are too stupid, fearful, racist, religious, gun-clinging, nativist, and “deplorable” to know what’s good for them. Even when it’s demonstrably not true.
               Very soon, Americans will learn if Britain will negate  democracy itself in service to the globalist agenda. On this side of the Atlantic, another caravan is being organized in Honduras for the purpose of testing U.S. immigration policy — again.
               The current standoff is a “make or break” moment for the nation. Either we remain a country with definable borders beholden to the Rule of Law, or we become an interchangeable cog in the globalist machine. One that wholly accommodates a globalist agenda — Liberty and self-determination be damned.
               A wall? The cornerstone of a constitutional republic is more like it.  ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/60510?mailing_id=4012&utm_mediu...      

Views: 10

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by Chip Bok

ALERT ALERT

LOOK: Obama Declared National Emergencies 13 Times Including Swine Flu, Iran And Flint Water Crisis

President Trump is expected to declare a State of Emergency at the US southern border on Friday.

Declaring the immigration crisis a national emergency is overdue. Presidents have declared national emergencies for nearly 50 years.

4

Barack Obama declared 13 national emergencies, 11 of which continue to this day. The Obama emergencies included the Swine Flu, Flint water crisis and Iran.

The Conservative Tribune reported:

As it turns out, there are currently 31 ongoing national emergencies over which the president wields certain authorities, the first of which has been in existence since 1979 and is one of only two emergencies declared by Carter.

There were a total of six national emergencies during former President Ronald Reagan’s tenure, as well as four more during the administration of former President George H.W. Bush, all of which have ended.

Former President Bill Clinton declared 17 national emergencies — six of which remain in effect — while former President George W. Bush declared 12 national emergencies, of which 10 remain ongoing.

Then we get to former President Barack Obama, who declared 13 national emergencies, 11 of which continue to this day. Thus far, President Trump has declared three active and ongoing national emergencies.

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service