~ Featuring ~  
Better Marriages, Happier Women
Brian Mark Weber  
Robert Mueller Just Infuriated House Democrats
by  After U.S. Attorney General William Barr was viciously insulted by House Democrats, Special Counsel Robert Mueller thumbed his nose at their demands to testify... It became all-too-apparent that left-wing radicals had pinned their hopes on the special counsel’s report to — finally — earn a win against President Donald Trump. Those hopes crumbled when he was fully exonerated. So far, the president has defeated every Democrat maneuver from seating conservative U.S. Supreme Court justices to travel bans and funding the border wall. When President Trump was exonerated from any wrongdoing in the 2016 elections, Democrats completely lost control of their faculties. They had every reason to believe that anti-Trump Mueller and his 12 angry Democrats would follow the coup attempts by disgraced ex-FBI director scumbag-James Comey among others. House Democrats still want their pound of flesh, and Mueller simply won’t give them the public spectacle they so desire. A.G. Barr and former White House lawyer Don McGahn already humiliated House Democrats. Following subpoenas, Democrats opened hearings with both men brushing them aside. Leading House Democrats such as New York Rep. scumbag/liar-Jerrold Nadler and California Rep. scumbag-Adam Schiff appear powerless. “Let me be clear. This committee will hear Mr. McGahn’s testimony, even if we have to go to court to secure it,” Rep. scumbag liar-Nadler said after he blew off their subpoena. Rep. scumbag-Schiff, who repeatedly and falsely told the American public he had impeachable documents that proved President Trump colluded with Russia, recently claimed he could compel Mueller to testify before Congress. “I feel very confident saying Mueller’s going to testify,” Rep. scumbag-Schiff said. “There’s no way that he cannot, and the public won’t stand for it. I think the Justice Department knows they’re on the poorest of ground in trying to prevent his testimony.”...
Nancy’s worst nightmare! Mueller 
sets Pelosi for up for fight of her life
by Tom Tillison
{ } ~ Democrats are reading into now-former special counsel Robert Mueller’s comments on Wednesday as a call to Congress to immediately begin impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump... And Speaker Nancy Pulosi may not be able to stop this runaway train. In his remarks, Mueller spoke of not being able to indict a sitting president with a crime because of DOJ policy, adding that they did not make a determination in that regard. “If we had confidence that the president did not commit a crime we would have said so,” Mueller stressed. “We did not, however, make a determination as to whether the president did commit a crime.” And with that, Democrats who have been clamoring to impeach Trump were off and running. House Judiciary Chairman scumbag liar-Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., was quick to respond, saying Trump was guilty of “lying” and while Mueller couldn’t pursue criminal charges against the president, “we will do so.” In effect, scumbag liar-Nadler suggested by Mueller not declaring Trump innocent, he was guilty. “In his statement this morning,” scumgbag liar-Nadler said, “Special Counsel Mueller reaffirmed his report, which found substantial evidence that Russia attacked our political system and that the President sought to obstruct Mueller’s investigation over and over again.” “He also confirmed three central points: he did not exonerate the President of the United States of obstruction of justice, obstruction of justice is a serious crime that strikes at the core of our justice system, and the Constitution points to Congress to take action to hold the President accountable,” the Democrat continued... These sorry A#$ dems won't take Muellers final word.
Democrats Succumb to Islamist Influence
by Harry Onickel } ~ Since the first meeting of the Continental Congress, the United States legislature has hosted religious leaders from various traditions to offer a prayer at the start of open sessions... On May 9, Texas representative Eddie Bernice Johnson invited a popular imam to give the opening invocation. Ordinarily, the presence and prayer of a Muslim religious leader wouldn’t be cause for concern, but the specific imam Rep. Johnson chose certainly is: notorious Islamist and homophobe Omar Suleiman. With over a million followers on Facebook, and almost three hundred thousand on Twitter, Suleiman is certainly influential among American Muslim youth. But, given his extremism, his influence should not be broadened or encouraged — especially not in the halls of Congress. For instance, Suleiman supports a theocratic legal system, calling for a “righteous khalifa [leader of a caliphate]” so that Sharia Islamic law can be implemented “in totality…on a state level,” and  insisted that Sharia practiced “on a societal level” would be a “righteous system.” Accordingly, the seminary Suleiman founded and leads, the Yaqeen Institute for Islamic Research, maintains a YouTube channel with videos of other popular Islamists justifying the practice of using whipping and cutting off limbs as punishments. Moreover, Suleiman has applauded the protracted periods of Arab violence against Israeli Jews known as the intifadas, writing, “God willing on this blessed night as the 3rd Intifada begins, the beginning of the end of Zionism the Jewish national self-determination movement is here.” Unsurprisingly, he has even dabbled in anti-Semitism by claiming “Zionist media” tries to silence the people of Gaza. Suleiman has expressed his opposition to homosexuality, stating that it is a “repugnant shameless sin.” He has further warned that “we will be forced to conform and watch this disease destroy our children.” Following significant public outcry that senior Democrats would give a platform to someone as extreme as Suleiman, American Islamist organizations, such as the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), rose to Suleiman’s defense, encouraging their supporters to call their representatives in support of the Islamist cleric...
The Palestinian War on the Trump Peace Plan
by Khaled Abu Toameh } ~ The Palestinians seem to be moving on two fronts to thwart US President Donald Trump's plan for peace in the Middle East, also known as the "Deal of the Century."... The Palestinian Authority and its political allies in the West Bank have  launched a diplomatic and media campaign to rally worldwide support for their rejection of Trump's upcoming plan. Hamas, Islamic Jihad and other Palestinian extremist groups, for their part, are already hinting that they will resort to violence in an effort to thwart the "Deal of the Century." Last week, Hamas  called on Bahrain not to allow the "Zionist enemy to defile its lands" by attending the economic conference. Recently, the Palestinians intensified their attacks on the upcoming peace plan, particularly after the US administration announced that it will unveil the economic portions of the "Deal of the Century" at an economic workshop in Bahrain in late June. The Palestinians have voiced strong opposition to the workshop and said they will boycott it, despite its goal of improving the living conditions of the residents of the West Bank and Gaza Strip. In a rare show of unity, President Mahmoud Abbas's ruling Fatah faction and its rivals in Hamas and Islamic Jihad are saying that the Palestinians will not only boycott the Bahrain conference, but that all the countries invited should also reject the invitation to attend the workshop. The Palestinians are particularly focusing their effort on trying to persuade the Arab states to boycott the Bahrain workshop. They are terrified that the Arab countries will surrender to US pressure and attend the conference, thus, as they see it, abandoning their Palestinian brothers and leaving them isolated in the international arena...  
President Trump responds to Mueller’s ‘parting’ shots, as sparks fly around the country
by Tom Tillison } ~ Within minutes of now former special counsel Robert Mueller making his first and last public remarks on his two year, $30+ million investigation of Russian collusion... 
President Donald Trump has declared the case closed. Citing what’s a foreign concept for the Democratic Party, that being due process and the presumption of innocence, the president took to Twitter to say: “Nothing changes from the Mueller Report. There was insufficient evidence and therefore, in our Country, a person is innocent. The case is closed! Thank you.”Speaking from the Justice Department, Mueller spoke of not being able to indict a sitting president with a federal crime and said they did not make a determination in that regard because the law doesn’t allow him to accuse the commander in chief of a crime even in a private report. Sarah Sanders released the following statement shortly after President Trump.“That is unconstitutional,” Mueller said. “It was bound by that department policy.” But he stopped short of declaring Trump innocent. “If we had confidence that the president did not commit a crime we would have said so,” Mueller stressed. “We did not, however, make a determination as to whether the president did commit a crime.” This being in reference to obstruction of justice, as Mueller’s report, said that they did not find any evidence of collusion with Russia. As for the possibility of testifying before Congress, Mueller said, “The report is my testimony.” Rep. scumbag liar-Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, one of five House panels currently investigating Trump, has reportedly been in negotiations with Mueller on attending a hearing. “There has been discussion about an appearance before Congress,” Mueller said on Wednesday. “Any testimony from this office would not go beyond our report. It contains our findings and analysis and the reasons for the decisions we made. We chose those words carefully and the work speaks for itself. And the report is my testimony. I would not provide information beyond that which is already public in any appearance before Congress.”
Better Marriages, Happier Women
Brian Mark Weber:  We’ve been conditioned for decades to believe the key to a happy and enduring marriage is one based on “progressive” values and a rejection of the traditional religious views of the relationship between husband and wife. But new studies reveal otherwise.

That’s right: Married men and women are happier when religion is part of their lives.

Of a new report on marriage, faith, and families by the Institute for Family Studies and the Wheatley Institution, authors W. Bradford Wilcox, Jason S. Carroll, and Laurie DeRose write in The New York Times Sunday Review, “The happiest of all wives in America are religious conservatives, followed by their religious progressive counterparts. Fully 73 percent of wives who hold conservative gender values and attend religious services regularly with their husbands have high-quality marriages.”

But even left-leaning couples are typically happier and enjoy stronger marriages when religious sentiment is part of their lives.

Wilcox, Carroll, and DeRose add that secular women “compared with religiously conservative women” do not “enjoy the social, emotional and practical support for family life provided by a church, mosque or synagogue.”

This seems to fly in the face of a feminist philosophy that religion prevents women from realizing true happiness, and that quality of life is attained only by rejecting religious principles — the patriarchy! — in favor of “progressive” values and a secular worldview.

But a society without religion can leave some people searching in the wrong places for happiness. This includes Millennials who have spurned marriage and family in favor of individual happiness, careers, and wealth. There’s certainly nothing wrong with these goals — except that marriage is actually one of the best ways to achieve them.

As Suzanne Venker suggests in the Washington Examiner, “By turning away from marriage, as understandable as it might have been at the time, millennials set themselves up to fail. Married people are significantly better off (financially, emotionally, even on the happiness scale) than any other group of Americans. The data are indisputable. To be sure, a culture of divorce scares people away from marriage. But what we’ve learned the hard way is that without marriage, a nation crumbles. Just because your parents failed at love doesn’t mean you will. Rejecting marriage outright was the real mistake.”

Of course, many factors have contributed to our nation’s high divorce rate, but there’s no doubt that secular progressivism has been one of them. (Frankly, we’d argue that failed marriages among Christian conservatives are a result of not living up to the biblical ideals they espouse.) When young people believe that everything in the universe is random and that abandoning religious values is the pathway to a happy life, it’s no wonder they reject marriage and family in pursuit of the false promises of secularism.

And while non-religious liberal women tend to celebrate marriages in which male spouses are engaged in family life, this isn’t a new concept in conservative religious homes, where husbands have always endeavored to embrace their role as fathers. At the same time, many feminist women who consider themselves progressives are less likely to have children in the first place.

There are many benefits to a religious life. “Faith is a force for good in contemporary family life in the Americas, Europe, and Oceania,” say the report’s authors. “Men and women who share an active religious life, for instance, enjoy higher levels of relationship quality and sexual satisfaction compared to their peers in secular or less/mixed religious relationships. They also have more children and are more likely to marry.” They add, “This report suggests the family-friendly norms and networks associated with religious communities reinforce the ties that bind.”

Makes sense. And it’s no wonder that more Americans admit they’re suffering from depression, anxiety, isolation, and other afflictions at a time when we’re abandoning the very religious values that held our society together for so long.

Earlier this year, the Pew Research Center conducted a study with similar findings. According to Pew’s analysis, “In the U.S. and many other countries around the world, regular participation in a religious community clearly is linked with higher levels of happiness and civic engagement (specifically, voting in elections and joining community groups or other voluntary organizations). This may suggest that societies with declining levels of religious engagement, like the U.S., could be at risk for declines in personal and societal well-being.”

After so many years of social and moral chaos, it’s interesting that we’ve come full circle and finally realized that maybe we had it right all along. After having been told that a rejection of religion would strengthen our society, we’re now realizing the powerful and beneficial affect that religion has on our marriages and communities.

Let’s hope it’s not too late to convince millions of young people that they’re looking for happiness in all the wrong places.   ~The Patriot Post  

Views: 8


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center



Political Cartoons by Tom StiglichPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel


Florida Sheriff — “I Will Not Enforce Assault Weapons Ban, Neither Will Most Sheriffs”

Dennis Lemma, who is the Sheriff in Central Florida’s Seminole County, told a group of 2nd Amendment activists recently that he would not enforce an assault weapons ban that could soon become Florida law if the “Ban Assault Weapons Now” amendment passes in the Sunshine State.

According to News965, the ban has the following specifications.

The amendment proposed in the state legislature would ban possession of assault weapons, which are defined as “semiautomatic rifles and shotguns capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition at once, either in fixed or detachable magazine, or any other ammunition feeding device.”

Lemma, an ardent supporter of the 2nd Amendment and a first term sheriff who is running for re-election, said this about whether or not he would enforce such a law.

“It’s not only that I wouldn’t, the majority of sheriffs across the state would not do it,” Lemma said in the video. It’s up to the sheriffs what they are willing to enforce.”

Trump Holds Rally in Milwaukee, WI 1-14-20

© 2020   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service