Tuesday PM ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~  
Gay Pride' Month — 'LGBTQ' Support Declines
QFXnKLoQMwPQMN62RE18PiD0JgCIKxbG0TTwL2USQP6zA8ToRHx_LHg9zPLOLFQ4iHjDqEYBdpAgVR0incJQxhaIdVM4J9tQ784RyovsUWpw9j6ur8rsenXU50iHMtVIrQ6NYQtZr4laWec4Lqshe_dY3lf7I4VDJMk_10w=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Mark Alexander  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Jury finds Navy SEAL Eddie Gallagher 
not guilty of war crimes
AZShtpOP7TxYdU728_Roe-ut43CWRGnzZ9F03Gpte6Iyb-MKFgkdr4P-wQkTMP-8SgKGpLasEPRASJK-QoF4XOY3K-d13p4o3ZMac3spvWjlxYX1HXF4YMpDAIQtIxaRIX9QJ07hczxekoipeAWt5mU28g=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Russ Read
washingtonexaminer.coms } ~ The jury assigned to the case of accused Special Warfare Chief Edward Gallagher has found the decorated Navy SEAL not guilty of murder and attempted murder... after a whirlwind trial that included bombshell revelations and twists. The verdict was reached by the five Marines and two sailors Tuesday after the prosecution and defense made their closing arguments the day before. Gallagher, 40, was accused of stabbing an injured teenage ISIS fighter to death and shooting at civilians during a deployment to Iraq in 2017. Seven members of Gallagher's own platoon leveled the accusations against him, describing their chief as a reckless murderer who failed to distinguish between civilians and the enemy. The accusers communicated through a WhatsApp group called "The Sewing Circle," a seemingly innocuous name for a group dedicated to discussing the alleged war crimes of a decorated sniper and medic. Those discussions would be the basis on which Navy prosecutors would bring charges against Gallagher. The case received national attention after a searing New York Times report  detailed the gory accusations, including stabbing an injured teenage ISIS fighter and shooting an elderly man and a young girl. The report claimed the accusers were told to keep quiet about Gallagher's actions or risk losing their tridents, the coveted badge identifying a sailor as a Navy SEAL. Gallagher's case drew further attention in May when it was reported that he was one of several accused troops being considered for pardons from President Trump. The news sharply divided the military community and even the Navy SEALs themselves. The SEAL community is known for being especially close-knit, but the Gallagher case created a clear division between old-school defenders and younger skeptics. With a verdict of not guilty, Gallagher will no longer need a pardon from Trump, who had previously stated he would wait until the trials were over in the cases the White House was reviewing before rendering a decision. With Gallagher's case over, attention will likely turn to the case of Army. Maj. Mathew Golsteyn, who plead not guilty last week to a charge of premeditated murder for the killing of a suspected Taliban bomb-maker...   https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/defense-national-security/jury-finds-navy-seal-eddie-gallagher-not-guilty-of-war-crimes  
.
Chuck scumbag-Schumer faces liberal 
ire over border bill ‘betrayal’
YvDVMIeFPWwi9mVFGNaYeQ_mdsVDycxMrqD-2lfVygDEACacm5dmoZ66XMNZvRdPJ_W04U8d1ejE4GDEJxOBLbRcwM37LmydpLoUeKplmtk2IOf-8cRTuvAgtXqzZ4xPhynQDNf5_K7bXCo7IPoNAJOJFWGouIVeMnuocpnF6HzbycOLeUAKs6uk3fAYGUTIDAIS1wr0kWUmF5XQ19DcTIJBjQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Brooke Singman 
foxnews.com } ~ Senate Minority Leader Chuck scumbag-Schumer is facing a lingering political backlash from liberal House Democrats over his role in the passage of a bipartisan border bill last week... which saw House Speaker liar-Nancy Pulosi forced to back down from a push to include restrictions on immigration enforcement. The Senate bill, which was approved by an overwhelming 84-8 vote last week, had $4.6 billion in crucial border funding, but was met with opposition by liberal House Democrats who wanted the restrictions included. In the end, liar-Pulosi, D-Calif., was forced to bring the bipartisan bill to a vote, amid pressure from Republicans and moderate Democrats to pass legislation ahead of the July 4 holiday break. Now, those in the House progressive wing are turning their ire toward scumbag-Schumer, D-N.Y., for allegedly not fighting for the restrictions they sought -- provisions such as limiting the amount of time unaccompanied minors can spend at an influx shelter, and reducing funding for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) by millions. “Chuck scumbag-Schumer f---d us,” a Democratic aide told Vanity Fair last week. “scumbag-Schumer threw all of the House Democrats under the bus and he will pay a heavy price for that,” another Democratic aide told Politico. The Congressional Hispanic Caucus last week called the measure a “betrayal of our American values,” and one that they will “not forget.” The drama has led to reports of a rift between scumbag-Schumer and liar-Pulosi. According to The Washington Post, liar-Pulosi was “blindsided” when the Senate voted overwhelmingly for the bipartisan bill. A House Democratic aide told the outlet that scumbag-Schumer “destroyed all of our leverage…by not being able to hold his people.” “The Senate Democrats did us a huge disservice,” Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, told the Post. “The benefit to having one chamber controlled by Democrats is you have people who can fight and win. But that requires the people in the minority chamber to also fight, even if they lose.”...  https://www.foxnews.com/politics/schumer-faces-liberal-ire-over-border-bill-betrayal  
.
US Border Patrol Releases Video of Agents Performing CPR – Saving Illegal Alien 
Child from Rio Grande
ec0hrS4B8jrKK7Y_hqcHw2iLAlT7NfbdstKHKC3wl2OKWx86IIG9ZP3jtBlYyjcPjqbCrMC34lsCMcUHVWPojRaEdNIwyx88OXpeszHCGiNmZqgtFlzOvwJRfNhQussH=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xBy Jim Hoft
thegatewaypundit.com } ~ Earlier this week a young father and his baby girl drowned crossing the Rio Grande to get to America. They were illegal immigrants... The left blamed President Trump for the tragic deaths. The left believes open borders will fix this. Of course, the left will never show the photos of illegal aliens rescued by US border agents. This doesn’t fit their narrative. On Thursday the US Border Patrol posted video of agents rescuing a 3-year-old illegal alien who drowned in the river. The agents pulled the child from the river and began giving the child CPR and rescued him. The media won’t show you this.
.
Federal Judge Blocks Billions 
of Dollars for Border Wall Funding
g9AOUXm0OBFniRtWtQm9VAYBfE8sY3C4se2So70oQ1RhvjLl3nrcS15SSkbfH2zPNBNMGgZBFXSOK-FxF5fp79pqfXvZucv_JqjMAzOPtzy4SdzcbtOoBTDDikDwwoMmUH61L5w=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Kevin Daley
dailysignal.com } ~ A federal judge in California barred the Trump administration Friday night from reallocating $2.5 billion to construct border barriers... U.S. District Judge Haywood Gilliam, an scumbag/liar-nObama appointee, expanded an earlier order and forbade the government from moving forward with specific border wall projects in Arizona, California, New Mexico, and Texas. He also turned the previous order into a permanent injunction.“Congress considered all of defendants’ proffered needs for border barrier construction, weighed the public interest in such construction against defendants’ request for taxpayer money, and struck what it considered to be the proper balance—in the public’s interest—by making available only $1.375 billion in funding, which was for certain border barrier construction not at issue here,” Gilliam’s order reads. Elsewhere in his decision, Gilliam said government lawyers were advancing “an argument that the court should not enjoin conduct found to be unlawful because the ends justify the means. No case supports this principle.” After declaring a national emergency at the southern border, the administration announced it would reprogram $600 million from the Treasury Department’s forfeiture fund, $2.5 billion from Defense Department counter-narcotics activities, and $3.6 billion from military construction projects to finance construction of the wall. The $2.5 billion for counter-drug efforts were at issue in Friday’s case. The plaintiff in Friday’s case is the Sierra Club, an environmentalist group that claims “recreational and aesthetic interests” in habitats near the border, like “hiking, bird watching, photography and other professional, scientific, recreational, and aesthetic uses.” A border wall will inevitably restrict their access to those habitats, the plaintiffs say, thereby diminishing their quality of life. They also fear heightened racial tensions and environmental damage... Sierra Club and Judge Gilliam are idiots but only see their views and not the Americans for protection.  
.
Nunes Warns: Something “Odd” About 
Mueller’s Upcoming Testimony
b2BRvlXRnk2O-rWjfbnMKQNnLYCMuuIp8qOXc_QBhSmqr3JX7BLc-9ZDJIBof-GaZ3rDh3RL44PBFkmN7jdvIlS6TptUbaihfKiBh9Ulm2JAB4gpKJzVzAk2F7Rmb1nImNk_rw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By bongino.com ~ The ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee Congressman Devin Nunes (R-CA) says there is something “odd”... about the plans surrounding Robert Mueller’s July 17 congressional testimony. “I don’t know which direction he’s Mueller going to go…I think there are two trains of thought out there: One is he’s just not going to say anything, which is very possible, but it’s also very possible too that he could throw a monkey wrench in things,” Nunes said. “What’s odd about this is, supposedly he’s only agreed to testify for four hours — but four hours with the House Intelligence Committee and the House Judiciary Committee is not enough time to get everyone’s questions in,” he continued. Also of concern to Nunes is the possibility that Mueller would send his “pit bull” Andrew Weissmann to testify behind closed doors. “In addition people should know he’s also not willing to testify, as of now, behind closed doors and he’s supposedly going to send in Andrew Weissmann and his team of geniuses that came up with these conspiracy theories and that’s not going to even be translated,” he warned.
.
Assault on religious liberty on 
a fast track Monday, July 1, 2019
s8lwWJu4e2ao4koZiqQYPo6rbbyIOaZ-9aW-F8P_IVoZp12cfGRZtg5kcjRacToMoMYl2LPMLgptnp9xX3AaV1Fo3WaCJq9Z0SCzyc4q4MJH1dN9=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
By Charlie Butts and Steve Jordahl
onenewsnow.com } ~ The California Assembly has passed a resolution calling on faith leaders in the state to affirm homosexuality and refrain from counseling anyone that change through Christ is possible... It is now headed to the Democrat-heavy State Senate.  Assembly Concurrent Resolution-99 proclaims that the state's legislators have "found that being lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender is not a disease, disorder, illness, deficiency, or shortcoming." Further, it "calls upon religious leaders with conviction to counsel on LGBT matters from a place of love, compassion, and knowledge of the psychological and other harms of conversion therapy." While it doesn't outright ban biblical counseling, Pastor Ken Williams – himself a former homosexual – told a state legislative committee it is an assault on religious liberty. "What's scary for me is that 200-plus years into America's development of its freedoms that we would be now moving to support one viewpoint so strongly that we would actually erode convictions," said the pastor.The resolution's sponsor, Democratic Assemblyman Evan Low, countered that the measure has "a number of leaders within the evangelical community who had articulated their support of the notion that individuals should be loved and celebrated as who they are." Chief among those is a past president of the National Association of Evangelicals, Kevin Mannoia, who is now a chaplain for Azusa Pacific University. Mannoia testified before an Assembly Committee on June 20 in favor of ACR-99. Attorney Roger Gannam of Liberty Counsel says it was a surprise Mannoia wrote a letter and then testified for the resolution. "It's one thing to say that he wants there to be a good dialogue and that it should be respectful and respect the dignity of people," Gannam tells OneNewsNow. "We would all agree with that – but to actually indicate support for this resolution was a big surprise and very, very disappointing." Pastor Williams begged the Assembly not to pass the resolution. "Assemblyman Low, you may have the votes to pass this," he said, "but I don't believe that you have the right to presuppose people's consciences or to tell them what they need to believe."...
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Gay Pride' Month — 'LGBTQ' Support Declines
QFXnKLoQMwPQMN62RE18PiD0JgCIKxbG0TTwL2USQP6zA8ToRHx_LHg9zPLOLFQ4iHjDqEYBdpAgVR0incJQxhaIdVM4J9tQ784RyovsUWpw9j6ur8rsenXU50iHMtVIrQ6NYQtZr4laWec4Lqshe_dY3lf7I4VDJMk_10w=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Mark Alexander:  June is so-called “Gay Pride Month,” and it ended on a low note for homosexual advocacy groups that promote gender confusion and identity dysphoria among young people. The trends regarding acceptance of that agenda among those 35 and under are showing promising signs of decline.

The nation’s oldest (1985) and one of its most prominent homosexual groups, the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, which has since expanded its advocacy to include the other manifestations of gender confusion — LGBTQ+ (ad infinitum) — just received the results of opinion research it sponsors annually. And the news was not good … for homosexual advocacy.

The report notes: “Five years ago, GLAAD partnered with The Harris Poll to launch a unique index to measure Americans’ attitudes toward lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people and issues. In the first three years of the Harris Poll study, the Accelerating Acceptance report showed positive momentum year-over-year, with Americans stating they were more comfortable with LGBTQ people and more supportive of LGBTQ issues. … Last year, however, the acceptance pendulum abruptly stopped and swung in the opposite direction. More non-LGBTQ adults responded that they were ‘very’ or ‘somewhat’ uncomfortable around LGBTQ people in select scenarios. … The decline in acceptance and rise in discrimination found in the survey corresponded to an increase in hateful rhetoric in our culture.”

By “hateful rhetoric,” GLAAD is referring to the empowerment of dissenting social and cultural views that it attributes to Donald Trump’s election. However, I would argue that the decline in support for GLAAD’s constituency is the result of the absurd extent to which these thugs have taken their jack-boot agenda, from men invading girls’ dressing rooms and bathrooms to battles over the use of pronouns that dare imply there are only two genders. Of course, only the most reality-challenged heterophobic gender deniers argue that point.

In fact, the Harris survey results regarding what parents would want for their children is the most revealing trend indicator. Among the Left’s most dependable demographic of useful idiots, those aged 18-34, a full third (33%) said they would not be comfortable with their children in a class with a gender-confused teacher — and that was up from 25% in 2016 and 29% in 2017. And 39% of young adults indicated they did not want their children exposed to an LGBTQ-themed history lesson, up from 27% and 30%, respectively, in 2016 and 2017. The survey also found that only 45% of young people indicated they were “very” or “somewhat” comfortable around gender-confused/dysphoric individuals — and that was down from 63% and 53%, respectively, in 2016 and 2017. The number of young people indicating they would be distressed by finding out a family member was homosexual rose from 29% in 2017 to 36% in 2018.

Remarkably, there was a significant drop in acceptance among young women — 64% were “comfortable” with homosexuals in 2017, down to 52% in 2018. As I have noted previously, women voters are the largest Democrat Party voting block, and their collective LGBT sympathy is a major reason Democrats pander to that gender-confused subset.

Two years of polling results does not confirm a trend, and we will have to review GLAAD’s report next year. But the sentiments and sensibility of young people may be headed in the right direction.

Harris Poll CEO John Gerzema tipped his biased hand with this skewed observation about his company’s GLAAD poll: “We count on the narrative that young people are more progressive and tolerant. These numbers are very alarming and signal a looming social crisis in discrimination.” Well thanks for that heads up!

According to GLAAD President Sarah Kate Ellis, the “rise in divisive rhetoric both in politics and in culture” has had “a negative influence on younger Americans.” She insists that “LGBTQ people and allies must urgently address today’s cultural crisis by being visible and vigilant.”

However, as I previously noted, the outcome of homosexual advocates “being visible and vigilant” is precisely why their support is dropping. Glenn Stanton of Focus on the Family agrees. He says that the drop in acceptance is because “the ‘gay’ movement continues to over-play its hand and that will certainly continue.” He adds, “Rather than simply being ‘live and let live,’ they are forcing Americans to embrace their politics, and often with overwhelming muscle and the life-crushing public accusations of a person’s so-called ‘bigotry’ and ‘hatefulness’ if they dare disagree.”

As for the absurd gender-pronoun variants, GLAAD’s Ellis notes that it’s “a newness that takes time for people to understand.” Or it takes time for people to reject.

The most ridiculous example of corporate support for gender-pronoun confusion came when Nabisco announced a new packaging scheme for its Oreo cookies: “We’re proud to celebrate inclusivity for all gender identities and expressions. In partnership with National Council of Teachers of English, we’re giving away special edition Pronoun Packs and encouraging everybody to share their pronouns with Pride today and every day.” Seriously, Nabisco’s advertising department has become that detached from gender reality.

Regarding how LOUD the “LGBT+” crowd has become, another just-released research report found that Americans think one in four people are LGBT+. According to the report, “Americans’ estimate of the proportion of gay people in the U.S. is more than five times Gallup’s more encompassing 2017 estimate that 4.5% of Americans are LGBT, based on respondents’ self-identification as being lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender.”

Finally, for those who are quick to label others who don’t embrace their gender-bending orthodoxy as “haters,” we as Christians are called to love other sinners but not to embrace sin. That distinction is too often lost in rancorous rhetoric from the Left, as was the case over the weekend during New York’s “gay pride” parade. The storefront of a Chick-fil-A in Manhattan was desecrated with signs reading “F—k haters,” a reference to the fact the business is Christian owned. Of course, the “haters” were those who posted that message.  ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/63972?mailing_id=4378&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4378&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center