The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
Why is Left Wing Violence Acceptable?
by Larry Horist
.
Treason Is Now in Vogue
"Chelsea Manning Changed the Course of History. Now She's Focusing on Herself," is the sickening headline of the September issue of Vogue magazine. The fawning story begins with what we guess is supposed to be an endearing description of "her" appearance and newfound comfort in "her" own skin. It goes on to tell much of Manning's story, though it's factually wrong in some details. More on that in a minute, but suffice to say the Left is in full swing happily celebrating its new transgender poster child.
We say the story is sickening for two reasons. First, Bradley/Chelsea Manning is an individual who deserves our pity, prayer and help, not vacuous celebrations. His gender dysphoria and what strikes us as narcissistic personality disorder is tragic, not heroic. He's had a difficult life, including his father leaving at a young age and his mother attempting suicide. Transgendered people are at a drastically higher risk of suicide attempts than the general population, and it's no surprise that Manning, too, has tried. And yet to Vogue, his only "problem" is that he couldn't be "herself" until taxpayer-funded transition surgery.
Second, Manning is a traitor who released more than a million pages of classified information about U.S. intelligence operations to WikiLeaks, endangering lives and disrupting policy. He aided and abetted the enemies of America while in our nation's uniform, all because he decided, on his own authority, to stimulate "worldwide discussion, debate and reforms." Yet his disclosures were totally self-serving. And Vogue lied about some of the information: "The breach's breadth was startling, as were its contents," the magazine reports, including "the so-called Collateral Murder video, showing a U.S. helicopter killing a group of Baghdad pedestrians that included children and press."
"On the contrary," rejoins the Washington Examiner's Tom Rogan, "it shows the lawful targeting of insurgents armed with rifles and a grenade launcher. Those 'Baghdad pedestrians' were threatening a U.S. Army unit that suffered one of the highest casualty rates of any unit in Iraq."
In any case, it's fair to say he'd still be in prison — or the grave — if he was still a man. Barack liar-nObama would have had no politically advantageous reason to give him a ridiculous commutation deal, all while couching it as enough being enough. "Let's be clear," liar-nObama said (using a phrase typically indicating he's lying), "Chelsea Manning has served a tough prison sentence. I feel very comfortable that justice has been served."
No, liar-nObama's political objective was served, and it is still being served by this tripe from Vogue and other outlets that sycophantically flatter Manning and their own "enlightened" cosmopolitan egos. ~The Patriot Post
.
.
Former NSA Tech Director Bill Binney Outlines
DNC Emails Were a Leak, Not a Russian Hack
{theconservativetreehouse.com} ~ Former NSA Technical Director Bill Binney outlines how the 2016 DNC emails were actually taken by a leaker using a portable storage device, and not taken by a computer hack initiated by the vast Russian enterprise... The reality that it was an internal leak further advances the possibility that DNC employee Seth Rich was actually the person who took the DNC email data after becoming disenfranchised by the DNC intentionally undermining Bernie Sanders and aiding candidate liar-Hillary Clinton. Seth Rich was murdered under rather unusual circumstances in 2016, shortly after WikiLeaks began releasing and publishing the emails. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/08/14/former-nsa-tech-director-bill-binney-outlines-dnc-emails-were-a-leak-not-a-russian-hack/
.
Ambassador Friedman's daughter makes Aliyah
by Yoni Kempinski
{israelnationalnews.com} ~ US Ambassador to Israel David Friedman’s daughter made Aliyah to Israel on Tuesday, along with 232 other immigrants from North America brought on a special flight chartered by Nefesh B’Nefesh... Ambassador Friedman met his daughter, Talia Friedman, on the tarmac to welcome her to her new home. “We’re so proud of our daughter Talia,” Friedman told Arutz Sheva. “She’s always wanted to live in Israel and she’s realizing her dream and the whole family is just very proud of her. We’re here to just greet her and to give her a hug and to wish her hatzlacha rabba success here in Israel. We’re very excited.”... http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/233945
utm_source=activetrail&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl
.
The North Korea Gambit
by DR. PETER VINCENT PRY
{familysecuritymatters.org} ~ Now that North Korea is recognized by the intelligence community and policymakers alike as a clear and present danger to the U.S. mainland-armed with ICBMs capable of blasting American cities with atomic warheads... possibly with much more powerful thermonuclear warheads in 6-18 months-what can we do? First, understand that North Korea is a pawn in a geostrategic chess game being played by China and Russia against the United States. The North Korean nuclear missile threat is built on technology provided by Russia and China, to threaten and if necessary wage nuclear war by proxy against the U.S. and its Pacific allies. Their North Korea gambit is to so increase the nuclear threat against the United States, that U.S. security guarantees to Japan, South Korea and other allies will no longer be credible. Will the U.S. sacrifice Chicago and Denver to protect Seoul and Tokyo? China, Russia, and North Korea don't think so... http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/the-north-korea-gambit?f=must_readsby DR. PETER VINCENT PRY
.
Palestinians: The Honeymoon with the US is Over
In his recent meeting with US presidential envoys Jason Greenblatt and
In his recent meeting with US presidential envoys Jason Greenblatt and
Jared Kushner in Ramallah, an enraged Mahmoud Abbas (right) rejected
their demand that he halt payments to terrorists and their families
by Bassam Tawil
{gatestoneinstitute.org} ~ US President Donald Trump's envoys, Jason Greenblatt and Jared Kushner, are planning to return to the Middle East soon to discuss ways of reviving the stalled "peace process" between Israel and the Palestinians... Greenblatt tweeted last week that he was looking forward to returning to the Middle East "as we pursue peace." Not surprisingly, the Palestinians have returned to their old habit of accusing the US of being "biased" in favor of Israel. As the US envoys prepare to head to the Middle East, Palestinians are saying that they have lost confidence in the Trump administration, as they have done with all previous administrations... https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10830/palestinians-us-mediationby Bassam Tawil
.
BLM Founder – White Speech
Is Hate Speech, No First Amendment Rights
by rickwells.us
{rickwells.us} ~ The agitator for criminal rights obsessed with racism who started the Black Lives Matter hate group was kicked out of her home when she was 16 by her parents... Her Wikipedia page says it was because she’s a lesbian, something her parents objected to, but it likely had more to do with the huge chip on her shoulder and the matching mouth. The name of this skin color obsessed individual is, as unbelievable or fitting as it might be, Patrisse Cullors. She’s a fulltime agitator so she’s right at home on CNN complaining about people who produce, work for a living and don’t believe in communism as an acceptable alternative to the Constitution and individual liberty. On the subject of the Constitution, this liberal pontification expert who knows better than the rest of us how we should be living our own lives, has a different translation than the one the rest of us use. It’s something along the lines of “The Racist’s Constitution – Butt-Hurt Hoodrat Version. In her special edition of the Constitution, the First Amendment text is a little longer. It contains an exclusion for hate speech...These people and people like her are so brainwashed. She needs help. http://rickwells.us/blm-founder-white-speech-hate-speech-no-first-amendment-rights/.
.
by Larry Horist
{punchingbagpost.com} ~ In response to the tragedy in Charlottesville, Virginia, President Trump condemned the acts of violence in the “strongest terms.” He expanded his condemnation to include ALL who promote or carry out violence. Seems like a reasonable comment.
For the next several days, and counting, the left wing news media spun a narrative that by not mentioning the perpetrators and provocateurs by name, the President was actually endorsing the white supremacy organizations. To reinforce this claim, they dredged up previous times where they, themselves, interpreted Trump’s words to mean something other than their defined meaning. Sure, he condemned David Duke, but not quickly enough. He repeatedly preached against violence, but not in the right words. It was what Trump did not say that became the point of criticism. Consider this point again. The President strong words of condemnation against those who perpetrated violence in Charlottesville and any others who have similar motives had no meaning, but what he did not say did.
His words were described as a “dog whistle,” meaning that his actual words of condemnation were to be interpreted as a subtle show of support for the hate mongers. Dog whistle is a nonsense term that self-justifies interpreting a person’s words to any meaning a critic might prefer. A dog whistle is for dogs.
The Presidents condemnation was reiterated by virtually every person in his administration, many naming the offensive organizations. This included Vice President Pence, National Security Advisor H. R. McMaster and others. Among those strongly condemning the action AND the organizations was Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who immediately launched a federal investigation.
In the perverse world inside the New York City/D.C. press bubble, these condemnations by Trump administration officials, including his most senior staff, were interpreted as repudiations of the President’s statements. Even after the White House issued a statement on behalf of the President – his official statement – repudiating the white supremacist groups by name, the major media continued to malign the President by ignoring his more specific statements.
The hyperbole of the media, especially CNN and MSNBC, was boundless. The mainstream media, with their panels of parroting pundits, began to characterize the President with offensive appellations that are usually the rhetoric of the absurdly ignorant. Claiming that Trump’s failure to read the script they offered up in hindsight, major news personalities called him a racist, a Nazi, a white supremacist, a provocateur of violence. They lashed out at anyone who would not take up their intellectually corrupt cause in demonizing Trump to the point of impeachment or worse. They descended on the President with all the table etiquette of a pack of jackals.
They assassinated his character over condemning violent groups “on many sides.” The fact that they found those words so offensive is due to their acquiescence, if not endorsement, of the preponderance of political violence emanating from the radical left. For proof, one only need review the NY/DC media’s coverage of the attack on Republican congressman or their limited, if any, coverage on the calls for the random killing of police officers by left wing hate groups. For years, the mainstream media has minimized the meaning of the ubiquitous left wing violence. Campus riots and the trail of crime and violence in the wake of Occupy Wall Street were largely brushed off. The left and its media spokespeople have no moral pedestal from which to pass judgment. For these reasons, the left wing press could not address the other side of the confrontation and took umbrage when Trump did.
One thing I learned on the streets of Chicago is that when you have two gangs egging for a fight, you will get a fight. The reason for the conflict and who threw the first punch – or nowadays – fired the first shot is generally unknown and pretty much unimportant. Most times people wound up with bloody noses or black eyes, but sometimes people died.
In many ways, the tragedy that occurred in Charlottesville was similar to those urban gang wars. By both their nature and its intent the hateful white supremacist organizations are provocative and prone to violent confrontation. This is common knowledge and has been as long as I can remember.
I recall the ragtag remnants of the staunchly anti-Semitic KKK marching in Skokie, Illinois – arguably one of the most Jewish communities in America. It was not their intention to protest, but to provoke. The arrival in Charlottesville was no different.
What gets lost in the news – intentionally, I believe – is the motivation and intention of some of those who came to Charlottesville to protest. Most came to peacefully demonstrate and show the world that the hate mongers do not represent American values. Some, however, were there to provoke physical confrontation as they have done in other areas of the country. And they did. To doubt the culpability of the rally protesters, one only need recall the violent confrontation that commenced long before the fatal act of terrorism. This was a fight that could not have been more predictable if it had been advertised as a boxing card event.
Two hateful elements met on the streets of Charlottesville egging for a fight, much like those urban gangs of my youth. Unfortunately, the police were not adequately prepared to impose order. Like any such confrontation, shouts led to shoves and the cycle of violence was begun. When Trump condemned ALL those who promote and provoke violence, he is not wrong.
Why is Left Wing Violence Acceptable?
{punchingbagpost.com} ~ In response to the tragedy in Charlottesville, Virginia, President Trump condemned the acts of violence in the “strongest terms.” He expanded his condemnation to include ALL who promote or carry out violence. Seems like a reasonable comment.
For the next several days, and counting, the left wing news media spun a narrative that by not mentioning the perpetrators and provocateurs by name, the President was actually endorsing the white supremacy organizations. To reinforce this claim, they dredged up previous times where they, themselves, interpreted Trump’s words to mean something other than their defined meaning. Sure, he condemned David Duke, but not quickly enough. He repeatedly preached against violence, but not in the right words. It was what Trump did not say that became the point of criticism. Consider this point again. The President strong words of condemnation against those who perpetrated violence in Charlottesville and any others who have similar motives had no meaning, but what he did not say did.
His words were described as a “dog whistle,” meaning that his actual words of condemnation were to be interpreted as a subtle show of support for the hate mongers. Dog whistle is a nonsense term that self-justifies interpreting a person’s words to any meaning a critic might prefer. A dog whistle is for dogs.
The Presidents condemnation was reiterated by virtually every person in his administration, many naming the offensive organizations. This included Vice President Pence, National Security Advisor H. R. McMaster and others. Among those strongly condemning the action AND the organizations was Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who immediately launched a federal investigation.
In the perverse world inside the New York City/D.C. press bubble, these condemnations by Trump administration officials, including his most senior staff, were interpreted as repudiations of the President’s statements. Even after the White House issued a statement on behalf of the President – his official statement – repudiating the white supremacist groups by name, the major media continued to malign the President by ignoring his more specific statements.
The hyperbole of the media, especially CNN and MSNBC, was boundless. The mainstream media, with their panels of parroting pundits, began to characterize the President with offensive appellations that are usually the rhetoric of the absurdly ignorant. Claiming that Trump’s failure to read the script they offered up in hindsight, major news personalities called him a racist, a Nazi, a white supremacist, a provocateur of violence. They lashed out at anyone who would not take up their intellectually corrupt cause in demonizing Trump to the point of impeachment or worse. They descended on the President with all the table etiquette of a pack of jackals.
They assassinated his character over condemning violent groups “on many sides.” The fact that they found those words so offensive is due to their acquiescence, if not endorsement, of the preponderance of political violence emanating from the radical left. For proof, one only need review the NY/DC media’s coverage of the attack on Republican congressman or their limited, if any, coverage on the calls for the random killing of police officers by left wing hate groups. For years, the mainstream media has minimized the meaning of the ubiquitous left wing violence. Campus riots and the trail of crime and violence in the wake of Occupy Wall Street were largely brushed off. The left and its media spokespeople have no moral pedestal from which to pass judgment. For these reasons, the left wing press could not address the other side of the confrontation and took umbrage when Trump did.
One thing I learned on the streets of Chicago is that when you have two gangs egging for a fight, you will get a fight. The reason for the conflict and who threw the first punch – or nowadays – fired the first shot is generally unknown and pretty much unimportant. Most times people wound up with bloody noses or black eyes, but sometimes people died.
In many ways, the tragedy that occurred in Charlottesville was similar to those urban gang wars. By both their nature and its intent the hateful white supremacist organizations are provocative and prone to violent confrontation. This is common knowledge and has been as long as I can remember.
I recall the ragtag remnants of the staunchly anti-Semitic KKK marching in Skokie, Illinois – arguably one of the most Jewish communities in America. It was not their intention to protest, but to provoke. The arrival in Charlottesville was no different.
What gets lost in the news – intentionally, I believe – is the motivation and intention of some of those who came to Charlottesville to protest. Most came to peacefully demonstrate and show the world that the hate mongers do not represent American values. Some, however, were there to provoke physical confrontation as they have done in other areas of the country. And they did. To doubt the culpability of the rally protesters, one only need recall the violent confrontation that commenced long before the fatal act of terrorism. This was a fight that could not have been more predictable if it had been advertised as a boxing card event.
Two hateful elements met on the streets of Charlottesville egging for a fight, much like those urban gangs of my youth. Unfortunately, the police were not adequately prepared to impose order. Like any such confrontation, shouts led to shoves and the cycle of violence was begun. When Trump condemned ALL those who promote and provoke violence, he is not wrong.
Comments