~ Featuring ~
What the Trump Wing Must Do to 
Win Back the Suburbs
by Harold Hutchison  
Jerome Corsi Rejecting Plea Deal, 
Plans to Sue dirty cop-Mueller
by Joshua Caplan
{} ~ Former Infowars D.C. bureau chief Jerome Corsi will reject a plea agreement offered by the special counsel... and fire back with a criminal complaint, accusing dirty cop-Robert Mueller of “Gestapo” tactics in attempting to pressure the author into pleading guilty to one count of perjury. “They can put me in prison the rest of my life. I am not going to sign a lie,” Corsi said in a brief telephone call with CNN. Asked what dirty cop-Mueller office will do next if he does not agree to the plea deal, Corsi replied, “I don’t know.” Corsi told NBC producer Anna Schecter that a plea agreement would involve the author of pleading guilty to one count of perjury. “I’d rather sit in prison and rot for as long as these thugs want me to,” he told Schecter. Instead of accepting a plea deal, OAN’s Emerald Robinson reports Corsi will file a criminal complaint against dirty cop-Mueller with acting Attorney  General Mathew Whitaker. As reported Friday, Corsi revealed that he has been negotiating a potential plea but declined to comment further on the matter. He said on a YouTube show earlier this month that he expected to be charged with lying to federal investigators, though he said at the time that he was innocent of wrongdoing...
Rock-Throwing Migrants Used Women 
And Children As Human Shields
{} ~ National Border Patrol Council President Brandon Judd: “The way these people rushed the border was absolutely monstrous... They pushed women and children up front and then behind those women and children, they started throwing rocks, cement bricks, they started throwing bottles at our Border Patrol agents.” “We were forced to use the action, adding that they did not use “kinetic force” on any children and instead launched tear gas into the area to force the crowd to disperse.“Several agents were actually struck by rocks,” Scott said, before revealing that the migrants pushed women and children to the front of their group to discourage agents from responding to rock-throwing with force. “What we saw over and over yesterday was that the group — the caravan, as we call them — would push women and children to the front and then begin, basically, rocking our agents,” Scott asserted. Scott further explained that agents did not target women and children with gas, but that “once that chemical is released, it does go through the air.”...
scumbag/clown-Schumer flips Supreme Court
discrimination ruling 180 degrees to attack Roberts
by Pete Kasperowicz
{} ~ Senate Minority Leader Chuck scumbag/clown-Schumer on Monday accused Chief Justice John Roberts of deciding in 2013 that voting discrimination against blacks no longer exists... even though Roberts wrote explicitly at the time that it "still exists." The Democratic New York lawmaker was on the Senate floor speaking against Thomas Farr, a North Carolina lawyer who is President Trump's pick to be a district court judge in his home state. scumbag/clown-Schumer said on the Senate floor that Farr "stands for the disenfranchisement of voters," then raised the 2013 Supreme Court case Shelby County v Holder. That case ended in a Roberts opinion that said a key part of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is outdated and needs to be modernized. scumbag/clown-Schumer said that opinion showed that Roberts believes voting discrimination no longer exists. "Justice Roberts will go down in history as one of those who worked to take away voting rights when he authored the Shelby decision and stated that he didn't believe that ... more or less, he stated that he didn't believe that discrimination existed any longer, so we wouldn't need Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act," scumbag/clown-Schumer said. But Roberts never wrote that voting discrimination no longer exists and, in fact, said explicitly that it does still exist. "At the same time, voting discrimination still exists; no one doubts that," Roberts wrote at the time...
lowlife-Kamala Harris Could Lose Seat 
on Senate Judiciary Committee
by Andrew Kugle
{} ~ Sen. lowlife-Kamala Harris (D., Calif.) could lose her seat on the Senate Judiciary Committee according to a Sunday report from the Washington Post... lowlife-Harris, who is a potential 2020 candidate, may be forced to give up her seat on the committee after Republicans gained seats in the midterm elections. The stronger GOP majority means an additional Republican will replace a Democrat on the committee. The California senator is the most junior Democratic member of the committee, which means unless she is able to negotiate an agreement with Republicans or her fellow Democrats on the committee, lowlife-Harris would be the one replaced. The committee is central in Supreme Court justice confirmations, attorney general confirmations, and oversight of special counsel dirty cop-Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation, all issues bringing a lot of media spotlight, which would be beneficial to the first term senator if she decides to run in 2020. Liberal advocacy groups like Demand Justice are trying to find a way for lowlife-Harris to stay on the committee...
Trump’s last, best chance for wall 
creates latest shutdown threat
{} ~ Congress is returning to Washington with a tight deadline to pass seven spending bills and avert a partial government shutdown... over President Trump’s demand that lawmakers fund his wall on the Mexican border. The partial shutdown will take place on Dec. 7 if Congress does not pass legislation, creating the last chance for Trump to win wall funding before Democrats take over the House majority in January.Trump has threatened to veto a spending bill that does not include funding for the wall. If he follows through, the partial shutdown would hit the Homeland Security, Justice and State departments, among other government entities. “This would be a very good time to do a shutdown,” Trump told reporters at the White House earlier this month. “I don’t think it’s going to be necessary, because I think the Democrats will come to their senses, and if they don’t come to their senses, we will continue to win elections.” Many think that Congress will get a bill past the finish line despite Trump’s talk...
What the Trump Wing Must Do to Win Back the Suburbs
by Harold Hutchison:  When considering the GOP’s disastrous defeat in the suburbs in the 2018 midterm elections, there are a number of places to look for problems and solutions. One big reason for this shellacking was the lack of unity in the GOP and the conservatism movement more generally. This is because when you look at the GOP and conservatism, right now there are two major wings: An establishment wing and a Donald Trump/MAGA wing.

             The dividing line is not so clear-cut: You can have very conservative people who worked for Ted Cruz (like Amanda Carpenter) be firmly Never Trump, while moderate Republicans like Rudy Giuliani are going full MAGA. In a number of cases, it is more a matter of attitude, tone, and political combativeness rather than policy differences. The MAGA wing has justifiable beefs with establishment Republicans and conservatives like Nicolle Wallace for failing to call out abusive language (and worse) from the Left, and in some cases, joining the attacks. Many establishment types have grown sick of President Trump’s tone. The two sides are digging in, neither willing to consider a truce.
               It’s more than that, though. Some of the last two years’ policy changes didn’t help the GOP and contributed to the drubbing in the House. For example, consider tax reform. Sure, it did a lot of good things, including the repatriation of money that American companies were keeping overseas, but the cap on the deductions for state and local taxes (SALT) hammered the suburbs in high-tax states.
               Democrats in some deep-blue states even moved to reduce the tax hit from the federal government due to that change. Granted, the reason they had to act was they had high taxes in the first place, but the GOP never made that case effectively, and as a result, people who were taking a hit saw Democrats moving to help taxpayers. That didn’t help the GOP when many suburban women were already turned off by Trump’s tone, and while the GOP failed to deliver even a “skinny” scumbag/liar-nObamaCare repeal.
               Add the bias from the mainstream media and a Democrat base fueled by anger over the 2016 election, and the GOP not only suffered its biggest shellacking in the House since 1974, but it lost Senate seats it should have won or held in Ohio, Arizona, Nevada, Montana, and West Virginia, as well as governorships it should have held in Kansas, Nevada, Michigan, and Wisconsin. Much of this was the suburbs flipping.
               So what can the Trump wing of the GOP do to win back the suburbs? We’re not likely to see Trump’s tone change — it’s far more likely that you’ll find oceanfront property in Utah. But aside from that, there are some things that can be done.
               One thing may be to restore the SALT deduction — or at least double the cap before it hits. The next step is to do what should have been done in 2010: Come up with a free-market approach to health care that can protect those with preexisting conditions. After that, the GOP needs to look at other issues of concern to the suburbs and come up with good free-market solutions.
               The GOP also needs to improve its marketing of these policies — not just on the theoretical principles but to also explain the benefits in real-world terms. A more free-market approach to health insurance that allows a family to buy a policy that meets their needs and that doesn’t have unnecessary bells and whistles could help them save for a vacation. Lower gas prices from reforming EPA regulations could help a family not have to choose between kids’ activities.
               For the MAGA wing of the GOP, making inroads in the suburbs is essential. They may not get back all those who have defected from the GOP, but they really don’t need to. They just need to get enough suburban votes to go with those who Trump added to the GOP’s winning coalition in 2016.  ~The Patriot Post  

Views: 16


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center



Political Cartoons by Tom StiglichPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel


Florida Sheriff — “I Will Not Enforce Assault Weapons Ban, Neither Will Most Sheriffs”

Dennis Lemma, who is the Sheriff in Central Florida’s Seminole County, told a group of 2nd Amendment activists recently that he would not enforce an assault weapons ban that could soon become Florida law if the “Ban Assault Weapons Now” amendment passes in the Sunshine State.

According to News965, the ban has the following specifications.

The amendment proposed in the state legislature would ban possession of assault weapons, which are defined as “semiautomatic rifles and shotguns capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition at once, either in fixed or detachable magazine, or any other ammunition feeding device.”

Lemma, an ardent supporter of the 2nd Amendment and a first term sheriff who is running for re-election, said this about whether or not he would enforce such a law.

“It’s not only that I wouldn’t, the majority of sheriffs across the state would not do it,” Lemma said in the video. It’s up to the sheriffs what they are willing to enforce.”

Trump Holds Rally in Milwaukee, WI 1-14-20

© 2020   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service