Tuesday PM ~ TheFrontPageCover

Merry Christmas
aGT3yOMM5MEZuZOU8ZaVkHBBITtugkF-S56PP4XF48NOVGeTMKz6saHgbuGPfzU8yAsg8uNV0nM_jKVEr39fEn6KSlPPcHwa8CeVArTElFfNpmI0A4a9HZoTujZq1FsPb9N5n3OTVCc=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
The Front Page Cover
 The Events of the Week -- Featuring: 
The "Elite" Coup Of 2016
by Moon Of Alabama
 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Judge Jeanine Blasts Michelle liar-nObama
For Claiming All Hope Now Gone
by Rick Wells
IbVv7ItMI7HXcTa5KarIPLXY6x_IELIMQRcR_jZHPT_Dy-Bv8tDLnoJvGb1cVkVmKblrrN3ISe87BPdMdu911FFA8U632kGkhteM6SxUUKRZh9w0iccgxyQ2aWE12o0=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{rickwells.us} ~ Judge Jeanine’s opening statement begins at the 1:50 mark in the video. She starts off saying, “The left has been telling you for years what you’re gonna eat, what you should say, and now, how you should feel... Take a listen to Michelle liar-nObama.” She then plays the clip of Mooch and Oprah Winfrey talking about how all hope is now gone with the liar-Clinton loss. “Really?” asks Pirro, “This from a woman who in 2008, at 44 years old, said for the first time in her life she was proud of her country when her husband was running for president. And now, eight years later, you’re out of hope, Michelle? You’ve lived a life few can even imagine, at the citadel of power and prestige in the world. You and your husband blessed by God and the American people with a unique and historic opportunity to not only lead America from that shining place on a hill, but impact Americans and give them hope that virtually no others can.” “And now that you’re leaving, hope is gone?” Judge Jeanine asks, “Since when does hope rise and fall with you and Barack in the White House? But it doesn’t end there...
.
liar-nObama/liar-Clinton bots rabid,
puerile and just plain pitiful
BOHr5n51JTF-nQ97FqPtX77MHw3L9FzHxQn8EUEkruV9oJ1fY8FsABvUDWIBBJMzlu_A4L89JPAjojW_jMyM4ZofLBAIbpxIygnzSuGGNA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
 by Sher Zieve
{renewamerica.com} ~ Almost each and every day, now, the Democrats are pulling something else out of their hats to stop President-Elect Donald J. Trump from becoming the 45th President of the United States on 20 January 2017... Today, the Dems are demanding that the Electoral College not cast their Constitutionally required votes for Mr. Trump on 19 December. Instead, they are demanding an "Intelligence briefing," so that they might be satisfied that Trump should actually take the office. They are working hard to negate the votes of We-the-People and overturn the 2016 presidential election. This is childish and petulant Narcissism taken into a previously unexplored exponential realm. This really needs to end. You have become pitiful caricatures of humanity... http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/zieve/161218
.
Karl Rove: Dems Attempting To Throw
A ‘Coup’ To Undermine Trump
by Christian Datoc
eT21s7srquTvZtuRVJLLhVGi_-pH1lXBcGuTYAzkzCGIwdS7mB_t_LlMai48Iq_fiYJCoxksE-LfC9motPjlv_kO3qxlD_GU6SXz4PSS2oqsoLtlumxMsj-L_NaEuRNB87YnvgtVrPQLcHW05NSc1BALBzh-1w=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{dailycaller.com} ~ Karl Rove said on “Fox News Sunday” that efforts to convince electoral college electors to vote for someone other than Donald Trump are tantamount to a coup... “First of all, let’s be clear,” Rove told host Chris Wallace. “The CIA said Russia did not have, quote, a single purpose. That is to say the idea that this was all about helping Trump… They said this was about an important part of the Russian hacking was aimed at undermining confidence in the American electoral system. “I love all the hyperventilation on the left that this was somehow responsible for liar-Hillary clinton’s defeat,” he continued. ““Let’s be clear what this is about. One, a coup. They’re attempting to have 37 electors flip, which is not going to happen, or to throw it in the house of representatives and somehow have 26 states, delegations — some of them dominated by Republicans — vote for somebody other than Donald Trump. Not going to happen.”  “Let’s be clear what this is about. One, a coup. They’re attempting to have 37 electors flip, which is not going to happen, or to throw it in the house of representatives and somehow have 26 states, delegations — some of them dominated by Republicans — vote for somebody other than Donald Trump. Not going to happen.” http://dailycaller.com/2016/12/18/karl-rove-dems-attempting-to-throw-a-coup-to-undermine-trump-video/?utm_source=WhatCountsEmail&utm_medium=TheDC%20Morning&utm_campaign=TheDC%20Weekend
.
Fox Business Interview Goes From
Bad To Worse For Nancy Pulosi’s Daughter
by Christian Datoc
NgiowTe4OVW4pK7Hi-tn0KhQeZsH_Ol8x1cwVQ5MRAqKodxTEgxCWjuiD05R8LD33KC4Fn3nbs0V8CJUBF5DG3whzNgTLxASyP0yjsLSq2khdTfuNFebSdkydAT7iW_zwGCcPWnMcJ3u-xwpFKwTeSklMdbr63b9cyvOh7wmsN3jk-860A=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{dailycaller.com} ~ Christine Pulosi’s Friday morning interview on Fox Business quickly devolved into an all-out screaming match with host Maria Bartiromo... The Democratic campaign strategist — and daughter of House Minority Leader Nancy Pulosi — started by talking about the Russian government’s involvement in hacks of the DNC and RNC, yet refused to yield time for Bartiromo to offer any questions. “Listen, let’s not talk on top of each other. Let’s not talk on top of each other, Christine, OK? The audience doesn’t know what you’re saying or what I’m saying if we talk on top of each other,” she added before asking, “how much of this is sour grapes on your side’s part?”...  http://dailycaller.com/2016/12/16/rude-fox-business-interview-goes-from-bad-to-worse-for-nancy-pelosis-daughter-video/?utm_source=WhatCountsEmail&utm_medium=TheDC%20Morning&utm_campaign=TheDC%20Weekend
.
Lynch Attempts To Rewrite History,
“Explains” Bill liar-Clinton Tarmac Meeting
by Rick Wells
XWG1f3g_SNSxw29VYBv87fDwxKp2LzbBFQsBtG6BQmg6nAEma78YAoVQXZQ1K0_tgnCJJwscbaGRr1cbzBsy3O6D0KHNlFs2yh9EmH8QVvYhSZ6_DW1v1rA64E7YAIs=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{rickwells.us} ~ With the election and liar-Hillary Clinton now history, Loretta Lynch is not going to be keeping that Attorney General position she was promised if she just let liar-Clinton off on her corruption... Lynch did her part but liar-Clinton wasn’t able to seal the deal. Now she’s attempting to put the best face she can on her horrible lack of judgment and abuse of power. Lynch said, “I do regret sitting down and having a conversation with him, because it did give people concern. And as I said, my greatest concern has always been making sure that people understand that the Department of Justice works in a way that is independent and looks at everybody equally,” Lynch said on CNN’s “State of the Union.” “She’s failing on both the clearly and the cleanly scores. Most folks believe she made a deal to benefit liar-Clinton, the inconvenient timing and facts are making hers a hard argument to press. Tapper tries to soften the bumps in making the her claims that she is most concerned with people believing that DOJ is not fair and impartial. She says that was the reason why she attempted to give a quick response to the situation. A quick lie is no substitute for the truth...  http://http://rickwells.us/lynch-attempts-rewrite-history-explains-bill-clinton-tarmac-meeting//lynch-attempts-rewrite-history-explains-bill-clinton-tarmac-meeting/
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
The "Elite" Coup Of 2016
by Moon Of Alabama
{informationclearinghouse.info} ~ December 16, 2016 "Information Clearing House" - "Moon Of Alabama" -
*There is an "elite" coup attempt underway against the U.S. President-elect Trump.
*The coup is orchestrated by the camp of liar-Hillary Clinton in association with the CIA and neoconservative powers in Congress.
*The plan is to use the CIA's "Russia made Trump the winner" nonsense to swing the electoral college against him. The case would then be bumped up to Congress. Major neocon and warmonger parts of the Republicans could then move the presidency to liar-Clinton or, if that fails, put Trump's vice president-elect Mike Pence onto the throne. The regular bipartisan war business, which a Trump presidency threatens to interrupt, could continue.
*Should the coup succeed violent insurrections in the United States are likely to ensue with unpredictable consequences.

The above theses are thus far only a general outlay. No general plan has been published. The scheme though is pretty obvious by now. However, the following contains some speculation.

The priority aim is to deny Trump the presidency. He is too independent and a danger for several power centers within the ruling U.S. power circles. The selection of Tillerson as new Secretary of State only reinforces this Prediction: Bolton will not get the Deputy position. Tillerson is for profitable stability, not for regime change adventures. The institutional Trump enemies are:
*The CIA which has become the Central Assassination Agency under the Bush and liar-nObama administrations. Huge parts of its budgets depend on a continuation of the war on Syria and the drone assassination campaigns in Afghanistan, Pakistan and elsewhere. Trump's more isolationist policies would likely end these campaigns and the related budget troughs.
*The weapons industry which could lose its enormous sales to its major customers in the Persian Gulf should a President Trump reduce U.S. interference in the Middle East and elsewhere.
*The neoconservatives and Likudniks who want the U.S. as Israel's weapon to strong arm the Middle East to the Zionists' benefit.
*The general war hawks, military and "humanitarian interventionists" to whom any reduction of the U.S. role as primary power in the world is anathema to their believes.
The current CIA director Brennan, a leading figure of the CIA torture program and liar-nObama consigliere, is in the liar-Clinton/anti-Trump camp. The former CIA heads Hayden and Panetta are public liar-Clinton supporters as is torturer king and former CIA deputy director Michael Morell.
 
It is thereby no wonder that the CIA is leading the anti-Russian campaign. Its task now is to implant the idea in the U.S. public that Russian intervention skewed the U.S. election towards Trump. The purpose is the delegitimization of the Trump victory in the eyes of the media and public but even more so in the eyes of the electors within the electoral college.
 
The CIA is heavily supported by the same mainstream media that pushed for liar-Clinton during the election. These are, not by chance, also the same media that pushed the CIA's earlier "Saddam's Weapon of Mass Destruction" campaign.
 
The Democratic partisan and Harvard law Professor Lawrence Lessig is pushing the electors and offers them free personal legal support. He says the electoral college vote is now close.
 
Could 37 Republican electors, put there by voters in their states to vote for Trump, be convinced to move from electing Trump to abstain or vote for someone else, Trump would miss the needed 270 votes. The whole election of the president would then by kicked up to the House of Representatives.
 
Should the electors vote for Trump there is still a possibility that members of the House and the Senate could officially question that vote and cause delays or Congressional probes and legal challenges.
 
Here are the detailed general proceedings and specifics for the electoral college as explained by the National Archives and Records Administration.
 
Though neoconservatives have no genuine support within the U.S. electorate they have a strong hold on significant parts of Congress and the relevant MSM commentariat. Many leading neoconservatives and war hawks like Robert Kagan, Max Boot and the Washington Post editorial board came out for liar-Clinton during the campaign. liar-Clinton even ran campaign advertisements with Republican Congress luminaries like Lindsay Graham, Sasse and Flake.
 
The House and the Senate majority may well be on the anti-Trump side if push comes to shove. But whatever the outcome there surely would be intense legal challenges and I expect the case to go up to the Supreme Court.
 
As an alternative to legal shenanigans Trump's inauguration could be delayed by liar-nObama's order to the intelligence community to create a formal review of Russian intervention in the election by January 20. That is not by chance the official inauguration date! The selling point:
By ordering a “full review” of allegations of Russian into the 2016 election process, President Barack liar-nObama is essentially asking the IC to make an analytical judgment about the validity of the election that will place Trump in the Oval Office.
A "compromise" in Congress could be to wait for the Intelligence Community's analysis and then discuss it before certifying Trump as president. That would end up with no result as National Intelligence Estimates are notoriously vague. Meanwhile the Vice President-elect would sit in as acting President:
If the President-elect fails to qualify before inauguration, Section 3 of the 20th Amendment states that the Vice President-elect will act as President until such a time as a President has qualified.
If the congressional or legal process around the Trump election gets delayed, that may be a state for a long time. The ruling Washington blob or borg could well live with an acting President Pence while Trump would have no official say in any government business. Could liar-Clinton then become acting VP or qualify as the new president?
 
The media intervention on the anti-Trump side is heavy.
 
But first keep in mind that there is no public evidence, ZERO, that Russia indeed had anything to do with the DNC or Podesta or other leaks and the publication of emails by various outlets like Wikileaks.
 
Craig Murray assures us that he knows that these were not hacks but insider leaks and that he knows the leakers. Indeed he now tells us that the emails were handed over to him during a visits in Washington. Former intelligence officials including the technically very knowledgeable former NSA official William Binney concur that the hacking story is false.
 
All we have heard or seen so far are hearsay rumors and allegations of evidence. To me as experienced IT professional the case is technically laughable just as Murray explains here. If the claimed hacks occurred at all the alleged methods were so common that anybody could have done these. There is not even one claimed fact yet that is technically halfway acceptable as evidence that "Russia did it".
 
But still the NYT runs a big package of pieces telling us that "Russia did it" based on the non-factual CIA rumors and unprofessional IT assertions by Crowdstrike, the self-promoting IT security company the DNC hired and paid. Before that the Washington Post published major claims of Russian interference by anonymous officials. NBC News now tops that with "intelligence officials" saying Putin himself ran the hacking campaign. Authors of the story are the long time insider hacks Bill Arkin and Ken Dilanian known for clearing his stories with the CIA before publishing. The next story will tells us that Vladimir Valdimirovich himself was punching the keyboard.
 
Many news outlets and editorials follow these "leads".
 
Part of the scheme the liar-Clinton campaign has worked out was explained by a former opposition research consultant to the Democratic National Council, the Ukrainian-American Alexandra (aka Andrea) Chalupa, in this thread:

Andrea Chalupa ‏@AndreaChalupa Dec 11

1.) Electoral College meets Dec. 19. If Electors ignore #StateOfEmergency we're in, & Trump gets elected, we can stop him Jan. 6 in Congress
 
2.) If any objections to Electoral College vote are made, they must be submitted in writing, signed by at least 1 House member & 1 Senator
 
3.) If objections are presented, House & Senate withdraw to their chambers to consider their merits under procedures set out in federal law
Editorials and op-eds in the major papers are pushing the scheme along. Just for example from a long list A.J. Dionne in the Washington Post:
The CIA’s finding that Russia actively intervened in our election to make Trump president is an excellent reason for the electors to consider whether they should exercise their independent power. At the very least, they should be briefed on what the CIA knows, and in particular on whether there is any evidence that Trump or his lieutenants were engaged with Russia during the campaign.
The New York Times editorial laments about Trump ridiculing the CIA fairy tales it promotes.

Many people who have voted for Trump would be disgusted and outraged if or when Trump will be denied his office. Many of them are armed and would protest. Violence is ensured should the coup succeed.

Trump selected four former generals to joins his cabinet and staff. Should the troubles escalate we might be roughly in for a scenario as laid out in the 1992 military paper: The Origins of the American Military Coup of 2012 (pdf) by Charles J. Dunlap.
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center