The Front Page Cover
The Events of the Week -- Featuring:
The Worst Excesses Of The Left
by Erick Erickson
.
liar-nObama Reserves Right to Criticize
An unwritten rule of outgoing presidents, considering the many challenges the position brings, is to respect the office by making a commitment to refrain from publicly criticizing the incoming president and his policy decisions. No one has exemplified this commitment better than George W. Bush, who despite being blamed almost incessantly by Barack liar-nObama for everything from the poor economy to Iraq never fought back or attempted to defend his legacy. He left it for historians to judge generations from now.
While every president desires to leave a lasting, positive legacy, once the individual has left the office he has no control over what becomes of his policies or how future historians will judge his time in office. The office is and always has been greater than the individual. liar-nObama seems to think otherwise.
On Sunday in Lima, Peru, liar-nObama — while acknowledging the respect George W. Bush showed him, saying he "could not have been more gracious to me when I came in" — showed he'd learned very little from his predecessor. Contending that he reserved the right to comment on Donald Trump's policy decisions, liar-nObama stated, "As an American citizen who cares deeply about our country, if there are issues that have less to do with the specifics of some legislative proposal or battle or go to core questions about our values and ideals, and if I think that it's necessary or helpful for me to defend those ideals, I'll examine it when it comes." And what may those "values" be of which liar-nObama speaks? We're betting that Americans will find out soon enough as liar-nObama is sure to continue his legacy as the lecturer in chief. ~The Patriot Post
.
OPINION IN BRIEF
John Goodman: "One family canceled Thanksgiving dinner so they wouldn’t have to be with pro-Trump relatives. Another family canceled a Christmas reunion for the same reason. One couple changed the date of their wedding so that a pro-Trump relative wouldn’t be able to attend. Another couple chose to get married in Italy — a place too distant for their relatives to travel to. These are just a few of the ruptures that have followed the election of Donald Trump, as reported by The New York Times. Are we a deeply divided nation? Maybe. But if we are divided the cause of that division comes squarely from the left, not the right. In virtually every case, the people who are canceling reunions and refusing to talk to their friends and family members are liar-Hillary supporters. The Times reported not a single instance of a Trump voter shun. What’s the cause of all this? I think it is identity politics. ... Identity politics works on some voters. I have heard stories of women who break down crying at the mere mention of the election results. Are they crying because NAFTA may be renegotiated? Or the pipeline may be built? Of course not. If elections are about identity, then elections are about you in a very personal way. If the other candidate wins, you have been personally rejected. I would probably cry too if I were naïve enough to believe all that."
~The Patriot Post
.
.
Donald Trump and the Return of
European Anti-Americanism
by Soeren Kern
by Soeren Kern
{gatestoneinstitute.org} ~ European anti-Americanism — which was on the wane during the presidency of Barack liar-nObama, who steered the United States on a course of globalism rather than nationalism — is back with a vengeance... Europe's media establishment has greeted Donald Trump's election victory with a vitriol not seen since the George W. Bush presidency, when anti-Americanism in Europe was at fever pitch. Since the American election on November 9, European television, radio and print media have produced an avalanche of negative stories, editorials and commentary that seethe with rage over the outcome of the vote. European criticism of Trump goes far beyond a simple displeasure with the man who will be the next president. The condemnation reveals a deep-seated contempt for the United States, and for American voters who democratically elected a candidate committed to restoring American economic and military strength... https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9372/trump-europe-anti-Americanism
.
Schumer Threatens 'Tooth and Nail' Fight
Over Supreme Court Nominee
by Susan Jones
{cnsnews.com} ~ Come January, Republicans will control the House, the Senate and the presidency, but with only 52 Republicans in the Senate. That will not give them the 60 needed to break a Democrat filibuster... Appearing on various Sunday talk shows, Schumer was asked if Senate Democrats will filibuster Trump's Supreme Court nominee, whoever it may be. "I would hope first and foremost that President Trump nominates a mainstream nominee capable of getting bipartisan support," Schumer told "Fox News Sunday."... http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/schumer-trump-should-name-mainstream-supreme-court-nominee-or-dems-will?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiT1Rjek1qRTRNVEkzTXpWaCIsInQiOiJKWnpWWExpZ2h2UXBTNkxBNUN3b2kzd2d5K0drXC9mZHZTSXFuU1Q2Ym14VFdNSmtGcndudWlzclFDOExuSTB0UERWTnl2UVVBYXVvN1VcL1BcL3FnYmRERldpSWFPeFpYZlNCUVwvNm9Udko1VXc9In0%3D
VIDEO: http://www.mrctv.org/videos/schumer-threatens-tooth-and-nail-fight-over-supreme-court-nominee
.
UN Globalist Claims US Trapped –
liar-nObama Climate Hoax Irreversible
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ What is it about the climate hoax that has its proponents so committed to its implementation? There is no flood of seawater and no submerging coastal areas anywhere on the planet unless erosion or other forces are at play... The temperature, globally, is not rising and in fact we may be in a cooling period due to reduced sunspot activity. The reality is that the effect of the actions of a segment of the surface dwellers, mankind, even in its most draconian enforcement of the existing Paris and Agenda 2030 agreements, will have virtually no impact on global temperatures. So what is behind their hand-wringing hysteria? The UN climate models, those trusted by the alarmist’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, indicated that the world would be only 0.137 degree C cooler by 2100 if the US eliminated all of its CO2 emissions, an impossibility. Expanded to all of the industrialized world similarly moving into caves and banning fire, it still is an insignificant 0.278 degree C the year 2100. Does killing the economies and a lot of the residents of the planet for a decrease in temperature of one fifth of a degree over 84 years really seem like a good idea? Are those who think it is really leadership caliber people?... http://rickwells.us/frenchy-fried-un-globalist-claims-us-trapped-obama-climate-hoax-irreversible/
.
Trump Would Relish a Supreme Court Fight
by John Fund
{nationalreview.com} ~ Chuck Schumer, the incoming leader of Senate Democrats, warned Sunday on NBC’s Meet the Press that any Supreme Court nominee of Donald Trump’s will be filibustered if he or she isn’t “mainstream.”... “If he doesn’t nominate a mainstream candidate, we’re going to go at him with everything we have . . . go at the candidate with everything we’ve got because this is so, so important,” Schumer said. He then falsely claimed that all four of the nominees put forth by President liar-nObama and President Bush had won wide bipartisan support. Not true. Justice Samuel Alito was confirmed in 2006 with the votes of only four out of 44 Senate Democrats. Schumer’s threat is real. Schumer’s threat is real. During the debate on Alito, Harry dinky-Reid, who was then the Democratic leader of the House, and then-senator Barack liar-nObama attempted a filibuster against him... http://www.nationalreview.com/article/442343/donald-trump-supreme-court-fight-reid-schumer-threaten-filibuster?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily%20Trending%20Email%20Reoccurring-%20Monday%20to%20Thursday%202016-11-21&utm_term=NR5PM%20Actives
.
Death Threats: Last Bastion
for liar-Hillary Clinton Supporters
by Dawn Gaye
{theblacksphere.net} ~ The Left will attempt to maintain power by any means necessary, and their tactics include the threat of death. Or in the case of this young man we discuss, the very real death where he merely joked about voting for Trump... The Federalist Papers reports on 22-year-old Mike Banerian, an official elector in Michigan: “You have people saying ‘you’re a hateful bigot, I hope you die,’” Banerian said. “I’ve had people talk about shoving a gun in my mouth and blowing my brains out. And I’ve received dozens and dozens of those emails. Even the non-threatening-my-life emails are very aggressive.” The Detroit News has verified one message containing a death wish and another containing a death threat, in which the person told Banerian he would “put a bullet” in his mouth...These people are really sick. http://theblacksphere.net/2016/11/death-threats-last-bastion-hillary-clinton-supporters/
.
.
The Worst Excesses Of The Left
by Erick Erickson
{freedomsback.com} ~ In the past week, as conservative opponents of Donald Trump have come to terms with his victory, nothing has done more to help them give Trump the benefit of the doubt than the complete meltdown by the American left. Having written just last week that those of us who got the election wrong exercise some humility and consider we might have gotten Trump wrong too, leftwing activists have flooded my inbox with hate mail for selling out to fascism.
Therein lies a problem for the left. After the election, Noam Chomsky, the left’s conscience, declared the Republican Party “has become the most dangerous organization in world history.” He went on to claim the party “is dedicated to racing as rapidly as possible to destruction of organized human life.”
Shortly after the election, at the Democratic National Committee, a staffer named Zach began yelling at the interim DNC Chairwoman, Donna Brazile, “You and your friends will die of old age and I’m going to die from climate change. You and your friends let this happen, which is going to cut 40 years off my life expectancy.” Jamelle Bouie, a CBS News analyst and writer, wrote a piece entitled “There’s No Such Thing as a Good Trump Voter.” His subtitle is, “People voted for a racist who promised racist outcomes. They don’t deserve your empathy.”
On college campuses across America and in the streets of major cities, the left is protesting, rioting, threatening, crying and bullying. The CEO of the company GrubHub sent a letter to his employees denouncing Donald Trump and asking any Trump supporters who agreed with Trump’s policies to resign from the company.
At Rutgers University, police took a lecturer named Kevin Allred in for a psychological evaluation. Allred, a self-styled feminist, made statements about killing white people. Allred is a white, gay male from Utah living in New York. Among other things, Allred tweeted, “if i see any Trump bumper stickers on the road today, my brakes will go out and i’ll run you off the road.” After the police showed up, Allred claimed it was “proof positive that Trump’s crackdown on free speech has absolutely begun.” Needless to say, Allred is a lecturer at a liberal university in a liberal city run by a quasi-communist mayor in a country presided over by Barack liar-nObama, not Donald Trump.
The supposedly progressive left is convinced that Donald Trump is going to get us all killed due to global warming. Trump is also, supposedly, going to round up Muslims, Jews, and Hispanics. He will strip children of their gender identity, though he supports transgender rights, and he will eradicate gay marriage, though he supports it. In fact, many of Donald Trump’s major policy initiatives are spending programs previously championed by liberals. But the American left is convinced doom is at hand and Trump is going to kill us all.
It raises a troubling question. If Noam Chomsky really believes the GOP is the “most dangerous organization in world history” and it is “dedicated to racing as rapidly as possible to destruction of organized human life” how can the left not take up arms? If the left really believes Trump is going to put black people back on plantations, Jews in incinerators and gays in closets, how can they not physically fight back?
That is the danger of the hyperbole and rhetoric. In 2013, gay rights activist Floyd Lee Corkins attempted to storm into the Family Research Council with a gun and chick-fil-a sandwiches. He intended to murder the employees of the socially conservative group and stuff their mouths with the sandwiches. Corkins got the idea after seeing the organization listed as a hate group on the Southern Poverty Law Center’s website.
No one serious expects Jamelle Bouie or Noah Chomsky to pick up a gun. But with rhetoric that shrill, let us not be surprised if they inspire the next Floyd Lee Corkins. After all, according to Bouie, all Trump supporters are racists, and according to Chomsky, the GOP is going to kill us all. Why wouldn’t the left turn deadly if they really believed that?
Therein lies a problem for the left. After the election, Noam Chomsky, the left’s conscience, declared the Republican Party “has become the most dangerous organization in world history.” He went on to claim the party “is dedicated to racing as rapidly as possible to destruction of organized human life.”
Shortly after the election, at the Democratic National Committee, a staffer named Zach began yelling at the interim DNC Chairwoman, Donna Brazile, “You and your friends will die of old age and I’m going to die from climate change. You and your friends let this happen, which is going to cut 40 years off my life expectancy.” Jamelle Bouie, a CBS News analyst and writer, wrote a piece entitled “There’s No Such Thing as a Good Trump Voter.” His subtitle is, “People voted for a racist who promised racist outcomes. They don’t deserve your empathy.”
On college campuses across America and in the streets of major cities, the left is protesting, rioting, threatening, crying and bullying. The CEO of the company GrubHub sent a letter to his employees denouncing Donald Trump and asking any Trump supporters who agreed with Trump’s policies to resign from the company.
At Rutgers University, police took a lecturer named Kevin Allred in for a psychological evaluation. Allred, a self-styled feminist, made statements about killing white people. Allred is a white, gay male from Utah living in New York. Among other things, Allred tweeted, “if i see any Trump bumper stickers on the road today, my brakes will go out and i’ll run you off the road.” After the police showed up, Allred claimed it was “proof positive that Trump’s crackdown on free speech has absolutely begun.” Needless to say, Allred is a lecturer at a liberal university in a liberal city run by a quasi-communist mayor in a country presided over by Barack liar-nObama, not Donald Trump.
The supposedly progressive left is convinced that Donald Trump is going to get us all killed due to global warming. Trump is also, supposedly, going to round up Muslims, Jews, and Hispanics. He will strip children of their gender identity, though he supports transgender rights, and he will eradicate gay marriage, though he supports it. In fact, many of Donald Trump’s major policy initiatives are spending programs previously championed by liberals. But the American left is convinced doom is at hand and Trump is going to kill us all.
It raises a troubling question. If Noam Chomsky really believes the GOP is the “most dangerous organization in world history” and it is “dedicated to racing as rapidly as possible to destruction of organized human life” how can the left not take up arms? If the left really believes Trump is going to put black people back on plantations, Jews in incinerators and gays in closets, how can they not physically fight back?
That is the danger of the hyperbole and rhetoric. In 2013, gay rights activist Floyd Lee Corkins attempted to storm into the Family Research Council with a gun and chick-fil-a sandwiches. He intended to murder the employees of the socially conservative group and stuff their mouths with the sandwiches. Corkins got the idea after seeing the organization listed as a hate group on the Southern Poverty Law Center’s website.
No one serious expects Jamelle Bouie or Noah Chomsky to pick up a gun. But with rhetoric that shrill, let us not be surprised if they inspire the next Floyd Lee Corkins. After all, according to Bouie, all Trump supporters are racists, and according to Chomsky, the GOP is going to kill us all. Why wouldn’t the left turn deadly if they really believed that?
Comments