TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
'If It Is True'
.
What Pundits Get Wrong About
The Border Security Fight
by Mollie Hemingway
{thefederalist.com} ~ In response to growing problems on the southern U.S. border, President Donald Trump attempted to get Congress to authorize broad border security provisions including a secure barrier... more personnel, more beds for detainees, technology for drug interdiction, and $800 million in aid for asylum seekers, among other things. Congress did not want to authorize these things, leading to a partial government shutdown lasting 35 days. On Friday, the two branches agreed to a temporary re-opening of the government for three weeks to work out a deal. Pundits, the media, and other Trump critics were elated that he was unable to secure the border provisions he sought during the shutdown, and presented the temporary re-opening as a huge victory for Speaker of the House Nancy Pulosi (D-Calif). Trump supporters viewed the failure to get the deal as a huge loss and tremendous disappointment. Neither set of people are wrong, but here are a few other things to keep in mind as the discussion continues. It is absolutely true that the shutdown ended without Trump being able to deliver increased border security. The failure to end the shutdown with increased border security is a victory for Pulosi, who said she’d refuse to even think about the topic until the government was re-opened. She won that standoff. It is also true that the government is only re-opening for three weeks. This is not necessarily a permanent failure to secure the border. All will depend on what the White House, Pulosi, and Senate Republicans do in the interim. But here there is also reason for concern from those who support borders, rule of law, and national sovereignty...Tripwire Alert – HPSCI Chairman scumbag-Adam Schiff
Outlines Impeachment Process and Targets Donald Trump Jr
by sundance.
Roger Stone -vs- ‘Resistance’ Operative
George Stephanopoulos
by sundanceCorsi willing to 'affirm' that information
about him in Stone indictment is accurate
by Devan Cole.
California Republican Urges Trump to
Declare Emergency and “Build the Wall”
{restoreamericanglory.com} ~ In an op-ed published in The Hill, Rep. Tom McClintock (R-CA) urged President Trump to recognize Democratic Party obstruction in Congress for what it is, realize that Nancy Pulosi and her thugs are never going to pony up the funds... for the wall, and go back to the considered-and-discarded idea of declaring a national emergency. Not for the sake of a political victory, McClintock wrote, but for the fact that is actually IS a national emergency at the border. Walls have been used for thousands of years to impede unauthorized entry, and for one reason: They work. And they still work. When Israel built a 144-mile wall to protect its southern border with Egypt, illegal immigration fell 97 percent. The $5.7 billion that Trump has requested to build a wall first authorized in 1996 is a fraction of the cost incurred by American citizens every year to support the illegal population in this country. The impasse cannot go on much longer, and the president cannot unilaterally appropriate funds for the wall. But in 1976, Congress authorized the president to reprogram already appropriated but unobligated military construction funds for the defense of the nation. And what is more central to national defense than the integrity of our borders? In the piece, McClintock acknowledged that there are even those within the GOP who have insisted that President Trump disregard this route... http://www.restoreamericanglory.com/breaking-news/california-republican-urges-trump-to-declare-emergency-and-build-the-wall/
.
.
'If It Is True'
by Bruce Bialosky
{townhall.com} ~ Never in the history of the country has there been a more dangerous and damning statement.
Yet, based on a report from one publication that has had a problematic past, the Press of America was ready to bring down a duly-elected president based on: “If It Is True.”
This came with the arrival of the two-year anniversary of Mr. Trump’s Inauguration. With that came a broadside of rationale for the removal of Trump as president. That was led by a publication which has a great history, but under the leadership of Jeffrey Goldberg has become hyper-partisan and a center of Left-wing thought -- The Atlantic.
After running what was entitled Unthinkable, 50 essays on the most outlandish and dangerous moments of the Trump Presidency, The Atlantic ran their pièce de résistance: Impeach Donald Trump. This 28-page analysis gives rationale for going after Trump based on innuendo and falsehoods; i.e., political violence since his election is mainly from the Right. I presume the author is not aware of Antifa and the Black Bloc.
The author, Yoni Applebaum, also lays out five points of reasoning for impeaching even if Trump is not worthy of impeachment. His first point is “once an impeachment inquiry begins, the president loses control of the public conversation.” Otherwise start proceedings just to shut up Trump. The last of the five points: “even when it fails to remove a president, it severely damages his political prospects.” Meaning it would be a death knell for Trump’s reelection. In summary, if we cannot do a current political coup then we can make sure he is a one-term president.
It is questionable whether the American public would tolerate this thinly-veiled maneuver so the Trump-haters had to have real ammunition. They got it Thursday night January 17th at 10:11 P.M. when BuzzFeed released a story that caused even people like myself to be knocked back on their heels. Trump purportedly had told Michael Cohen, his attorney, to perjure himself in front of Congress. The report caused a firestorm because “IF IT IS TRUE,” then Democrats would have what they need -- an actual crime with which to impeach Trump.
The next day virtually every MSM publication carried the story. They did not wait to validate the facts. The story was covered as if the facts were real, but they included those now magic words or some version, “If It Is True.” Every major publication sent battalions of reporter out to verify the story, but none could. Yet Democrats had a field day because they now had Trump by the throat. When asked by the Press they used the Press’s own language – “IF IT IS TRUE.”
I was baffled. I questioned that Trump had put something like that in an email. Others picked apart BuzzFeed’s story and the credibility of the authors. John Santucci of ABC News stated contradicting BuzzFeed “In all our reporting, I haven’t found any in the Trump Org that have met with or been interviewed by Mueller.” The authors had not even seen the underlying evidence or had they. They could not agree. Andrew McCarthy, a former U.S. attorney and the go-to guy for me and so many others on these legal matters, said he could not believe it because Mueller would have charged Cohen with that when he had charged him.
Then as you know, the Special Counsel's office came out and said the story is false. And the MSM melted along with the Trump-haters. The furor subsided, or did it? Ben Smith, editor-in-chief, did not falter in the face of the pressure of an unprecedented press release by the Special Counsel denying the story Mr. Smith had published. Did he release documents validating the article? Did he bring forward the two government officials who supposedly were sources? In the ultimate act of hubris, he told the Special Cousel to prove BuzzFeed was wrong. Then the legion of Trump-haters started parsing the Special Counsel's statement as if it was not a complete disabusing of the BuzzFeed story.
The new criteria for our press to run with a story has become “IF IT IS TRUE.” It does not matter where the report comes from or the seriousness of the claim. The MSM has become an echo chamber for anything anti-Trump. This one though was a behemoth story, published with no validation and once again our press is sadly embarrassed. They did not have to run the story, however, as the Wall Street Journal did not touch the report in its print addition.
Don’t think that this is over. scumbag-Adam Schiff (D-CA), the new chair of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, says this needs to be investigated. Lawrence Tribe former Harvard professor and a regular Tweeter of Trump Hysteria, is still advocating immediate impeachment along with others like Billionaire Gone Wild, Tom Steyer.
“Are you now or have you ever been a member of the Communist Party” lived for over 60 years as the most damning statement/inquiry ever made in our history. Though it was made by powerful people in our government, it was barely echoed in the Press. The Press ended up fighting the implications of the question. Today the press has started the use of “IF IT IS TRUE” and then amplified it. The elected officials just copied the phrase and went along.
A justification used for Trump Impeachment is his abuse of our Constitution even though it is unclear how he has done such. This is actual abuse of our Constitution. Our Press has abused the First Amendment and degraded itself in a manner that will permanently harm the value of a free press and thus our First Amendment rights. And yet there is not one person being fired or quitting in shame – are you listening Chuck Todd?
We live in dangerous times if this is not disavowed and never used again.
Comments