~ Featuring ~
Identity Politics Failed dummycratsDems ... Again
by Robin Smith  
President Trump and DAG Rod Rosenstein – 
“No Collusion”, No Immediate Worries
by sundance
{} ~ Unless something consequential happens as a result of congressional oversight,… if there’s one official who will be in place through the mid-term elections it’s DAG Rod Rosenstein... Through the declassification agreement between President Trump and Rosenstein, POTUS carries tremendous leverage and he’s in no hurry to fire him. President Trump and President Trump’s supporters have two slightly different sets of priorities when it comes to the DOJ and FBI. From President Trump’s perspective the thorn in his administration has been Special Counsel dirty cop-Robert Mueller.  The agreement between Rosenstein and Trump negates any concern about dirty cop-Mueller. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein created the special counsel under fraudulent pretense. That origination material Ohr 302’s, FISA pages, origination EC, and Page/Strzok messages is now a risk to the Deputy AG. DAG Rosenstein does not want his involvement in the fraud to be exposed; hence his request to block/stall/delay the declassification directive. However, at any time President Trump can declassify all the documents and outline the fraudulent basis that originated the special counsel. This is essentially President Trump’s leverage... 
                   Kavanaugh's Lesson: Inform the American People
by Lloyd Marcus
{} ~ Brett Kavanaugh is now a justice on the Supreme Court -- a tremendous victory for President Trump and America. Praise God!... Last week, fake news media and the dummycrats-Democrats flooded the airwaves with their narrative that Trump cruelly “mocked” Christine Blasey Ford. Upon listening to what Trump actually said, I thought, “For crying out loud. All Trump did was expose the unreported facts of the case. And this is called mocking?” The truth of the matter is, the left's greatest weapon is its ability to dominate the airwaves with deceptions and lies which produce misinformed voters and Republican politicians fearful of telling the truth. I knew that Trump humorously explaining the absurdity of Ford's claim was a home run. First, he informed the public of the facts and second, he outraged the left, which told me Trump's explanation was effective. Leftists have laid down the rules of political battle which most Republicans and GOP advisers sheepishly obey. Leftists' rules says they are allowed to use any immoral gutter tactic they can conceive to defeat conservatives and Republicans. Meanwhile, any attempt by conservatives/Republicans to defend themselves is branded racist, sexist, homophobic, and an expression of white privilege. Against the advice of many, Trump broke the left’s rule by simply sharing the facts of the case with the American people. Brilliant!...
Solomon Review Highlights CURRENT DOJ and FBI
Corruption Within HPSCI Report Footnote #43
by sundance
{} ~ It was the same dummycrays-DNC, along with liar-Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, that funded the unverified... salacious dossier by a British intel operative, Christopher Steele, that became a central piece of evidence used to justify the FBI surveillance of the Trump campaign in the final days of the election. And it was the same law firm that made the payments for the dossier research so those could be disguised in campaign spending reports to avoid the disclosure of the actual beneficiaries of the research, which were liar-Clinton and the dummycrays-DNC. And it was, in turns out, the same meeting that was so heavily censored by the intel agencies from  Footnote 43 in the House report — treated, in other words, as some big national security secret. What makes this so extraordinary is that the FBI and the DOJ would have Americans believe that a contact with a lawyer for a political party during the middle of the election is somehow a matter of national security that should be hidden from the public. Well, that argument was proven to be a lie by the very way the interview with Baker played out last Wednesday on Capitol Hill. Baker was not interviewed in a “SCIF” — a “sensitive compartmented information facility” routinely used to discuss super-secret, highly sensitive information. There was no claim of classification over any information he provided Congress that day. The big picture behind this specific point of irrefutable evidence is that current DOJ and FBI officials are redacting information to protect former DOJ and FBI officials.  This is the essential point CTH has been pointing out in recent days, weeks and months...
Bolton Tears Down Smug Reporter Over Palestine Dispute
{} ~ It’s a sad state of affairs when a young journalist thinks she knows more about national security and foreign policy... than a seasoned veteran like National security adviser John Bolton. But that’s just what it looked like in an exchange between Bolton and a White House reporter on Wednesday when she challenged him for his reference to the “so-called state” of Palestine. “So-called state?” the reporter asked. “The president in New York city as you know recommitted his goal of achieving a two-state solution. So, is using that sort of language productive in achieving his goal. ”While the young reporter took exception with his characterization of the state status of Palestine, the 69-year-old Bolton quickly schooled her on the facts.“It’s accurate. It is not a state,” he said. He then laid out the many reasons why.“It’s not a state now. It does not meet the customary international law test of statehood. It doesn’t control defined boundries. It doesn’t fulfill the normal functions of government. There are a whole host of reasons why it’s not a state,” he said...
Meet the GOP woman voter who could hand House to Democrats
by David M. Drucker
{} ~ If dummycrats-Democrats capture at least the House, they’ll owe the good fortune to Republican voters like Anna Smith... The 40-year-old, college-educated mother of two young children is married to a Navy submariner and describes her politics as fiscally conservative, socially libertarian, and predisposed toward the Second Amendment. She’s a registered Republican who always voted Republican. But Smith couldn’t stomach President Trump, and his provocative conduct in office since the tumultuous 2016 election has compounded her disgust and hardened her opposition. So, Smith is doing something unprecedented for her: volunteering on a major political campaign. With critical midterm elections four weeks out, she’s knocking on doors for dummycrats-Democrat Phil Bredesen, the former governor who is running for an open Senate seat in Tennessee against Republican Rep. Marsha Blackburn. Smith isn’t complaining about Blackburn’s support for the $1.3 trillion tax overhaul, or GOP plans to dismantle what’s left of scumbag/liar-nObamacare. She didn’t seem all that concerned about the conservative makeover of the federal judiciary, or all that motivated by the row over Brett Kavanaugh, whose Supreme Court nomination was roiled by sexual misconduct allegations. For Smith, voting dummycrats-Democrat is about stopping Trump. “His behavior, making fun of people, mocking people, is just so distasteful and it doesn’t help anything. It’s not pushing things forward,” Smith said in an interview. “He is not a traditional Republican. I’m still here, is what I feel like. I’m still here as a moderate Republican and he does not represent me.”... You should be ashame of yourself Anna Smith.  
Identity Politics Failed dummycratsDems ... Again
by Robin Smith:  “I’ve been saying for a very long time there’s a special place in hell for women who don’t help each other.” —former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright

             Albright is, of course, a dummycrats-Democrat fixture and a trusted friend and supporter of liar-Bill and liar-Hillary Clinton. Her February 2016 comment was meant to criticize and marginalize women who didn’t toe the angry-leftist line in supporting liar-Clinton in the 2016 election. In that case, of course, there are a lot of women whose “sin” of thinking for themselves has them judged and sentenced for Hades.
               The circus events of the last several weeks whirling around the Senate confirmation hearings of now-Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh reveal a great deal about the tremendous divide among those with XX chromosomal biology. Yes, the female gender does, indeed, have a biological code, complete with hormones unique to women. But those facts are either rejected or minimized by the political Left, which relies on identity politics to slice and dice individuals into segments of voters, framed with a narrative of a grievance aligned with the identity of that segmented voter group — women, blacks, homosexuals, illegal immigrants, etc. Of course, those grievances will be remedied only by dummycrats-Democrat-run government intervention.
               The #MeToo movement was used in hopes that America would see a conservative jurist blocked from the Supreme Court by a broken woman, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, who became a living, breathing victim willing to step up to expose a crime that had been perpetrated against her 36 years ago. The aim of the angry women on the Left was to provide a sense of justice to all women who had been harassed, assaulted, raped, or in any way abused by a man — particularly a man who, in their minds but with no evidence, had escaped confrontation and prosecution only to rise to great prominence due to his white, male biology. dummycrats-Democrats worked to galvanize all women around a surrogate target of hate that would influence the midterm votes of millions.
               This #MeToo effort morphed into a #YouToo scenario: You, too, could see your brother, your son, your husband or yourself sitting accused of serious crimes with no evidence to support the allegations, yet facing public humiliation and the assassination of character and career. In the attempt to paint every man as a drunken fool driven by animalistic instincts without discipline or care, the militant women have successfully framed themselves to be emotionally incontinent, incapable of reason and critical thinking, and driven by their own feminine organs, which they wear as hats at protests.
               Instead of identifying with women angry and aggrieved, there are more women, regardless of partisan identification, who have husbands, while imperfect, who are life partners and friends. There are more women who have those annoying brothers who always welcomed the advice and intervention of a sister in important moments in life. There are women, young and old, with sons, and those women now see a world without a system of justice, replaced by a hyper-politicized process that could publicly crucify her own child and his future.
               Add to this reality the fact that conservative women don’t find their identity merely in a political label. Their identity doesn’t come with a set of emotions, grievances, or a victim status like a boxed Barbie complete with a themed wardrobe. It doesn’t come with a segregated menu of issues that all lead back to a demanded right to kill an unplanned or unwanted child in the womb.
               With less than four weeks from the Nov. 6 elections, the dummycrats-Democrats’ much-hyped “blue wave” is jeopardized by a counterforce of conservative women standing alongside the men in their lives. Polling has captured the momentum of the highly energized angry female on the Left suddenly eclipsed by a 12-point surge of Republican women, who now lead the “enthusiasm gap” in a Marist poll that had them, back in July, as less concerned or engaged.
               Maybe it’ll turn out that the Left’s fact-free assault on Brett Kavanaugh will backfire.
               In 2004, the palette of issues that moved female voters revolved around security, hence, the push by the George W. Bush campaign for the security moms. In 2010, there were a field of female candidates endorsed by former Alaskan Governor and VP nominee Sarah Palin deemed the Mama Grizzlies. In 2018, women again play a vital role in the outcome of these critical midterm elections. This November, voters will decide whether America’s federal legislative body is run by those who are promoting chaos and mob rule driven by emotional malcontents and who turn individual citizens into subjects whose identity and rights come only from a massive government — or whether it’s run by those who guard the Liberty that authentically empowers individuals in a nation governed by the Rule of Law. Which is it, #MeToo or #YouToo?

~The Patriot Post  

Views: 18


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center



Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

Political Cartoons by Lisa BensonPolitical Cartoons by Gary Varvel


CONFUSION:   Pelosi Says Constitution Spells Out ‘Two Co-Equal Branches’ Of Government

No Nancy. No.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi must be taking night classes at the Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez School of Government.

Pelosi, the 79-year-old third-highest ranking official in the U.S. government, was speaking to the Center for American Progress today when she mistakenly said there are “two co-equal branches” of government, before correcting herself to say there are three.


“First of all, let me just say, we take an oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States,” Pelosi said.

“Democrats take that oath seriously, and we are committed to honoring our oath of office. I’m not sure that our Republican colleagues share that commitment, and I’m not sure that the president of the United States does, too,” she claimed.

“So, in light of the fact that the beauty of the Constitution is a system of checks and balances— two co-equal branches— three co-equal branches of government,” she corrected with a laugh.

“A check and balance on each other,” she continued. “Con— Constitution spells out the pri— pa, uh, the duties of Congress and one of them is oversight of the president of the United States, another one of them is to impeach the president of the United States,” Pelosi said.

In November, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez rallied supporters on Facebook to pitch in and help Democrats take back “all three chambers of Congress.”

“…the Progressive movement works and it wins in all districts…If we work our butts off to make sure that we take back all three chambers of Congress– three chambers of government…,” she said during the virtual appearance.

She clarified that she meant the “presidency, the Senate and the House.”

According to the Constitution, the three branches of government are the legislative, executive and judicial.

Below: Nancy Pelosi is continuing to promote the false narrative that President Trump is involved in a cover-up and therefore may be guilty of an impeachable offense. Millie Weaver joins Alex to break down the propaganda being used to overturn the democratic election of 2016 


© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service