~ Featuring ~
Slouching Towards a Police State 
by Arnold Ahlert
Gowdy Offers Proof Trump Is Innocent on Russian Collusion 

by Matt
{ } ~ Trey Gowdy appeared on “Fox News Sunday” to discuss the new revelations from the FBI’s FISA warrant application that was used to spy on Trump associate Carter Page among other subjects... The FISA application more or less confirms every suspicion that conservatives had. Within the first few pages of the application, it’s confirmed that the FISA application relied heavily on information from British spy Christopher Steele’s infamous anti-Trump dossier. Steele is referred to throughout the application as “Source 1.” So in other words, it was a foreign spy meddling in our election that the FBI used to justify spying on Carter Page, on the basis that Page was acting with foreign powers to meddle in our election. A bit ironic, but also disturbing, because it shows that the FBI was influenced by liar-Clinton-funded partisan research. As you may remember, it was Fusion GPS funding Steele’s dossier, which received funding from the  liar-Clinton campaign, dummycrats-DNC, and liar-nObama’s “Organizing for America.” And for all the research that’s gone into Trump’s alleged collusion with the Russians, whether it be Steele’s dossier, the FBI’s counterintelligence operation, or the Mueller Special Council which is a continuation of the FBI’s counterintelligence operation, has there been anything to show for it? Not a single indictment of anyone related to the Trump campaign stemming from the Mueller Special Counsel actually has to do with Russian collusion. Paul Manafort and Rick Gates were indicted on tax evasion and money laundering charges, while George Papadopoulos and Michael Flynn lied to the FBI...
Losing America
by John Scotto
{ } ~ Not too long ago we as a people could generally agree upon a certain set of core values. Today a smaller majority of the American people still believe in the US Constitution... and many people are starting to lose focus on the things that really matter the most. When did certain members of our society all of sudden become selective regarding the laws they wished to be enforced? When exactly did some US citizens lose their basic instinct for survival? Sadly, we now have a substantial force within the dummycrats-Democratic Party who currently advocate and even believe in wide open borders and illegal immigration. When did the acceptance of such a lawlessness become a norm? When did the people who actually make it a point to stand up for the rule of law and who believe in securing our borders suddenly become the enemy? Can a sovereign nation without a secure border, without a common language, and soon without a common culture survive? The dummycrats- Democratic Party's leadership not too long ago believed illegal immigration was wrong. Why have their minds now suddenly shifted? Has importing a new dummycrats-Democrat voter base into this nation become just too appealing an idea for them not to take advantage of?  A voter base which would be beholden to big government from cradle to grave. A voting bloc of people that would cast their votes depending upon what government could provide them...
Israel in Crisis Mode as Assad Regime
Forces Reach Golan Border 

by Yochanan Visser
{ } ~ While the Israeli army was busy saving the lives of 800 members of the Syrian rescue organization "White Helmets" this weekend... the Russian-Iranian-backed Assad regime forces mercilessly pounded the last pockets of resistance in the Yarmouk Basin. The Yarmouk Basin straddles the border with Israel and Jordan on the southern Golan Heights. The heavy Russian bombardments on the local ISIS branch Jaish Khalid Ibn al-Walid were audible throughout north-eastern Israel and started on Saturday evening. The London-based Syrian watchdog organization Syrian Observatory for Human Rights claimed the Russian air force carried out between 120 and 130 airstrikes against the Islamic State affiliate which refused to be part of a new surrender agreement between the Assad regime and other Islamist rebel groups on the Golan Heights... 
Iranian Regime in Desperate Situation 
{ } ~ The situation in Iran is getting serious for the mullahs, according to Clarion Intelligence Network director and Shillman Fellow Ryan Mauro... That might only worsen come November 4, he explains in this TV interview. Mauro points to the widespread protests particularly over water shortages and the possibility of additional sanctions. While the current American policy is not in favor of a push for regime change in Tehran, he believes there are underlying signs in that direction.   ttps://
In a first: Israel fires two David Sling interceptor missiles
{ } ~ Israel used it’s David Sling interceptor system for the first time on Monday... firing two missiles against SS-21 Tochka tactical ballistic missiles launched from Syria as part of the internal fighting in the war-torn country. The SS-21 ballistic missiles, which carry a half-ton warhead, were detected by Israel’s aerial defense system when they were fired from south-eastern Syria, and the decision to intercept them was made by the IDF when it was believed that their trajectory would see them fall near the Kinneret in northern Israel. It is not clear at this stage of the  investigation whether the first missile, which seemed to be heading towards Israel, was intercepted by the David Sling. The second SS-21 missile fell one kilometer from the border with Israel. The defense establishment is currently investigating the event in order to determine whether the use of the system could be defined as a success. Incoming rocket sirens sounded across in northern Israel Monday morning, first in the northern city of Safed and the Galilee region at 10.05 a.m. and moments later in the Golan Heights and the city of Katzrin. Sirens wailed again the Galilee and Golan less than half an hour later...


Slouching Towards a Police State 
by Arnold Ahlert:  “Let me tell you: You take on the intelligence community — they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you.” —Sen. Chuck clown-Schumer (D-NY) , Jan. 3, 2017

             Consider the glaringly unconstitutional implication of that statement. Unelected bureaucrats accountable to no one can “get back” at the duly elected president of the United States?
               Right now Russian hacking of the dummycrats-DNC, its interference in the 2016 election, and the collusion with Donald Trump and his officials allegedly abetting it has become the Indisputable Narrative™ among those still reeling from the fact that liar-Hillary Clinton lost the election. The same liar-Hillary Clinton who would have made sure any evidence of the corruption infesting the Justice Department, the FBI, and the various agencies that comprise the intelligence community ended up in the same place as the 30,000 subpoenaed emails she deleted.
               Emails we now know ended up with a “foreign entity,” a revelation an equally corrupt media have willfully chosen to ignore.
               A far as indisputable facts go, let’s stipulate two. One, all of the ostensible Russian hacking that might have been perpetrated occurred on a somnambulant liar-nObama administration’s watch. Two, the leaders of Barack liar-nObama’s intel community are documented liars.
                Those liars included former National Security Advisor Susan Rice, who insisted the terrorist attack in Benghazi was engendered by an anti-Muslim video and that she knew nothing about the unmasking of Trump officials; former Director of National Intelligence scumbag-James Clapper, who lied to Congress about the extent of the NSA’s data collection; and former CIA Director scumbag/commie-John Brennan, who claimed he didn’t know who commissioned the anti-Trump dossier and insisted that “nothing could be further from the truth” when asked if the CIA illegally accessed Senate Intelligence Committee staff computers.
                scumbag/commie-Brennan was incensed by Trump’s performance in Helsinki, declaring it was “nothing short of treasonous.”
               That outburst was telling, and no one put it in better perspective than investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson. “What would an intel official who speaks like this be willing to do using his official office and intel tools … to protect the nation from what he views as this sort of threat?” she tweeted.
               What indeed. It is quite likely the allegations of Russian collusion and the Muller investigation it engendered is a coordinated effort to keep America from learning exactly that.
               Last Friday, any pretense of even-handedness in that investigation completely evaporated. Mueller offered immunity to dummycrats-Democrat operative Tony Podesta, whose brother John was liar-Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, in exchange for testimony against former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort. Both Manafort and Podesta were operating as unregistered lobbyists on behalf of the Ukrainian government, yet Podesta remains free and now immune, while Manafort is facing life in prison.
               How egregious is the double standard? The liar-nObama administration’s transfer of control of one-fifth of America’s uranium supply to Russia’s state-controlled nuclear-energy conglomerate, Rosatom — even when it knew Rosatom’s American subsidiary, Tenam USA, had committed felony extortion, fraud, and money-laundering offenses — remains off limits to scrutiny.
               The FBI had an informant who warned them about Tenam’s felonious efforts — in 2010, when it would have killed the deal. Yet the agency postponed prosecution until four years later. In 2015 Vadim Mikerin, the Russian official in charge of Tenam USA, was allowed to plead guilty to one count of money-laundering conspiracy — instead of being prosecuted under section 1956 of the penal codem which would have subjected him to decades in prison.
               It gets worse. Canadian company Uranium One, which would ultimately gain control of the uranium, contributed more than $145 million to the liar-Clinton Foundation, and company chairman Ian Telfer donated $2.35 million on his own. liar-Bill Clinton received a $500,000 speaking fee from Renaissance Capital, a Kremlin-linked bank that was promoting Uranium One stock.
               So why doesn’t something that reeks of quid pro quo merit an investigation? Because it would require some of the principal players involved in the current investigation to investigate … themselves.
               During the uranium transfer, Robert Mueller headed the FBI. The investigation was supervised by disgraced former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, and ended with the plea bargain when scumbag-James Comey was FBI director. It was centered in Tenam’s home base of Maryland, whose U.S. attorney was Rod Rosenstein. And Mikerin’s plea bargain was cosigned by the DOJ’s Fraud Section, then run by attorney Andrew Weissman, one of Mueller’s current investigators.
               With the possible exception of Weissman, whose dubious track record of high-profile convictions includes a unanimous reversal by the Supreme Court, every one of these government officials has been presented to the public as a “paragon of integrity.”
               The aforementioned Indisputable Narrative™ regarding Russian interference is based on an intel community report called the “Intelligence Community Assessment.” Jack Matlock, former ambassador to the Soviet Union and witness to its collapse, insists it’s a sham. “A report of the intelligence community in my day would include the input of all the relevant intelligence agencies and would reveal whether all agreed with the conclusions,” he explains.
               He notes that only three of the nation’s 17 intelligence agencies participated and cites a compelling piece of Senate testimony on May 8, 2017, when scumbag-James Clapper stated that “two dozen or so analysts — hand-picked, seasoned experts from each of the contributing agencies” compiled the report.
               “If you can hand-pick the analysts, you can hand-pick the conclusions,” Matlock asserts.
               He further insists dissenting opinions existed and were squelched, but he is most incredulous regarding the assertions surrounding the persona identified as “Guccifer 2.0,” who Mueller insists is a front for the 12 Russian military officers he just indicted, claiming they were behind the hack of the dummycrats-Democrat National Committee’s server.
               Matlock notes that retired senior NSA technical experts reveal Guccifer’s data was locally downloaded and then manipulated, “leading to the conclusion that ‘Guccifer 2.0’ is a total fabrication.”
               We’ll never know. Incredibly, the FBI never directly examined the dummycrats-DNC servers. They simply took the word of CrowdStrike, a company hired by the dummycrats-DNC, that the Russians did the hacking.
               Yet columnist Michael Thau agrees with Matlock’s assessment, citing evidencecollected by an investigative journalist using the pseudonym Adam Carter. Carter lays out a compelling case that, as Thau writes, “CrowdStrike engaged in a disinformation campaign, inventing not just a fake Russian hack but also a fake hacker called ‘Guccifer 2.0.’”
               “Trump came into office with the liar-nObama/Bush/liar-Clinton/Bush IC apparatus firmly against him,” columnist Michael Walsh asserts.
               That apparatus has a lot of help. In “God Bless the Deep State,” Washington Post columnist Eugene Robinson  advocates  for its apparently extra-constitutional transcendence. “In this emergency, the loyal and honorable deep state has a higher duty,” he asserts. “It’s called patriotism.”
               The use of police-state tactics to get rid of Donald Trump constitutes a “higher duty”?
               The genuine emergency in America today is the ongoing “by any means necessary” effort to unseat a duly elected president, and the useful idiots who cheer it on, believing they’re forever immune from the abuses of power they champion.
               As for the investigators, they are anything but patriots. They are partisan zealots who would destroy the nation — “six ways from Sunday” — in order to “save” it.

~The Patriot Post

Views: 37


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Rudy Tirre on July 24, 2018 at 9:02am


thats for sure enough is enough

Comment by Bonnie Somer on July 24, 2018 at 8:49am







Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service