Tues Med/PM ~ TheFrontPageCover

 TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~  
Shutdown Politics: Where to Now?
XV8cmn9AuMGGAzy0w5brDKDA9oucnKdpmgD5Q_i7YzGeSWu0EFe3nBdV7uuM2cqkIm2b5SQeJHA5JC0DRQUa3C2MlsqxJTCEG1XtRqTcVc86mxLsnf4iXiBEdd-_nqL3Lc1R0xZwbQS4SNtu0m6sJlyfBqgtTLKerzT7vrU=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Nate Jackson  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
On closer examination, Roger Stone 
indictment is less than it seems
V7ZYvqujzBe4hH2GyFKMPeItp9NQlz6N1gNAQLwXx7x54zQAbr9Rh97jJ96s4sOHmDAHKhAt6jbAtLDRfzys23Hn2Fxn2Iv_jfBda5hvwQ-bg6PCvq_e3oV0TDLX8-Y1Duuz4ORTu2U_zw7pw9W12Gdi0OzK2CovxvqRWsPDmvW-q8sTz0oPJ5IOaFU4jgzgQg-LkzkNd4r60Wt7cUMijDc8urt5MC3OrAwZwbmrnqi6Z1buELUL02AQXpyJuKW0M4tgFhMKKSHUEtUXdLP6Ez62Pqk6WOc1Y795u_KjHqUiG4jaWuXOIAAUYMhgdtl-swI1SAMPJUrab6ZKxN3z0SOwHqaEI8zsXWtEB4K7=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby Byron York
{washingtonexaminer.com} ~ There are two sides to special counsel dirty cop-Robert Mueller's  indictment of longtime Trump associate Roger Stone... On one side there are the under-oath statements Stone made to the House Intelligence Committee that dirty cop-Mueller says are false. On the other, there are the Stone statements dirty cop-Mueller did not challenge. The testimony for which Stone was indicted concerns his descriptions of dealings with two men — Jerome Corsi and Randy Credico — who Stone used to attempt to get in touch with WikiLeaks head Julian Assange in the summer and fall of 2016, at the height of the presidential campaign, when WikiLeaks published hacked emails relating to scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton. Some of dirty cop-Mueller's charges seem somewhat small; for example, Stone was charged with lying because he said he and Credico communicated by phone but not by email when in fact, according to dirty cop-Mueller, they communicated by both phone and email. But in each case, dirty cop-Mueller says Stone knowingly made false statements. On the other hand, the indictment does not accuse Stone of lying in some key instances when he defended himself against some of the most serious allegations of the Trump-Russia matter. Remember the media frenzy over Stone's August 2016 tweet that it would soon be "the Podesta's time in the barrel"? Remember Stone's tweets with Guccifer 2.0? And remember his claim, "I dined with my new pal Julian Assange last night"? House investigators asked Stone many questions about those topics, which Stone answered. dirty cop-Mueller did not charge Stone with lying about those issues, or with any illegal underlying behavior, either. First, a warning: It is impossible for the public to fully evaluate the Stone indictment. It is based entirely on Stone's testimony to the Intelligence Committee, which took place on Sept. 26, 2017. There is, of course, a transcript of that testimony. It would be useful for anyone trying to understand the Stone case to read the transcript...
The Palestinian Jihad Against Peace
Vcf8LNktPtnuRpEtIcPki2q4hFJ34JEE10C7FZ_SLdzGBaIhvgiFsgn8nd77CNikGGOfcV7jBQxzyD2nJwX7wH3hug=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby Bassam Tawil
{gatestoneinstitute.org} ~ Palestinian leaders have recently stepped up their efforts to stop Arab countries from normalizing their relations -- or even signing peace agreements -- with Israel... The campaign comes against a backdrop of reports about the warming of relations between Israel and some Arab countries, including a recent visit to Oman by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The specter of peace between the Arab countries and Israel has become a nightmare for Palestinian leaders. Instead of worrying about building a better future -- which the Palestinians desperately need -- Palestinian leaders are feverishly working to thwart any attempt to bring the Arab countries closer to Israel. As part of the "anti-normalization" campaign, the Palestinian leaders in the West Bank are now putting pressure on the Arab countries to boycott a US-sponsored global summit to discuss the Middle East and Iran, which is scheduled for next month in Poland. US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said in a televised interview that the meeting would "focus on Middle East stability and peace and freedom and security here in this region, and that includes an important element of making sure that Iran is not a destabilizing influence."...  https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/13631/palestinians-jihad-against-peace
.
Roger Stone opens door to cooperating with 
dirty cop-Mueller after dramatic predawn arrest
M9H5IlgzQb2-T4qxBmYcYH9IeBz3wyhQxy-n5zT9bWu_ciKqOQDEVrY-6PwI3UemZrensHKUM9Qp4uNmU3z11BvvDQAxdgMiapVHnLDHvKtI1g2m8ftXhOLbYohMccQtIscq15ClxIQBmiRI2FjaA2k76AQKv_ZkQkFjXUHaLvvMHK9NvW4IAn4wzrwC_LoztpCL-1aHsRn5kopvARNWlDHbPQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Gregg Re  
{foxnews.com} ~ Former Trump adviser Roger Stone appeared to open the door to cooperating in Special Counsel dirty cop-Robert Mueller's probe on Sunday... even as he called the obstruction charges against him "fabricated" and defiantly condemned his dramatic, guns-drawn predawn arrest. Speaking to ABC News' "This Week," Stone told anchor George Stephanopoulos he hasn't ruled out the possibility of striking a deal with prosecutors. Ex-Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort is currently fighting dirty cop-Mueller's accusations that he violated the terms of his plea agreement in an unrelated case. "Uh, you know, That's a question I'll have to determine after my attorneys have some discussion," Stone said, when asked about a potential cooperation deal. "If there's wrongdoing by other people in the campaign that I know about, which I know of none, but if there is, I would certainly testify honestly. I'd also testify honestly about any other matter, including any communications with the president." Stone continued: "It's true that we spoke on the phone. But those communications are political in nature. They're benign. And there's certainly no conspiracy with Russia. The president's right: There is no Russian collusion."...
.
If President Trump Tries To Declare A National Emergency
To Build The Wall, The Democrats Plan To Use Lawsuits
To Keep It From Ever Being Built
Wa-K7-OW9OqbV4WUiYbDBpy6Vzs2hpenziBFANIWLqdd2CryKNyN9PUtQ73Gg3i7Yb5pfHMGjG1orcaK0nca4ROvlllkI0_ROaF7aBSj0EKR8am0bfxAWRJhsng2Iz-7S8YY2tSYXkfX5_jGbxrNBBM8LbUxaaEu2A=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
{thewashingtonstandard.com} ~ This is exactly what I was talking about in my piece yesterday on Trump’s cave... He knows this will happen, will let it happen and run out the clock on the first term hoping his support base will continue to support him thinking he’s trying to do something when it’s nothing more than controlling the opposition and providing cover over the next two years for attacks on our rights. Watch and see. President Trump has repeatedly floated the idea of declaring a national emergency in order to pave the way for the wall to be built, and it is now being reported that the White House has actually drawn up a draft proclamation to be used if Trump decides to go in that direction. But there is a very strong reason why he hasn’t pulled the trigger on such a move yet. If Trump tries to make an end run around Congress in this manner, the Democrats plan to immediately take him to court. That would mean construction of the wall would be tied up in the court system for years, and if Trump lost in 2020 it would never happen at all. So if Trump is really committed to the wall, he needs to keep going with this shutdown until the Democrats finally give in. Using a national emergency to build the wall sounds like a simple solution to a lot of people, but the truth is that it would be a legal nightmare. The easy part would be actually declaring the national emergency. Presidents have made 58 national emergency declarations since 1979, and 31 of them are still in effect right now...
.
Why Did Wray Allow dirty cop-Mueller's 
Thugs to Use 29 FBI Agents on Roger Stone?
vbUmfLw1Xs5XW6FwNqY_gqh6lvciDay815aDy781pyk6p7goJfX5rURme5FbmqJ-BWP1a3EslQHScPBfw2UUL-b2Uuv7EG00s6YJMuaJ73-9jU6k=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Victoria Toensing
{dailycaller.com} ~ Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Chris Wray should hang his head in shame. At a time when he should be restoring the FBI’s reputation... after scumbag-Jim Comey, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok and others tarnished its image as our country’s premier law enforcement agency, he allowed 29 gun slinging agents to make a predawn arrest of former Trump advisor Roger Stone. Stone is not a drug dealer, nor is he a terrorist. Stone is charged with obstruction of justice and making false statements to the special counsel. Significantly, the alleged false statements specified in the indictment were about conduct, which, if admitted, was not criminal. I prosecuted drug dealers. I never sent more than a handful of agents to arrest them, and these were were gun toting, vicious dudes. Stone does not own a gun nor does he even have a license to do so. I supervised the prosecution and, thus, the capture of foreign terrorists. The FBI never sent 29 agents to capture even the most dangerous...  https://dailycaller.com/2019/01/26/toensing-mueller-stone/
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Shutdown Politics: Where to Now?
XV8cmn9AuMGGAzy0w5brDKDA9oucnKdpmgD5Q_i7YzGeSWu0EFe3nBdV7uuM2cqkIm2b5SQeJHA5JC0DRQUa3C2MlsqxJTCEG1XtRqTcVc86mxLsnf4iXiBEdd-_nqL3Lc1R0xZwbQS4SNtu0m6sJlyfBqgtTLKerzT7vrU=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Nate Jackson:  After 35 days, the partial government shutdown is over. President Donald Trump conceded to an increasingly painful reality Friday afternoon, signing a bill to reopen the government until Feb. 15, during which time he will continue to try to persuade Democrats to negotiate for a border barrier. They won’t. And then the president will “really have no choice” but to declare a national emergency so he can allocate funds to build a couple hundred miles of barrier. There’s little question that Friday’s deal was a temporary defeat for Trump and a big victory for House Speaker Nancy Pulosi. But there’s a lot more to this fight than meets the eye, and it’s certainly not over yet.

Trump arguably misstepped when he told “scumbag-Chuck and Nancy” in their December meeting that he’d happily take responsibility for a shutdown. That sound bite only made blaming him for the shutdown easier for the media. Two other factors strengthened the Dems’ position. First, Trump Derangement Syndrome means anything Trump pitches — and he campaigned heavily on a “big, beautiful wall,” paid for by Mexico — is anathema. Second, Pulosi had taken to calling a border wall “immoral,” and there is simply no compromise when an issue has been made that black and white.

So what was Trump’s play in forcing the shutdown? He’s been floating an emergency declaration since December, but he couldn’t do it out of the blue. He needed to provethat the border is in a state of emergency. Over the course of the last five weeks, Trump showed just how intractable and entrenched Democrats really are, leaving him with no other recourse but to declare an emergency. Trump looked like the reasonable one by agreeing to a deal that included nothing he wanted, and Pulosi’s approval/disapproval spread is far worse than Trump’s. In fact, Trump’s support among Hispanics is up 19% in just one month.

Granted, declaring an emergency isn’t a clean play either. With 31 active emergencies on the books, Trump has a case. But Democrats will immediately challenge him in court, specifically where an activist scumbag/liar-nObama judge will block him, and such a declaration could set a precedent for a President lowlife-Kamala Harris to tackle climate change with an emergency declaration. Moreover, it’s likely such a move by Trump would actually divide Republicans more than defeat Democrats.

Speaking of that, where was the congressional GOP in all of this? Senate Republicans couldn’t have been clearer about their disinterest in backing Trump. Recall too that the GOP controlled both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue for the previous two years and did nothing about the border. Was immigration not an emergency then? Border security was Trump’s signature issue, but his administration did little to push a legislative effort until the GOP had lost the House. And Congress cared little for doing anything without his leadership. We’ll borrow one of Trump’s favorite words to describe this collective lack of effort: “Sad!”

Republicans also had unified control of Washington from 2001-2006. They did little on immigration. Democrats held power in 2009 and 2010. They did nothing — well, except take over the health and financial sectors of the economy. We’re left to conclude that both parties believe they benefit not from solving the major national problem of immigration but by exploiting it for political purposes.

A final note: Trump wanted $5.7 billion for a border barrier, while Washington University professor Liberty Vittert estimates the shutdown cost the American public approximately $40 billion — enough to pay for “the entire wall to be built and maintained for 40 years.” A more conservative estimate by the Congressional Budget Office still puts the economic toll at $11 billion, including $3 billion that’s permanent.  

~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/60814?mailing_id=4040&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4040&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center

Comments

  • Bonnie

    You said in a nut shell. I do hope he will open the flood gates at the sotu speech.

  • I BELIEVE HE ACCOMPLISHED MORE THAN WE SEE

     HE HAS EXPOSED THE DEMS FOR WHAT THEY ARE

    LIARS AND HYPOCRITES WILLING TO DESTROY THE NATION B/C OF THEIR HATE OF

    HIM.

    NOW WHAT; THE SOTU SPEECH IS COMING AND HE HAS THE BULLY PULPIT AND IS

    GOING TO MAKE THEM EVER REGRET THEY TOOK HIM ON OVER THIS.   I HOPE HE

    HAS ALL OF THE ANGEL MOMS AND FAMILIES THERE I AM LOOKING FWD TO HIM

    MAKING THE DEMS LOOK LIKE THE AMERICA HATERS THEY ARE HE HAS WON 

    AND NANCY WILL SOON KNOW THAT.

    MANY OF THE DEMS WERE TELLING HER GIVE HIM THE MONEY SHE CANNOT 

    SHE WON'T MAKE HERSELF LOOK WEAK BUT THE PRES DOES NOT CARE THEY

    HATE HIM ANYWAY.   

This reply was deleted.