Tues/Med PM ~ TheFrontPageCove

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Ninth Circuit Rules Against 
Trump Ending DACA
w6eFaY4gSuqFVk-IawO6rqDYDCk6eaw1eEgMnXfkMdggHq_ZHQjaEkmo3RyKjHHofrQGBb4FonsQYbLL0DbUw0-IpUl5RD0Va7Mqe41lQwOFApxp3hbWA5Nb0SaiAW6bueOOCOwA63lkCqZHZEDnuvutLLK_fFl8Fb1Elbg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
by Political Editors  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
If Trump Ended Birthright Citizenship by Executive Order, 
He’d Be Enforcing Existing Law
Xt8BjmiM9JNBAi5sUq9hDWJYPlhBcne61qSIjBLBrvRFkI3qDaPusOC0-9zwnGjB8Rw_WRAx-EswK6mhQ3H-M1npUpfV7HfZLNx8n3N-HwTua1HFVJO1OwlK0w=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450by Ed Feulner
{dailysignal.com}~ President Donald Trump’s critics have found something else to rend their garments over: his determination to end so-called “birthright citizenship.” Why, they thunder, it’s unconstitutional... And even if it could be changed, it can’t be by executive order. They’re wrong on both counts. That probably comes as a surprise to many Americans, including some who consider themselves Trump supporters. Haven’t we all been told for years that if you’re born here, you’re automatically a U.S. citizen? It’s all right there in the 14th Amendment. No matter who your parents are or what their status is, you’re an American. Simple as that. Or is it? Consider the actual wording: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the States wherein they reside.” Seems pretty cut and dry, but check out that crucial clause: “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” It’s easy to mumble over it, but we shouldn’t. The Senate included it there for a reason when it passed the amendment in 1868: to make it clear that not everyone born here is automatically a citizen...  https://www.dailysignal.com/2018/11/09/if-trump-ended-birthright-citizenship-by-executive-order-hed-be-enforcing-existing-law/?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWWpjNU9EVTBNVFF3TTJFNSIsInQiOiJMQmpOaFhhUkx6QUkzZ1FwQ3o0TTFHZFwvOEZRWkNRNHl5cFhyQkZTRm5BWXNVcVFvY01hNzZmWXRkRGpMQTBBcG1UVm1VUmpNanZlTWdqQUdlbGh1ZW5vc21DUk0wNXAzSUJkQ0JNRW5OanRSeEZ4UDdqYXp0cnYzU21nY0ZpUGYifQ%3D%3D
.
socialist-Andrew Gillum outraged by illegal 
email votes in heavily Republican county
wGWm5EZDfIKlEzwW7miqYHcs0L-9SFkWNs_mI4Cz36EH9T4aUDzuuDufU2FQgW7WynFIXmaFjTT5hhc1OP4CDgsu9ZXQE-Mshe97_Db5wWP8Wm9sIg60fpmHC9YIrwS0FTOFDAtpQ2QBNXhNTWwlfI0T2vDuhGOV1n4TNgecd88DWE6X2JsjN82i1UHrdALG9OWs0NRESYytw4nWb2j4nZOoKrY=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=300
{washingtontimes.com} ~ Democratic gubernatorial candidate socialist-Andrew Gillum has expressed outrage that some voters in hurricane-ravaged Bay County had been allowed to vote by email against state rules... socialist-Gillum spoke Monday evening at an African-American church in Boynton Beach. Elections Supervisor Mark Andersen in heavily Republican Bay County told the Miami Herald earlier on Monday that he allowed about 150 people to cast ballots by email, which is illegal under state law. “These are the stories that we know,” socialist-Gillum said. “Imagine the ones that we don’t.” President Donald Trump tweeted earlier Monday that the election should be called for socialist-Gillum’s Republican opponent, Ron DeSantis, and Gov. Rick Scott, who is running for U.S. Senate. Trump said an honest vote count is no longer possible.  socialist-Gillum disagreed with the tweet, saying, “Not one supervisor, not one governor, not one president - if that’s what we want to call him- should be able to take away our sense of hope.” Now if those email votes where done in a democratic area he would be silent.  https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/nov/12/andrew-gillum-blasts-illegal-email-votes-bay-count/?utm_source=Boomtrain&utm_medium=manual&utm_campaign=20180326&utm_term=newsalert&utm_content=newsalert&bt_ee=7oxATdWMvpLmsIi7j%2BQ9XjSV8%2FWEJICK8k6jyyapqK8qf5Sz3ggIGMy0JeGYHIH4&bt_ts=1542074385661
.
12 Potential Trump Nominees for Attorney General
DxRrfFB90SqAoBpN1jAniuy1SgHWl2v0OwpLscJs_KG8oxAWz3KGuojij3Eqd8CcudwPK_3hnQB4x7Y-scNPTkZJoaEYUZPbHgfxl5WrdkgtEW4b=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450by Troy Worden
{dailysignal.com} ~ Attorney General Jeff Sessions resigned Wednesday, creating a vacancy in President Donald Trump’s Cabinet... and the opportunity to confirm a new leader at the Department of Justice. The question facing Trump is whom he might pick as the next attorney general. The Heritage Foundation’s John Malcolm, vice president of the Institute for Constitutional Government and director of the Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, discussed the following dozen possible candidates for the position during recent TV interviews.1. Pam Bondi, 2. John Ratcliffe, 3. Trey Gowdy, 4. Janice Rogers Brown,  5. Lindsey Graham, 6. Edith Jones, 7. Michael Luttig, 8. Alex Acosta, 9. Matt Whitaker, 10. Alex Azar, 11. Chris Christie and 12. Rudy Giuliani
.
The Deep State imprisons another good guy
by  RACHEL ALEXANDER 

{wnd.com} ~ Democrats are gloating over the sentencing of former Rep. Steve Stockman, R-Texas, last week. He was ordered to serve 10 years in prison for the vague charges of mail fraud, wire fraud and money laundering... Whenever prosecutors want to get someone who hasn’t actually committed a crime, they use those vague but scary-sounding charges. He was also ordered to pay $1,014,718.51 in restitution, to be divided between him and two other co-defendants. What did Stockman actually do to warrant this? He facilitated four donations from two donors totaling $915,000 to two nonprofits he was associated with. One of the nonprofits spent some of the money on a campaign mailer showing the differences between Stockman and the senator he was running against. It is a (c)4, and its purpose was to educate voters. The mailer did not endorse Stockman or tell people how to vote, so it did not run afoul of campaign laws. The donors were fine with how their money was used, which was mostly for youth education. But prosecutors said it constituted fraud. They said Stockman stole charitable contributions and used them for personal expenses. The truth is, he never benefited personally but took some pay before he ran for office. He was a fundraiser for the nonprofits before he was in office. The nonprofit merely chose to spend some of the money later on a campaign mailer. Stockman’s charitable efforts were ignored. He was recognized for hiring the handicapped including the deaf, blind and mentally handicapped. Gallaudet University, the first school of higher education for the deaf, gave him an award for his efforts. Stockman was charged with money laundering and wire fraud in part because Wells Fargo opened a new savings account for him. But this was a well-known scandal that was the fault of Wells Fargo. Wells Fargo opened up millions of fraudulent savings and checking accounts on behalf of Wells Fargo clients without their permission. They ended up paying a fine of $185 million... Why is the deep state getting away with this?
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
. 
Ninth Circuit Rules Against Trump Ending DACA
w6eFaY4gSuqFVk-IawO6rqDYDCk6eaw1eEgMnXfkMdggHq_ZHQjaEkmo3RyKjHHofrQGBb4FonsQYbLL0DbUw0-IpUl5RD0Va7Mqe41lQwOFApxp3hbWA5Nb0SaiAW6bueOOCOwA63lkCqZHZEDnuvutLLK_fFl8Fb1Elbg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
by Political Editors:  On Thursday, the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that President Donald Trump’s decision to end Barack scumbag/liar-nObama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) was illegal. In its ruling, the court rejected      Trump’s correct argument that DACA was unconstitutionally created in the first place, ruling that “DACA was a permissible exercise of executive discretion.” No it wasn’t, and even   scumbag/liar-nObama repeatedly said so … until it was politically convenient to change his mind. Furthermore, it’s ironic that the court doesn’t think Trump, as the president, has the same authority to rescind scumbag/liar-nObama’s executive order. In fact, the judges alleged that Trump’s decision to rescind was “based on an erroneous view of what the law required” and that “the rescission was arbitrary and capricious under settled law.”

             Seems to us the court contradicted itself in stating that DACA is not law and therefore didn’t require an act of Congress, and yet it has the authority of law and Trump is not free to rescind it.
               Responding to the ruling, Justice Department spokesman Steven Stafford stated, “While we are disappointed with today’s ruling, we are pleased that the court has finally acted and that the Supreme Court now can consider our petition for review. The Justice Department will continue to vigorously defend its position on this matter, and looks forward to vindicating that position before the Supreme Court.” And that is exactly where this issue needs to go.  ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/59400?mailing_id=3856&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.3856&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center