~ Featuring ~
by Arnold Ahlert
Tillerson Is Out 
by Political Editors:  It has been rumored numerous  times over the last nine months or so, but now those rumors are fact. President Donald Trump has removed Rex Tillerson as his secretary of state. It was no secret that Trump and Tillerson did not see eye-to-eye on several issue, but a spokesman for Tillerson said that he was not expecting to be let go and “had every intention of staying.” In fact, he reportedly found out from Trump’s tweet and is “unaware of the reason” for his firing. We believe there are two keys: North Korea and Iran.

            Trump has tapped current CIA Director Mike Pompeo to step in as head of the State Department, and he nominated current CIA Deputy Director Gina Haspel to replace Pompeo. In his announcement, Trump noted Pompeo’s impressive record of service in both the military and Congress, and he also highlighted the fact that Haspel “will be the CIA’s first-ever female director, a historic milestone.” Trump then thanked Tillerson for his service and wished him and his family well. And so ends the somewhat rocky term for Tillerson at the State Department — a term that was still light years ahead of that of either liar-Hillary Clinton or John hanoi-Kerry.   
~The Patriot Post


GOP Poised for Big Senate Win
by Dick Morris
{ } ~ Quietly, out of sight of those who follow the national media, Republicans are gaining in five key Senate races for seats now held by Democrats... in states Donald Trump carried. In West Virginia, Indiana, Missouri, Montana and North Dakota, Democrat incumbents are behind either a “generic” Republican candidate or the actual likely GOP nominee. Each of these states has a strong Republican bent and, in some, the Democrat incumbent won almost by accident six years ago. In each state, the Democrat incumbent was elected claiming to be above party and pledging to overcome the partisan gridlock in Washington. Every one of them promptly went to the Senate and voted the party line against the Trump tax cuts. This vote, more than any other, has come to epitomize how fraudulent their declarations of independence are... 
Mueller Almost Done With Trump Probe, 
But Could Hold Off On Charges 
by Ann
{ } ~ FBI Special Counsel Robert Mueller is nearly done with his obstruction probe of Donald Trump... but there’s a very sneaky reason he could hold off on bringing any charges against the President. In short, it’s because he wants more people to talk.  As reported by Bloomberg Politics, Mueller could set the obstruction case aside in order to finish investigating alleged Russian collusion and the hacking of Democrats. If Mueller were to bring obstruction charges early, it could encourage witnesses to be “less cooperative” in other parts of the probe. Three key witnesses Mueller hopes to interview include Trump, Donald Trump Jr., and Ivanka Trump. For the President’s part, on Sunday Trump spokesperson Raj Shah told ABC News that Trump “intends to” meet with Mueller for an interview under oath...
Kudlow is front-runner for Cohn's job: CNBC
{ } ~ Larry Kudlow is the leading candidate to replace Gary Cohn as President Trump’s top economic adviser... CNBC's Jim Cramer reported Monday. Cramer, who has worked with Kudlow at the network on the show “Kudlow and Cramer,” reported that Kudlow has not been formally offered the job, but is the leading choice among the president and some of his advisers. Kudlow declined to comment to CNBC, where he works as a senior contributor... 
Stay Out of DARK ALLIES Where mad-MAXINE
WATERS Lurks – Calif AG Warns TRUMP 
{ } ~ California’s scofflaw open borders Attorney General, Xavier Becerra, joined Andrea Mitchell for an interview... in which he was urged to take a parting shot at President Trump in defense of fellow Californian, mad-Maxine Waters. President Trump had recently described mad-Waters as being a low IQ individual, something that nobody has yet presented any type of documentation to prove otherwise. mad-Waters has her bachelor’s degree in sociology. It’s not rocket science but it does come in handy when you need some initials after your name and plan a career redistributing other people’s wealth.  Becerra knows that President Trump was in Pennsylvania making a speech for a House candidate there but, being the lying Democrat that he is, indicated that he did so from 2,000 miles away “because he is probably too afraid to say it to her face.”...
DISGRACE!!! California Cafe Bans Cops
Face It liar-Hillary, You Lost Because You SUCKED! 
If Nominated I Will NOT Run, If Elected I Will NOT Serve
Liberal Radio Host Bill Press Mocks DNC’s “Bold Move” On Super Delegates, “Who Are They Kidding?
Joy Behar On People Who Met With Farrakhan ‘Everyone Has Baggage’
Prager U-Brexit: Why Britain Left the European Union
ACU Chairman Matt Schlapp Reacts To Liberal Call To Ice, ICE


by Arnold Ahlert:  “Trump should continue to make American producers more competitive in global markets through tax, regulatory, energy, and other pro-America policy changes that bring jobs and capital back to the United States. … Steel and aluminum import tariffs will work decisively against this goal.” —from a column by Larry Kudlow, Arthur Laffer and Stephen Moore

            To tariff or not to tariff, that is the question. Or is it? Maybe the real question is, what about Lisdoonvarna? Despite nine out of 10 people in this Irish town of 300 residents voting against it, the Irish government signed a contract with a local hotel to provide residences to “asylum seekers” and “refugees” that will increase the town’s population by more than a third.
            Likely, this is just the beginning of Ireland’s commitment to a plan approved in 2015 by EU interior ministers, aimed at distributing at least 120,000 “migrants” among EU member states — utterly irrespective of whether those countries want them or not. Ireland’s geographic isolation relative to the rest of the EU had spared it — until now.
            It gets worse. Two weeks ago, it was revealed the Irish government has been paying “journalists” to promote Project Ireland 2040, a plan to boost Ireland’s 4.7 million population by another million — courtesy of mass migration. In other words, a staggering 21% of Ireland’s population will be comprised of migrants within 22 years.
            Last week, German Chancellor Angela Merkel finally admitted that “no-go zones” exist in Germany. She should know. Merkel won Time Magazine’s “Person of the Year” in 2015, largely for her open-borders stance that allowed more than one million “asylum seekers” and “refugees” into Germany. Now she’s decided it’s time to get tough on crime.
            Sweden is another nation looking to crack down on crime, but it too has already surrendered certain areas to immigrant gangs, and police officers themselves have been subjected to attacks — including one where a hand grenade was tossed at a police station. In fact, hand grenades have become a “trend” in gang attacks in Sweden.
            In the last 18 years France’s Jewish population has declined from 555,000 to 500,000. Why? “There’s no Jewish future there,” asserts Steve Eisenberg, co-founder of the Jewish International Connection of New York. “You can’t walk in Paris wearing a yarmulke. You’re taking your life in your hands.
            In Italy’s March 4 election, a majority of voters opted for anti-immigrant, populist and stridently anti-European Union parties over the status quo. As columnist Angelo Codevilla put it, this is what happens “when voters are ruled by officials and associated corporate types who despise them.”
            What does any of the above have to do with collective handwringing over tariffs and the departure of Donald Trump’s economic adviser Gary Cohn? Because it’s collective handwringing by America’s very own “officials and associated corporate types” who despise us. “The prevailing wisdom on Wall Street and in Washington was that the departure of someone like Gary Cohn would be immediately catastrophic for the markets and the US economy,” asserts Charles Gasparino.
            Make that the prevailing globalist wisdom on Wall Street and in Washington.
            And who’s kidding whom with regard to wisdom? Wall Street elitists ran the entire global economy into a ditch in 2008, and Washington elitists bailed them out to the tune of $700 billion, courtesy of the taxpayer-funded Troubled Asset Relief Program. Moreover, the Federal Reserve gave elitists additional cushioning, courtesy of Quantitative Easing (QE), and a Zero Interest Rate Policy (ZIRP) that ultimately precipitated a financial bonanza for the top 1%.
            ZIRP also precipitated a calamity for Main Street America, forced to endure a decade where anything remotely resembling safe-haven savings vehicles, protecting a lifetime’s worth of earnings, were eviscerated.
            And now, many of these same elitists are distraught because the current president doesn’t buy into their particular brand of “wisdom?
            Note that Mssrs. Kudlow, Laffer and Moore spoke of bringing jobs and capital back to the United States. What they didn’t speak to is why they left in the first place. For the globalist elites, there are no countries, only markets. There are no citizens, only workers and consumers. The preservation of a nation’s customs, culture, traditions, borders and language? Anachronistic concepts that must give way to one-world governance run by “enlightened” technocrats.
            Technocrats who also embrace open borders and mass immigration precisely because it undercuts the preservation of national identity.
            Furthermore, the globalist enterprise is strictly bottom line — if specific areas in “flyover America” must take the hit for the generalized  benefit of global profits, so be it. In short, global well-being trumps heartland catastrophe. Yet as columnist Michael Goodwin reminds us, those most critical of Trump’s approach “offer no solutions for the working class Americans left behind by the bipartisan push for globalization.
            Globalization with disastrous possibilities beyond economics and immigration. “We today confront a Chinese Communist dictatorship and superpower that seeks to displace America as first power on earth and to drive the U.S. military back across the Pacific,” writes columnist Pat Buchanan. By the way, he notes, China’s “$375 billion trade surplus with us in 2017 far exceeded the entire Chinese defense budget.”
            Are Americans content with trade policies that subsidize the Chinese quest for world domination? The same Chinese “superb at free-trade rhetoric and even more superb at highly protectionist behavior,” as Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross put it at the Davos World Economic Forum in January?
            As for tariffs, misinformation abounds. America already imposes  12,000 of them on a variety of products. Is that a lot? At the same forum, Ross challenged the assembled group of globalist elites to name a nation less protectionist than America. He got no responses.
            “For the past 30+ years, DC politicians have been selling out the U.S. economy to corporate interests, Wall Street and multinationals,” writes  ConservativeTreeHouse columnist Sundance. “President Trump is simply saying ‘no more,’ and finally putting a stop to it. They hate him. He doesn’t care.”
            He shouldn’t, because that sellout has been beyond egregious. “Global debt levels soared to a record high of $233 trillion in the third quarter of 2017,” CNBC reported in January. Global debt levels engineered by the same elitists responsible for the 2008 crash, many of whom now rail against Trump’s “ignorant” economic policies.
            Trump’s tariffs — targeted and negotiable — represent a classic shot across the globalist bow. No matter how much the elites despise Trump and his agenda, he is determined to take a jackhammer to their “prevailing wisdom” that ultimately came down to two corollaries, one spoken and one unspoken. The spoken one? Wall Street and Washington are “too big to fail.” The unspoken one? The rest of America is “too deplorable to matter.
            No longer. “MAGAnomics” will play itself out, no matter how often $1,000 bonuses are dismissed as crumbs, tax cuts are labeled  “catastrophic,” or “putting Americans first” is derided as delusional or racist.
            The real delusion has been assuming millions of Americans were content to be cogs in a globalist machine, mollified by a “new normal” that hollowed out their cities and towns — along with their lives. The hardhats who spoke at Trump’s tariff signing ceremony humanized working Americans. The same working Americans globalists would rather objectify.
            If there is a better reason why Donald Trump is president, one is hard pressed to imagine what it is.  
~The Patriot Post

Views: 14


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center



Reporter Kicked Out Of Michelle Obama
Conference For Violating ‘Black Girl Code’

The Black Entertainment Television channel recently hosted a conference in south Florida for black women known as “Leading Women Defined,” which featured a casual conversation between former first lady Michelle Obama and former senior White House adviser Valerie Jarrett.

But according to the New York Post’s Page Six, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist who was in attendance was booted from the remainder of the conference after she wrote an article about some of the comments Obama had made during the discussion.

Robin Givhan, a fashion critic and staff writer for The Washington Post, documented the highlights of the friendly chat between Obama and Jarrett.

Some of the highlights of the conversation included the former first lady’s thoughts on President Donald Trump’s inauguration as the Obamas prepared to leave the White House, the role she played during the 2008 election, her difficulty settling in as “the spouse” to the president, how she described her White House garden as a “subversive act” to garner trust with the public and her upcoming memoir. Of course Givhan also wrote about what Obama was wearing … after all, she is a fashion critic.

But following the publication of the article, according to Page Six, BET demanded Givhan leave the conference early amid claims that she had violated a “sacred space” by publishing the content of the conversation.

They also canceled a panel discussion that Givhan initially had been asked to moderate.

However, Page Six noted that BET’s claim that Obama’s discussion was “private” and not intended to be shared with anyone else outside the small gathering in attendance didn’t hold up to scrutiny given the fact that BET itself posted clips from the discussion on its site.

Furthermore, Jarrett also posted those clips on social media and told everyone to “tune in” to the network so they could hear what Obama had to say.

Shortly thereafter, the dispute descended into a sharp back-and-forth on social media between Givhan and others who were irked at what she had done, as can be seen on Givhan’s Twitter feed.

Several of her critics asserted that the conversation had been “off-the-record” — an assertion Givhan flatly denied — and one user claimed the reporter had “violated a sacred trust” between black women.

Another said what she had done was a “complete violation of journalistic ethics and Black girl code, all at once,” while still another asserted through a hashtag that Givhan was “#notoneofus,” as if she were being banished from the exclusive realm of accepted professional black women.

For their part, a BET representative told Page Six that Givhan had been “invited as a guest (not working press) to moderate a fashion panel,” and noted that her travel and lodging expenses had been paid for by the network.

“She was made aware that it was an intimate conversation in a sacred space of sisterhood and fellowship,” the rep added.

Neither Givhan nor representatives for Obama responded to requests for comment on the report from Page Six.

If the WaPo reporter really was instructed ahead of time that the conversation between Obama and Jarrett was “off the record” and a private affair, but published anyway, then BET was justified in booting her from the remainder of the conference — though the mean-spirited commentary she received on social media still crossed the line.

But if Givhan received no prior warning on the matter — and given the fact that BET itself published the conversation later — then this is just a major display of hypocrisy and unnecessary infighting.

What do you think?


© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service