TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Left vs. right: Are both sides equally vitriolic?
by ERIK RUSH
.
Tuesday Top Headlines 
by Media Editors:  President Trump nominates Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh to Supreme Court (The White House)
.
George W. Bush praises Trump for “outstanding” Supreme Court pick (Washington Examiner)
.
Chuck clown-Schumer to oppose Kavanaugh nomination: “Now is the time to fight” (Washington Examiner)
.
2020 White House contenders race to oppose Trump’s judicial pick (The Hill)
.
Oops: Women’s March denounces “XX” in statement on Kavanaugh nomination (Washington Examiner)
.
House Judiciary Committee subpoenas anti-Trump FBI lawyer Lisa Page (The Washington Times)
.
Judge refuses Trump request to change court order on family detention (Fox News)
.
Mexico reportedly will create its own border force (The Washington Times)
.
Twenty-four alleged MS-13 members indicted in Maryland — drugs, murder, bodies dismembered (CNS News)
.
Older immigrants “crowding out” U.S. teens for summer jobs (Washington Examiner)
.
California university works to reduce number of white people on campus (The College Fix)
.
RNC: We’ve made 20 million voter contacts already in the midterms (Hot Air)
.
Humor: Mexican restaurant under fire for racially profiling white girl, offering her mild hot sauce (The Babylon Bee)
.
Policy: Time for Secretary DeVos to rescind liar-nObama-era school discipline policies (Manhattan Institute)
.
Policy: How we enabled the Chinese opioid supply chain (American Enterprise Institute)   
 
.
Manafort filing unmasks DOJ meeting with 
AP reporters, questions if 'grand jury secrecy' violated 
by Catherine Herridge
{ foxnews.com } ~ Lawyers for ex-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort are raising concerns about a 2017 meeting between top law enforcement figures and Associated Press reporters... questioning whether “grand jury secrecy” was violated and revealing memos that say the reporters even offered investigators a “code” pertaining to their client’s storage facility. The details emerged in a series of recent filings, including an effort by Manafort's attorneys to get his criminal trial moved from Northern Virginia, citing pretrial publicity. “Mr. Manafort's legal issues and the attendant daily media coverage have become a theater in the continuing controversy surrounding President Trump and his election," Manafort's lawyers wrote Judge T.S. Ellis, who is overseeing the bank and tax fraud case in Northern Virginia. A second prosecution, involving similar charges, is underway in Washington, D.C. Arguing for a trial in Roanoke, Va., Manafort's legal team said an “inside-the-beltway jury” would be biased against their client...
.
UK Parliament: Little Interest in Grooming Gangs
by Andrew Jones
{ gatestoneinstitute.org } ~ In response to Britain's ongoing sexual grooming scandal... a group of 20 MPs signed an open letter to recently appointed Home Secretary, Sajid Javid, urging coordinated action. As the UK Parliament has 650 MPs, the 20 signatories constitute a mere 3% willing to support the protection of children subjected to gang-rape, trafficking and torture, and at times murder. Such a paltry number of politicians willing to speak out against child sexual slavery seems yet more evidence of the moral bankruptcy of Britain's political elite and how low the country appears to have sunk. Britain's media elite have ignored the letter. Reporting has been limited to the local press in Oxford  and Rochdale -- areas afflicted by grooming -- as well as a few alternative media outlets such as Breitbart London, and indirect reference on Sky News...   https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/12662/britain-parliament-groomin... 
.
Will #Resistance summer dampen 
the dunnycrats-Democrats' big autumn?
by Salena Zito
{ washingtonexaminer.com } ~ On Wednesday afternoon during the height of the Fourth of July festivities at the Statue of Liberty... Therese Patricia Okoumou began scaling Lady Liberty and held a T-shirt up with “Trumpcare Makes us Sick” on one side and “Rise and Resist” on the other. Despite telling authorities she would not come down until “all the children are released," she eventually descended after a team of over a dozen highly skilled New York City police officers with the department’s emergency service unit cajoled her down from the skirts of the statue's base. Her protest evacuated Liberty Island, turning away over 4,000 people who had planned to make a visit to arguably America’s most iconic symbol of liberty as part of their family’s celebration of the signing of the Declaration of Independence...   https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/will-resistan...
.
No More Illegal Immigration – INTRUDER ALERT!

by Dustin Koellhoffer
{ ipatriot.com } ~ Finding the right words is often difficult when dealing with the ignorance of liberalism... They constantly corrupt the language, deliberately make words ambiguous, and use the confusion they create to impose their subterfuge of making lawbreaking righteous. Even the term ‘liberal,’ which used to refer to Christian Americans who wanted to advance their culture and technology while worshipping God has been corrupted by the Left. Now ‘liberal’ refers to atheist socialists who want to tear down everything that Christians have built to establish dictatorships. Language changes over time because the culture changes, but not always for the better as socialists prove in their desire to progress backwards and regress America back into totalitarianism of government rule. The reason they want this is because leftists are control freaks who want to impose their ideology on others for their own benefit. Two Americas: Americanism or Socialism, Right vs. Left “Illegal aliens” was fine in describing foreigners who came into America illegally, but liberals are so stoopid they thought it sounded too much like saying we were being invaded by criminals from another planet. Then they altered the term to “illegal immigrant.” Now they say that sounds like we are saying immigrants are illegal people and “no person is illegal” because they are so stoopid they can’t figure out that people committing crimes by breaking the law makes their actions illegal.  Then they came up with “undocumented workers” as if this is Nazi Germany where you are required to have your papers on you at all times and it’s legal for them to work without citizenship papers.  So, let’s use a term that is unambiguous, so the limited liberal mind cannot be so easily confused...
.
Instances of Voter Fraud Continue to Mount, 
Further Compromising Our Elections
by Jason Snead
{ dailysignal.com } ~ Recent voter fraud cases show the growing importance of upholding election integrity... Last year, Cassandra Amber Marie Ritter was convicted of heroin distribution in Winchester, Virginia. Two weeks later, Ritter voted at a local fire department even though she knew she had lost her right to vote as a consequence of her conviction. She received a two-year suspended sentence. In Texas, Crystal Mason recently received a five-year sentence for illegally voting in the 2016 presidential election. Mason showed up at the polls to vote, only to discover her name had been removed from the rolls. This was no accident; Mason was on probation following a 60-month sentence for felony tax fraud and lost her right to vote as a result...
.
.
Left vs. right: Are both sides equally vitriolic?
by ERIK RUSH


{ wnd.com ~ Two weeks ago, a bit of a controversy erupted over a billboard on Interstate 40 in Texas that suggested liberals keep driving until they leave the state. The billboard was subsequently removed after the party who had paid for the sign asked for it to be taken down, not having anticipated how controversial it would become.

Last week, a new billboard was erected in Amarillo, Texas, by another party in response to the earlier sign. The new sign reads: “Texas is for everyone, not for bigotry. Welcome, y’all.”

It’s a nice sentiment, but it got me to thinking: I don’t necessarily see a desire to encourage liberals to leave a particular locale as bigotry at all.

I see it as prudence.

After all, excepting those who self-identify as liberals but who often demonstrate a preponderance of conservative core values simply because they’ve bought into the idea that liberals are nice and conservatives are big fat meanies, haven’t liberals pretty much established that they’re subversive, dishonorable, foul-mouthed, duplicitous swine? I can’t see why any thinking person with a healthy sense of self-interest or self-preservation would want too many dedicated, politically active liberals around them at all.

I belong to a few non-political organizations, which have many liberals amongst their membership. I take great care never to engage these folks in discussions around culture or politics due to liberals’ proclivity for summarily denying fundamental truths and for their summary acceptance of harmful, abject falsehoods. I do this because to do otherwise would only invite disharmony within these organizations.

It is worth mentioning that I’ve also found liberals to be far more likely than non-liberals to attempt to politicize affairs within such organizations if given the slightest opportunity. Further, as with anyone else, it is inescapable that liberals’ beliefs necessarily bleed over into their general deportment and the way they interact with others, whether in relationships, the workplace, or in casual settings.

Recently in this space, I addressed dummycrats-Democratic Rep. scumbag/mad-Maxine Waters’ advocacy of mob violence against officials in the administration of President Donald Trump. This was only one of many recent instances of outrageous and incendiary behavior on the part of liberals since Trump’s election.

Last week, Fox News’ Brit Hume penned a column admonishing people like Rep. scumbag/mad-Waters to refrain from such incendiary rhetoric, but added that we all need to do so as well. This is sound advice, but Hume’s piece overlooks one salient fact: “We all” aren’t the ones advocating mob violence, nor do we need anyone to inform us that such action is antisocial.

Additionally, there is simply no comparison between the sheer volume and vitriol vis-à-vis the rhetoric of the left versus that of their counterparts. When conservatives hear President Trump deliver a coarse retort following an attacker’s bombardment, they squirm a little but tend to keep quiet because they’re glad to see someone defending himself against these scum. Conversely, as far as the left is concerned, calumnies, expletives and expressed wishes for death and dismemberment are the norm; they’re encouraged, and anyone they don’t like is fair game.

Hume pointed out that one of the chief offenders of late has been President Trump himself, who “has certainly contributed heavily to the current poisonous atmosphere, speaking of his opponents in the crudest language and finding no slight too minor to merit a bruising response.”

While it’s true that President Trump does give as good as he gets with regard to scathing attacks, the truth is that the tone of political discourse became exponentially more volatile during the liar-nObama administration. While liar-nObama may not have used expletives, he was very calculated in his rhetoric and quite adept at pushing just the right buttons, as it were, of the right demographics to bring about the maximum emotional response in his target audience.

Case in point: There is simply no denying that race relations deteriorated significantly during the liar-nObama years, and that was primarily due to his use of the bully pulpit in this regard.

Speaking further to the aforementioned low character of liberals in this vein, in addition to the caustic language being proffered, there have been other, even more untoward and dangerous behaviors in which those on the left have engaged. The utterly baseless investigation into the Trump campaign’s alleged collusion with Russian operatives in order to gain an advantage in the 2016 general election not only revealed that it was the camp of liar-Hillary Clinton and other Democrats who engaged in such collusion, but that parties in the FBI at various levels conspired to protect liar-Hillary Clinton during the investigation into her illegal email server, as well as conspiring to keep Trump from getting elected.

Following the decline in civility catalyzed by liar-nObama and his surrogates, it was the election of Donald Trump that caused the left to go completely off the rails, but nothing can excuse their marked descent into rhetorical depravity and criminality over the last couple of years. The advent of the #Walkaway movement, in which some liberals have advocated abandoning liberalism and the dummycrats-Democratic Party, certainly evidences how bad affairs have become.

All things considered, while some might argue that rank-and-file voting liberals ought not be ostracized, marginalized, or politely asked to leave the state of Texas, until they start widely condemning leftist orthodoxy or change their voting habits, I will continue to avoid them and advocate for their political disenfranchisement.

Views: 21

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Goodbye 2020: Clinton Ordered By Federal Judge To Submit To Questioning

(TeaParty.org) – Just when Hillary Clinton began hinting that she’s ready to run again in 2020, she has been ordered by a federal judge to submit to questioning about the use of her private email server to convey classified documents during her time as Secretary of State.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan made the order as part of a lawsuit from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

“Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions — including key q’s about the setting up of her email system,” wrote Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a tweet following the ruling.

Judicial Watch 🔎 @JudicialWatch

BREAKING: Judicial Watch announced today that, following JW's court battle, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that Hillary Clinton must answer – under oath – two additional questions on her controversial email system within 30 days.

Judicial Watch: Federal Court Ordered Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under...

 (Washington, DC) –Judicial Watch announced today that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that within 30 days Hillary Clinton must answer under oath two additional questions about her...

judicialwatch.org
Tom Fitton  @TomFitton

Breaking: Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions -- including key q's about the setting up of her email system. Court denied our request to unseal vid depositions of Clinton aides. Great work by Michael Bekesha!

As a statement from Judicial Watch explains, the ruling is the latest development in the group’s Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, which they began to discover why former deputy chief of staff to Mrs. Clinton, Huma Abedin, was allowed to work at the State Department while also engaged in “outside employment.”

Clinton now has 30 days to answer two key questions from a list of 25 questions composed by Judicial Watch.

The questions the judge selected are:

1) “Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.”

During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

This new development is huge because it means that the two critical scandals from Clinton’s time in the State Department, her private email server and the Benghazi attacks, are facing fresh scrutiny in both the legal system and the court of public opinion.

And while Clinton likely had little chance of any run in 2020, this makes it even less likely she will stand even a shred of a chance.

We’ve have got to hope and pray that at long last, this leads to the long overdue criminal charges we’ve all been waiting to see.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service