.TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
The Senate Hearing on Accustations
Everything You Need to Know About
the Kavanaugh Hearing and the Latest Accusations
by Sara Carter.
Kavanaugh, Ford hearing live blog: Supreme Court nominee
and professor testify on sexual assault accusations
by Kathleen Joyce, Shelley Ng
{ foxnews.com } ~ Christine Blasey Ford and Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday... on the California professor's sexual assault allegations against the judge. Ford has accused Kavanaugh of pinning her to a bed during a house party in Maryland in the early 1980s, attempting to remove her clothes and putting his hand over her mouth when she tried to scream. At the time of the alleged incident, Ford was 15 and Kavanaugh was 17, she said, adding that Kavanaugh was drunk. “I thought he might inadvertently kill me,” Ford said. “He was trying to attack me and remove my clothing.” Kavanaugh has vehemently denied these claims, calling them "totally false and outrageous." "We’re talking about an allegation of sexual assault. I’ve never sexually assaulted anyone. I did not have sexual intercourse or anything close to sexual intercourse in high school or for many years there after," Kavanaugh said in an interview with Fox News... http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/27/kananaugh-ford-hearing-live-blog-supreme-court-nominee-and-professor-testify-on-sexual-assault-accusations.html
. { foxnews.com } ~ Christine Blasey Ford and Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday... on the California professor's sexual assault allegations against the judge. Ford has accused Kavanaugh of pinning her to a bed during a house party in Maryland in the early 1980s, attempting to remove her clothes and putting his hand over her mouth when she tried to scream. At the time of the alleged incident, Ford was 15 and Kavanaugh was 17, she said, adding that Kavanaugh was drunk. “I thought he might inadvertently kill me,” Ford said. “He was trying to attack me and remove my clothing.” Kavanaugh has vehemently denied these claims, calling them "totally false and outrageous." "We’re talking about an allegation of sexual assault. I’ve never sexually assaulted anyone. I did not have sexual intercourse or anything close to sexual intercourse in high school or for many years there after," Kavanaugh said in an interview with Fox News... http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/27/kananaugh-ford-hearing-live-blog-supreme-court-nominee-and-professor-testify-on-sexual-assault-accusations.html
Senate Judiciary Hearing: Judge Brett Kavanaugh -vs-
Christine Blasey Ford – 9:45am Livestream Coverage
by sundanceC-SPAN VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zVOkb3CdZ0
FOX LIVESTREAM VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwbyRk1jkv8
ABC LIVESTREAM VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPRzWdAt9fk
STANDING WITH BRETT VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watchv=7vAaYseYunE
KAVANAUGH WATCH PARTY: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-AWBph2J34o
.Prof. Ford Flunks as a Female Role Model
by Doris O'Brien
{americanthinker.com} ~ In Shirley Jackson's short story, "The Lottery" – published in 1948 and later made into a film – a rural community holds its annual drawing, after which the unlucky winner is stoned to death... This pagan-like ritual presumed personal culpability for whatever ills had befallen the town since the last lottery. Jackson's chilling tale is one of superstition and human sacrifice practiced on behalf of self-interest. To be fair, the story's lottery made no distinction among townspeople based on sex, race, wealth, opinion, occupation, or popularity. In the piece, it was a woman with a sterling reputation who met her end at the willing hands of her neighbors. To that extent, it seems less shocking than what has happened in the current "lottery" to choose a Supreme Court justice, since in the present ordeal there is implicit bias based almost entirely on a progressive ideology built on by "identity politics." In this latest Kavanaugh scenario – in which the ultimate objective is to stone to death the object's reputation by way of advancing one's own political interests – the white conservative male is most likely to have the lottery tickets stacked against him. The dummycrats-Democrat leadership has methodically assembled its own stockpile of societal, racial, ideological, and sexual missiles to hurl at the accused. These liberal insurgents are by no means innocent Davids taking aim at Goliath. Rather, they are power-hungry government "servants" out to vanquish a well reputed conservative Republican with as many smooth stones as it takes. Now that the "Me Too" movement has become rooted in our consciousness, dummycrats-Democrats are eagerly harvesting it for selfish political gain. Any resistance to the assumption that an accusing woman is not immediately and totally to be believed is no longer tolerated. The very idea has become, in itself, a form of guilt. We all know the framework of Judge Kavanaugh's ordeal. What we lack are the details, which no longer matter to those out to destroy him...
Two Men Come Forward to Judiciary Claiming
They, Not Kavanaugh, Assaulted Ford
by Rusty
{thepoliticalinsider.com} ~ In a stunning turn of events, two men interviewed by the Senate Judiciary Committee suggested Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh may have simply been a victim of mistaken identity... A statement released by Committee Republicans late Wednesday indicated that on Monday they spoke: “with a man who believes he, not Judge Kavanaugh, had the encounter with Dr. Ford in 1982 that is the basis of his complaint.” Ford had offered the initial accusation – the only one with even a slight whiff of possible truth – alleging that Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her in 1982 at a high school party. The release of her polygraph letter on Wednesday cast serious doubt on her claims, while this new information is set to rock the political world as Ford and Kavanaugh both prepare to testify about the incident. A second interview was conducted with the man who later provided the Judiciary with a “more in-depth written statement.”Reports indicate that a second man was interviewed by phone. That man also believes he may have been confused with Kavanaugh. The news comes just hours after Ford’s story began to crumble when her polygraph letter indicated she couldn’t keep the number of people in attendance at the party straight, while simultaneously revealing she must have flown to the examination after previously stating she could not fly out of fear of enclosed spaces...
.Kavanaugh Told Senate Investigators,
'This Is Not right. It's an Outrage'
by Susan Jones.
Christine Blasey Ford Testifies She Flies
Many Times a Year After Saying She’s Afraid of Flying
by Jim E
{thepoliticalinsider.com} ~ Once again, Christine Blasey Ford, the woman who claims Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her while both were in high school... just contradicted herself while under oath before the Senate Judiciary Committee. First, she contradicted her own story about the number of individuals who attended the party where Kavanaugh assaulted her. That looks bad because it shows Ford’s memory isn’t exactly trustworthy. Now we’re learning more damning information about Ford. Prior to her testimony, the Senate Judiciary Committee asked to set up a date for Ford to testify. Ford gave the excuse that she wasn’t interested in flying to Washington because she had a fear of flying. We later found out that she had flown to the Washington, D.C., area just months prior to the allegations coming to light. Now we’re learning that Ford flies quite often, leading many to believe that Ford doesn’t actually have a fear of flying....
dummycrats-Dems Waste NO Time Smearing Kavanaugh
{americanactionnews.com} ~ Sen. lowlife-Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) has Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh often her mind these days... The 2020 contender has posted nearly 4,000 different Facebook ads lambasting the judge, according to the social media site. Ms. lowlife-Harris, who serves on the Senate Judiciary Committee, had dozens of active Kavanaugh ads up as of Wednesday afternoon, a day before all eyes will be on the committee as senators listen to testimony by Judge Kavanaugh and one woman who has accused him of sexual assault. The ads are slight variations on the same message, urging voters to sign a petition opposing Judge Kavanaugh. Most ads highlight what she says is his opposition to Roe v. Wade and loyalty to President Trump. Ms. lowlife-Harris’s petition links to a fundraising page suggesting contributions of $15 or more to her campaign. She isn’t up for re-election this year. A potential 2020 dummycrats-Democratic presidential contender, Ms. lowlife-Harris is a heavy user of social media. A New York University study of Facebook advertising from May to July found that she was outpacing all other senators in her use of paid ads on the platform, according to the Mercury News, which wrote about the study.
.Kavanaugh comes out firing,
rips Senate process as a 'national disgrace'
by Melissa Quinn.
Ford Polygraph Results Released.
Did They Just Blow a Huge Hole in Her Story?
by BENJAMIN ARIE{westernjournal.com} ~ The narrative that liberals have hung their hopes on to stop Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh is falling apart... There are now so many holes in the story, it’s incredible dummycrats-Democrats are still running with it. Christine Blasey Ford is the woman who accused Kavanaugh of drunkenly groping her at a party way back when he was 17 years old, but she has been largely unable to produce solid evidence or witnesses to back up her serious claims. One of the only points in her favor was that she took a “lie detector” polygraph test, which was widely reported by the media as supporting her story by showing that she wasn’t lying.That is, until now. On Wednesday, the actual details from that polygraph were released to the public — and they make her already-flimsy story seem downright unbelievable. The biggest problem with the so-called “lie detector” results are that the examiner never actually asked questions about Kavanaugh during the polygraph test. Bizarrely, the person conducting the polygraph — who was a third-party examiner and not a law enforcement official — had Ford scribble down her nearly 40-year-old memory of the drunken party, and then asked her two vague questions. Those two questions were: “Is any part of your statement false?” and “Did you make up any part of your statement?” This is absolutely important to understand: Again, the polygraph test didn’t actually ask the main accuser any questions about Kavanaugh. His name was never brought up by the interviewer... https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/ford-polygraph-results-released-just-blow-huge-hole-story/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=patriotupdate&utm_campaign=dailypm&utm_content=libertyalliance
Comments