The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
Even Comey Thought 
liar-Clinton Was 'Grossly Negligent'
by Jordan Candler
Leftist Group Retracts Flawed Analysis of GOP Tax Plan
by Political Editors:  When catering to a political ideology matters more than seeking after objective truth, then the credibility of one’s findings is properly questioned. The Tax Policy Center (TPC) issued and then retracted its analysis of the House Republicans’ Tax Cut and Jobs Act (TCJA) this week, stating, “TPC staff found an error in the preliminary distributional analysis of the Tax Cut and Jobs Act that we released today. This error involved the additional child tax credit component of the proposed legislation.” The TPC had recently produced an analysis of the Republicans’ plan in which it claimed “at least 12% of taxpayers would pay higher taxes … in 2018 and at least 28% … would pay more in 2027.” Now the TPC is saying, oops, uh, never mind.

          The truth is that the TPC has a leftist anti-Republican bias. As Chris Edwards, a tax policy expert at the Cato Institute, explained, “The real issue is that the Tax Policy Center tilts to the left in the assumptions it uses in simulations of tax plans, and in the way it presents findings. The Tax Policy Center undercounts the dynamic efforts of economic growth from tax reform, and it presents study results in ways that appear to show high-earners do the best under Republican tax reform plans.
          In early October after the TPC claimed that 50% of the GOP’s tax plan would benefit the top 1%, The Wall Street Journal in calling out the center’s leftist bias wrote, “The Tax Policy Center is a joint project of the left-leaning Brookings Institution and the Urban Institute that the media routinely labels ‘nonpartisan.’ Its record of hostility to any GOP tax reform that cuts tax rates shows the opposite. And the latest evidence of bias is its willingness to jump to conclusions about the GOP plan before crucial details are known.” Like former FBI chief James Comey, and his mysteriously edited decision to exonerate liar-Hillary Clinton, it seems the TPC had already decided the TCJA plan was bad simply based on the fact that Republicans were creating it.
          Furthermore, like the Congressional Budget Office and its static analysis practices, the TPC seems to view taxes as government-created revenue, to which the only way to create more revenue is by raising taxes, rather than tax cuts that have been proven to grow revenue by growing the economy. The White House defended the GOP’s tax plan by pointing to a Tax Foundation study that found the Republican plan would spur GDP growth by 3.9%, eventually reaching 4.4% annual economic growth, while creating 975,000 full-time jobs.
          If tax cuts lead to more people working and earning more money, then that equals more people paying taxes, which in turn means more money going to the government. And theoretically, if more people are working, then there would be fewer people in need of welfare, costing the government less money. But then that would mean fewer people dependent upon the government. A bridge too far for Democrats?  ~The Patriot Pos

Feinstein, Dems Roll Out New Gun 
Bill To “Begin Removing These Weapons”
{} ~ Confiscation and disarmament Democrats, led by Sen Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and many of her anti-Constitution comrades... on Wednesday introduced their latest attack on the Second Amendment, the Assault Weapons Ban of 2017. A press release from Feinstein’s office utilizes their familiar vague, subject to interpretation language, stating that the bill bans “the sale, transfer, manufacture, and importation of military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines.” What, no prison time for ownership or possession? In a statement Feinstein said, “We’re introducing an updated Assault Weapons Ban for one reason: so that after every mass shooting with a military-style assault weapon, the American people will know that a tool to reduce these massacres is sitting in the Senate, ready for debate and a vote.” They’re admitting that it’s just Democrat political theater, planted for future use against the American people, much like liar-nObama’s so-called judges...Feinstein and her buddies don't have any common sense.
Brazile takes on liar-Clinton 'cult': 
Says team was 'condescending,' impenetrable
{} ~ Former Democratic Party boss Donna Brazile – in her bombshell campaign book and media interviews promoting it... has painted the picture of a liar-Hillary Clinton presidential campaign that was impenetrable and even “cult”-like, hampering any effort by advisers who warned about the missteps that gave Donald Trump a path to the White House. In an interview Wednesday night on Fox News' "Tucker Carlson Tonight," Brazile seemed to walk back suggestions in her book that some on the liar-Clinton team were sexist, but described their attitude this way: “It was dismissive. Condescending and dismissive, those are the words I characterize in the book,” Brazile said...
America’s embassy in Israel 
should be moved to Jerusalem — now

by John R. Bolton
{} ~ Whether to move America’s embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem has long been a subject of political debate in the U.S. and abroad... It’s time now to resolve the debate by recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital city and relocating our embassy there on incontestably Israeli sovereign territory. This relocation would be sensible, prudent and efficient for the United States. It would not adversely affect negotiations over Jerusalem’s final status or the broader Middle East peace process, nor would it impair our diplomatic relations among predominantly Arab and Muslim nations. Over the years, as with many other aspects of Middle Eastern geopolitics, a near-theological view has developed here and abroad about the impact of moving the U.S. embassy. Now is the ideal time to sweep this detritus aside and initiate the long-overdue transfer...
Rep. Franks's Epic Takedown 
of Those Obsessive Collusion Claims
by Cortney O'Brien
{} ~ While the votes were coming in a handful of statewide races Tuesday night... Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ) was on the House floor delivering a serious takedown of those Russian collusion stories the media can't get enough of, but can't seem to back up. Franks offered a summary of the "bombshell" reports last week that former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and his business associate Rick Gates were being indicted for money laundering and conspiracy against the United States. It looked bad at first glance, but we soon learned the Trump campaign was not mentioned in any of the 12 charges. "In other words, the announcement amounted to what many have called a nothingburger," Franks concluded...
CBO says repealing liar-nObamacare's individual
mandate penalties would save $338 billion
by Kimberly Leonard
{} ~ The Congressional Budget Office on Wednesday said that repealing liar-nObamacare's individual mandate penalties would save $338 billion over the next decade... providing a potential injection of money to help finance Republican tax reform efforts. The CBO acknowledged Wednesday that it was revisiting its methodology around the repeal of the individual mandate, but that changes would not be included in a full report set to be released later in the afternoon. Keith Hall, CBO director, said in a blog post that the evaluation was still underway by his agency and by the Joint Committee on Taxation...
Even Comey Thought liar-Clinton Was 'Grossly Negligent'
by Jordan Candler:  Well this is certainly an interesting development. Suffice to say, something just doesn’t sit right when it comes to liar-Hillary Clinton’s consequence-free application of an unsecure email server — hence the GOP’s recent decision to dig deeper into why no charges were issued. It’s simply a question of putting together the pieces. And another clue may have just been revealed.

          According to a report in The Hill, last year then-FBI Director James Comey, who claimed that charges against liar-Clinton were unnecessary, initially felt otherwise. New evidence shows that in early May 2016, Comey drafted a memo in which he stated, “There is evidence to support a conclusion that Secretary liar-Clinton, and others, used the email server in a manner that was grossly negligent with respect to the handling of classified information.
          Contrast this with what Comey ultimately declared two months later: “Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary liar-Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of the classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.
          As The Hill explains, “The change [to extremely careless] is significant, since federal law states that gross negligence in handling the nation’s intelligence can be punished criminally with prison time or fines.” Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) responded, “Apparently … Comey and other FBI officials believed the facts fit that gross negligence standard until later edits were made.
          According to The Hill, “The documents turned over to Congress do not indicate who recommended the key wording changes. … Memos show that at least three top FBI officials were involved in helping Comey fashion and edit the statement, including Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, General Counsel James Baker and chief of staff Jim Rybicki.
          The name McCabe should raise red flags. As we recently reported, McCabe was assistant FBI director under liar-nObama. His wife, who last year ran for the state senate in Virginia, received a massive $675,000 campaign contribution from Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe — former chairman of the Democratic National Committee and prolific fundraiser for the liar-Clintons. Both McCabe and McAuliffe are being investigated for the suspicious transaction. Moreover, according to Judicial Watch, “We uncovered Justice Department records showing that McCabe did not recuse himself from the investigation into former Secretary of State liar-Hillary Clinton’s unsecure, non-government email server until Tuesday, November 1, 2016, just one week prior to the presidential election!” Coincidence?
          McCabe’s name coming up again could all be happenstance, but someone clearly edited Comey’s initial words and cleared liar-Hillary’s name. Is McCabe that person? Heck, it could have been Comey himself who changed the term. Either way, it really probably goes even further up the chain. We’ve stated before that Comey was following Barack liar-nObama’s cue in exonerating liar-Cl.... But it was no doubt accomplished with the help of Comey’s close colleagues in addition to growing pressure. Don’t forget that Attorney General Loretta Lynch was also implicated when she met with liar-Bill Clinton on a tarmac. Bottom line: Whatever concerns Comey had were tempered his superiors.
          Finally, The Hill notes, “While Comey told Congress last year that he would never have prosecuted liar-Clinton without proof she intended to violate a law, the editing of his statement suggests there might have been dissent within the FBI about that decision.” There certainly was not much dissent among underlings at the FBI and DOJ, where agents were highly frustrated over the outcome of the investigation. But there was always dissent in the Democrat Party leadership. What the new memos offer is more proof that it wasn’t just liar-Clinton who was grossly negligent. As even Comey initially implied, she should be in jail. But someone higher up ensured that wouldn’t happen.  ~The Patriot Pos

Views: 14


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center




Rush Limbaugh Explains How Robert Mueller
Will Attempt To Financially Destroy President Trump

 Special Counsel Robert Mueller has crossed President Trump’s “red line” after issuing a subpoena for documents related to the Trump Organization’s business dealings with Russia.

New York Times reports:

The special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, has subpoenaed the Trump Organization to turn over documents, including some related to Russia, according to two people briefed on the matter. The order is the first known time that the special counsel demanded documents directly related to President Trump’s businesses, bringing the investigation closer to the president. […] The Trump Organization has said that it never had real estate holdings in Russia, but witnesses recently interviewed by Mr. Mueller have been asked about a possible real estate deal in Moscow. In 2015, a longtime business associate of Mr. Trump’s emailed Mr. Trump’s lawyer Michael Cohen at his Trump Organization account claiming he had ties to President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia and said that building a Trump Tower in Moscow would help Mr. Trump’s presidential campaign.

Radio host Rush Limbaugh theorized on his program Friday that one of Mueller’s true objectives is to financially destroy President Trump.

Partial transcript via Breitbart News:

And these requests, the subpoena for documents from the Trump Organization, I ask you again, what has that to do with the campaign and with collusion and with the Russians? They’ve already been looking into Trump business in Russia with the Miss, what is it, USA, whatever his pageant is.

Do you all remember during the early days of the campaign there was news that Trump, in a tax return something like 20 years ago, took a $900 million deduction that was granted and survived an audit by the IRS? Now, I forget the details. It had to do with losses that he had incurred in that year in building things. It was around 900 or $920 million deduction. I’ll never forget when it was reported because most people will never come close to ever having that in a lifetime, and to have a guy personally write that much off?

Anyway, I think Mueller wants that $920 million back. I think Mueller wants to prove that that was a faulty deduction. I think that they want to go back, they want to get Trump’s tax returns because they want to nullify that $900 million deduction, and then they want to collect 20 years of interest and penalties and wipe Trump out.

In the meantime, President Trump’s lawyers are in the process of negotiating with special counsel Robert Mueller to bring the Russia probe to an end, reports Rebecca Ballhaus and Peter Nicholas of the Wall Street Journal.

Mueller’s tentacles continue to reach further and further.

CNN reported that investigators are attempting to determine whether former Blackwater chief Erik Prince misled the  House Intelligence Committee about a meeting he had in Seychelles in January of 2017.

Prince is accused of using the meeting as an opportunity to establish a secret back channel with Russia.

Fox News’ Catherine Herridge spoke with one of President Trump’s personal lawyers about the new subpoena request by Special Counsel Mueller.

According to Herridge, Trump’s lawyer was unaware of the subpoena and said it may be a ‘wrap up’ subpoena or ‘clean up’ subpoena which may signal the end of the investigation.


© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service