TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
The dummycrats-Democratic 
Party’s Christian problem
by DAVID LIMBAUGH
.
Peter Strzok Testifies To Joint Session of Congress
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ The FBI counterintelligence official at the center of the liar-Clinton and Trump investigations is scheduled to testify today...  FBI Agent Peter Strzok will testify publicly before a joint House Oversight/Judiciary Committee. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/07/12/peter-strzok-testif...
.
Liberman: Israel should close its Irish embassy 
by TOVAH LAZAROFF
{ jpost.com } ~ Defense Minister Avigdor Liberman called on Israel to close its embassy in Dublin in response to the Irish Senate vote... to advance legislation that would criminalize trade with east Jerusalem, the Golan Heights and the West Bank. On Thursday, the Foreign Ministry met with Irish Ambassador Alison Kelly. The foreign ministry summoned her for a conversation to protest the legislation’s advancement, even though Ireland’s government has opposed it. No further action was taken after the meeting. "There is no point in summoning the Irish ambassador to Israel for a reprimand,” Liberman wrote on his twitter account. “Israel should immediately close its embassy in Dublin. We will not turn the other cheek to those who boycott us,” Liberman wrote. Ireland has made it clear that it opposes any boycotts against areas of Israel within the pre-1967 lines. It has vigorously opposed any Israeli activity over those lines. But its opposition to the private member’s bill is more about strategy and legality. It believes that the legislation runs counter to European Union law and would harm its ability to be involved in any Middle East peace process...
.
rino-McCain may resign to push 
Kavanaugh confirmation through Senate 
{ conservativeinstitute.org } ~ With a tight battle looming to confirm Trump nominee Brett Kavanaugh as a Supreme Court justice... one Republican senator may make a sacrifice to push the nominee through. Sen. rino-John McCain (R-AZ) could finally step down — and have someone appointed in his place — if he is not well enough to make the trip to Washington to vote in favor of the nominee, ABC analyst Alex Castellanos reported on Tuesday. “There’s some word that if rino-McCain is not able to vote and his vote is needed, he might resign and let someone appoint a senator who would support this judge,” Castellanos said. If rino-McCain were to step down, Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey, a Republican, would appoint a replacement...
.
Trump shares letter from 
Kim Jong Un heralding start of 'meaningful journey'
by Naomi Lim
{ washingtonexaminer.com } ~ President Trump shared on social media Thursday a letter he received from North Korean leader Kim Jong Un last week... in which Kim says he appreciated the "energetic and extraordinary" diplomatic efforts made by the Trump administration to engage the rogue nation. "The significant first meeting with Your Excellency and the joint statement that we signed together in Singapore 24 days ago was indeed the start of a meaningful journey," Kim wrote in the note, dated July 6, of the pair's historic summit on June 12. "I firmly believe that the strong will, sincere efforts and unique approach of myself and Your Excellency Mr. President aimed at opening up a new future between the DPRK and the U.S. will surely come to fruition," Kim continued...
.
Rod Rosenstein requests 93 federal 
prosecutors help vet Brett Kavanaugh: Report
by Diana Stancy Correll
{ washingtonexaminer.com } ~ Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein has requested that federal prosecutors help vet President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee... Brett Kavanaugh, a new report says. Rosenstein requested that the prosecutors examine Kavanaugh’s government documents and asked the 93 United States attorneys to have every office submit several federal prosecutors “who can make this important project a priority for the next several weeks,” the New York Times reports. The move departs from the norm, as it is standard for Justice Department lawyers to participate in work for Supreme Court nominations, but not prosecutors...
.
.
The dummycrats-Democratic 
Party’s Christian problem
by DAVID LIMBAUGH


{ conservativeinstitute.org } ~ People on the left are outraged when you question their patriotism, their dedication to the nation as founded and their respect for the Constitution as originally written, but they continually vindicate our concerns.

The most recent example is the left’s unhinged mania at Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s inclusion on President Trump’s list of potential Supreme Court appointees.

In times of perceived crisis — and this is certainly one of those times for leftists — they show their colors, and you can color them militantly opposed to Barrett, in large part because of her Catholicism.

And guess what else. Rumor is that she frequents a Bible study, as well.

Forget Barrett’s distinguished career and formidable legal credentials. The leftist media went bonkers, unapologetically displaying their bigotry when it comes to Christians.

One commentator pointed out that Barrett “went to Notre Dame. She is very Catholic.”

Get that? She’s not only an evil Catholic; she’s very much a Catholic.

Another pundit said, “It’s kind of a dubious position, but I’m sure that if Trump does pick a woman, she’ll be known as the Aunt Lydia of the Supreme Court” — a derogatory reference to the villainous character in the popular show The Handmaid’s Tale.

This is reminiscent of Dianne Fein-stein’s astounding alarm, expressed during Barrett’s appellate court confirmation hearing in the Senate, that Barrett’s Catholic “dogma lives loudly within” her.

When leftists aren’t denying their prejudice, they often selectively cite Scripture to “prove” that Jesus Christ was a social justice warrior or that the Bible mandates open borders.

Oh, yes, and Jesus didn’t judge people as we dastardly conservatives do. In a 2010 piece, liberal professor Michael Shermer quoted the oft-misinterpreted passage in which Jesus begins, “Judge not, that ye be not judged.” Then Shermer declared:

Would any red-blooded, gun-toting, Hummer-driving, hard-drinking, Bible-toting conservative today say anything like this? (Matthew 5:43-44): “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you.”

It is astounding that leftists see themselves as tolerant and nonjudgmental, but I’ll let their record speak for itself on this.

But when they’re not cherry-picking Scripture to shame immigration hawks or to pander to Christian voters during political campaigns, they show us another side.

I’m not saying that no leftists are Christians, but I am saying that far too many of them show a hostility toward Christianity and Bible-believing Christians. It’s more than just a disdain for political conservatives who are also churchgoing Christians.

My 2003 book, Persecution: How Liberals Are Waging War Against Christianity, documents the left’s pattern of discrimination against Christian influences in culture, Christian values and Christian religious liberty.

When I appeared on “Hannity & Colmes” for an interview on the book, I had great difficulty getting an airing with liberal co-host Alan Colmes because he couldn’t get over the subtitle.

I was friendly with Alan, and he was respectful, but he insisted on my defending his inferred premise that I was saying that liberals can’t be Christian.

As I explained to Alan, I would never suggest that liberals can’t be Christian, and indeed, I know many who are. I happen to believe that in many cases, their political worldview is at odds with a biblical worldview, but I don’t presume to challenge the authenticity of their faith.

No — my point is that irrespective of their deep-felt faith or lack thereof, they too often are at odds with biblical Christianity and Bible-believing Christians in the media, at universities and other schools, in our culture, and in the political sphere.

And is it any coincidence that the overwhelming number of mocking atheists on Twitter, in my admittedly anecdotal experience, are flaming leftists? I don’t think so.

Barack liar-nObama infamously disparaged Bible-and gun-toting Americans who live in small Midwestern towns.

“It’s not surprising,” said liar-nObama, that “they get bitter and cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”

That statement set off alarm bells for me for many reasons, not the least of which was that Christians are supposed to cling to Jesus Christ. Their faith in him is central to the religion.

There is not only no shame in trusting and depending on Christ; it is essential as the road to their salvation and their Christian living. What’s more telling than liar-nObama’s appalling statement is that he was wholly unaware what he was revealing about himself with it.

It’s not just liar-nObama but the dummycrats-Democratic Party at large. Is its frequent disrespect for the God of the Bible, Christian home-schoolers and the constitutionally protected religious liberty of Christians indicative of something or just a matter of my imagination?

How about dummycrats-Democrats’ hostility to voluntary prayer in public schools, their selective excising of Christian history from public school textbooks, their allergy to Christian-themed hymns in public schools or their dislike of Christmas displays in the public square?

How about leftist Hollywood’s routine depiction of Christians as fanatical lunatics? Remember when thedummycrats-Democratic National Committee denounced God in three votes and took the word and concept of God out of the party platform at the 2012 convention?

If you don’t like my anecdotal impressions, what do you make of the Pew Research Center’s reporting that just 45 percent of dummycrats-Democrats believe in the God of the Bible and a significantly lower percentage of white Democrats do?

According to Pew, “in their beliefs about God, nonwhitedummycrats-Democrats more closely resemble Republicans than white dummycrats-Democrats.”

This fact alone, coupled with Kanye West’s admiration for Donald Trump, should have dummycrats-Democrats quaking in their boots — but I digress.

If dummycrats-Democrats don’t want to be perceived as being anti-Christian in their attitudes and policies, they’d better regroup, because plenty of people have taken notice.

You can’t convince me they’re unconcerned about it, or they wouldn’t spend so much time defending themselves against the charge.

They definitely don’t want Middle America to believe these things about them, so they’ll continue to deny their prejudice during election season, but one of these days, to quote one of their Christian icons, their chickens will come home to roost.

Views: 11

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Rudy Tirre on July 13, 2018 at 7:26am

Bonnie

Yes he is out of control and needs to be removed. He has no right to vet Brett. I am sure the is being forced by the deep state

Comment by Bonnie Somer on July 13, 2018 at 3:20am
Rod Rosenstein requests 93 federal 
prosecutors help vet Brett Kavanaugh:  WHO THE HELL IS HE TO MAKE SUCH A REQUEST.   I HAVE NEVER HEARD OF THIS BEING DONE.  I THOUGHT IT WAS UP TO ONLY THE SENATE TO CONFIRM THIS MAN.   ROSENSTEIN IS ABUSING HIS OFFICE AND NEEDS TO BE FIRED NOW.    I SAY EMAIL THE WH AND BITCH AND WHINE TIL HE IS GONE.  HIS STONEWALLING OF DOCS IS A/O REASON HE IS A DISGRACE.   

LIGHTER SIDE

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by Henry Payne

Political Cartoons by Mike Lester

ALERT ALERT

Newt Says What The Rest Of Us Are Thinking:
It’s Time To Throw Peter Strzok In Jail

Disgraced FBI special agent Peter Strzok, a senior member of the bureau who gained notoriety in recent months over his anti-Trump text messages to a colleague, was grilled for nearly 10 hours during a joint congressional committee hearing on Thursday.

At issue was Strzok’s anti-Trump texts to former FBI lawyer and lover Lisa Page that coincided with his leading of the investigations into both former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server scandal and the alleged Trump/Russia 2016 election collusion, as well as his involvement in the subsequent Robert Mueller special counsel probe.

The hearing proved to be a heated battle, as Strzok displayed an arrogant smugness in defiance of pointed questions from Republicans that he largely danced around, while Democrats sought to upend and undermine the entire hearing with a plethora of interruptions, parliamentary maneuvers and outright praise for the man who helped let Clinton off the hook while ferociously targeting Trump.

Former House speaker and presidential candidate Newt Gingrich was less than impressed with Strzok’s performance and cooperation in the hearing and suggested during an appearance on Fox Business that the FBI agent should be held in contempt of Congress.

“I think they have to move to hold him in contempt and throw him in jail,” Gingrich said of Congress and Strzok.

“This is a person who is willfully standing up and refusing to appear as a congressional witness and he was a government employee at the time,” he continued.

“He has every obligation to inform the legislative branch, and I don’t think they have any choice except to move a motion of contempt because he is fundamentally — and so is his girlfriend (Page) — they’re both fundamentally in violation of the entire constitutional process,” he added.

Page had been subpoenaed to appear before Congress on Wednesday but refused to appear, saying she’d been unable to review relevant documents prior to the scheduled hearing, a closed-door hearing that has since been rescheduled for Friday.

Gingrich was not the only one who thought Strzok deserved to be held in contempt of Congress, as House Judiciary Committee chairman Bob Goodlatte informed Strzok that he remained at risk of such during the hearing, according to The Daily Caller.

That warning from Goodlatte came after Strzok had refused to answer a straightforward question posed by House Oversight Committee chairman Trey Gowdy, regarding how many people Strzok had personally interviewed between a specific set of dates in relation to the Clinton email investigation.

“Mr. Strzok, please be advised that you can either comply with the committee’s direction to answer the question or refuse to do so,” Goodlatte stated. “The latter of which will place you in risk of a contempt citation and potential criminal liability. Do you understand that? The question is directed to the witness.”

Strzok still refused to answer, citing instructions received from his counsel and the FBI to not answer certain questions on certain topics.

Goodlatte replied, “Mr. Strzok, in a moment we will continue with the hearing, but based on your refusal to answer the question, at the conclusion of the day we will be recessing the hearing and you will be subject to recall to allow the committee to consider proceeding with a contempt citation.”

It is unclear if Goodlatte and the committee ultimately did consider a contempt citation for Strzok following the contentious hearing, nor is it clear if Page will be held in contempt for blowing off her subpoenaed appearance on Wednesday.

Hopefully Congress will follow through on the threats of contempt followed by actual jail time against Strzok and Page in response to their uncooperative behavior and failure to appear when subpoenaed, if only to ensure that future witnesses called before Congress for sensitive or contentious hearings don’t think they can get away with the same sort of behavior.

TEA PARTY TARGET

Cops Sent To Seize Veteran’s Guns Without A Warrant, He Refused To Turn Them Over

“No one from the state was going to take my firearms without due process,” says Leonard Cottrell, after successfully staving off law enforcement and the courts from confiscating his firearms. Cottrell, an Iraq War veteran, was at work when he received a phone call from his wife. The cops were there, busting in to take his guns away. It all started after a casual conversation his son had at school.

Ammoland reports:

Police said their visit was sparked by a conversation that Leonard Cottrell Jr.’s 13-year-old son had had with another student at the school. Cottrell said he was told his son and the other student were discussing security being lax and what they would have to do to escape a school shooting at Millstone Middle School.

The conversation was overheard by another student, who went home and told his parents, and his mother panicked. The mom then contacted the school, which contacted the State Police, according to Cottrell.

The visit from the troopers came around 10 p.m. on June 14, 2018, Cottrell said, a day after Gov. Phil Murphy signed several gun enforcement bills into law.

After several hours, Cottrell said police agreed not to take the guns but to allow him to move them to another location while the investigation continued.

“They had admitted several times that my son made no threat to himself or other students or the school or anything like that,” he said.

Cottrell said he made it very clear to the police that he was “not going to willingly give up my constitutional rights where there’s no justifiable cause, no warrants, no nothing.”

The troopers searched his son’s room and found nothing, Cottrell said.

“To appease everybody, I had my firearms stored someplace else,” he said. “That way, during the course of the investigation, my son doesn’t have access to them and it’s on neutral ground and everything and everybody’s happy.”

“In the Garden State, the usual approach is to confiscate first and ask questions later, and victims of this approach often don’t know their rights. ‎In this case, the victim pushed back and confiscation was avoided — but the circumstances surrounding the incident are outrageous. A student expressing concern over lack of security is not a reason to send police to the student’s home — but it might be a reason to send police to the school to keep students and teachers safe” said Scott L. Bach, executive director of the Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs and a member of the NRA board of directors.

NJ.com adds:

Cottrell, a disabled U.S. Army veteran who served three tours during “Operation Iraqi Freedom,” owns a shotgun and a pistol. He has all the correct permits to own the firearms, he said, and predominately uses the shotgun to hunt.

He said his wife allowed the officers to enter the home, and with her permission, they searched his son’s room — but they did not find any weapons, he said. The officers, he said, didn’t have a warrant but still wanted to take his guns. Cottrell wouldn’t let them.

“No one from the state was going to take my firearms without due process,” he said Thursday.

He said the attempted seizure resulted because of a new law Gov. Phil Murphy signed into law that makes it easier for police to confiscate guns when someone in the state poses a threat to themselves or others. The law is part of a broader statewide effort to make New Jersey’s gun laws even tougher amid the national outcry for more gun control in the wake of the school shooting in Parkland, Florida.

Cottrell said the officers “danced around the issue” when he confronted them about the new law.

A New Jersey State Police spokesman declined to answer questions about whether this incident had anything to do with the new gun laws.

In an email, Sgt. First Class Jeff Flynn said, “Troopers responded to Mr. Cottrell’s residence in reference to the report of a possible school threat. Based on their investigation, it was determined that Mr. Cottrell’s weapons did not need to be seized.”

David Codrea, writing for Ammoland, further added:

To appease everybody, I had my firearms stored someplace else,” New Jersey gun owner and Army veteran Leonard Cottrell Jr. told New Jersey 101.5 after a June 14 visit from State Police,. “That way, during the course of the investigation, my son doesn’t have access to them and it’s on neutral ground and everything and everybody’s happy.”

Cottrell was recalling state troopers showing up at his door to confiscate firearms after his 13-year-old son was overheard discussing lax school safety with a friend.

Indoctrinated by a pervasive snitch culture — one that never seems to deter the blatantly obvious demonic nutjobs — the eavesdropping student told his parents, who told school administrators, who in turn called the cops. (Note “If you see something, say something” carries risks of its own – if you report the wrong person, you could end up smeared as a “hater.”)

“Cottrell said he made it very clear to the police that he was ‘not going to willingly give up my constitutional rights where there’s no justifiable cause, no warrants, no nothing,’” the report continued. Despite that, his home is now a “gun free zone” and that has been publicized by the media. He has, in fact, willingly ceded those rights, and by his own words in order to make authorities “happy.”

Before judging him for that, consider the environment that is New Jersey. Then consider the overwhelming force the state can bring to bear, and its predisposition to using it, especially if it’s to enforce citizen disarmament. It’s easy to anonymously declare “Molon Labe” on the internet. In meatspace, resistance is more effective when the aggressor doesn’t get to dictate the time and place, especially if that place is your home and you have family inside.

Appeasing gun-grabbers, generally couched as “compromise,” is impossible. It’s like throwing a scrap of flesh to a circling pack of jackals and expecting them to be sated and leave you alone — instead of sensing opportunity and fear, and moving in closer.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service