~ Featuring ~
The dummycrats-Democratic 
Party’s Christian problem
Peter Strzok Testifies To Joint Session of Congress
by sundance
{ } ~ The FBI counterintelligence official at the center of the liar-Clinton and Trump investigations is scheduled to testify today...  FBI Agent Peter Strzok will testify publicly before a joint House Oversight/Judiciary Committee.
Liberman: Israel should close its Irish embassy 
{ } ~ Defense Minister Avigdor Liberman called on Israel to close its embassy in Dublin in response to the Irish Senate vote... to advance legislation that would criminalize trade with east Jerusalem, the Golan Heights and the West Bank. On Thursday, the Foreign Ministry met with Irish Ambassador Alison Kelly. The foreign ministry summoned her for a conversation to protest the legislation’s advancement, even though Ireland’s government has opposed it. No further action was taken after the meeting. "There is no point in summoning the Irish ambassador to Israel for a reprimand,” Liberman wrote on his twitter account. “Israel should immediately close its embassy in Dublin. We will not turn the other cheek to those who boycott us,” Liberman wrote. Ireland has made it clear that it opposes any boycotts against areas of Israel within the pre-1967 lines. It has vigorously opposed any Israeli activity over those lines. But its opposition to the private member’s bill is more about strategy and legality. It believes that the legislation runs counter to European Union law and would harm its ability to be involved in any Middle East peace process...
rino-McCain may resign to push 
Kavanaugh confirmation through Senate 
{ } ~ With a tight battle looming to confirm Trump nominee Brett Kavanaugh as a Supreme Court justice... one Republican senator may make a sacrifice to push the nominee through. Sen. rino-John McCain (R-AZ) could finally step down — and have someone appointed in his place — if he is not well enough to make the trip to Washington to vote in favor of the nominee, ABC analyst Alex Castellanos reported on Tuesday. “There’s some word that if rino-McCain is not able to vote and his vote is needed, he might resign and let someone appoint a senator who would support this judge,” Castellanos said. If rino-McCain were to step down, Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey, a Republican, would appoint a replacement...
Trump shares letter from 
Kim Jong Un heralding start of 'meaningful journey'
by Naomi Lim
{ } ~ President Trump shared on social media Thursday a letter he received from North Korean leader Kim Jong Un last week... in which Kim says he appreciated the "energetic and extraordinary" diplomatic efforts made by the Trump administration to engage the rogue nation. "The significant first meeting with Your Excellency and the joint statement that we signed together in Singapore 24 days ago was indeed the start of a meaningful journey," Kim wrote in the note, dated July 6, of the pair's historic summit on June 12. "I firmly believe that the strong will, sincere efforts and unique approach of myself and Your Excellency Mr. President aimed at opening up a new future between the DPRK and the U.S. will surely come to fruition," Kim continued...
Rod Rosenstein requests 93 federal 
prosecutors help vet Brett Kavanaugh: Report
by Diana Stancy Correll
{ } ~ Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein has requested that federal prosecutors help vet President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee... Brett Kavanaugh, a new report says. Rosenstein requested that the prosecutors examine Kavanaugh’s government documents and asked the 93 United States attorneys to have every office submit several federal prosecutors “who can make this important project a priority for the next several weeks,” the New York Times reports. The move departs from the norm, as it is standard for Justice Department lawyers to participate in work for Supreme Court nominations, but not prosecutors...
The dummycrats-Democratic 
Party’s Christian problem

{ } ~ People on the left are outraged when you question their patriotism, their dedication to the nation as founded and their respect for the Constitution as originally written, but they continually vindicate our concerns.

The most recent example is the left’s unhinged mania at Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s inclusion on President Trump’s list of potential Supreme Court appointees.

In times of perceived crisis — and this is certainly one of those times for leftists — they show their colors, and you can color them militantly opposed to Barrett, in large part because of her Catholicism.

And guess what else. Rumor is that she frequents a Bible study, as well.

Forget Barrett’s distinguished career and formidable legal credentials. The leftist media went bonkers, unapologetically displaying their bigotry when it comes to Christians.

One commentator pointed out that Barrett “went to Notre Dame. She is very Catholic.”

Get that? She’s not only an evil Catholic; she’s very much a Catholic.

Another pundit said, “It’s kind of a dubious position, but I’m sure that if Trump does pick a woman, she’ll be known as the Aunt Lydia of the Supreme Court” — a derogatory reference to the villainous character in the popular show The Handmaid’s Tale.

This is reminiscent of Dianne Fein-stein’s astounding alarm, expressed during Barrett’s appellate court confirmation hearing in the Senate, that Barrett’s Catholic “dogma lives loudly within” her.

When leftists aren’t denying their prejudice, they often selectively cite Scripture to “prove” that Jesus Christ was a social justice warrior or that the Bible mandates open borders.

Oh, yes, and Jesus didn’t judge people as we dastardly conservatives do. In a 2010 piece, liberal professor Michael Shermer quoted the oft-misinterpreted passage in which Jesus begins, “Judge not, that ye be not judged.” Then Shermer declared:

Would any red-blooded, gun-toting, Hummer-driving, hard-drinking, Bible-toting conservative today say anything like this? (Matthew 5:43-44): “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you.”

It is astounding that leftists see themselves as tolerant and nonjudgmental, but I’ll let their record speak for itself on this.

But when they’re not cherry-picking Scripture to shame immigration hawks or to pander to Christian voters during political campaigns, they show us another side.

I’m not saying that no leftists are Christians, but I am saying that far too many of them show a hostility toward Christianity and Bible-believing Christians. It’s more than just a disdain for political conservatives who are also churchgoing Christians.

My 2003 book, Persecution: How Liberals Are Waging War Against Christianity, documents the left’s pattern of discrimination against Christian influences in culture, Christian values and Christian religious liberty.

When I appeared on “Hannity & Colmes” for an interview on the book, I had great difficulty getting an airing with liberal co-host Alan Colmes because he couldn’t get over the subtitle.

I was friendly with Alan, and he was respectful, but he insisted on my defending his inferred premise that I was saying that liberals can’t be Christian.

As I explained to Alan, I would never suggest that liberals can’t be Christian, and indeed, I know many who are. I happen to believe that in many cases, their political worldview is at odds with a biblical worldview, but I don’t presume to challenge the authenticity of their faith.

No — my point is that irrespective of their deep-felt faith or lack thereof, they too often are at odds with biblical Christianity and Bible-believing Christians in the media, at universities and other schools, in our culture, and in the political sphere.

And is it any coincidence that the overwhelming number of mocking atheists on Twitter, in my admittedly anecdotal experience, are flaming leftists? I don’t think so.

Barack liar-nObama infamously disparaged Bible-and gun-toting Americans who live in small Midwestern towns.

“It’s not surprising,” said liar-nObama, that “they get bitter and cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”

That statement set off alarm bells for me for many reasons, not the least of which was that Christians are supposed to cling to Jesus Christ. Their faith in him is central to the religion.

There is not only no shame in trusting and depending on Christ; it is essential as the road to their salvation and their Christian living. What’s more telling than liar-nObama’s appalling statement is that he was wholly unaware what he was revealing about himself with it.

It’s not just liar-nObama but the dummycrats-Democratic Party at large. Is its frequent disrespect for the God of the Bible, Christian home-schoolers and the constitutionally protected religious liberty of Christians indicative of something or just a matter of my imagination?

How about dummycrats-Democrats’ hostility to voluntary prayer in public schools, their selective excising of Christian history from public school textbooks, their allergy to Christian-themed hymns in public schools or their dislike of Christmas displays in the public square?

How about leftist Hollywood’s routine depiction of Christians as fanatical lunatics? Remember when thedummycrats-Democratic National Committee denounced God in three votes and took the word and concept of God out of the party platform at the 2012 convention?

If you don’t like my anecdotal impressions, what do you make of the Pew Research Center’s reporting that just 45 percent of dummycrats-Democrats believe in the God of the Bible and a significantly lower percentage of white Democrats do?

According to Pew, “in their beliefs about God, nonwhitedummycrats-Democrats more closely resemble Republicans than white dummycrats-Democrats.”

This fact alone, coupled with Kanye West’s admiration for Donald Trump, should have dummycrats-Democrats quaking in their boots — but I digress.

If dummycrats-Democrats don’t want to be perceived as being anti-Christian in their attitudes and policies, they’d better regroup, because plenty of people have taken notice.

You can’t convince me they’re unconcerned about it, or they wouldn’t spend so much time defending themselves against the charge.

They definitely don’t want Middle America to believe these things about them, so they’ll continue to deny their prejudice during election season, but one of these days, to quote one of their Christian icons, their chickens will come home to roost.

Views: 14


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Rudy Tirre on July 13, 2018 at 7:26am


Yes he is out of control and needs to be removed. He has no right to vet Brett. I am sure the is being forced by the deep state

Comment by Bonnie Somer on July 13, 2018 at 3:20am
Rod Rosenstein requests 93 federal 



Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich


 Judge Orders Mueller To Prove  Russia Meddled In Election 

Judge Dabney L. Friedrich

A Washington federal judge on Thursday ordered special counsel Robert Mueller’s team to clarify election meddling claims lodged against a Russian company operated by Yevgeny Prigozhin, an ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, according to Bloomberg.

Concord Management and Consulting, LLC. – one of three businesses indicted by Mueller in February along with 13 individuals for election meddling, surprised the special counsel in April when they actually showed up in court to fight the charges. Mueller’s team tried to delay Concord from entering the case, arguing that thee Russian company not been properly served, however Judge Dabney Friedrich denied the request – effectively telling prosecutors ‘well, they’re here.’

Concord was accused in the indictment of supporting the Internet Research Agency (IRA), a Russian ‘troll farm’ accused of trying to influence the 2016 US election.

On Thursday, Judge Freidrich asked Mueller’s prosecutors if she should assume they aren’t accusing Concord of violating US laws applicable to election expenditures and failure to register as a foreign agent.

Concord has asked Dabney to throw out the charges – claiming that Mueller’s office fabricated a crime, and that there is no law against interfering in elections.

According to the judge’s request for clarification, the Justice Department has argued that it doesn’t have to show that Concord had a legal duty to report its expenditures to the Federal Election Commission. Rather, the allegation is that the company knowingly engaged in deceptive acts that precluded the FEC, or the Justice Department, from ascertaining whether they had broken the law. -Bloomberg

On Monday, Friedrich raised questions over whether the special counsel’s office could prove a key element of their case – saying that it was “hard to see” how allegations of Russian influence were intended to interfere with US government operations vs. simply “confusing voters,” reports

During a 90-minute hearing, Friedrich questioned prosecutor Jonathan Kravis about how the government would be able to show the Russian defendants were aware of the Justice Department and FEC’s functions and then deliberately sought to skirt them.

“You still have to show knowledge of the agencies and what they do. How do you do that?” Friedrich asked.

Kravis, a prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, argued that the government needed only to show that Concord Management and the other defendants were generally aware that the U.S. government “regulates and monitors” foreign participation in American politics. That awareness, Kravis said, could be inferred from the Russians’ alleged creation of fake social media accounts that appeared to be run by U.S. citizens and “computer infrastructure” intended to mask the Russian origin of the influence operation.

“That is deception that is directed at a higher level,” Kravis said. Kravis appeared in court with Michael Dreeben, a top Justice Department appellate lawyer on detail to the special counsel’s office.

Concord pleaded not guilty in May. Their attorney, Eric Dubelier – a partner at Reed Smith, has described the election meddling charges as “make believe,” arguing on Monday that Mueller’s indictment against Concord “doesn’t charge a crime.”

“There is no statute of interfering with an election. There just isn’t,” said Dubelier, who added that Mueller’s office alleged a “made-up crime to fit the facts they have.”

Dubelier added that the case against Concord Management is the first in US history “where anyone has ever been charged with defrauding the Justice Department” through their failure to register under FARA.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service