ACTION

Thursday Noon ~ thefrontpagecover

Posted by Rudy Tirre on June 13, 2019 at 11:36am
TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~  
YouTube Bows to Leftist 
Anti-Free-Speech Demands
x-YSiXcWvoCVOUxc6vsFUP_ViRKiZedf9izyKx8pP11ozCUGYuXSh_iDH3Qml1aFEKmlyGbT28hE8svbbXiNtcJRT0aoqjDscXvUKM7-2tDdaOiZwIukrlK5UYtr_t4gJDAkXLnh9xT6VOtn4-J5pile2bxIIQ08y7LWUxw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Culture Beat  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Devin Nunes and Mark Meadows Discuss 
Corruption Within FBI/DOJ and “New Whistle-blowers” Coming Forward
Q4TN2hIhJ4TTa6UF5ggAgHinIotnEJzvOGB7NMT42YTa5TNshB5tu8VRP9HKbLnpl8eQPDJLOeIeBgmldaWNCSzO6FdY0A7eTaQc2aYC-osOkSHdS79jw2XnA-Vn-xxgzLYYV_LyoYl27OpIh5Mb9QoBjVoSBtx-hne7NHWQtsrFT-ERx228EoU=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ HPSCI ranking member Devin Nunes appears with judiciary committee member Mark Meadows to discuss today’s HPSCI hearing, corruption within the DOJ/FBI... and the current NYT story about AG Bill Barr questioning the CIA construct of the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment. Notice in Mr. Nunes statements: “corrupt rank and file“? CURIOUS; also Fusion GPS and the FBI operating on “parallel tracks“? CURIOUS x 2  Additionally, from Rep. Mark Meadows we hear this: “We are now getting a lot of whistle-blowers” … “people who knew this was wrong are coming forward now” … Also from Nunes, confirmation that Rosenstein’s original scope memo was based on empowering/authorizing Weissmann and Mueller to investigate ie. ‘utilize’ the dossier manufactured by Fusion GPS, Glenn Simpson, Nellie Ohr and Christopher Steele.
.
Hope Hicks agrees to testify before House panel
DOCPzZHYnCPH-mDSFqYT6z3oOUHvipqk0g13G4Ueb7oO9Y3PTb0TvQUYgsltVp-HT7SQ1VxZmURgcEjZHtQilsBHfnwRgka-uaWcjuCK8mVsbuOMdAzsDCc18hPSp-9F2p_jT8vnJHz0syJPaV7-EHkiaMQpCVfTcxcE9VnN-1uY2EFwKduJRbgvp3oQ7mgeExvCFUkstFQjsfEO-w8B7SIQXPd2Gr5E_y_kOG2dsyNCpVdk-qVRoHal_Sumf6-NrRv_sqH6Gb2PPFoJjmcQvCrpwQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby Morgan Chalfant and Olivia Brevers
{ thehill.com } ~ President Trump’s former aide Hope Hicks has agreed to testify before the House Judiciary Committee behind closed doors... the panel announced Wednesday afternoon. Hicks has agreed to submit to a transcribed interview before the committee next Wednesday. The committee had originally subpoenaed her for public testimony on June 19. “It is important to hear from Ms. Hicks, who was a key witness for the Special Counsel. Ms. Hicks understands that the Committee will be free to pose questions as it sees fit, including about her time on the Trump Campaign and her time in the White House,” Judiciary Committee Chairman scumbag liar-Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said in a statement. scumbag liar-Nadler said he planned to release the transcript publicly ”promptly" after her testimony. Hicks’s testimony will be significant, as she is the first former White House staffer to appear before the Democrat-led committee as part of its sprawling investigation into allegations of obstruction of justice and other abuses of power by Trump and his associates. The White House has thus far blocked former officials such as ex-White House counsel Don McGahn from turning over documents and delivering testimony before the committee pursuant to subpoenas. Earlier this month, the White House instructed Hicks and Annie Donaldson, McGahn’s former deputy, to decline to turn over documents related to their time in the administration. White House counsel Pat Cipollone argued that the documents remain under control of the White House and implicate executive branch confidentiality interests and executive privilege...  https://thehill.com/homenews/house/448244-hope-hicks-agrees-to-testify-before-house-panel-report  
.
Supreme Court should decide if 
'perpetual detention' permitted at Gitmo
T9tHLnBhO7DvYKt03qlPvbqGLAAMnNfbQNwzHwCQ91YzS87Da8fOB6f45NMFq6Z1NYT4LeAK_4mNlBZPM8eM079pNT9vdVdwYo0D0FOGBtUXdvztG0KLUD0sWXE4ujRkXUSi0j1P-MnxHAiMMZ6oRlVAmoHQwkmqhbGU_dYLxzrGGrtPqfSLTixCKBymzak-Fw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Pete Williams
{ nbcnews.com } ~ Stephen Breyer said Monday that the Supreme Court should take another look at whether the court's earlier rulings regarding enemy combatants at Guantanamo Bay allow "perpetual detention."... Breyer dissented when the court denied an appeal from a Gitmo detainee, Moath Hamza Ahmed al-Alwi, a man from Yemen captured by Pakistani forces and accused of being one of Osama bin Laden's bodyguards and of fighting against U.S. forces. He has challenged his open-ended detention, which has continued at Gitmo for 17 years. The U.S. has never filed charges against him. The U.S. military said he admitted fighting with the Taliban and staying at Qaeda safehouses. His lawyers said al-Alwi fled for safety to Pakistan and was seized by bounty hunters. In 2004, the Supreme Court ruled that Congress gave the president authority to detain enemy combatants for the duration of the relevant conflict. But, Breyer noted, the court's majority said its understanding of what Congress allowed might change if circumstances changed and detention had no prospect of ending. "It is past time to confront the difficult question left open" by that earlier ruling, Breyer said. "Al-Alwi faces the real prospect that he will spend the rest of his life in detention based on his status as an enemy combatant a generation ago, even though today's conflict may differ substantially from the one Congress anticipated."The court should address whether "Congress has authorized and the Constitution permits continued detention." The court rejected al-Alwi's appeal by an apparent vote of 7-1, with Breyer the sole dissenter. Justice Brett Kavanaugh did not participate, because the case came to the court from the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, on which he served.
.
Trey Gowdy Takes On The scumbag/liar-Clintons: “Trust Me When I Tell You This”
KH1GntEKXf-6WqF5hrmL_yFp8GbKf9rBkc1tP2BAgAyZwZJIaXdCCbRSfqzEsM7hnglynRWqrOJdxZLYHSt5zwJAB0pxz_Jfy5fZQzUwrLvDuuiXxqZqwLM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby Tori McNabb
{ redrightvideos.com } ~ Trey Gowdy was on Fox News last night and said, on the scumbag/liar-Clintons, “entanglements” with the Dept. of Justice run much deeper than the average viewer knows... A little cryptic, he told Martha McCallum that “history will be much kinder to scumbag-Jim Comey than the July press conference than the Dems were”.  “I think he had access to information that, because he is a stand-up guy he’s not gonna disseminate classified information though God knows everybody else is…so all your viewers see is this meeting on the tarmac,” he explained. “scumbag-Jim Comey had access to additional information that I am convinced left him with no other choice but to make the decision he made in July,” Gowdy said. Host McCallum then asked if Gowdy was implying if scumbag-Comey was pressured into clearing scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton of wrongdoing. “No…he wanted to safeguard the integrity of the investigation, the integrity of the process, and I probably ought to just leave it right there,” Gowdy replied. “Trust me when I tell you this, Martha — I know what it was and I have been a critic of scumbag-James Comey in the past. But he made the only decision he could have made with respect to appropriating that decision away from the Department of Justice and making the decision himself.” “I only take away from that that you are suggesting that there were more entanglements between the scumbag/liar-Clintons and perhaps the Justice Department than everyone understands,” McCallum guessed. “You’re very perceptive,” Gowdy confirmed. I hate that Gowdy doesn’t plan to run again… he’s a force of nature that’s much needed on the hill these days.
VIDEO at the site.
.
Politicians Must Face Consequences 
For Crimes They Enable
3MoPFe1kKuD1OFG0OEp4bq-xSG5PR0CZ6pW6cLDxc-0ZKyLsABrK0igfBl0Jz3vYmkAD0gM35ZACS_tyx730oaPr74oQtRqlVP2aATFjEN--iZyaFBQrYJkeCcmEEqvMxD7PaKYlQ5q4dAEj0RzNdF9sEl_vGwkw5vOqHCoxLu164E0zZHbaNetmmEqiXuVWUCBluBq3SmZC7w=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby Michael Cutler
{ frontpagemag.com } ~ The phrase, Failure is Not An Option served as the title of the book written by Gene Kranz, Flight Director for NASA who helped create the U.S. manned space program and was instrumental in successfully returning the crew of Apollo 13... to the earth after their spacecraft suffered a catastrophic explosion half-way to the moon. In most professions, especially where lives are on the line, failure to do the job is not an option. This is particularly true where law enforcement and the military are concerned. Politicians, not unlike members of the military and law enforcement officers, take oaths of office where they swear affirm that they will enforce our laws and defend the Constitution. While law enforcement officers and members of the armed forces may face dire consequences for violating their oaths of office, politicians generally do not. Their oaths of office do not provide an “escape clause” whereby they may opt to ignore any of the laws that are not to their liking. Unlike the entries on the menu of a restaurant where the patrons order the food that they find palatable or where they may substitute one item on the menu for another, their oaths of office demand that those who take that oath agree to enforce all laws and honor and defend all of the provisions of our Constitution. Dereliction of duty is a serious offense for members of the armed forces and for law enforcement officers and one that carries significant consequences. On June 4, 2019 ABC News reported, Police arrest ex-deputy who 'did absolutely nothing to mitigate' Parkland school massacre. We will not delve in the specifics of this ongoing case, but it is important to note that the deputy sheriff in this case has been charged with multiple crimes, some of which are felonies, all emanating from his alleged failures to act to protect the children who were killed in that school. Contrast how that deputy is being prosecuted for alleged failures to act with the politicians who, with impunity, demand that law enforcement officers not act to cooperate with immigration law enforcement personnel - even when those actions result in the death of innocent victims...
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
YouTube Bows to Leftist Anti-Free-Speech Demands
x-YSiXcWvoCVOUxc6vsFUP_ViRKiZedf9izyKx8pP11ozCUGYuXSh_iDH3Qml1aFEKmlyGbT28hE8svbbXiNtcJRT0aoqjDscXvUKM7-2tDdaOiZwIukrlK5UYtr_t4gJDAkXLnh9xT6VOtn4-J5pile2bxIIQ08y7LWUxw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Culture Beat:  Remember when the Internet was a great big free-speech zone, where almost any idea or belief could be freely and easily expressed? Well, leave it to the Left to mess it all up. Popular conservative political comedian Stephen Crowder recently had his YouTube channel demonetized — all because a leftist activist and “journalist” at Vox complained that Crowder’s comments about him, making fun of his homosexuality and ethnicity, amounted to bullying.

Initially, YouTube did nothing other than noting that Crowder’s comments did not violate its policies. The Vox journalist, however, being the leftist that he is, took to social media and called on the Rainbow Mafia to boycott YouTube. It wasn’t long before YouTube partially reversed course and demonetized Crowder’s channel, explaining, “Even if a creator’s content doesn’t violate our community guidelines, we will take a look at the broader context and impact, and if their behavior is egregious and harms the broader community, we may take actions” [emphasis added].

Hello, 1984.

Crowder represents just the latest victim in a growing number of mostly right-leaning personalities who have been punished or silenced by social-media giants for daring to express views the Left vindictively classifies as “hate speech.”

And YouTube is just getting started. Following its action against Crowder, YouTube announced that it was “taking another step in our hate speech policy by specifically prohibiting videos alleging that a group is superior in order to justify discrimination, segregation or exclusion based on qualities like age, gender, races, caste, religion, sexual orientation or veteran status.”

Not only will YouTube demonetize and censor creator content based upon its own subjective and ever-evolving definition of what encompasses “dangerous” hate speech, but it will “rank content based on quality.” As Sundar Pichai, CEO of YouTube’s parent company Google, explained, “We are bringing that same notion and approach to YouTube so that we can rank higher quality stuff better and really prevent borderline content.” In short, YouTube will promote mainstream media news and political commentary over nontraditional new media. And by doing so, it aims to limit the impact of disfavored alternative journalism.

These tech giants are acting the part of Big Brother, censoring political speech with which they disagree, and then running and hiding behind their “private company” moniker whenever they’re called out for it. Many conservatives point to the free market as the sole solution, but that response is arguably too idealistic and naive. Government’s aim should be to protect the right of Americans to access the “town square.” And if social-media giants do indeed represent the town square, then First Amendment concerns are valid.

<>

Update: After the huge uproar over this issue, YouTube finally apologized Wednesday … to the “LBGT” community. YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki lamented not taking more definitive action against Crowder, saying, “I know that the decisions we made was very hurtful to the LGBTQ community and that wasn’t our intention at all.”  ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/63583?mailing_id=4328&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4328&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

E-mail me when people leave their comments –
Follow

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center