Thursday Noon ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~  
The Demos' Baltimore Race-Bait Strategy
Qpn-H5dhR_G2vmgvs0kpG-THPgD0M0hVQOM-hBg4UxQbuJ468zYLYB8ELfInUgAdv39EhqHdTxmMHOWGcq1b0ZATAD8LYjgB9dMj4MG1DbFeRmYS0U6P30Bg76U8RqUrdYBV9Mf1BJBJiglF5QTPLuxTnTw6kvJe9rUwLLA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Thomas Gallatin  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
AG William Barr will deliver justice to 
any scumbag/liar-nObama officials 
who committed crimes
by Daniel Chaitin & Jerry Dunleavy
washingtonexaminer.com } ~ A top Republican investigator said accountability is coming for any of those individuals who may have committed crimes during the Trump-Russia investigation... With the Justice Department conducting a review of that operation, Rep. John Ratcliffe said during a Fox News interview Sunday that he trusts Attorney General William Barr and Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz to provide answers. And while Ratcliffe said he does not want to prematurely accuse any specific person of a crime — as Democrats have done with President Trump — he stressed that it is clear crimes were committed by people during the scumbag/liar-nObama administration, including government officials.“I think the first thing we need to do is make sure we don’t do what the Democrats have done," the Texas Republican told host Maria Bartiromo on Sunday Morning Futures. "They accused Donald Trump of a crime and then they try and reverse engineer a process to justify that accusation. So I’m not going to accuse any specific person of any specific crime, I just want there to be a fair process to get there. What I do know as a former federal prosecutor is that it does appear that there were crimes committed during the scumbag/liar-nObama administration.”Ratcliffe, a Texas Republican on the House Judiciary and Intelligence committees who was critical of special counsel Robert Mueller during his testimony in front of those committees last Wednesday, is Trump's pick to replace outgoing Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats. Although many of the GOP lines of questioning last week focused on the origins of the investigation, Mueller largely shut them down, often saying these were issues that were "outside my purview." Ratcliffe explained this is why Barr, who has tasked U.S. Attorney John Durham to lead the so-called investigation of the investigators, must fill in the gaps...  https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/john-ratcliffe-ag-william-barr-will-deliver-justice-to-any-obama-officials-who-committed-crimes?fbclid=IwAR1dDFLjKV_xnqrgoDnRnG6xHj8EcuA-iQkyY3NKpnzlR_L2AsGKfZPje-g  
.
Reconciling John Solomon’s 
Reporting on scumbag-Comey
ZhYTtE9BXx-yW-BmpEEBqS6YVtFfDoMD97ifHAvuoPhymfBMWlKeV2xZiELkMS-0hqprII0ia0kaqvk3T0iUpJnV6sC6uk4EVU0j1KIrtw5-CsqmX9eR372EcSx6tINLFvXT-CfpRRLKBLfZO48BMZ1MUxURUw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ To say there is broad-based confusion is an understatement. The recent reporting by John Solomon of The Hill only makes the confusion worse. Let’s stand back and reconcile two issues... with evidence to support that are MASSIVELY conflated. First, go read the full Solomon article. Notice the entire construct of the article surrounds “The scumbag-Comey Memos“. As you will see, this specific topic is important. Within the Solomon article you will find: […] Inspector General (IG) Michael Horowitz’s team referred scumbag-Comey for possible prosecution under the classified information protection laws, but Department of Justice (DOJ) prosecutors working for Attorney General William Barr reportedly have decided to decline prosecution — a decision that’s likely to upset scumbag-Comey’s conservative critics. Prosecutors found the IG’s findings compelling but decided not to bring charges because they did not believe they had enough evidence of scumbag-Comey’s intent to violate the law, according to multiple sources. […] Patrick Fitzgerald and Daniel Richman, two of scumbag-Comey’s lawyers, and Keith Urbahn, his spokesman, did not return repeated calls and emails seeking comment. […] While they cautioned that the IG’s final report won’t be complete until it gets feedback from scumbag-Comey’s lawyers in the next few days, it is expected to conclude that the former FBI director improperly took with him memos that were FBI property when he was fired, transmitted classified information via an insecure email account, and shared some of the memos with his private lawyers...
.
FBI Agents Picked Up scumbag-Comey Memos 
From His House Day Before Senate Testimony
JdwguH5XDzjFgTtkpIOKZL13XlDGdV_DgFJDswxu1uYbi5m79I8-iYOauzUub2mHH9CtcjJ4jTpI6c-BfZbbHSEaBNYLUsAtk0Kj_dFpTz8y0yLjR3r8zc05z6CMCvIYqCw-dYNlN2Y4bOg7Kk4P74BgAT02o-E4wBA2mh_ai665=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ A recent FOIA release from Judicial Watch reveals that two of Mueller’s initial FBI agents, based on dates and redactions – likely Peter Strzok and Joe Pientka, visited scumbag-James Comey on June 7th, 2017... to retrieve a collection of his memos. However, a word of caution, one of the memos was titled “last night at 6:30pm” and is being widely misinterpreted to have been written the night before (June 6th, 2017) when that is not accurate. It is likely that memo relates to the January dinner in the White House with President Trump that held the same sentence. If we ignore the misinterpreted “last night” memo aspect dinner with potus in January ’17, here’s what we can learn from this FOIA release: ♦First, the memos were picked up while FBI agent’s Peter Strzok and Joe Pientka were lead FBI agents that transferred into the Mueller team. Therefore it’s likely they were the two who traveled to scumbag-Comey’s house for this June 7th effort. ♦Second, the memos were picked up June 7th, 2017, the day before scumbag-James Comey appeared before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, June 8th, 2017. It was during this June 8th SSCI committee testimony where scumbag-Comey first revealed the scope of his memo keeping. Keep in mind, all prior research shows SSCI Chairman Richard Burr and SSCI Vice-Chair Mark Warner were part of the corrupt effort against President Trump. Their committee was where leaker James Wolfe sleeping with journalist Ali Watkins was operational. The SSCI was part of the aggregate coup effort...
.
scumbag-Elijah Cummings Called Baltimore
 ‘Drug Infested Area’ in 1999
sXiaNheDSu7CLfl7SZh7zBGbWD-YWlDhYhivfViz9DHBEMMMvEajWoVnGN4txFxNTjRFlIi5S1C_3TllfCojMYc-t2moX1s4vM4BYf9GOkkssHKVBY2MoOI3ywGB1ned5Yy634jlpaSY7d8nHV2q-sciuWyXBhT6i38=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Graham Piro
freebeacon.com } ~ Embattled Rep. scumbag-Elijah Cummings (D., Md.) described his community of Baltimore as a "drug infested area"... in a video from a 1999 congressional hearing.  "This morning, I left my community of Baltimore, a drug infested area, where a lot of the drugs we're talking about today have already taken the lives of so many children," scumbag-Cummings said. "The same children that I watched 14 or 15 years ago as they grew up now walking around like zombies. This is only 40 miles away from here." President Trump criticized both the city of Baltimore and scumbag-Cummings in multiple tweets over the past week. He  called Rep. scumbag-Cummings a "brutal bully"  and claimed the representative was "screaming at the great men & women of Border Patrol about conditions at the Southern Border, when actually his Baltimore district is FAR WORSE and more dangerous." "scumbag-Cumming District is a disgusting, rat and rodent infested mess. If he spent more time in Baltimore, maybe he could help clean up this very dangerous & filthy place," he continued. After the initial criticism, he continued to double down. "Why is so much money sent to the scumbag-Elijah Cummings district when it is considered the worst run and most dangerous anywhere in the United States," he wrote on Twitter. "No human being would want to live there. Where is all this money going? How much is stolen? Investigate this corrupt mess immediately!"... He failed and failing now to clean up Baltimore.
.
MSNBC Host Grills dinky-Warren
on Tax Hike Dodge
2-WfEHzoqBbBfx6Fs-YdIbDfH1CZfmWHA9PCLZUfBEBZp1CFnsPFlfsD3iJJs2KbK_UVL_PcEPaph_moEOTQNbK1DGGRZJx90os5bj_S1NiXa8Y2oAHAftGUct8kRWfYTSYjwCJp2ukYxRIkzXBzDlnI7duHNk5BuNI=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Jeffrey Cimmino
freebeacon.com } ~ MSNBC host Chris Matthews grilled Sen. Elizabeth dinky-Warren (D., Mass.) after Tuesday's Democratic presidential debate... about her dodging the question of whether her proposed health care overhaul required tax hikes. dinky-Warren repeatedly tried to make the argument that overall costs would decrease, but Matthews pressed for a clear answer as to whether taxes would need to be raised. "If you have Medicare for life or government health insurance, you'll have to have more benefits and commie-Bernie's talking about the eyeglasses, hearing aids, everything. There will have to be more money or your pay will go up. You guys dodged that tonight," Matthews said. "No, no. It's not a dodge," dinky-Warren replied. "Jake Tapper kept saying how much of your taxes are going to go up and you said—" Matthews said. "How much are your costs going to go down," dinky-Warren interjected. "Different question. How much will your taxes go up—," Matthews responded. "No, it's how much of your costs because it's how much families end up spending," dinky-Warren insisted.  Matthews said he understood dinky-Warren's argument that, overall, healthcare costs would decrease by reducing premiums, but kept pressing on whether taxes would have to be raised. dinky-Warren then pivoted to talking about families suffering from high medical bills even with health insurance... She Still dodged the question.  https://freebeacon.com/politics/msnbc-host-grills-warren-on-tax-hike-dodge/?utm_source=Freedom+Mail&utm_campaign=de9787f868-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_03_19_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b5e6e0e9ea-de9787f868-45611665  
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
The Demos' Baltimore Race-Bait Strategy
Qpn-H5dhR_G2vmgvs0kpG-THPgD0M0hVQOM-hBg4UxQbuJ468zYLYB8ELfInUgAdv39EhqHdTxmMHOWGcq1b0ZATAD8LYjgB9dMj4MG1DbFeRmYS0U6P30Bg76U8RqUrdYBV9Mf1BJBJiglF5QTPLuxTnTw6kvJe9rUwLLA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Thomas Gallatin:  In 2016, Donald Trump won the presidency by winning the margins, that narrow group of voters who can tip a state into the win column. Trump was able to grab the historically consistent Democrat Rust Belt by winning with blue-collar workers snubbed by coastal Democrats. With the 2020 election just over 17 months away, Trump is actively and aggressively attempting to once again winnow away at the margins. That’s really what this latest hubbub over Trump’s calling out Rep. scumbag-Elijah Cummings (D-MD) and the deplorable conditions of Baltimore is all about. The overreaction of Democrats and the Leftmedia to his factually accurate statements on Democrat-run Baltimore has provided Trump with exactly the kind of political freakout he wants. As we noted yesterday, the more Trump is able to poke Democrats, the more they expose themselves as irrational extremists.

Trump has eagerly gone where few Republicans have ever dared to go, unflinchingly calling out the failures of Democrats no matter what their race. Clearly, Trump refuses to bow to the Left’s nonsensical redefinition of racism — that only white people can truly be racist. And when the Democrats’ only criticism is to label Trump a racist in the face of evidence that demonstrates the exact opposite (Trump’s work on criminal-justice reform and support for Israel, to name just a couple), the bigger question emerges: Why?

Democrats vigorously wave the race card because they are clearly fearful that Trump may be making inroads with black voters; enough to win the margins. In 2016, Trump won 8% of the black vote to scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton’s 88%. If Trump is able to substantially increase his percentage of the black vote, then he will have won that particular margin, and most likely the election. Democrats know this, which is why they are desperately trying to convince everyone that Trump’s “real” motivation behind criticism directed toward an individual who is a racial minority is an expression of racism, not policy disagreements. Democrats and the Leftmedia are hoping this race-hustling strategy will work to deceive enough people and blacks in particular to vote against Trump. It’s a one-trick pony that Democrats have been riding for a long time. But this time, a Republican is hitting back hard.  ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/64615?mailing_id=4449&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4449&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center