TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
No City for Old Commies
Daniel Greenfield
.
MSNBC’s Nicole Wallace Lies Saying Trump
‘Talking About Exterminating Latinos’
by WARNER TODD HUSTON
{ godfatherpolitics.com } ~ This is called “journalism.”: MSNBC “reporter” Nicolle Wallace went on the air and falsely insisted that Trump is “talking about exterminating Latinos.”... Talk about fake news… no, it is more like utter calumny. President Donald Trump has never said anything like that. So much journalism! On Tuesday, Wallace was discussing the president’s “violent rhetoric” when she outright lied about what Trump has said. “What do you do when, certainly, the last Republican president fought for, sought and it’s not ideal but had 44% of Latino voters,” Wallace said. “So politically powerful inside the last Republican administration. President scumbag/liar-nObama used the power of the presidency to try to pass comprehensive immigration reform, with the Latino community, Latino leaders, at the table.” “You now have a president, as you said, talking about exterminating Latinos,” Wallace exclaimed. Many Twitter users struck back at Wallace’s lies: After taking much criticism, Wallace soon “apologized” with one of those non-apology apologies. She should be fired..
‘Such a charade!’ scumbag-De Blasio bashes
Fox News, battles Sean Hannity
during unruly exchange
by Vivek Saxena
{ bizpacreview.com } ~ New York City Mayor scumbag-Bill de Blasio made history Wednesday evening by becoming the only Democrat presidential to sit with Fox News host Sean Hannity for a lively discussion... It’s unlikely that any of his peers — particularly Sen. Elizabeth dinky-Warren, who’s described Fox as a “hate-for-profit” network though that description seems to fit CNN more than Fox — will follow suit, though a few have participated in Fox-hosted town halls. But just because scumbag-de Blasio was humble enough to sit with a Fox News host didn’t mean he wasn’t about to take shots at the network, which is widely hated by the left for being the only network willing to approach the news from a conservative versus liberal angle. At one point in his heated discussion with Hannity, the NYC mayor accused outright accused the network of perpetrating a “charade” in which it allegedly distracts Americans from the “real issues.” The “charade” remark was made during a discussion on illegal immigration. Echoing the sentiment of most conservatives, Hannity said that so-called “comprehensive immigration reform” should only be addressed after the border is thoroughly secured via a wall...Hannity corners scumbag-de Blasio on gun rights
.
Democrats and Republicans both love the same thing: Disastrous healthcare price controls
by Ryan Ellis
{ washingtonexaminer.com } ~ If there’s one thing Republicans can agree on when it comes to healthcare, it’s that they are opposed to “Medicare for all.” Alternatively known as “socialized medicine” or “single-payer healthcare,”... "Medicare for all" is a polite way of saying that the government will take over the healthcare sector and control it from top to bottom. Support for "Medicare for all" collapses when people learn what it entails: the loss of private sector health insurance plans they mostly like, massive tax increases, and the government rationing drugs and doctor visits. President Trump will be running against "Medicare for all" no matter who the Democrats nominate against him in 2020. There’s one problem, though. In case after case, President Trump and congressional Republicans are paving the way for "Medicare for all" by endorsing one of its central pillars: the government setting price controls on providers. Most of the time these days, price control ideas have as their target drug manufacturers, but they are not alone. Doctors, ambulance services, and hospitals have also been proposed as targets of government price-fixing. The form price controls take varies, but the end result is always the same: a price set by the government and not the market. A price control might look like an average of other price controls from socialized medicine countries, or binding arbitration with a stick, or an inflation adjusted price cap. It’s all just means to the same end. Some conservatives like price controls, because the Congressional Budget Office will score them as lowering government spending in the short run. If the government is spending $1 for a widget because that’s what it costs in the market but then imposes a price control of 60 cents, CBO will of course say that taxpayers save 40 cents per widget. But that’s like saying cutting off your leg will help you lose weight. It’s true, but it misses a much larger point. Price controls are bad because they lead to scarcity. If a healthcare provider is forced to accept a below-market price by the government, they are not going to go out of their way to make their product or service available. We see that in other countries with price controls, where people are forced to endure long waits for doctor visits, surgical procedures, and breakthrough medicines....
Assistant secretary of State
resigns after immigration clash
By ZACK BUDRYK
{ thehill.com } ~ The State Department’s top diplomat for Latin American matters has resigned after a dispute with the White House over Guatemalan immigration policy... according to The Washington Post. A senior administration official told the newspaper Kim Breier, assistant secretary of State for the Western Hemisphere, is leaving her post after White House policy adviser Stephen Miller berated her in an email chain for what he perceived as an insufficient defense of the Trump administration’s “safe third country” asylum agreement with Guatemala. Miller told Breier that it was "her job" to defend the agreement, which requires Central American migrants to seek asylum in Guatemala before applying for asylum in the U.S., the official added. The Post notes that it is unclear whether this was a primary cause of her resignation. A second senior official, however, told the newspaper no such email chain exists. While other State Department officials, including Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, have reportedly objected to the policy, Breier, a Mexico expert, primarily took issue with White House micromanagement, according to the Post, which cited officials. Breier was reportedly a key figure in ongoing negotiations with Mexican officials, including talks in June that eventually averted threats by the White House to impose steep tariffs on Mexican goods. Mexican officials have remained in contact with her and see her exit as a major blow to relations, CNN reported, citing Mexican sources....
Democratic lawmaker criticized
for tweeting names of Trump donors
By JONATHAN EASLEY
{ thehill.com } ~ House Republican leaders and President Trump’s campaign lashed out at Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas), the brother of Democratic presidential candidate Julián Castro... for tweeting out the names and business interests of dozens of donors to the Trump reelection campaign. Joaquin Castro late Monday used his Twitter account to publish the names of 44 Texans who donated the maximum $2,700 to Trump, specifically calling out the owners of several prominent businesses in San Antonio, where the Castro brothers are from. “Their contributions are fueling a campaign of hate that labels Hispanic immigrants as ‘invaders’,” the lawmaker tweeted. Trump campaign communications director Tim Murtaugh accused Castro of “endangering the safety of the people he is supposed to be representing.” “Democrats want to talk about inciting violence?” Murtaugh said. “This naming of private citizens and their employers is reckless and irresponsible. He is endangering the safety of people he is supposed to be representing. No one should be targeted for exercising their First Amendment rights or for their political beliefs. He should delete the tweet, apologize, and his brother’s campaign should disavow it.” The Trump campaign also reported Castro’s tweet to Twitter, saying it broke the company’s abuse and harassment provision. Candidates are required to disclose the names and employers of donors who give $200 or more in Federal Election Commission filings, which are available online for anyone to see... https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/456429-democratic-lawmaker-criticized-for-tweeting-names-of-trump-donors .
.
No City for Old Commies
{ sultanknish.blogspot.com } ~ A Russian Communist painter spent decades defacing San Francisco with ugly social realist art. The son of a Russian Orthodox priest who had left his faith and found a new one, Victor Mikhail Arnautoff depicted a world of stolid ugliness, of shapeless men and women crowding a foreshortened world.
Arnautoff did not like America. And he was a bad painter. His people are soulless representations of an objectified working class. No one smiles in these murals. They occasionally frown and grimace. Their world, like the people in it, has no dimension or depth. Even the revolution will not save them. Only transform them from one type of routine into another in a hopeless world without beauty or meaning.
To social realists like Arnautoff, people were a type of machinery. Society was a factory. Human bodies were just lumpy misshapen industrial architecture. Life was work and work was a struggle.
But the WPA era was a golden age for leftist muralists whose ugly social realist art still scars buildings and lobbies across the country. The Federal Art Project littered Marxist dogma across countless government buildings, often encoded into murals of Washington, Lincoln, and other great Americans.
Arnautoff had assisted Diego Rivera, but his own murals were, until now, far more obscure. And the mural whose fame outlived the Communist, who died in Leningrad in the 70s, had been painted on the walls of an American high school. Generations of high school students had passed it without caring.
Until now.
When Victor Arnautoff took on the job of depicting George Washington’s life for the walls of George Washington High School in San Francisco, he mixed his usual bad style with anti-American dogma. The Communist Party member depicts Washington as a slave owner and a murderer of American Indians. His America was an imperialist nation built on the oppression of minorities and exploitation of workers.
Few noticed. Time passed.
Arnautoff moved to the Soviet Union in the 60s after being investigated by the House Unamerican Activities Committee. He continued to produce ugly but unknown murals in the USSR.
And then modern identity politics leftists, to whom Arnautoff was just another dead white man, noticed the George Washington High School murals and decided that they were racist and must be destroyed.
After a vote by a San Francisco school board, $600,000 will be spent destroying the anti-American mural.
The irony of a Communist artist’s anti-American art falling victim to contemporary anti-American activists shows that even long after Stalin’s death, the purge of Soviet artists still continues. The battle over the mural has pitted old lefties, who understood what Arnautoff was trying to accomplish, with a new generation of identity politics crybullies who monetize their brand by crying about their trauma.
Old lefties have begun pursuing a ballot measure to save the mural.
At an ILWU meeting, celebrating Arnautoff ‘s participation in the labor movement, a small group of young lefties took the meeting hostage to protest the mural, while elderly lefties shouted, “Shame” at them. The sight of scraggly bearded reds in open collar shirts practically weeping as a new generation of cultural revolutionists refused to listen to their explanations of the mural was tragically hilarious.
The revolution was not only devouring its own children, but even its own grandparents.
Here was a HUAC martyr being unthinkingly dismissed as a white racist because he had depicted Washington as a slaveowner and Indian killer, without understanding that was his whole point. San Francisco’s ILWU, an organization with deep Marxist roots, was fighting #PaintItDown, a group of middle-class women in the education industry, chanting about decolonization and cultural trauma.
The ILWUers depicted the #PaintItDown protesters as “rightists,” and Willie Brown, the former San Francisco mayor, compared them to Trump supporters, but both are radical lefties. The mutual incomprehension and hostility just show a culture clash between two ideological generations.
The ILWU speaks in the hoary language of class warfare. It venerates a radical history going back over a century. To #PaintItDown, the history of a white labor movement is irrelevant. What matters are the voices of minorities. And some of its loudest white women claim Indian descent, making them indigenous. While everyone else in the country, including the elderly Marxists, are “settlers.”
To the elderly radicals reciting the tales of ancient strikes and protests, the angry lefty soccer moms are bourgeois rightists, and to the anti-mural protesters, the ILWU’s lefties are a bunch of white settlers.
And the future does not belong to elderly Marxists, but to hashtag social justice activists.
The Nation, whose history goes back to the days of the Arnautoff mural and beyond, betrayed its comrades, and took the side of the middle-class teachers, therapists and social justice soccer moms.
San Francisco school board President Stevon Cook compared supporters of the mural to “defenders of the confederate flag or those who fought to keep up the prominent statue of Robert E. Lee.” Suddenly, a Communist artist was Moses Jacob Ezekiel and the ILWUers were the Daughters of the Confederacy.
Cook probably hates America no less than Arnautoff did. At his first board meeting, he jettisoned the Pledge of Allegiance for a Maya Angelou quote. To the mural’s defenders, history matters. To its opponents, the past is irrelevant. Not just the past embodied by George Washington, but also the one embodied by Victor Mikhail Arnautoff and the aging Stalinists watching faded filmstrips of the USSR.
Lefties never seem to grasp that destroying everything about America means their own destruction. They thought that the revolution would mean destroying the White House, the Chamber of Commerce, the Bank of America, the Constitution, bourgeois values, marriage, and golf courses, but would leave their world of radical bookstores, cafes, history books, concerts, murals, and positions intact.
Now in San Francisco, the revolution has come for them.
"I just wonder how some of our local residents who claim to be progressive, yet still advocate to keep the mural, are feeling when they see the likes of the National Review and Tucker Carlson come to their defense," Cook wrote.
He has a point.
The true progressive has no past. Like a figure in a social realist mural, he is trapped in a dimensionless present which he cannot escape except by dreaming of an impossible utopian future. Even the Marxist with the scraggliest beard has a conservative streak. There is some part of the past he would preserve.
When Marxists fight to preserve the past, they are conserving something. They are being conservative.
Socialism demands the elimination of property, and yet there is always some trinket that the collectivist clings to, that he hides away, because it makes him human. The right side of history mandates the destruction of the past, but the men and women who fought for utopia cling to the past because it gives them meaning. We are only as human as we distinguish ourselves from the collectivist leftist herd.
Leftist ideology demands that its members give up their humanity. But humanity always finds a way. The inhuman demands of leftist ideology eventually come up against the demands of our humanity.
Toward the end of his life, Victor Arnautoff returned to the Soviet Union where he drew pictures of Vladimir Lenin and Felix Dzerzhinsky, the monstrous founder of the Communist secret police. He continued producing school murals depicting an idealized Communist utopia. Many did not survive the fall of the Soviet Union a decade after his death. Even in the USSR, his style had become antiquated.
Arnautoff claimed that art was only as legitimate as its “social” purpose. But leftist social politics is always changing. Beauty and truth endure. There was neither beauty nor truth in Arnautoff’s work.
It was always doomed.
The story of Arnautoff’s mural is not that of George Washington. It is the story of a destructive political movement that destroys itself. The Left likes to claim the future. But, like Arnautoff, it has no future.
When you have no past, you have no future.
George Washington’s work lives on. Victor Mikhail Arnautoff’s work is already gone.
Comments