Thursday Noon ~ TheFrontPageCover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~  
Anti-Trump Press Spins Bigger
Paychecks as a Bad Thing
9JRtWH0ZcKPndxIzsPlJsske-o7VoV9VOuJoWkSb-STqLnKtg5f0HuXcmT5Ew-vacbNWeA1cq-wJpag0AKOCC2MRiddH2AYVZjDS8-lNHcU5wkkur59ovz-YiL6pwIwFdJZrbAJwc3Ady7JG2vpnRny1IreBayI6vcIx0UI=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Louis DeBroux  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Senate confirms William Barr to be 
Trump's next attorney general
ZML6wzK-tUuRlPN9b9ytKCHksX8oFw4-SRSupAs6RZuJWTBwDghrI7etEMiyxoDx-w8hrwOKcrLJ8a97qk3NFVn_biQNamMKyHEYrTEiwpcP2KCLCFeGj_5sm6gMkvC9riFA8kCq_GCK8ZDj9Em_uG7aOyDUERpxgltQCPrPJ1LphUll8Tn1OAWBj5IS7c0ZkyyCkrnDYviI_yVW2SmdJHylNJm_fynd7qhHdywaHBaveMvSrHy7J9aJfpJ6fz9r_arJbQJq2tS547pkuU9_7-flVxGIpA1Dw-Iqe0wBxPo1N7h9l7U8O712zMIQT4wT9o4u4YyytLlivOhGFfQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Susan Ferrechio
{washingtonexaminer.com} ~ The Senate voted Thursday to confirm William Barr, President Trump’s pick to serve as his next attorney general. Barr had a simple majority of votes thanks to Republicans and a small group of Democrats who supported him... though the vote was still ongoing shortly after 1 p.m. Democrats who oppose Barr’s confirmation have criticized his ability to fairly oversee special counsel dirty cop-Robert Mueller’s probe into the Trump campaign’s alleged collusion with Russians. Many said they were alarmed by a 20-page memo Barr authored in June questioning the legitimacy of the dirty cop-Mueller probe and making the case that dirty cop-Mueller should not demand Trump “submit to interrogation about alleged obstruction.”Barr told Judiciary Committee lawmakers during his confirmation hearing his memo aimed to narrowly address the obstruction question and that he believes dirty cop-Mueller should be able to complete his investigation into alleged collusion. But Barr won the overwhelming support of Republican senators, who praised his long career as a lawyer and former attorney general for President George H.W. Bush. The position has been filled temporarily by Sessions’ chief of staff, Matthew Whitaker, since Sessions was fired.   https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/congress/senate-confirms-william-barr-to-be-trumps-next-attorney-general?gfhadsg&utm_source=WEX_Breaking%20News%20Alert_02/14/2019&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=WEX_Breaking%20News
.
Resistance rattled by 'no collusion' talk
Z7ETDahvwyp4wZdO-F1BShRxboV2B65AWbQXsFRequns-6QmyrQJdrOO0b3n6G5U1Mk2caLjviMgy8xO3CT0QBvGs_GA1PMh5zyPqZzAvM5bazXOIkL1ofO2uUlJplxOz6enleEHOZUQLx_34qcozDc89520YzoT_oTRO5eBxShcAteC7iqYF3kLe_R1XP9GWFBb6piI5xLkPfIuaAz1YPVsLDD9WXasHIC4FAsW14KAZpmDGu5w5Ki7jZHO7MqVZkDNC-kq5KeFfdOaoLqtucQok7wWUtX8rI9f3aljwXnhfpOzWJWrcgO4H1ZnVeftGSkhfx0bkauuiQc1rPeU6UDDmjM2seyDt-XZXwlw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby Byron York
{washingtonexaminer.com} ~ There have been reports recently that the Senate Intelligence Committee, the panel conducting the bipartisan flagship congressional investigation of the Trump-Russia affair... has not found evidence to conclude that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to fix the 2016 election. "If we write a report based upon the facts that we have, then we don't have anything that would suggest there was collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia," the committee's chairman, Republican Sen. Richard Burr, told CBS last week. Pressed on his statement a few days later, Burr said, "The only thing I've addressed is whether we had facts that suggest there was collusion. We don't have any." Burr added one caveat: "Just saying what factually we've found to date. We haven't finished our investigation."At about the same time, NBC News  reported that committee Democrats did not fundamentally dispute Burr's statement, although they emphasized they had uncovered no "direct" evidence of collusion. "Both Republicans and Democrats are telling us that they found no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, which after all was the big question that everyone was asking," said NBC's Ken Dilanian Tuesday. The talk prompted pushback from the top Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, Sen. Mark Warner, who told CNN that he is not on board with Burr. "Respectfully, I disagree," Warner said. "I'm not going to get into any conclusions I've reached, because my basis of this has been that I'm not going to reach any conclusion until we finish the investigation. And we still have a number of the key witnesses to come back."... They will never gave up.  https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/byron-york-resistance-rattled-by-no-collusion-talk?utm_source=WEX_News%20Brief_02/12/2019&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=WEX_News%20Brief
.
Trump Prepares To Give In — Insists He Can 
Get Border Funding From ‘Other Sources’
guGJlU0hRXiFwkqfcxM747pTYmW8vwpy0zz7KKgH6gF8ksQRHDhpnhEdDnXZQPRpwZoJIn5UXVF5JWuq89AfEn7OWG7DxM3soWr5eYigKu5WfeAY_l02AqJIelk_gAKQTYbJO_6NAlqe=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by theconservativebrief.com:   As the conflict over the border wall continues to increase, certain reports are claiming that President Trump is preparing to “give in” to Congressional Democrats and seek border funding from other sources... reports The Daily Caller News Foundation. As the deadline to keep government open approaches, Congress has put forth a prospective “compromise” to meet President Trump’s immigration demands. Unfortunately, the aforementioned compromise is a far cry from receiving the $5.7 billion dollars which are paramount for building the wall along the Southern border. Of course, the Democrats know this and are doing everything they can to ram the legislation through Congress. If the Democrats have their way, the new bill to keep the government open after Friday will provide $1.375 billion dollars for a physical barrier at the Southern border and reduce the number of detention beds which are managed by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Of course, this “compromise” is terrible because it fails to meet the stipulations which the president has repeatedly mandated. However, reports claim that President Trump may sign the legislation and then garner the rest of the funds from the government via executive order.
FEC Still Refuses To Investigate Alleged $84 Million scumbag/liar-Clinton Campaign 
Money Laundering  
Lg7u4WM_VF2U9eUe7HFQTmtSVzFtxi60eU_EMj7GStUid0SMtu8oXdiUbLzyhTpKHSQi1jzAufADW2Ee5PgavDpeulfHh2wBLIXNpPG-_w_8AG-7ux_r7gDt5f07cxv-_THFex5bUwiCFrEIVuI=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Margot Cleveland  
{thefederalist.com} ~ Tuesday evening the Committee to Defend the President (CDP) filed a motion in a D.C. federal court seeking to supplement the complaint it had filed against the Federal Election Committee (FEC) in April 2018... In its original complaint, the CDP alleged that the agency responsible for enforcing campaign-finance law failed to act on an administrative complaint the CDP had filed with the FEC. That complaint charged that, during the 2016 presidential election, Democrats illegally funneled approximately $84 million through the scumbag/liar-Hillary Victory Fund to the Democratic National Committee (DNC), which then illegally coordinated with the scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton campaign. To understand the alleged scheme requires familiarity with controlling campaign-finance law and campaign contribution limits. As I explained at the time CDP sued the FEC last April: Under federal law, ‘an individual donor can contribute $2,700 to any candidate, $10,000 to any state party committee, and during the 2016 cycle $33,400 to a national party’s main account. These groups can all get together and take a single check from a donor for the sum of those contribution limits—it’s legal because the donor cannot exceed the base limit for any one recipient. And state parties can make unlimited transfer to their national party.’ This legal loophole allows ‘bundlers’ to raise large sums of money from wealthy donors—more than $400,000 at a time—filtering the funds to the national committees. Democrats and Republicans alike exploit this tactic. But once the money reaches the national committees, other limits apply. During the 2016 election cycle, Democrats followed this formula, with scumbag/liar-Clinton, the DNC, and participating state Democratic committees establishing the scumbag/liar-Hillary Victory Fund (HVF) as a joint fundraising committee to accept contributions from large donors. To comply with the law, the HVF needed to transfer the donations to the specified recipients, whether the scumbag/liar-Clinton campaign, down-ticket Democrats, the DNC, or state committees...  http://thefederalist.com/2019/02/13/fec-still-refuses-investigate-alleged-84-million-clinton-campaign-money-laundering/?utm_source=The+Federalist+List&utm_campaign=86a01b61c5-RSS_The_Federalist_Daily_Updates_w_Transom&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_cfcb868ceb-86a01b61c5-83771801
.
Israelis Respond to Christian Warning
 that Saudis Might Destroy Mount Sinai
o4dwM1YG1G_7yGhCbJR-nbUYRDHRjsKqm0BXYtsfHJsKWGJg9QbcWwnCsNrE9lpiqr2CC8gFVgPbwYrQ3qFgCzGQSlFMD3nn_nZ8SeAtGEHVHveGfUTE0Q=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by israeltoday.co.il:   Israeli media on Tuesday picked up on the recent claim by Christian  researchers that the real Mount Sinai is in Saudi Arabia, and that the Saudi authorities might soon bulldoze the holy mountain to prevent what they call "idolatrous" attention... The Doubting Thomas Research Foundation has for years been trying to prove that the biblical Red Sea crossing took place between the Sinai Peninsula and what is now Saudi Arabia, and that the real Mount Sinai is located in the oil-rich kingdom at a site known as Jabal al-Lawz. In a recently-published video clip, the group's director, Ryan Mauro, is seen secretly visiting Jabal al-Lawz before being chased away by locals. Mauro claims that the Saudi regime knows that the mountain in question is the biblical Mount Sinai, and is doing all it can to keep that fact from going public. A local jihadi who he interviewed in the video seemed to agree. "When I was in the jihad world we all knew that the Mount Sinai was in Saudi Arabia," the jihadi says while speaking through a voice changer with his face hidden. "The people on the outside had no idea that it was there," he added. "We fighters didn’t want anyone to know about it, and we knew the Saudi government hid it and protected it with security and we all agreed with it."...
.
Europe Takes Steps to Bypass
U.S. Sanctions on Iran
by Eric B. Lorber and Behnam Ben Taleblu

{fdd.org} ~ Last month, foreign ministers from the E3 France, Germany, and the United Kingdom heralded the creation of a long-awaited alternative payments system for transactions with Iran...
 By doing so, Europe is acting on its pledge to keep the Iran nuclear deal alive by shielding certain transactions with Iran from U.S. sanctions. Taken at face value, the E3’s Instrument for Supporting Trade Exchanges, or INSTEX, mechanism serves to support “legitimate trade” between Europe and Iran consisting of non-sanctionable goods like food and medicine. INSTEX also aims to add new countries to its payments system over time. While trade in permitted goods does not threaten American sanctions on Iran, such a channel has the potential to be abused and expanded, posing a serious risk to the Iran sanctions regime and to Washington’s coercive economic power. Risks aside, INSTEX is legally redundant; by definition, it is already permissible for non-U.S. firms to engage in non-sanctionable trade. When restoring sanctions on November 5, the U.S. Treasury reiterated that humanitarian transactions with Iran could continue. Similarly, SWIFT, the financial messaging service, facilitates humanitarian  transactions. Moreover, countries that have received sanctions exemptions to purchase Iranian oil will once again be depositing their payments to Iran in escrow accounts to promote trade in non-sanctionable goods. Given Iran’s access to such means and funding, the shortage of basic consumer goods at home is only due to the regime failing to prioritize the needs of its own people. The risk of abuse related to INSTEX stems from Iran’s ongoing employment of deceptive financial practices. A 2018 Treasury advisory  noted that Tehran “has long used front and shell companies to exploit financial systems around the world to generate revenues and transfer funds in support of malign conduct.” Iran has had no qualms engaging in fraudulent activity on the soil of countries like Germany that are spearheading the effort to assist Iran...
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Anti-Trump Press Spins Bigger Paychecks 
as a Bad Thing
9JRtWH0ZcKPndxIzsPlJsske-o7VoV9VOuJoWkSb-STqLnKtg5f0HuXcmT5Ew-vacbNWeA1cq-wJpag0AKOCC2MRiddH2AYVZjDS8-lNHcU5wkkur59ovz-YiL6pwIwFdJZrbAJwc3Ady7JG2vpnRny1IreBayI6vcIx0UI=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Louis DeBroux:  A recent Washington Post headline perfectly captures the length the media and Democrats (but we repeat ourselves) will go to spin, distort, and lie in order to deny any positive coverage to President Donald Trump and Republicans.

The headline reads “Millions of Americans could be stunned as their tax refunds shrink,” which on its face seems a pretty damning indictment of President Trump’s signature legislative achievement of his first two years. After all, Trump and congressional Republicans touted tax reform as a huge victory for the American people, yet now we are learn millions of Americans are receiving lower tax refunds than expected? Have Republicans pulled a fast one on the American people and lied about the benefits of the tax cuts?

Hardly.

The Post, having done a masterful job of burying the lede, eventually gets to the truth … in paragraph 13. After noting the average tax refund is down 8% from last year (about $170) and quoting American workers angry and frustrated at smaller tax refunds (for which they blame Republicans), the Post finally drops this little nugget of truth:

Many Americans may confuse their meager refunds as a sign that they paid more in taxes as a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Generally, that is not true.

According to the Tax Policy Center, 80 percent of filers received a tax cut, and about 5 percent wound up paying more in federal income taxes. The tax cuts showed up in fatter weekly or biweekly paychecks for most Americans, but few people noticed, according to polling.

“There’s a difference between taxes and your refund,” said Joseph Rosenberg, a senior research associate at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center at the Urban Institute. “People generally got a piece of their tax cut last year gradually in the form of lower withholding on their paychecks.”

In other words, 80% of Americans are receiving smaller refunds because fewer tax dollars were taken from their weekly paychecks!

And that is a very good thing. Aside from the simple fact of having more money on a regular basis, Nicole Kaeding, director of federal projects at the Tax Foundation, points out, “Getting a tax refund means that you gave the government an interest-free loan because you overpaid your taxes.”

A small percentage of Americans are feeling a pinch from the new tax law; primarily the more affluent taxpayers in high-tax, Democrat-run states. Under the new tax law, the SALT (state and local income taxes, and property taxes) deduction was capped at $10,000. In past years, these Democrat states have gotten away with forcing the rest of America to subsidize their lavish welfare  programs and government-employee benefits. Voters in these states were apparently perfectly happy to keep electing leftist politicians who enact these high tax rates, knowing they could deduct those taxes on their federal returns and make the rest of us cover the difference. With the SALT deduction cap, they are finally feeling the sting.

To be sure, many Americans are excited to receive a large tax-refund check, despite personal-finance experts telling us that is simply not a good idea. As Rosenberg notes, “It’s a mystery why taxpayers seem to be comfortable — and even happy — with getting refund checks.” Our banks certainly would never give us interest-free loans, so why should we give the government one, rather than using that extra money to pay down debt or increase savings?

Despite the intentional misrepresentation and criticism by the press, the tax cuts have been an enormous success.

After the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the positive benefits kick in almost immediately. Hundreds of American corporations announced wage increases and bonuses ranging from $1,000 to $2,500 for rank-and-file workers. Even Walmart, the corporation leftists most love to hate because they claim it forces workers to labor for slave wages, responded to the tax cut by raising its minimum wage to $11/hour, a full 52% higher than the federal minimum wage demands.

Not surprisingly, then-House Minority Leader Nancy Pulosi referred to these worker windfalls as “pathetic,” “insignificant,” and “crumbs.” Other Democrats claimed the corporations had planned on these wage increases and bonuses anyway, and it was entirely coincidental that they occurred right after the Republican tax cuts.

Yet none other than Apple, the proudly “liberal,” Trump-hating corporation adored for its “wokeness” by idealistic “progressives,” admitted the GOP tax cuts were the catalyst. Apple CEO Tim Cook announced that, due to the lower corporate tax rate, Apple would repatriate $250 billion dollars into the U.S. economy, in the process paying a $38 billion tax bill. Additionally, Apple handed out $2,500 in stock grants to employees, and announced an additional $350 billion investment in the U.S., creating 20,000 new jobs.

Democrat Sen. lowlife-Kamala Harris, working hard to win the hearts of the party’s far-left wing and thus the Democrat 2020 presidential nomination, tweeted, “The average tax refund is down about $170 compared to last year. Let’s call the President’s tax cut what it is: a middle-class tax hike to line the pockets of already wealthy corporations and the 1%.”

Her spin is so demonstrably false that even The Washington Post’s “fact-checker” was obliged to award her Four Pinocchios for lying.

Even so, while the GOP/Trump tax cuts (which not a single Democrat voted for) have been a massive jumpstart to the economy, neither Trump nor Republicans can depend on a hostile press to really admit the truth. They’ll have to take this good news directly to the American people.  ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/61119?mailing_id=4075&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4075&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body
 
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center