Posted 12:53

~ Featuring ~
How Justice Kavanaugh Will 
Change the Supreme Court
by Hans von Spakovsky  
BUSTED: Tennessee dummycrats-Dem’s Staff Explains
THE TRUTH Behind Candidate’s Pro-Kavanaugh Stance
by Sara Carter
{} ~ Explosive undercover footage released by James O’Keefe and Project Veritas Wednesday night showed the stunning depth dummycrats-Democrat politicians are willing to go... to retake control of Congress after the 2018 midterm elections. The stunning video shows Tennessee Senate hopeful Phil Bredesen’s staff explaining the true motivation behind his alleged “support” for Brett Kavanaugh; admitting “it’s a political move” and “this isn’t about anything” other than appealing to moderate voters in the state. “No, it’s a political move… He thinks that like we’re down like half a point right now. It’s like really close and we’re losing by a point or two. So he thinks that if like by saying this he’s appealing to more moderate Republicans and he’ll get more of them to vote for us,” said one staffer.“I was so confused because I just can’t believe he would actually vote for him,” asked one journalist. “He wouldn’t. But he’s saying he would… Which I don’t know if it makes it worse or better. No, it makes it better,” added another worker for Bredesen’s campaign.
#WalkAway Founder: dummycrats-Democrats
Are Jumping Ship Over Kavanaugh Smear
by Stephanie Hamill
{} ~ Brandon Straka, the openly gay former dummycrats-Democrat behind the recent movement to #Walkaway from liberalism... says he has seen an uptick in the number of people who say they’re ‘walking away’ from the dummycrats-Democratic party. He says hundreds of people have reached out to him since the  Justice Brett Kavanaugh battle started, and he began receiving more video testimonials and messages from people who say they will now vote Republican because of the smear campaign launched against Kavanaugh. Straka also talks about the first #WalkAway Campaign march he will be hosting in Washington D.C. on Oct 26-28th. For more details about the event, you can visit ...
The Left's Next Big Thing
by J.R. Dunn
{} ~ Fresh off getting their britches kicked over the Kavanaugh nomination, the American left has come up with yet another scheme to stymie the GOP and strangle the MAGA program in its cradle... This is the product of John Burton, an scumbag/liar-nObama acolyte and political activist who, harnessing the crowd sourcing process the "Wiki effect", has signed up an army of amateur volunteers to examine the records of dozens of vulnerable GOP candidates with the intention of publicizing these findings in a string of October surprises. Burton is an ex-banker who worked for the scumbag/liar-nObama campaign as an opposition researcher. After Donald Trump was elected, he joined the "Resistance," according to his own words, out of guilt that he'd allowed Trump to be elected. He immediately organized a telephone campaign in which, shortly after the inauguration, 78,000 callers contacted the Senate Judiciary Committee demanding an investigation into "Russian collusion." Some sources give him credit for the dirty cop-Mueller investigation, which is arguable, to say the least. Burton then applied himself to organizing "Citizen Strong," a 501(c)(4) "grassroots" outfit dedicated to ending the Trump menace. Anticipating the 2018 elections, he has organized 16,000 volunteers who have been searching the net for "damaging material" on GOP candidates. Citizen Strong is targeting three Senate races, 22 House races, and 133 state legislative races in 13 states. The effort has been financed by what even his supporters call "dark money." It should also be mentioned that one of the individuals involved is an evident Russian immigrant named "Tanya."  Another is named "Vlad." You'd really think they'd know better...
Saudi Arabia must answer to Khashoggi allegations
{} ~ The mystery continues. Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi, known for his criticism of the Saudi government and its crown prince... entered the Saudi consulate in Istanbul on October 2, and never came out. Turkish investigators probing his disappearance say that he was murdered, or possibly abducted, in the consulate by a 15-member Saudi squad. The allegation has turned up the heat on Saudi Arabia, which denies any wrongdoing. As the Saudis rightly point out, the Turkish investigators have no hard evidence. The only thing we know: Khashoggi went to the consulate on Friday, September 28 to do some paperwork so he could marry his Turkish fiancée, and was told to return on Tuesday, October 2. He had worried that he could be kidnapped and taken back to Saudi Arabia if he went in to the consulate. He entered around 1:30 p.m. on October 2, and never came back out. Khashoggi moved to the U.S. last year as Saudi authorities began detaining dozens of critics. Of course, Saudi Arabia has previously targeted dissidents living abroad. Indeed, three princes living in Europe that were critical of the government disappeared  between 2015-2016. Khashoggi, while not royal, was undeniably close to power centers. As an outspoken critic from within the kingdom’s elite — he was a consummate  insider, having served as an advisor to the royal family — the regime may have viewed him as a voice that would not be ignored. Saudi-Turkey tensions are now escalating. On Monday, Turkey requested a search of the Saudi consulate, while Turkish authorities said they were investigating a black van with diplomatic plates that they believe may have carried Khashoggi from the consulate.  Turkish authorities recently released CCTV footage showing Khashoggi entering the consulate and several diplomatic vehicles purportedly carrying Saudi intelligence officers and officials arriving at and leaving the facility...
How Palestinians Lie to Europeans
by Bassam Tawil
{} ~ The Palestinian Authority (PA) says it wants the international community to exert pressure on Israel to "halt violations against the Palestinians and international law."... The demand was relayed to members of a delegation from the European Parliament who met on October 8 in Ramallah with PA Prime Minister Rami Hamdallah. At the meeting, Hamdallah also renewed the PA's call for providing "international protection" for the Palestinians. Hamdallah's appeal to the European Parliament representatives should be seen in the context of the PA leadership's ongoing campaign of lies and incitement against Israel. The appeal also smacks of hypocrisy and deceit. Hamdallah is apparently referring to Israel's defensive measures along the border between the Gaza Strip, where thousands of Hamas supporters have been staging violent demonstrations since March 2018. As part of the Hamas-orchestrated protests, which are sometimes called the "March of Return," Palestinians have been infiltrating the border with Israel and hurling firebombs and explosive devices at Israeli soldiers. They have also been launching arson kites and booby-trapped balloons towards Israeli communities near the border with the Gaza Strip. Hamdallah and his boss, PA President Mahmoud Abbas, believe that Israel has no right to defend itself against the campaign of terrorism waged by Hamas and other Palestinian terror groups in the Gaza Strip. In their eyes, it is fine for Palestinians to throw explosive devices and firebombs at soldiers, but it is completely unacceptable for the soldiers to defend themselves. According to the twisted logic of the Palestinian leaders, it all started when Israel fired back... 
How Justice Kavanaugh Will Change the Supreme Court

by Hans von Spakovsky

Brett Kavanaugh was sworn in as the newest justice on the U.S. Supreme Court on Saturday and he will begin hearing oral arguments on Tuesday, Oct. 9, when the court comes back from its Columbus Day holiday.
               Those who expect rapid, radical changes in the jurisprudence of the court are likely to be disappointed. But in the long run, there seems little doubt that Kavanaugh’s addition will lead to stronger enforcement of constitutional rights such as religious liberty, the right to bear arms, greater adherence to limits on congressional and executive power, and, perhaps most importantly, a lesser likelihood that the court will create new rights not explicitly recognized in the Constitution.
               Much has been said about the unfair and downright nasty tactics used by some dummycrats-Democratic senators and their allies during Kavanaugh’s confirmation battle. But the reason they resorted to these tactics is because the federal courts have become so important in their quest to change America into their version of a progressive utopia.
               For many decades, liberals have been using the federal courts to implement the changes they have been unable to achieve through Congress and state legislatures. When they cannot convince voters and legislators, they have resorted to federal judges to ignore the law and ignore the Constitution and implement their social policies by judicial fiat.
               The legal battle over the proposed Millennium coal export terminal in Longview widened into a much broader national issue Tuesday.
               dummycrats-Democrats still have four solid liberal justices on the court who are likely to vote the way liberals want them to on most issues, particularly “social justice” issues like abortion, racial preferences, gay marriage, and campaign finance. From their perspective, there is only one politically acceptable view on those issues.
               Kavanaugh is replacing Justice Anthony Kennedy, for whom Kavanaugh clerked. On many issues, Kennedy was a staunch supporter of the Constitution. He certainly voted to protect the First Amendment in numerous cases coming before the court, particularly in the area of campaign finance law.
               He wrote the opinion in Citizens United, the 2010 decision that threw out limits on independent political speech and expenditures, a decision that has been almost uniformly (and unfairly) condemned by liberals.
               Kennedy was the key fifth vote in District of Columbia v. Heller, the 2008 decision that upheld the right of every American to keep and bear arms under the Second Amendment. So, there are many cases where Kennedy was the fifth voted needed to uphold the rights of Americans under the Bill of Rights and other amendments to the Constitution.
               In fact, in the last term of the court, he was the crucial fifth vote in 19 important cases, including the decisions upholding President Donald Trump’s travel ban and throwing out an Illinois law that forced government employees to pay dues to unions they refused to join and that expressed views that they did not support.
               On the other hand, since the Heller case and the court’s follow-up decision in McDonald v. City of Chicago, the court has avoided Second Amendment cases. This has allowed jurisdictions all over the country to impose restrictive gun laws and regulations, particularly on concealed carry rights, that have been upheld by the lower federal courts.
               With Kavanaugh’s strong record on the Second Amendment, for which he was criticized by dummycrats-Democratic senators, one can hope that the Supreme Court will finally take up these cases and reinforce its precedent.
               Kennedy also had a habit of occasionally siding with the liberal wing of the court and creating nonexistent rights on politically correct social issues such as capital punishment, abortion, and gay rights.
               The point here is not that one side of these issues should prevail. The point is that many of these are issues that are not dealt with in the Constitution and should be decided by the legislative process or by the people directly, not the courts.
               Take gay marriage. Kennedy was the essential fifth vote in Obergefell v. Hodges, the 2015 decision that created a constitutional “right” to gay marriage. Marriage laws have always been a prerogative of state governments, not the federal government.
               Gay marriage was being dealt with by state legislatures, as some states decided to recognize it and others did not. As Justice Antonin Scalia said in his scathing dissent, overriding the rights of the states and their voters to decide this issue was a fundamental “threat to American democracy.
               Even though Kennedy often voted against what liberals wanted the court to do, he voted with them often enough that they continued to see the federal courts—and in particular, the Supreme Court—as their substitute venue for implementing the social policy they could not achieve through the democratic process. With Kavanaugh, that substitute venue will likely disappear.
               That, in turn, could diminish the power of the Supreme Court over the political, social, and cultural affairs of the nation. And that would be a good thing.
               The Supreme Court was never envisioned by our Founders as the final arbiter and decision-maker on all affairs, foreign and domestic. It is the court’s extension of its power into areas where it should not be exercising power that has played a large role in turning the confirmation of its justices into a rancorous political campaign that diminishes the court and damages the pursuit of justice in the federal courts.

~The Patriot Post

Views: 43


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center



Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

Political Cartoons by Lisa BensonPolitical Cartoons by Gary Varvel


CONFUSION:   Pelosi Says Constitution Spells Out ‘Two Co-Equal Branches’ Of Government

No Nancy. No.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi must be taking night classes at the Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez School of Government.

Pelosi, the 79-year-old third-highest ranking official in the U.S. government, was speaking to the Center for American Progress today when she mistakenly said there are “two co-equal branches” of government, before correcting herself to say there are three.


“First of all, let me just say, we take an oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States,” Pelosi said.

“Democrats take that oath seriously, and we are committed to honoring our oath of office. I’m not sure that our Republican colleagues share that commitment, and I’m not sure that the president of the United States does, too,” she claimed.

“So, in light of the fact that the beauty of the Constitution is a system of checks and balances— two co-equal branches— three co-equal branches of government,” she corrected with a laugh.

“A check and balance on each other,” she continued. “Con— Constitution spells out the pri— pa, uh, the duties of Congress and one of them is oversight of the president of the United States, another one of them is to impeach the president of the United States,” Pelosi said.

In November, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez rallied supporters on Facebook to pitch in and help Democrats take back “all three chambers of Congress.”

“…the Progressive movement works and it wins in all districts…If we work our butts off to make sure that we take back all three chambers of Congress– three chambers of government…,” she said during the virtual appearance.

She clarified that she meant the “presidency, the Senate and the House.”

According to the Constitution, the three branches of government are the legislative, executive and judicial.

Below: Nancy Pelosi is continuing to promote the false narrative that President Trump is involved in a cover-up and therefore may be guilty of an impeachable offense. Millie Weaver joins Alex to break down the propaganda being used to overturn the democratic election of 2016 


© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service