Thursday AM ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Trump Derangement Syndrome on Steroids
94fuUGGIUhFqFBkhrpKYpYUEMt7HQtSbeDZEAATehLOXddJPoLEoXRuwMBtEJS9MVgCcmqBwfpGTfgoG9IEec8wJJHisFwU1VEaK5dxKWLH_Nhss7dds4HcQJYAQdjWDcCe4KyBy8UNofZ3yDSWJenvlaI0fbTA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href= David Limbaugh
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Trump Impeachment Inquiry Hearing
NUYIzU0XLXzMDmkyTQ6mJsxwKWJDA_6r7YrEJLgk3eLfzb1r5SPaAra5vWMb5Pg35e7YfQax3LFgsgFDXfqb38tf379qL07bRVj3JEtNHlK5svw9pR0DOtwvlS7lQJOkr73dEyUD1IMeWzoewMaxJJ4rtRUr0HXiTsk=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by .democracynow.org ~ Televised impeachment hearings have begun into whether President Trump withheld military aid from Ukraine... to pressure the Ukrainian president to investigate his political rival loose lips liar-Joe Biden and his son. It is only the third time in U.S. history there have been televised impeachment hearings. The first two witnesses to testify will be George Kent, a deputy assistant secretary of state, and Bill Taylor, a former ambassador and the top U.S. diplomat in Ukraine.
.
scumbag-Adam Schiff blasted 
as 'lying sack of excrement'
c-h6x_Ho_u45LXCX6uZBvP3EBwrR9g190sq4Q4oJYxHtvjXFK7LXNRe67hDiP2Gp3tiQhZ5QS5qY7cfoaVtsR35hvN8-YaI5iqftTofDvpuNlO_tCFpXaaLKMftuuQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Joe Kovacs
{ wnd.com } ~ As Democrats prepare for televised hearings this week in connection with their effort to impeach President Donald Trump... the congressman leading the charge to oust the commander in chief is being publicly slammed as a serial liar. "scumbag-Adam Schiff is a lying sack of excrement!" radio talk-show his Rush Limbaugh exclaimed on his national broadcast Tuesday, adding that House Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi "chose a bug-eyed, lying sack of excrement to be the face of this." "We've documented the lies," Limbaugh continued. "The guy and scumbag-Eric Swalwell were inseparable in this. They both claim they've got evidence of Trump colluding with Russia. They both say it's clearly obvious, it's clearly visible, it's right there. They've never produced it 'cause they don't have it. scumbag-Schiff is the guy who lied about the contents of Trump's phone call." While many in the national news media have suggested this could be one of Trump's worst weeks in office because of the televised hearings, Limbaugh said it could be the opposite. "This could end up being one of Trump's best weeks, because the curtain is now being pushed back," he explained. "I think there are gonna be millions of Americans who are going to have the chance, anyway, who haven't been following this wall-to-wall like you and I have been, to see what a partisan sham this whole thing is.""So it's possible here, folks, the American people are gonna finally see scumbag-Schiff's goggle-eyed, rabid hatred of Trump on full display. They're going to see the rabid partisanship of other Democrats on that committee. "They're not gonna be able to help themselves, and people are going to quickly realize what a total farce this whole exercise is. That is as big a possibility as this being a disaster for Trump. Trump didn't do anything. That doesn't mean it can't be a disaster. It depends on how clever they are and so forth, but I'm not as pessimistic as a lot of people are about this." Limbaugh found it curious how citizens are not even going to hear from the anonymous whistleblower, reported by RealClearInvestigations to be career CIA employee Eric Ciaramella...   https://www.https://www.wnd.com/2019/11/adam-schiff-blasted-lying-sack-excrement/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=wnd-breaking&utm_campaign=breaking&utm_content=breaking  /2019/11/adam-schiff-blasted-lying-sack-excrement/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=wnd-breaking&utm_campaign=breaking&utm_content=breaking   
What About a loose lips liar-Biden
Impeachment Inquiry?
zTi-ttfeWw_8I7shX_Coi-2IruA0NEKCB99RjxXBjjAKS8GcQol8BYw6w10--LnE1pPQS8DzMAIlWqiLSJxcMxt053cUsH-jRADsxrkzHbkUSMtqIKMI7PCFudWYaJ1m6HjnHqB9eZOSP9SPpRfShufZkgsgMA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by E. DONALD ELLIOTT
{ spectator.org } ~ In his fine book Impeachment: A Citizen’s Guide (2017), Harvard Law School Professor Cass R. Sunstein, a prominent Democrat who served in the scumbag/liar-nObama White House, stresses a key point about impeachment... grounds for impeachment should be neutral in the sense that we would be willing to apply them equally to politicians with whom we agree as well as those whom we despise. A general principle of law, enshrined among other places in the 14th Amendment, is that norms are valid only if we are willing to apply them to everyone; that’s why the statue of Justice is blind. Professor Sunstein is right, however, that the neutrality test is particularly important for impeachment, because the constitutional standard is necessarily vague and turns on judgments such as whether or not misdeeds are sufficiently serious to justify removal from office. If we would not be willing to apply the same rule to someone with whom we agree politically, we should doubt whether it is a valid basis to kick someone out of office with whom we disagree. Or, in the immortal words of Vinny, the homespun legal philosopher in the movie My Cousin Vinny, “It won’t hold water” to say that something is an impeachable offense when the other side’s guy does it but it is perfectly okay when our own guy does essentially the same thing. loose lips liar-Joe Biden has admitted to doing almost exactly what the House Democrats accuse President Trump of doing in their impeachment inquiry: using his position in government to obtain private political benefit from a foreign government. We should all be asking, “Why isn’t loose lips liar-Biden also the target of a second impeachment inquiry?” Some people might think that is because loose lips liar-Biden has left office, but according to both William Murphy, professor of American History at the State University of New York, and every other expert I know who has addressed the issue, former officials like loose lips liar-Biden may also be impeached after they leave office. Impeaching a former official is not a meaningless gesture because impeachment may prohibit someone from holding office in the future, including the presidency in loose lips liar-Biden’s case; in the words of the Constitution, impeachment may disqualify a person “to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States.” As vice president, loose lips liar-Joe Biden threatened to hold up a billion dollars in aid to Ukraine unless that country fired a prosecutor who was investigating Burisma, the energy company that was paying his son $600,000 a year to serve on its board of directors. All these facts are detailed here ( https://www.manhattancontrarian.com/blog/2019-10-5-the-bidens-stone-cold-crooked ) and don’t need to be repeated. There is no dispute about them. You can even watch loose lips liar-Biden on YouTube ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=65&v=UXA--dj2-CY ) bragging to the Council on Foreign Relations that he did it: “I looked at them and said, ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor Shokin is not fired, you’re not getting the money a $1 billion loan guarantee.’ Well, son of a b-tch.… He got fired.” As a result, the investigation of Burisma was suspended, at least until Trump tried to get it restarted, a move for which the Dems want to impeach him.  Despite the eerie similarity of loose lips liar-Biden’s actions to those that are supposed to constitute “high crimes and misdemeanors” warranting the impeachment of President Trump, loose lips liar-Biden and his supporters dare anyone to find anything illegal in his use of his official position to threaten to withhold aid to Ukraine unless it stifled a criminal investigation of his son’s company...
.
scumbag-Schiff Denies Republican 
Requests for Testimony From Key Witnesses
EU0UXnc0Xr_6urtFDhJ5X-O9nZbTzA_nfE0JbZARlqkMzEU1AZ53Olipf4VzO-Vpzl8XTF3WFudy8c2Nm58L19GkXEphq29s3w-RCR0UaWb38qK7kg7YAwo1e_KUz2UyPAHkSrW827N0UrCQYR-ap8pHMhgb_HEeA4WLqLQKCb7t6WvoXVNN=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Joseph Klein
{ cms.frontpagemag.com } ~ Alexander Hamilton warned in Federalist No. 65, dealing with impeachments in the House of Representatives and trials in the Senate... that during the impeachment phase there may often be “animosities, partialities, influence, and interest on one side or on the other; and in such cases there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” He hoped the Senate would be able to determine guilt or innocence and serve impartially “between an INDIVIDUAL accused, and the REPRESENTATIVES OF THE PEOPLE, HIS ACCUSERS.” House Intelligence Committee Chairman scumbag-Adam Schiff, pressing hard for the House to formally become President Trump’s “accusers” and hand over articles of impeachment to the Senate for trial, is displaying the worst traits that Alexander Hamilton described. The latest example is scumbag-Schiff’s refusal to let the American people hear from the whistleblower, whose complaint containing a secondhand account of President Trump’s July 25, 2019 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky gave rise to the impeachment inquiry against President Trump in the first place. The whistleblower’s testimony is "redundant and unnecessary," scumbag-Schiff said in a letter to Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Devin Nunes rejecting House Republicans’ request for the whistleblower to testify during the public phase of the impeachment inquiry hearings. scumbag-Schiff claimed that the impeachment inquiry already “has gathered an ever-growing body of evidence -- from witnesses and documents, including the president's own words in his July 25 call record -- that not only confirms but far exceeds the initial information in the whistleblower's complaint." As usual, scumbag-Schiff is lying to rationalize the extreme one-sided way he is conducting his sham hearings. Originally, scumbag-Schiff himself had said the whistleblower would appear before Congress “very soon,” but changed his mind after reports surfaced of the whistleblower’s contacts with members of scumbag-Schiff’s staff before filing the complaint. The whistleblower’s testimony as to the identity of his or her sources is highly relevant to ensuring a fair proceeding and making a complete record for the Senate to consider as the trier of fact. So are the whistleblower’s biases and motives for coming forward and filing a complaint after having first contacted members of scumbag-Schiff’s staff. Who did the whistleblower talk to, what did they say to the whistleblower that became the basis for the whistleblower’s complaint, and where did the whistleblower’s sources tell the whistleblower they got their information about the July 25th call? The complaint did not match in some material respects what the president said as memorialized in the publicly released memo of the call, despite scumbag-Schiff’s false claims to the contrary. Moreover, from what we have learned so far from the released deposition transcripts, there appears to have been more of a sharing of interpretations of President Trump’s intentions among like-minded individuals opposed to the president’s policies in Ukraine than a factual account of what the witnesses actually heard or observed the president say or do...  How can this be a fair inquiry when he is blocking witness.  https://cms.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2019/11/schiff-denies-republican-requests-testimony-key-joseph-klein   
Afghan president: 3 Taliban to be 
released for held US, Australian
O6xCeHtp9puDDzf4alPY1PnmTc4pFUdepWpms36ZQ8PY2GvXFg3v2wE4FH9hTZvgYMbWXW3c0EhpdhmSsqvlvhW2j_e7V6SuPy8pC66jfiPb057OLYU9tErGEr3I5r4Z12watWZwGAbeU_XUgfE1XA_1gfRP2atgCvamWvIb8h8zrmE_Nu-rgqlSToaL_kuPRYbrA7JmD_a6lswN6SQxauPGFA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Danielle Wallace  
{ foxnews.com } ~ Afghan President Ashraf Ghani announced on Tuesday that his government would release three Taliban figures in an effort to have the insurgents free an American and Australian abducted in 2016 and held captive for three years... Ghani said at a press event broadcast live on state television that three members of the Taliban-linked Haqqani network -- Anas Haqqani, Haji Mali Khan and Hafiz Rashid -- would be released "conditionally in exchange" for an American identified as Kevin King and an Australian man identified as Timothy Weekes — who were both abducted at gunpoint outside the American University in Kabul where they worked as teachers, according to the Associated Press. It was not clear if the three insurgents had been released yet. Ghani did not elaborate on when or where the prisoner exchange would take place. The Afghan president said the three insurgents had been under the custody of the Afghanistan government and were held at the Bagram prison, at an airbase that also houses U.S. troops just outside Kabul. "In a demonstration of respect for humanity by the government and nation of Afghanistan, we decided to conditionally release these three Taliban prisoners who were arrested in close cooperation with our international partners from other countries," Ghani said. "We can assure the families of both teachers that we welcome and honor those who come to our country to pursue education." Ghani said his government decided to release the insurgents in order “to facilitate direct peace negotiations." He added that the release of the teachers was a "part of our main demands during the indirect negotiations with Taliban." The Taliban have long demanded the release of Anas Haqqani, the younger brother of Sirajuddin, the deputy head of the Taliban and leader of the Haqqani network, often considered the strongest of the Taliban factions fighting in Afghanistan.  Anas Haqqani was arrested in Bahrain in 2014 and handed over to the Afghan government, which later sentenced him to death. It was not clear when his execution was supposed to take place...   https://www.foxnews.com/world/afghan-president-3-taliban-released-us-australian-kevin-king-timothy-weekes-american-university  
.
Justices Should Reject Criminal Alien’s 
Appeal of Deportation Order
2wBU5-68iU48qTlyeH2DZQeduyzytx7j1xI-dtZmDZUrGOdOtJxWwZEUC8dSPZdnrDD811ILK-ZQ0zZBXHobkBczZMv3qe_0RXvjDhU51_yaa5QQy-fker8BpaQQClmpHzU=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Hans von Spakovsky
{ dailysignal.com } ~ The Supreme Court on Nov. 4 heard oral arguments in an immigration case that could have a dramatic impact on how many criminal aliens plaguing our communities finally get deported... The case, Barton v. Barr, is complicated, in large part because the statutes involved are vague and subject to various interpretations. That prompted Justice Stephen Breyer to comment during oral arguments that “it wasn’t a genius who drafted this.” But the decision that will be made by the court in interpreting these immigration laws will affect the lives and safety of Americans. Under federal immigration law, a permanent resident alien who is here legally is “removable” if he is “inadmissible.”  That is to say, he should never have been admitted in the first place because he met one of the factors listed in the statute (8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)), such as posing “a threat to the property, safety, or welfare of the alien or others.”  A permanent resident alien is also removable if he is “deportable” under another statute (8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)), which lists a series of disqualifying offenses, including violations of any “law of the United States.” The attorney general has the discretion to cancel the removal of such an alien, but to be eligible for such cancellation, the alien has to show not only that he is statutorily eligible for such relief from the attorney general, but that he also deserves such favorable treatment. The statutory requirement is that the alien has been “lawfully admitted for permanent residence for not less than 5 years”; has “resided” in the country “continuously for 7 years after having been admitted”; and that he has not been “convicted of any aggravated felony.”...   https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/11/08/justices-should-reject-criminal-aliens-appeal-of-deportation-order/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=justices-should-reject-criminal-aliens-appeal-of-deportation-order?utm_source=TDS_Email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=MorningBell&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWkdFd00yVTRaV015WlRVNSIsInQiOiI2Q2xwUHdnWlVcL3JsVzBnM0FBWEhVSk1JOGtKZXBWejdxMDd1U2h2bnFjQ0NLRFVUWEo0Nk5hemF5bWdcL2FxU05QZlhxcG9ZN243SHdhY05PT2pkU3ZaNTBlbVJhQ3JTeGQybFlxeVMwUmJnZTdcL2VjMnN0UFN3dlBXNjF3YXBxSyJ9   
Lettuce Pray: Climate Change, 
Neo-Paganism, and the End of the World
YUGDB0uoQgi4wz70snW65h4tIYUeHzwbrayx5DuHPUgdjpcgsD1E3KpE6GwFG3VuiC6fBEL4rkJj0JvFuYu8be6quS9v9zt6ghn11Pji24fXWqF8DRdTwq4aPPDCei7RS6C0KQI=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Dion Pierre
{ dailysignal.com } ~ The climate change movement has become the “modern world’s secular religion,” declared Wall Street Journal columnist Gerard Baker recently. Climate activists preach a gospel of conservation that aims to redeem humanity’s environmental sins... They counsel us to abstain from eating meat to reduce our “carbon footprint,” and prophesy that Earth will perish unless governments worldwide trust the oracle from whom we received this hallowed revelation. Climate cultists appropriate aspects of Christianity to call the world to repent for its “Original Sin of a carbon industrial revolution,” wrote Baker. They do that and more. Climate cultists, whether consciously or unconsciously, have adopted the schema of the Christian eschaton, or end of the world. They have also incorporated into their faith elements of neo-paganism. Baker wasn’t the first to spot traces of the eschaton in the climate gospel. Researchers Rachelle Peterson and Peter Wood remarked in “Sustainability: Higher Education’s New Fundamentalism” that “sustainability, like Christianity, offers a view of the Earth as once-pristine and pure but now fallen; recognizes the sinfulness of humanity,” and “offers forms of expiation and absolution.” However, rather than seeking to redeem humanity in the “next life,” sustainability promises to stave off the end times and save sinners in the “here and now.” Some episodes have emphasized the climate cult’s resemblance to neo-paganism. Sumantra Maitra at The Federalist pointed to an event at Union Theological Seminary in New York City where students confessed their sins to plants. Maitra argued that this means climate activists are “pagan animists.” In other words, they believe that worshipping nature enables one to “grow as a living soul connected to the universe.”... Why and how do these people continue to believe this falsely claim.  https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/11/08/lettuce-pray-climate-change-neo-paganism-and-the-end-of-the-world/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=lettuce-pray-climate-change-neo-paganism-and-the-end-of-the-world?utm_source=TDS_Email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=MorningBell&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWkdFd00yVTRaV015WlRVNSIsInQiOiI2Q2xwUHdnWlVcL3JsVzBnM0FBWEhVSk1JOGtKZXBWejdxMDd1U2h2bnFjQ0NLRFVUWEo0Nk5hemF5bWdcL2FxU05QZlhxcG9ZN243SHdhY05PT2pkU3ZaNTBlbVJhQ3JTeGQybFlxeVMwUmJnZTdcL2VjMnN0UFN3dlBXNjF3YXBxSyJ9   
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Trump Derangement Syndrome on Steroids
94fuUGGIUhFqFBkhrpKYpYUEMt7HQtSbeDZEAATehLOXddJPoLEoXRuwMBtEJS9MVgCcmqBwfpGTfgoG9IEec8wJJHisFwU1VEaK5dxKWLH_Nhss7dds4HcQJYAQdjWDcCe4KyBy8UNofZ3yDSWJenvlaI0fbTA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href= David Limbaugh
 

Trump Derangement Syndrome is not merely a cute-sounding phrase to deflect criticism of President Trump. It’s real. It’s palpable.

Case in point: The American Prospect’s Paul Waldman gives us an earful about President Trump and how Trump is destroying everything that’s good and decent in America. Let me share some of his words, which speak for themselves — but I’ll speak for them, too.

“The impending impeachment of Donald Trump brings with it the possibility of something that has been in short supply over the last three years: accountability,” Waldman writes. “At last, you may think, we can use a constitutional process to proclaim at last that This Is Not OK.” Waldman goes on to acknowledge that Trump probably won’t be held to account after all, because though the House will likely impeach him, the Senate will vote against removing him from office.

What strikes me is Waldman’s unchecked assertion that Trump’s accountability “has been in short supply.” He wholly ignores that Democrats have been feverishly pursuing Trump since he announced his candidacy. For two years, they’ve prosecuted a bogus case on Trump “colluding” with Russia, guaranteeing they had unimpeachable evidence.

They were lying, and their would-be savior, special counsel Robert Mueller, produced no evidence of collusion. Accountability? Why haven’t the Democrats had to answer for their wasting taxpayers’ time and money over this lie? Neither they nor their legacy media co-conspirators have uttered one syllable of apology to the American people, let alone President Trump, for dragging us through this nightmare.

Instead, they immediately pivoted to Ukraine. Here we go again — but this time, it’s really serious. What is this, the fourth impeachment attempt? Why not? We now know from released transcripts that they’ve been planning this coup from the jump. We already knew it, but we’ve got the smoking gun. Will they be held to account for their election and post-election interference? Of course not, unless their constituents vote them out of office for abuse of power.

Waldman continues: “This is one of the products of Trump’s time in office: the contamination of our emotional lives. Trump has made us feel dread, despair, disillusionment, and a dozen other awful emotions whose grip it feels impossible to escape. And even if he loses in 2020 then slinks back to Mar-a-Lago to spend his days regaling his dwindling number of sycophants with tales of his matchless presidency, we’ll continue to live with the effects for years or even decades to come.”

I don’t know whom Waldman purports to speak for, but millions of Americans would find his words repugnant. Trump doesn’t make us feel dread and despair. Bullish on America and fighting leftist insanity and political correctness, he invigorates our patriotic instincts. His policies have stimulated robust economic growth, which is hardly cause for despair.

Waldman details “the unceasing parade of horrors emanating from the Oval Office,” citing the usual litany of Trump’s alleged sins — his oh-so-offensive tweets, his racism and his cruelty. It’s just so exhausting for poor Waldman. He writes: “And how many times have you found yourself almost involuntarily talking with friends or family about some awful thing Trump did or said, only to have someone stop and say, ‘Oh god, let’s just not talk about him for a while. I can’t take it.”

What’s exhausting is the ceaseless leftist noise machine railing against Trump. Leftists need to remove the smudges from their mirrors and see that they are projecting. They are the ones who have been vicious and hateful toward Trump from the beginning. They have wrongly accused him — and his supporters (half of Americans) — of racism and cruelty. They have contempt for all his supporters. Yet has Trump called them Nazis? Racists?

If you don’t believe me, read Waldman’s elaboration: “For many the mere fact that Trump could win in 2016 (even if he got three million fewer votes than scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton) was reason enough to lose faith in their country in a fundamental way. Eight years before they had convinced themselves that Barack scumbag/liar-nObama’s election meant America could be the place they wanted it to be: inclusive, tolerant, progressive, hopeful. Trump came along and told them that America was not that place.”

What? Precisely the opposite is true. Progressives are the antithesis of inclusion, tolerance and hope. They are intolerant of opposing viewpoints, and they readily use the power of government and social media giants to suppress conservative speech and religious liberty. They bully conservatives out of restaurants and college campuses. They are anything but hopeful. Former President scumbag/liar-nObama’s team told us the days of 3% growth were over. President Trump rejected the naysaying and gave us an economic boom, fulfilling his campaign promises and restoring hope.

The rest of Waldman’s piece is even more desperate and bitter, but space constraints preclude further dissection. I’ll just leave you with his closing paragraph, which encapsulates his TDS: “There may yet be more to come, if nothing else in the form of an election defeat next year. But it’s hard to escape the gnawing feeling that nothing we can do to Trump will ever make up for what he has done to us.”

To the contrary, Trump has done nothing to them, but they have done plenty to him. And he’s done plenty for us — specifically standing athwart the extreme left’s crusade to fundamentally and permanently transform America into a nation our framers wouldn’t recognize.

Thank you, President Trump, for standing up for America and those who still believe in it.   ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/opinion/66667?mailing_id=4642&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4642&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center