Thursday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
GOP Responds to Racism While Dems Ignore It
-NuNIV4LyC7jxPpUpGlCpMsQkR9qWfz48YUj8wgXmVxFNwiY7NkIgWJ1Dk6nd173tmS4ZYA44QA5BVs-DGYB69698fVnMsJ0vhx62TWiGL_D9uxuyT6_Fwyi-_w9imejjBAeWEO2J0PNa1JmKAYoN1yyc3M8sJQ1DIoKM-Y=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Thomas Gallatin  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
FBI interview makes big news — 
so why is it still secret?
OhCiRMu_VCKxcoRYkK_1O0SEdm7Uf5zVTesYAf0n_UHwxgnhb55mk16KgKENNKr-mauW_Zr1HlfRLJ9qu1pWI5-0xqAeKIt5_gB9qHONdQGIEZAsFQNGoPbQP7k_D2F7EmVZsLraNfNfRMymTw3ZqGJ9CzaouBW5zaKl7dnM2groIEB2kf4Bi4NOuo0oo86C8MH8KYJlhZNZq32B-MVSN-hRnE-XWsf5wLGLI2QIKbdo1Vu4wH152aLPx6O7NSDx59f2oEIyW0pmdfUKYBqWBkrN_DDBl9uC_HYNC25BPwBX7wcurZHcSvuUxQ9K8_oU3GafRlBcTMv7cB6o1j8Y=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby Byron York
{washingtonexaminer.com} ~ James Baker — the general counsel of the FBI during both the scumbag/liar-Clinton email and Trump-Russia investigations — sat for two interviews with House investigators last October... After the sessions — one on Oct. 3, the other Oct. 18 — Republican Rep. Mark Meadows called parts of Baker's testimony "explosive." Republicans intended to make the interview transcripts public. The questioning was not conducted in a classified setting, and Baker had FBI and other lawyers with him the whole time. But the House still had to send the transcripts to the FBI for clearance, just to make sure public release would not reveal any classified or otherwise secret information. If Republicans hoped for a quick OK from the bureau, they were sorely disappointed. October passed. Then November. Then December. And now, half of January. The FBI still has the transcripts, and there is no word on when the bureau will clear them for release. But now, the Baker transcripts are making news, even as they sit on FBI desks. Two major news stories in the past few days have been based in whole or in part on what Baker told lawmakers. Some news organizations appear to have read the transcripts, or at least significant portions of them, or had them read to reporters by someone with access. Suddenly, the Baker transcripts are hot. The most recent of the stories broke Tuesday. In a letter to Justice Department prosecutors, Meadows and Rep. Jim Jordan, now ranking minority on the House Judiciary Committee, revealed that Baker is the subject of a criminal leak investigation. It wasn't clear from the letter what the leak was — it appeared to be dossier-related, and in the interviews the two sides discussed Baker's interactions with Mother Jones journalist David Corn, but it was not clear from the letter what, precisely, the leak involved...
Federal Court Orders Discovery on 
scumbag/liar-Clinton Email, Benghazi Scandal
ausGW_sH1lj5-SPlU_u4x9yEdsLGmJg8lImZHmNHyVxUTqjGWYiSZStfnfc4I1yxj7L1fmC7wNceM2ouNi4WpxE27O8RNm5QVpkHeFwmX9XRKb8=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
{judicialwatch.org} ~ Judicial Watch announced today that United States District Judge Royce C. Lamberth ruled that discovery can begin in scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton’s email scandal... scumbag/liar-nObama administration senior State Department officials, lawyers, and scumbag/liar-Clinton aides will now be deposed under oath. Senior officials — including Susan Rice, Ben Rhodes, Jacob Sullivan, and FBI official E.W. Priestap — will now have to answer Judicial Watch’s written questions under oath. The court rejected the DOJ and State Department’s objections to Judicial Watch’s court-ordered discovery plan. The court, in ordering a discovery plan last month, ruled that the scumbag/liar-Clinton email system was “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency.” Discovery is scheduled to be completed within 120 days. The court will hold a post-discovery hearing to determine if Judicial Watch may also depose additional witnesses, including scumbag/liar-Clinton and her former Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills. Judge Lamberth ordered written responses under oath to Judicial Watch’s questions from scumbag/liar-nObama administration senior officials Rice, Rhodes and Sullivan, and former FBI official Priestap. Rice and Rhodes will answer interrogatories under oath on the Benghazi scandal. Rejecting the State and Justice Department objections to discovery on the infamous Benghazi talking points, Judge Lamberth reiterated: Judicial Watch also may serve interrogatories on Monica Hanley, a former staff member in the State Department’s Office of the Secretary, and on Lauren Jiloty, scumbag/liar-Clinton’s former special assistant...  https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/federal-court-orders-discovery-on-clinton-email-benghazi-scandal-top-obama-clinton-officials-susan-rice-and-ben-rhodes-to-respond-to-judicial-watch-questions-under-oath/
.
Two Democrat Gun Bills To Fight Like The Dickens  
8aKiC06zgMU5aymJcZ6s7V-ID2PlEuo0qWxgJIy8dNy-6Ciro3xfmOLcyrFwHT7XjYVp6mJzOxjDLunAj38r3JLh_JU-5ra_lV7H7MYilgvpqlcDXaUXqQLbIYzziZgVIOdI9K_m7DL7xpo=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Mark Overstreet  
{thefederalist.com} ~ As expected, within the first few days of the new Congress, Democrats announced legislation designed to eventually lead to the confiscation of firearms best suited for defensive purposes... semi-automatic rifles, such as the AR-15, and—if they can get District of Columbia v. Heller  overturned, as Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has advocated— handguns. Last Wednesday, Sen. Dianne Fein-stein  introduced her latest bill, co-sponsored by 27 other Democrat senators and commie-Bernie Sanders, to ban new “assault weapons,” meaning mostly AR-15s and similar semi-automatic rifles. The bill would also ban ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. Such magazines are designed for defensive purposes and are primarily used in semi-automatic rifles and handguns for that purpose. Fein-stein’s bill would allow existing owners to keep their firearms and magazines. However, no one should be fooled. As mayor of San Francisco, Fein-stein banned handguns from that city entirely until her ban was struck down in court. Also, in 1995, talking about her first “assault weapon ban” on CBS “60 Minutes,” she said, “If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them, Mr. and Mrs. America turn them all in, I would have done it. I could not do that. The votes weren’t there.” Fein-stein is playing the long game. She knows she doesn’t have the votes for gun confiscation now. However, on Tuesday, Speaker of the House Nancy Pulosi said Democrats will resume their efforts to “expand” background checks on gun purchases and that is the first of several steps toward fundamentally transforming the background check system into a national gun registry that can be used to enforce gun confiscation, once Democrats have the votes for confiscation...  http://thefederalist.com/2019/01/16/two-democrat-gun-bills-fight-like-dickens/?utm_source=The+Federalist+List&utm_campaign=269445cd69-RSS_The_Federalist_Daily_Updates_w_Transom&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_cfcb868ceb-269445cd69-83771801
.
Illegal Immigrant Previously Deported For Rape Arrested
Trying To Illegally Enter The Country Again  
a7eab9hvaQzr8NNQGptUFs7lbQbhH2HyKD4MtkabSVptAw29qNz1fBi2klVMaa4kYebAk2Fk1oNrOODnRJuQO7IVOPWUI1zYGVGcp26dV_1Cnnb0lXefTaHrelRb0hv23b0yRXq8T3piFyOb=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Mike Brest
{dailycaller.com} ~ Border patrol agents at the El Centro Sector in California arrested a convicted sex offender suspected of trying to reenter the country illegally on Monday... He was caught by agents from the Calexico Station approximately 11 miles east of the Calexico Port of Entry. Wilfredo Perez-Aguilar, 34, is a Guatemalan national who was convicted in 2005 for Sexual Abuse/Rape of a Minor, who was under the age of 12, while living in the United States illegally. He was subsequently sentenced to five years in prison and deported in May 2010 after serving his sentence for the conviction. “I am proud of our Border Patrol agents for making this arrest,” Chief Patrol Agent Gloria I. Chavez said in a statement from U.S. Customs and Border Protection. “Deported sexual predators seeking to illegally enter the U.S. will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.” The arrest comes amid a major political fight over border security. President Trump has repeatedly asked Congress for approximately $5.7 billion dollars for the wall. Democrats, in turn, have stood by their initial demand that they would not provide any funds for the wall but would concede $1.7 billion for “border security” on the condition that the money could not be allocated for the wall...
.
Denmark: "In One Generation, 
Our Country Has Changed"
-YvGK2blB9fsGVhBQilhJKI2l3buJ9xyFuyFt8TGBHKFccwaadXCOUU7LG_YeiMEYXAbwhSCDckSu5BuPnJifPYDJw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby Judith Bergman
{gatestoneinstitute.org} ~ Denmark made international headlines in late November 2018, when the Danish government announced a plan to send certain asylum seekers to the small, uninhabited island of Lindholm... The international outrage was intensified when it came to light that the island currently houses a research center for contagious animal diseases; that the ferry which the asylum seekers will be able to take to the mainland during the day it does not operate in the evening is named "Virus"; and that the asylum center will be accompanied by a constant police presence on the island. The group of asylum seekers meant to live in Lindholm consists of criminals of various sorts, including those who have been sentenced to be deported from Denmark, those who are considered a security threat to Denmark, and so-called "foreign warriors". The asylum seekers, however, cannot be deported to their country of origin, either because those countries do not adhere to human rights conventions, which Denmark has signed and by which it is therefore obligated that prohibit the use of torture, so-called inhumane treatment and the death sentence, or simply because the country of origin refuses to take them back. The island will undergo a comprehensive renovation, estimated to take nearly three years and to cost Danish taxpayers approximately 759 million Danish kroner (approximately $116 million). Until the renovation is completed, this group of asylum seekers will remain at their current housing facility, an asylum center known as Kærshovedgård, 6 kilometers from the nearest town of Bording. Kærshovedgård, a former prison, was established  as an asylum center in 2016...  https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/13521/denmark-immigration-transformation
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
GOP Responds to Racism While Dems Ignore It
-NuNIV4LyC7jxPpUpGlCpMsQkR9qWfz48YUj8wgXmVxFNwiY7NkIgWJ1Dk6nd173tmS4ZYA44QA5BVs-DGYB69698fVnMsJ0vhx62TWiGL_D9uxuyT6_Fwyi-_w9imejjBAeWEO2J0PNa1JmKAYoN1yyc3M8sJQ1DIoKM-Y=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Thomas Gallatin:  Republicans have been united and swift in rebuking one of their own, Iowa Rep. Steve King, over his recent and repeated history of seemingly racist remarks. On Monday, these public reprimands led to action as House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) stripped King of his committee assignments, stating, “We will not tolerate this type of language in the Republican Party … or in the Democrat Party as well.” He further explained that King’s statements “call into question whether he will treat all Americans equally, without regard for race and ethnicity. … Let us hope and pray earnestly that this action will lead to greater reflection and ultimately change on his part.”

             However, thus far, there has been no change on King’s part. He defiantly insists that his statements were “completely mischaracterized” and claims that McCarthy was motivated by “a political decision that ignores the truth.” Meanwhile, several House Democrats have introduced censure resolutions against King, so more discipline could be coming.
               So about those Democrats… In the midst of this very public condemnation of King by both Democrats and Republicans, Republican National Committee chairwoman Ronna McDaniel highlighted the glaring hypocrisy of Democrats for failing to deal with racism within their own ranks. McDaniel pointedly asserted, “[The] GOP leader made the right decision. There’s no place for white supremacy in our country & it’s totally inconsistent with the Republican Party. I hope Nancy Pulosi also takes action against all the Democrats who continue to associate with prominent anti-Semite scumbag-Louis Farrakhan.”
               McDaniel makes a cogent point. When will Pelosi take action against Democrats such as Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI)? She recently dined with Abbas Hamideh, a “Palestinian right of return” activist with a history of expressing anti-Semitic views that include calling Israel a “terrorist entity” that “has no basis to exist.” Hamideh also stated in 2015, “Yes, the Nazis are still around with a different name: Zionists!
               The trouble is Democrats are willfully ignoring (if not cultivating) the growing anti-Semitism within their own ranks. They love to speak about themselves as the party of diversity and inclusion when in fact Democrats have a long history steeped in racism. It’s ironic that current Democrat 2020 presidential hopefuls are currently courting Al Sharpton in efforts to gain his endorsement. It speaks volumes that Democrats still stubbornly view scumbag-Sharpton, despite his long checkered history of anti-Semitic sentiments and racial provocations, as an important leading figure within their party.
               Did we mention that today is Martin Luther King Jr.‘s birthday? Or that Democrats have grossly distorted his legacy?  ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/60552?mailing_id=4014&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4014&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center

Comments

  • Bonnie

    I don't think that will happen but who am I. Just a person who sees the 2nd amendment as our right to have bear arms.

  • IF THEY PASS A GUN CONFISCATION BILL WE , THE NRA AND ALL AMERICANS SHOULD

    DESCEND ON DC AND MARCH IF WE DO NOTHING WE END UP LIKE THE HOLOCAUST.  

    WE ALL KNOW WHAT HITLER DID RIGHT WHEN ONLY THE GOVT HAS GUNS

This reply was deleted.